Jump to content

Bladeson

Members+
  • Posts

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bladeson

  1. After playing one season with the beta the ME feels a little better but... The amount of 1v1's you get per game is sooooo frustrating it's insane. I signed Mbappe and EVERY (key) highlight he's dribbling past everyone from midfield and shooting straight at the goalkeeper. It's just so painful to watch. I don't care about losing or not scoring, just seeing so many 1v1's being missed per game makes me remember how this is a video game not even close to a realistic representation of real life football in terms of the ME. 

    Staying up all night making your tactic and signing players is truely the best part of this game. Then when you finally get to the actual matches, you quickly get disappointed and realise that the tactic you spent several hours making doesn't matter. You want to play very short passes and slow? Nope! Your players are doing long passes playing super fast every highlight. You are playing with a very defensive, slow, time wasting tactic? Nope! Your players will play fast counter attacking continuously trying to find a pass forwards. There are so many more examples of your tactics not being represented in the actual ME.

    I appreciate SI making the effort to put out a beta at least, shame it's not enough IMO.

  2. 23 minutes ago, roykela said:

    If it was objectively gamebreaking it would be so for everyone. It is a subjective interpretation of what is an enjoyable part of a game by an individual (where there can be several individuals), hampered by the undesirable effect of an action, or several, it has on the individual's particular part of enjoyment.
    I would argue that there isn't a chance SI are working very hard to fix these issues. I'd claim that it is a certainty.

    Yes? That's literally the point I made on how it's subjective. He made the argument it is objectively NOT gamebreaking.

  3. 9 minutes ago, KlaaZ said:

    There's litterally a stickied post from Neil at the top of this thread that these issues are under review. So you really shouldn't make stuff up about what their response really is. 

    And they shouldn't treat is as  game breaking because, as said before, it is not. If the issues were actually game breaking, people wouldn't be able to play this game in any enjoyable fashion and judging by the amount of people that are playing it on a continuous basis (including myself), it seems that a lot of people are able to do just that.

    That said, from what I know SI have always strived to improve this game over the past 20 years, I don't see any reason why that would have changed now. I'd rather have them fix something properly than hastily put a patch on that creates other problems down the line. So if they're taking their time, I'd think there is a reason for it. 

    You really should think about what a PR response is and not trust everything you read. As I said there's a chance SI is working very hard to fix these issues, I never said that's not a possibility. I simply said reading people representing SI say "100k-200k people are playing and having fun" in regards to issues with the ME does not give me a good impression towards them fixing the numerous issues. 

    You can't objectively and factually say it's not gamebreaking. It's gamebreaking to some people, it's clearly not gamebreaking for you. Good for you. Clearly you understand my definition of "gamebreaking" in this scenario was not "you literally cannot launch the game" simply a part of the game is not fun at all which leads me not wanting to play it.  By your definition which is incredibly flawed I could say: judging by the amount of people complaining and NOT playing the game it must be incredibly gamebreaking? Exactly, that argument doesn't work.

  4. 10 minutes ago, KlaaZ said:

    Why wouldn't it be? It's not because a game is a good that the developer doesn't want to strive for it to be even better. That's a very silly assumption really. 

    When a lot of people list issues with a particular area and SI's response to that is "Look at how many people are playing the game and look how good our reviews are" you think that mentality is beneficial to fixing the issues? Of course they are working on the issues to a degree of course, but I doubt they are treating it like it's gamebreaking clearly.

×
×
  • Create New...