Jump to content

Karlo

Members+
  • Posts

    212
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Karlo

  1. Not sure if it's typical Simeone but you may be missing some penetration from midfield to support your F9. Do you want both wingbacks on attack? I think support is fine, also for your DLP. Then you get something like this:

     

                  AFat     F9su

                MEZsu    CMat

    (C)WBsu     DLPsu     (C)WBsu

         WCBde  CDde  WCBde

                        SKde

  2. 1 hour ago, knap said:

    @Karlo

    Changed  a few roles above.

    What would be your preferred roles?

    for example

                    SK
    WB   BPD   BPD   WB
             BWM   DLP

     IW          AM            IF
                 CF/AF


                     SK
    WB   BPD   BPD   WB
                    DLP
         CM/MEZ  BBM
    W                              IF
                 CF/AF

  3. 11 minutes ago, KlaaZ said:

    So to expand on this, here's how I currently set up. 

      Hide contents

    20240216200523_1.thumb.jpg.71b0500e113dc881b645c30a1b604daa.jpg

    Considering I've been champions twice in a row, teams tend to sit back more against me and in turn, I find it harder to break them down. On top of that, I had a lot of problems with losing possession and then being countered, which is somewhat better in this setup. But it's still not very potent going forward, and I still feel that I give away too many good chances. It's worth mentioning that my squad is one of the better teams in the mental and technical attributes (especially the latter), but average on the physical end.

    The good: Lots of possession, very in control against teams sitting back. Because of this, usually enough to edge games.
    The meh: Hard to get the maximum out of my strikers and the RPM, average performances most of the time.
    The bad: Chance creation most of the time, in some cases very vulnerable at the back. 

    Tips are always welcome. Can always post my starting eleven.

     

    Looks pretty balanced. Only changes I would make is IWBat > WBat and maybe up the mentality to positive.

  4. 3 hours ago, Skywalk3r83 said:

    Interesting. Formation could be a 4231. Thanks. Going to try my Formation first but its on the list. Maybe for tough away games. 

    IFBde - Lsu - BPDde - IFBde

    It's a bit like how City defends with Stones. With the new rotations you get the field occupancy you want.

    Only the rest of the attacking roles will be a matter of experimenting and seeing what suits the players
     

  5. 3 hours ago, ashlfcowen said:

    Any noticeable-to-the-eye changes that you would recommend making here?

    I basically want to Un-Haaland the league and have set some objective around Nunez being the best striker in the league over the next decade.

    But he and the team have been pretty toothless...

    Any suggestions/advice/recommendations welcome.

    Screenshot(8).thumb.png.52967651b9326da9da19825a4557ec79.png87

    I think your set-up is pretty decent, some little adjustments could make the difference

    Trent > IWBsu
    Robertson > WBat
    Diaz > IFsu

    + shorter passing
    + run at defence
    + distribute quickly

    Also, is Thiago performing? Otherwise I would use a 'strong' DM there and play him just as a DMsu

  6. On 13/12/2023 at 21:29, Sheila said:

    I do apologise @Mik_Fe I haven't been checking this forum recently. The proper 433 works great the game has never really been able to work out how to defend against it. Its greatest weakness is against teams that play 442 oddly enough, which is all but extinct even at the lower levels these days.

    406913347_740713818102573_6994875547019798386_n.jpg

    386890183_1349001809324243_1402989433280747469_n.jpg

    406478613_897801364764254_4341979934281155538_n.jpg

     

    You've tagged the wrong user ;) and given TI's that were already visible in your first screenshot. I was asking for PI's (player instructions) or do you mind making your tactic available for download?

  7. @Wozzie 

    First of all, thank you very much for this fantastic skin.

    I'm not sure if it's a skin issue, but I often have to right-click > auto size all columns in the squad and tactics screen again so that my view is clearly visible again.

    Can I also do something about it, so that I don't have to do it manually every time?

  8. 15 hours ago, DarbyAllin__ said:

    Thanks, already changed all of it.

    I also put the WB into attack to try to overlap the IW on the left.

    Would you recommend changing the roles of the midfield? I think Mezzala in attack and IW kind of collide in the field when attacking

    DLP-BBM-MEZ is probably also my favourite midfield-trio, but both the BBM and MEZ do roam so when you need to be more 'compact' you could consider BWMsu and CMat.

    MEZat and IWsu is no problem, but if you change MEZ to CM you might consider Wsu or IFsu on AML (Wsu if you need width).

    WBat is extremely attacking, be careful with that. Good luck :thup:

×
×
  • Create New...