ermant

Members
  • Content count

    128
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About ermant

  • Rank
    Amateur
  1. Now in the new season, Bournemouth's Pitch size is 105x68 like most of the clubs. 88 meter width was really extreme. Was it a bug or what?
  2. There should be an explanation in the "no offers for player" message. If he doesn't want to go on loan before renewing contract, it should be there.
  3. I always suffer against them independent of their form and position in the league. Their goalkeeper does wonders again whoever he is. Now they have Marcus Bettinelli. It seems like he built a career only displaying ridiculous performances against me.
  4. Hi While playing away with Bournemouth, i realised there was something wrong with the view. I thought i have zoomed out. I checked the match camera. It was "main stand" as usual and ok. Then i checked the dimensions of Bournemouth Stadium and it was 107x88 m. Really? I think Premier League standardised the pitch dimensions a few years ago as 105x68. In the game, all the teams except Bournemouth have 105x68, including me but how can Bournemouth have 107x88? Standard Pitch Size is not official yet? Edit: Not all of them but most of them let's say. Stamford Bridge 103x67 and Anfield 101x68. A few meters but 107x88? Come on.
  5. "It has been announced that United Kingdom will be leaving the European Union at the end of the season. As part of the negotiations it has been agreed that there will be no changes to the current work permit system and no new restrictions on European Union players." I think this is what is called "soft brexit" right? Probably this is the easiest. Sure it is, what else could it be. Would it say "No work permit is required"? Not possible i guess. Only this scenario is called soft brexit or any other soft brexit scenarios? These brexit variations are a little bit confusing. As a note, i reloaded 10 times from the previous day to see if it changes but it doesn't. I got the same scenario in the same date everytime. This shows it is true that the scenario had been set in the beginning of the save.
  6. My captain has determination-19, leadership-17, teamwork-17. A world-class midfielder with worldwide reputation and driven personality. He is homegrown in status but not from the youth ranks. He is 21 years old and captain for almost 1,5 years. From the comments, maybe he lacks in age and length of captaincy. Still, i would expect him to convince in a few occasions, maybe on younger and less reputation players, but never. 0% success. as i mentioned before, only successful on players feeling forced out of the club sometimes. I haven't witnessed any other conviction.
  7. Hi, As title says, captains are unable to solve anything regardless of leadership abilities, reputations and other factors. I have changed the captain several times but even if he has high leadership ability, worldwide reputation and other players like him, he is not able to solve any problems with players. The problem generally is that players wants to move another club. I have never witnessed the captain convince a player to stay or drop the issue. The only problem he solves is, when i offer a player to clubs, he feels forced out. Generally he drops the issue when captain talks to him. This is the only solution i saw so far and generally works for only "feeling forced out". Never solves another unhappiness. I wonder if this is the same for everyone.
  8. Hi all, I want to see if you have the same problems or not. I have reported these but i want to sum them up in a topic. I constantly find new mistakes in "loan out" issue. 1- Monthly Fees for loaned out players are not added to transfer budget. This is the most important mistake in loan. I realised that i dont get monthly fees from the loaned out players which i was expecting to get almost 3M per month. It's a shame i have been playing for 6 seasons and haven't realised this before. I would get lots of money from monthly fees over seasons. 2- Loan Income In Player's History Is Wrong i recalled a player in january who was loaned with a deal of 200k/month in august. loan lenght was 5 months but in the player's history, under info column, it shows 1.8m loan fee. that info there doesn't seem to consider if the loan is completed or not. it would better multiply the monthly fee with actual loan length for correct information. 3- Loan Extensions Don't Appear In Current Season of Transfer History Table i have been loaning players for a few years using loan extensions but deals doesn't appear in the current season of transfer history table. normally i expect them to appear in the new season's table as they are extended but they don't. only first years of the deals appear in starting season and it is not continuous. it should be. I think these are important.
  9. Could you tell me how to check if it works fine or not? In finances, there is no "loan income" line. I usually check it from the amount of maximum transfer budget as i expect it to increase monthly. And if loan payments are right, in which day of the month they are paid? 1st of each month?
  10. Hi Ben, This issue doesn't seem to be solved in the latest update. After 6 seasons of play, i realised that i don't get monthly fees, as transfer budget never changes. I would never expect this to work wrong, it was okay for years. I was expecting almost 25-30M of loan income for current season and this was the case for the past seasons. What a waste for me. I was supposed to get over 100M of money, planned all the details, but i get 0 because of this bug.
  11. hi, i have been loaning players for a few years using loan extensions but deals doesn't appear in the current season of transfer history table. normally i expect them to appear in the new season's table as they are extended but they don't. only first year of deals appear in starting season of deals and it is not continuous. it should be. i am also suspicious that mothly fees of extended loans are added to transfer budget which i raised in another topic. i appreciate if you have a look. thanks.
  12. hi, i recalled a player in january who was loaned with a deal of 200k/month in august. loan lenght was 5 months but in the player's history, under info column, it shows 1.8m loan fee. that info there doesn't seem to consider if the loan is completed or not. it would better multiply the monthly fee with actual loan length for correct information. i dont think the real income is wrong because fee is added monthly to the transfer budget. i will appreciate if you have a look at it.
  13. hi, sometimes i face a problem that contract offer screen for a staff goes blank. not for he is not interested but some kind of a bug i came accross a few times. staff says "this is the contract i want" above but terms are greyed out and blank. i can say that this usually happens when you browse "contract offer" screen of multiple staff back to back. when you save and load, it goes back to normal. weird bug but this happens sometimes.
  14. yes lucas, thats for sure. i just wanted to know if something goes wrong with the public beta but it works fine. thanks for the fix. back to normal speed now.