-
Posts
212 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Articles
FAQs
Online Manual
Support: Blocks
Support: Games
Bug Tracker
SIGames Manual (beta)
Profiles
Posts posted by Karlo
-
-
On 29/12/2023 at 15:38, knap said:
ME 24.2
HOLY GHOST FIRE 451 ARSENAL P94 CC
ME24.2HOLYGHOSTFIREKnap451ARSENALP94CC.fmf 44.47 kB · 170 downloads
Hi @knap could you update this to latest ME, up to positive mentality and keep the player roles?
0 -
0
-
Hi @knap could you update
ME24.2WOFKnap4132NMCP104ECFA ?0 -
14 minutes ago, knap said:
Tactic above with a few minor tweaks
Thank you.
0 -
0
-
This is your 100th topic where you claim that your tactics have stopped working, when are you going to follow the well-intentioned advice given in your 100 previous topics?
0 -
-
1 hour ago, knap said:
for example
SK
WB BPD BPD WB
BWM DLP
IW AM IF
CF/AF
SK
WB BPD BPD WB
DLP
CM/MEZ BBM
W IF
CF/AF0 -
-
11 minutes ago, KlaaZ said:
So to expand on this, here's how I currently set up.
Considering I've been champions twice in a row, teams tend to sit back more against me and in turn, I find it harder to break them down. On top of that, I had a lot of problems with losing possession and then being countered, which is somewhat better in this setup. But it's still not very potent going forward, and I still feel that I give away too many good chances. It's worth mentioning that my squad is one of the better teams in the mental and technical attributes (especially the latter), but average on the physical end.
The good: Lots of possession, very in control against teams sitting back. Because of this, usually enough to edge games.
The meh: Hard to get the maximum out of my strikers and the RPM, average performances most of the time.
The bad: Chance creation most of the time, in some cases very vulnerable at the back.Tips are always welcome. Can always post my starting eleven.
Looks pretty balanced. Only changes I would make is IWBat > WBat and maybe up the mentality to positive.
0 -
33 minutes ago, knap said:
RPMs should work but unlikely BWM DLP
Thank you.
That's the thing, I won't mind if it's not working as good. Just a little bored of double FBat, DMsu and IF - AM - IF0 -
Hello Knap,
All 4231dm tactics look very similar in terms of roles. Would you like to make some more variations? It doesn't matter to me if the tactics generally perform less well. Think of:
BWM - DLP
IW - AM - IFor
VOL - RPM
W - AM - IF
etc.0 -
3 hours ago, Skywalk3r83 said:
Interesting. Formation could be a 4231. Thanks. Going to try my Formation first but its on the list. Maybe for tough away games.
IFBde - Lsu - BPDde - IFBde
It's a bit like how City defends with Stones. With the new rotations you get the field occupancy you want.
Only the rest of the attacking roles will be a matter of experimenting and seeing what suits the players
0 -
To create this formation, I think you will first have to start with a back four.
I think the right and left back should be IFBde and the DM a Libero on support.1 -
0
-
Set-up looks fine. The player roles and instructions are a good match, but don't really match the lower defensive line so I would just use standard if I were you.
1 -
19 hours ago, Jonathan Holmes said:
From your most recent tactics, which do you think are most effective?
which tactic do you suggest for having two strikers?
This one is fun
1 -
On 24/12/2023 at 23:22, whatsupdoc said:
Anyone have a 4-3-3 with a HB and f9 working?
Something like this?
Spoiler1 -
3 hours ago, ashlfcowen said:
Any noticeable-to-the-eye changes that you would recommend making here?
I basically want to Un-Haaland the league and have set some objective around Nunez being the best striker in the league over the next decade.
But he and the team have been pretty toothless...
Any suggestions/advice/recommendations welcome.
I think your set-up is pretty decent, some little adjustments could make the difference
Trent > IWBsu
Robertson > WBat
Diaz > IFsu
+ shorter passing
+ run at defence
+ distribute quickly
Also, is Thiago performing? Otherwise I would use a 'strong' DM there and play him just as a DMsu0 -
On 13/12/2023 at 21:29, Sheila said:
I do apologise @Mik_Fe I haven't been checking this forum recently. The proper 433 works great the game has never really been able to work out how to defend against it. Its greatest weakness is against teams that play 442 oddly enough, which is all but extinct even at the lower levels these days.
You've tagged the wrong user and given TI's that were already visible in your first screenshot. I was asking for PI's (player instructions) or do you mind making your tactic available for download?
0 -
First of all, thank you very much for this fantastic skin.
I'm not sure if it's a skin issue, but I often have to right-click > auto size all columns in the squad and tactics screen again so that my view is clearly visible again.
Can I also do something about it, so that I don't have to do it manually every time?
1 -
-
15 hours ago, DarbyAllin__ said:
Thanks, already changed all of it.
I also put the WB into attack to try to overlap the IW on the left.
Would you recommend changing the roles of the midfield? I think Mezzala in attack and IW kind of collide in the field when attacking
DLP-BBM-MEZ is probably also my favourite midfield-trio, but both the BBM and MEZ do roam so when you need to be more 'compact' you could consider BWMsu and CMat.
MEZat and IWsu is no problem, but if you change MEZ to CM you might consider Wsu or IFsu on AML (Wsu if you need width).WBat is extremely attacking, be careful with that. Good luck
0 -
3 hours ago, DarbyAllin__ said:
If you use a TFsu, you need a winger who can emerge as a striker. That's why I would try your AMR as IFat.
In addition, FBde > FBsu and standard defensive line and pressing.
If you want to counter, it also works well to use a lower line of engagement in combination with more urgent pressing, higher tempo and hit early crosses.
0
Need Help With Simeone's 5-3-2 Recreation
in Tactics, Training & Strategies Discussion
Posted
Not sure if it's typical Simeone but you may be missing some penetration from midfield to support your F9. Do you want both wingbacks on attack? I think support is fine, also for your DLP. Then you get something like this:
AFat F9su
MEZsu CMat
(C)WBsu DLPsu (C)WBsu
WCBde CDde WCBde
SKde