pejocho

"The law states that a player is in an offside position if any of their body parts, except the hands and arms, are in the opponents' half of the pitch, and closer to the opponents' goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent (the last opponent is usually, but not necessarily, the goalkeeper)"

Up, I see this thread marked with save game required and 21.1.3, but I uploaded the savegame some weeks ago and in the 21.2.2 version this issue persist. Help please! @Ben Kenney

Isn't it under review?!

Someone of SI staff could say if attackers low ratings are under review currently after the update please?

Thanks for your answer. One question, the low ratings that strikers and wingers are getting, in comparison between QME and FME (defenders are OK after the update) are currently under review? I give you the comparative I made.

Sincerely I didnt know, I saw that SI published the new update fixing the player ratings problem, and they told that they would improve other things like key tackles etc, but i didnt read that player ratings continue being a issue.If so, im glad of it.

It would make sense if full detail and no full detail leagues gets the same ratings, but it is no the case

I copy here the new test I have done. Strikers and wingers continue getting low ratings:

Ok, I see people again doubting if there is still a problem or not, as if this was not an objective and verifiable thing, so I will show the simple test: 4 top leagues (Italy, Germany, Spain, England) The same save, simulated by two way, all at full detail and all at no full detail. I only show players that have played >20 matches to get representative results. GK: No full detail full detail Okey, acceptable Center defenders: no full detail full detail: Acceptable Fullbacks: no full detail: ful

The 4 top leagues at full detail, all players controlled by AI, no human interferences: Martial 32 goals 6 assists 7.14 Sandro 27 goals 7.00 Morales 23 goals 6.94 Caputo 23 goals 6.85 etc Seriously someone can tell that it is not broken compared to no full detail leagues, and compared with every FM of the last years??? Attackers are not fixed!

Are you speaking about your specific players of your specific tactic that can be well adjusted to the ME mechanics and give good ratings, or are you speaking about all the players of the 4 top leagues (ALL AI PLAYERS) as me? Because there is a huge difference in the concept

Hello @Tony Garvey, Is it expected to fix this issue? It continues happeninig: Escudero Sevilla C: Franco Vazquez Sevilla C:

@Tony Garvey Hello, Its expected to fix this issue? It remains happening: Aitor Ruibal 20/21: Aitor Ruibal 21/22, the same signing:

Regarding the test i have done with the new update, wingers and strikers (attackers in general) ratings are not fixed:

I have done a new test with the new update and the attackers ratings are not fixed. The ratings are -0.20 lower at average, a huge difference regarding no full detail leagues. @Neil Brock @Josh Brimacombe-Wiard Wingers: -0.15 lower at average Strikers: 0.20 lower at average I wouldnt understand if you tell me that attackers ratings are fixed: Vardy 28 goals 7.06 Haaland 25 goals 7.02 Mane 23 goals 7 assists 7.13 Bernardo Silva 15 goals 13 assists 7.13 These are just examples, but ALL of them in no full detail leagues would get >7.30