Tetsuro P12
-
Posts
287 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Articles
FAQs
Online Manual
Support: Blocks
Support: Games
Bug Tracker
SIGames Manual (beta)
Profiles
Posts posted by Tetsuro P12
-
-
I would like to remove the welsh league but I don't find a way to do it. Or adding another.
0 -
This cross in the photo attached is a bad choice, slow and somewhat annoying, still the game this year is great. It's better in everything, especially the match engine that is more visually appealing and is more varied in actions (looks more real, alive). UI is definitely better, still has it's quirks (scouting section is crowded because of the transfers section inclusion), and match audio is actually nice and useful (in previous year edition it was super bugged), still volume seems to be bugged (can't lower it). Anyway no more audio if I play another game and come back with Quick Resume, bad bug.
Some bugs need to be ironed out, anyway this is the first time I can actually recommend the game. Very solid and mature on Xbox and well optimized for a Tv experience (easier and bigger UI and text, yay). Still I need to use the cursor for a good experience. AI can actually make good transfers, and it looks like it considers player's tactics, so the player can actually rely on it.
It's good. Keep it simple, fix the bugs and continue to improve the 3D match engine and the UI. Kudos to the developers.
0 -
Canada, U.S.A., Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Scotland and Galles. I want to play only licensed teams. I eventually do an exception for italian's Serie A because it's the most important (charismatic) football league and still has many teams licenced. I have started with a canadian team, this time. I started with a 2 stars league.
0 -
Go for the Series S and don't look back. It's fast, it max out at 100 watt. Series X is a waste (of money, materials and electricity).
0 -
2 hours ago, MrBannystar said:
Finished 4th in the PL last year, but only made 1 or 2 first team signings for the new season. Played 11 games in the new PL season and cannot score more than one goal. Some of the chances we've been missing have been shocking, too. I've played matches in the Champions League and Carabao Cup and have no problems scoring there, but just can't get more than one in the PL.
Is it just me or is something screwing me over?
Well... No, it's not you. It's a feat.
For what it takes... last year we were an almost good team, ended 3rd in Bundesliga (expected 10th) and won the german cup. This year we are a very good team, we are 8th (february), same tactics, just a few better players (expected 5th). Oh, atmosphere: Very good to Excellent, manager support: Very good.
I surrender, it's a feat.
No way to program your future, before or later you have to resign, that's how FM 'evolved'. Better find some fun with it.
P.S.: Don't worry about your tactics, if you nailed it the previous year it's evidently working. It's something else that's taking place (the Hand of God).
0 -
1 minute ago, themadsheep2001 said:
This is fundamentally wrong:
1) KDB plays as one for City (So doesn Keita for Liverpool, but they actually use the wide player the Mezzala and to overload the space.
2) It's actually no guarantee they leave open, if you're taking care of the ball, winning it back in the right areas, or committing fouls high up the pitch (see both Liverpool and City
3) Two inside fowards? Yes, also see City, and plenty of other teams in Europe
4) Shorter passing has nothing to do with directly picking Inside forwards
5) A higher line does not necessitate playing the offside trap, especially if you're willing and able to win 1 on 1 battles. Cover defenders don't always break offside traps either
6) Lower tempo has nothing to do with directly picking Inside forwards
1. I don't understood what are you referring to, Mezzala is a precise role.
2. It's a guarantee, you are playing with three attackers and a DM (and two WB?!) so that defensive phase is definitely weak.
3. Eventually I don't translate well IF. I translate it as 'Seconda Punta', not 'External Attacker' (so a support role for the striker, not an external attacker... that's a more offensive winger). If the IF isn't a Seconda Punta how do you translate that?
4. With many attackers you want to overturn fastly (counterattacking), that's not done with shorter passing and lower tempo.
5. An higher line make your defence more exposed so you need offside trap, if you break the line a forward insert himself behind the two defenders.
6. Already replied.
0 -
1 hour ago, JordanMillward_1 said:
Please then, @Tetsuro P12, as the expert, explain how it isn't logical and shouldn't work. I eagerly await your insights.
Mezzala is a role invented to replace the winger, but need to be sustained by many midfielders (like another two in line plus a DM). Both BBM and Mezzala leave their position and should leave you open to counterattack, no matter the DM. Also two IFs? And shorter passing with two IFs? An higher line with a covering defender (breaking offside)? Lower Tempo with two IFs? It just isn't logical. Also with that player placement the last you should do is to play out of defence. The ME allows you to do it, but would it work in real life? I seriously doubt it. Looks to be my last reply.
0 -
2 hours ago, JordanMillward_1 said:
Just on my way home from work, so I'll post a screenshot of the tactics I'm using when I'm on my PC in about 15-20 minutes.
EDIT: @diddydaddydoddy @themadsheep2001 - Here you go:
Partially rotated due to injuries at present, and don't have any personal instructions, though I'm looking at that at present, as well as Mane and Firmino's roles (I sometimes shift Mane to an Inverted Winger (A) and Firmino to CF(S)).
