Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

5 "What we've got here is a failure to communicate"

About LatZee

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Literal end of first half, so minute 45-46, there is a goal scored by heading in a corner... no deflections, no other player touching the ball, so straight out, corner, goal. The goal is disallowed for offside interference by other player, not the one who headed the ball in. That probably shouldn't happen as you can't be in an offside position after corner, throw in or a goal kick. Dynamo Dresden v Kaiserslautern.pkm
  2. While this discussion about the stars that no one in the world really understands is very fun, WTF are we even talking about? There are no 5 star players there in the screenshot, in fact, no one has more than 3.5 stars :P That aside, it's not all that unusual, SPAL has some very decent strikers (Petagna is one of best supportish big guy/deep lying strikers in the game, Pellegri is basically 19 year old mini Lewandowski, and Paloschi is still very decent) which is almost the only thing that matters in these stupid multi striker/super heavy pressure tactics that have been drastically overp
  3. Errr, IF(A) is nothing like a "false 10". False 10 or a central winger is a moniker given to players like Ozil or Sneijder (and more current Hazard or Coutinho) who would have been played like "classic 10" in ye olde days but nowadays they are often pushed to the wing and expected to perform the defensive duties of a winger, but then float more centrally (freeing the flank for the attacking full back) into traditional no 10 hole when the team has possession. IF(A) on the other hand is a typical wide forward looking to make diagonal runs behind the defence so more like Salah or Sterling. They w
  4. Sure I can (and have now), but, what's the point? It's just a meaningless single point of data that could be completely random. Or down to who knows what reason. I wouldn't even consider it a bug and therefore worthy of checking up the save game. Just like that stupid post above mine that I replied to. Honestly I don't really see the point because this is a thing that should be easy to catch in a soak test if it is true. Of course a million players will create all kind of weird random results, cherry picking a couple of them doesn't really have any meaning one way or the other. And some
  5. On the other hand, in my Toulouse save, 4 and half seasons in, 8/8 champions league finalist were english and Endgland just won the 2022 World Cup, so, where are those other mythical clubs or mythical other nations, they obviously don't exist, it's just clear confirmation bias from people who can't look past their english bias.
  6. That is probably due to difference between quick sim which decides things in leagues that you are not playing in (unless you put them to full detail) and which produces much more conservative results, and a full sim that uses this match engine where strikers easily overperform quite significantly.
  7. The color is 99% irrelevant, role suitability is just a very broad and super generic guide about what role suits the player theoretically, in isolation and with absolutely no relevance put on wider tactics. By your logic you could put 11 goalkeepers on the goal, they would all be full green so that should be perfect tactics. You are so utterly, completely and incredibly wrong in your approach. Your tactics looks like a random jumble of incompatible roles. Carrileros are generally used in systems that dont have any "naturally" wide players, so it is kinda not suitable for tactics that has a win
  • Create New...