And here are the results from the last couple of months with this save where I settled on the tactic and wanted to see how it went:
The fact that a tactic like this works show how broken is the ME. It's not even logical.
0 -
1 hour ago, roykela said:
1st - Technical skill, composure , decision-making and a good touch.
2nd - Technical skill, composure, vision and decision-making.
3rd - Nothing special. He's behaving and acting as a defender, only with a mind-set tilted towards being GK.
Doing those things is one thing but doing it at that level is something completely different.
There is so much to take into consideration during any moment of a football match and to say that 1st and 2nd is nothing technical is misunderstanding/not understanding the complexity of what's happening.
A "rubbish" pro player can do stuff like that maybe once or a few times in his career. But he can still do it. A top one can do it more consistently.
That's the difference.
Translating it to my own experience in real life; you're basically saying that my friend, with no technical skills or football understanding shouldn't have scored that goal of the season he scored, had it been in FM.
Couldn't run. Couldn't kick a ball. Didn't know how to head the ball etc. You get the picture. Worst of the worst.
But he managed to smash in a 35-meter volley in the top far corner during a tournament. Perfect strike.
Worst player scored the best goal of the season.
Translating it back to FM and pro players. Should that not happen at all if it had been in FM?
I don't see technical attirbutes in those two actions. This is technique (and a technical player), now let the defender do it in a match situation and you have a jolly (Roberto Carlos, then?):
I too have scored from long distance, if you have power in your legs you can do it... but give to it that spin to trick the keeper in the lower corner, that require technique.
0 -
It has never been a 'play your way', at all. All press, all attack, always. And this isn't any different.
The randomic part has been denounced, 'they' (Sigames? A few users?) replied A. Life is randomic, B. There are no cheats in the engine, everything is fair, C. Randomness is fun.
So you have to 'swallow and shut up', I presume.
1 -
47 minutes ago, enigmatic said:
Here is John O Shea, accurately rated as a pretty plodding defender throughout his career, doing his best Cantona impressions
nd here he is, having never played in goal in professional football before, doing a Manuer Neuer impression.
Top level professional footballers have a bit more ability to do unexpectedly skilful or smart stuff than your mate on a park field, even if they spend most of their career playing it simple.
Even your mate on a park field can control a crossfield ball and hit a shot into the top corner once in his life, and your mate on a park field doesn't have attributes equivalent to a star winger at semi-pro level....
1st and 2nd: nothing technical, 3rd: I don't know what to watch. Anyone can pass the ball under the legs, what's the point?
0 -
23 minutes ago, GR3NDAL said:
If a player is listed with an asking price and you match that asking price shouldn't the bid be acccepted rather than them saying actually we want double that now?
1. Bug.
2. Don't overdo with 'payment in installments', we (italians) call it 'rateizzazione', otherwise the board can react badly.
0 -
54 minutes ago, sporadicsmiles said:
If you played Bonucci in an identical role to Messi in FM for a full season, Messi would play infinitely better.
There is no scripting to the match engine in the way you are implying here. Attributes matter, but they are not the only thing. Otherwise you could just assemble the best CA team in the world and not even bother to play matches as you know you will win every single game. This is decidedly not what happens in football.
If you think chance plays no role in football, you must live in a world of constant frustration. Chance is one of the most important parts of football.
I do not understand the entire concept of this thread. We see all the time players who we normally think of as being average putting in amazing displays, scoring amazing goals, dominating games when you normally would not expect them to. There are already plenty of examples of this on this thread. It is an obvious part of football, it is not something you can really question.
The underlying current here seems to be that players should never be able play well if their attributes are low. Never score. Never have a great day. Lose every tackle. Which is absolute nonsense. That is contrary to our every day experience of football. Hell, even I have had days where everything I do works perfectly and I just play well. I am sure I am not alone in that. I remember once scoring a 30 yard screamer into the top corner. Never done it before, probably never will again.
I think this is a fundamental misunderstanding of how the game actually works. Attributes determine how good a player is on average. So over the course of a season a player will play more or less to his attributes. You would expect a striker with 20 finishing to outscore a striker with 10 finishing, playing in the same system, over the course of a season. This does not work on the level of a single game, and definitely not on a single passage of play (from which the OP and others are extrapolating here). Here there is much more of a random element. Attributes are only a small part of what is going on in a single game. The way in which players interact with their team mates and the opposition players is vastly important. And add the fact that players can do things like this. They will just do it much rarer than a better player. There is no mystery here, and it is another example of abusing numbers and statistics that I see so often on these forums.
It is annoying to concede such goals, but they happen and it is entirely realistic.
Perhaps, I don't know... lately things feels so much randomic.
Chance isn't randomity. Chance is kicking that ball badly, or unability to reaching it, etc., there is a mistake made by the player involved; 'Concentration, Decision, etc.' all those beautiful words that sometimes don't reflect well in the ME.
I understand it well: 'a player does a thing that should be incapable of doing'. That's causing frustration to a person, and that person is definitely right. A man can't give birth to a child, it's unable to (until we will find a capable coder able to mix the data accordingly), so a mediocre defender should not be able to mimic Ryan Giggs (I'm old, I know).
This is a great day for a defender:
0 -
24 minutes ago, FlorianAlbert9 said:
( scusa che skin è? )
Heffem v1.6 by a talented french artist, it's fantastic (unfortunately it doesn't support zoomed fonts).
Look at this:
0 -
4 hours ago, Carambau said:
I saw Guido Buchwald outdribble Diego Maradona at the world cup 1990 and this guy was the stereotype of "wooden"
Football is unpredictable and things like that happen. I actually like it that the game depicts these occasions too.
In PES?
4 hours ago, SipontumFMF said:So, if you concede a goal like this what will you say?
That's an eurogol, though I doubt that Acerbi can do this (more technical goal):
x Florian: That would be a very bad limit of current scripted engine; would mean that anyone can be capable of doing anything if against a very weaker player, that would be really bad. I don't know if we are now at that level, but I hope not (I do remember that in old editions non-technical players were unable to do specific moves, eventually my memory tricks me).
0 -
I thought it was a risky 'purchase' (well it costed 9M, still wasn't sure it would have performed because of his attributes) but he did wonders. Sometimes the graph don't reflect how well he will play, so I stopped thinking at numbers and now I trust more scout suggestions. Eventually his explosive physical attributes do matter so much. Finishing? Nay!
0 -
4 minutes ago, Carambau said:
I don´t think it works like that. Attributes always interact/depend on/work with each other, don´t forget that.
It should, otherwise it would be very limited. If a weak player can do wonders against a weak player it's far from reality. You can't really teach technique, there are personal predispositions in every player, some born woody and stay woody, no matter how they train. There are a few defenders with good technique but generally they haven't it; it's not required for the role, and you can't expect them to do a Maradona's thing, not even against the worst player in the planet.
0 -
Just now, Carambau said:
You always have to see it in relation to the opposing team, thats the point here.
Though 1 should always stumble. I can say that a 10 would be unable to dribble a 15 marking, but still be somewhat capable of dribbling by itself, a 5 would be uncapable of dribbling despite relations.
0 -
Just now, Forza#8903 said:
Loosing is never fun..
Nah, I remember losing against PSG in FM17 while not ragequitting. Telling myself 'we played good, can't do nothing against that dreadnought'. It was fair, or at least I sensed fairness. I wasn't tricked, it was immersive. I watched matches, now I don't watch them that often (I let them run silent in background).
0 -
3 minutes ago, FlorianAlbert9 said:
I think that the misunderstanding Is to think that the difference between 1 and 20 Is high.
While a player with 1 in dribbling would look like Messi if he played against us.
I bet that even the right foot of player like Recoba (if somebody remember him, i think he never used his right foot XD ) would be better of our natural foot.
The only thing i could argue against attributes is that phisically attributes seems always a little overpowered
1 is one. 1 mean stumble. 10 means mediocre, 20 top.
0 -
Bundesliga have such 'regional' teams. I played Eintracht and the board asked me if I wanted a second team, I told yes and they founded this Eintracht II. My problem is that if I move my players from U19 to Frankfurt II they stop to develop, even if they train well (getting 8+ in weekly training recap) they don't develop, so my Youth dies. Have you found german second teams completely useless? Should I avoid them and just try to loan my youth players to different teams?
Thank you
0 -
1 hour ago, GuitarMan said:
Respectfully I disagree. Players can and do perform above their ability on occasion. Particularly if surrounded by players of a higher calibre. Why else would their be so many transfer flops after players are brought following a rich vein of form in say a World Cup? The player hasn’t suddenly got worse, they are just no longer in a situation where they can over perform.
look at Son’s goal against Burnley the other week. A moment of individual brilliance Messi or Ronaldo would be proud of. Difference is he cannot do it as consistently as Messi or Ronaldo. Therefore he is not on the level of (or have the attributes of) Messi or Ronaldo. However he is still a talented professional footballer who can pull something out the bag once in a blue moon.
Opinions. I'll never do a Messi's thing, never. Anyway I always respect opinions.
I watched it, he was running straight and shooted. You too can do that.
Now ask Son to do this:P.S.: Terrible defenders (Burnley), I want to see them in current ME, not current Supermans.
0 -
Skip.
3 -
OP is right, Bonucci can't be a Messi, not for a single time, it just lack that quality. Attributes should always matter more, even before scripted engine content. It can't be a matter of chance, but what an element is capable of doing. Chances eventually should be decided by mental attributes.
ME has worsened from that point of view.
1
No way to program your future, before or later you have to resign, that's how FM 'evolved'. Better find some fun with it.
Isn't possible to remove playable leagues im FM23 Console?
in FM Console and FM Touch General Discussion
Posted · Edited by Tetsuro P12
That's bad, very bad. It's a feature we had back then if I remember correctly. It isn't even possibile to choose a second tier league only, like just Championship, must get necessarily the Premier too. What's the logic behind it?