DocSnyder
-
Posts
23 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Articles
FAQs
Online Manual
Support: Blocks
Support: Games
Bug Tracker
SIGames Manual (beta)
Profiles
Posts posted by DocSnyder
-
-
Very nice read, thanks a lot - I give it a try with Roda from the Netherlands.
0 -
It´s still working great in FM21 - used the 4-4-1-1 2DM.
2 -
Same here - youth recruitment went from 5/8 to 4/8.
I made two requests on the same day...at first increasing the junior coaching budget was rejected, then improving the youth recruitment was accepted. Junior coaching was accepted then, too, after i discussed it - here everything was ok (4/7 to 5/7).
Here´s a save where I can reproduce it directly...Save game name: "H96 Board Request"
1 -
Am 23.9.2020 um 00:23 schrieb silentwars:
Looking for a team where I can ultilise a gegenpressing style of play. Ideally in a European league, and a top half team. I want the players to have good work rate, determination, teamwork and fitness levels. No German teams please.
Atalanta Bergamo. They ARE gegenpressing.
0 -
In January I got Ikpeazu from the Hearts - he saved my ass
0 -
Scotland too here - 8th place with Ross County and they are really hard to manage.
0 -
Nils Quaschner from Bielefeld - 10-15 goals in Bundesliga for my Magdeburg team and hunting down the enemies.
0 -
There is no really chance to get your "superstar" there I think. In a classic 4-2-3-1, the players with the best stats are the AMR / AML, because they have the space they need...my AMC position gets his chances for assists and goals, too, but the glory old time of "10s" is over. So my AMC is important for my pressing, my first defender who attacks the deep playmakers of the enemy.
0 -
Third year - we're still rocking and there are still two players from the beginning in the third league in our starting eleven - the "double 6", Preißinger and Rother.
1 -
Da musst du auch nicht großartig im Netz suchen - rechts neben dem Spielerbild sieht du in einem Auswahlmenü die Grundeinstellung bzgl. der markierten Attribute, und dort wird bestätigt was du hier richtigerweise vermutest: die grau hinterlegten Attribute sind wichtig, die blauen "wünschenswert".
0 -
Am 8.4.2020 um 17:55 schrieb DocSnyder:
Wow. Really great tactic, thank you!
Most goals (38), least conceded (8), most clean sheets (14), 57% Avg. Possession (3rd), 85% passing accuracy (3rd), 88% tackling completion (3rd)...with a team which was 6th in the season preview (Odds 6,00).
Playing a wonderful football even now with the "vanilla team"...I'm looking forward to the action with better players.
We won the league with 84 points. Second year - second promotion, 2nd place in Zweite Bundesliga with 72 points. Fantastic! Hello Bundesliga, the only winner of an international competition in GDR's history (Cup Winners' Cup 1974) is giving his debut.
0 -
vor 25 Minuten schrieb HanziZoloman:
Well .. it's a little wierd isn't it?!
maybe we could fix a three players challenge in 3rd Liga you, me and ace?!
Haha...or an online save and destroying the league^^
0 -
Am 7.4.2020 um 17:19 schrieb DocSnyder:
Fantastic post AceAvenger! I´ll try to awake another fallen East-German giant - Magdeburg is calling.
Wow. Really great tactic, thank you!
Most goals (38), least conceded (8), most clean sheets (14), 57% Avg. Possession (3rd), 85% passing accuracy (3rd), 88% tackling completion (3rd)...with a team which was 6th in the season preview (Odds 6,00).
Playing a wonderful football even now with the "vanilla team"...I'm looking forward to the action with better players.
1 -
Fantastic post AceAvenger! I´ll try to awake another fallen East-German giant - Magdeburg is calling.
0 -
vor einer Stunde schrieb Experienced Defender:
It will mostly mitigate the problem in terms of defensive vulnerability, but such setup would not be optimal attacking-wise. Here is what it would look like:
DLFsu
IFat Wsu
CMat DLPsu
DMde
FBsu CDde CDde WBat
As i said, in a purely defensive sense - this is notably more solid that your initial setup.
But the problem is how you create and use space when attacking, especially on the left side where you have 2 players looking to attack the box centrally but there could well be a shortage of effective support from out wide.
On the right side, you now have both wide players in crossing-heavy roles. Which is okay if you want to play a style that largely relies on crosses (like wing-play), but judging from your instructions - you does not seem to want that.
Fortunately, the problem can be easily solved by just one more swap:
DLFsu
IFsu Wat
DLPsu CMat
DMde
FB/WBat CDde CDde FBsu
This kind of setup would make a lot more sense. It still does not mean that you should play exactly like that. Because some degree of increased defensive risk is still there (mainly on the right flank), so a lot depends on how able your players are to handle that risk. But you can give it a try anyway and see if and how it works for your team.
I think the best idea is to start with no instructions out of possession (both DL and LOE on standard), especially if your CBs aren't fast and/or intelligent enough. Opposition shots from distance are more likely to be the problem when you play on a lower defensive line (although this does not depend solely on the defensive line setting, but the tactic as a whole).
Thanks a lot again...I'll try it in a new save. A Half Back instead of the DMde would gain a little bit more defensive stability, or?
Toonrock: I think my team is not good enough for super-gegenpress. But perhaps it will be it in a few years.
0 -
Am 5.4.2020 um 01:46 schrieb Experienced Defender:
Maybe it's partly due to the "bad team", but is primarily about the tactic.
Just look how defensively exposed your right flank is - both WB and CM on attack duties.
At the same time, the left flank is pretty much the opposite - a bit too conservative.
So your both flanks are problematic, although in different ways - the right one overly vulnerable, and the left one lacking wide support in the final third.
Plus, given the reputation of your team, instructions such as counter-press, play out of defence and work ball into box are also potentially risky - for different reasons and to varying degrees, but anyway risky.
Okay, thank you. Would a simple change in the CM - CMa to the left position, DLPSu to the right - solve this problem? Simplifying the TIs like you said makes sense...whats about my Defensive Line? Is a high one okay with CDs which only have Pace 10-11? I'm afraid that a standard line will give the opponent too many shots from the distance - and these are very dangerous in this FM.
Frukox: thank you too - I will try a counter tactic like this vs. the teams from Glasgow, which seem to play two leagues above us.
0 -
Hey,
whats wrong with my tactic? I'm managing Ross County, standing on the last place with 17 points after 21 games...12:37 goals...is it the tactic? The bad team? The bad manager? They want 8 points in the next 5 matches, otherwise I'll be sacked...
PI: only close down more for the front four
1 -
Looks fine. I´m testing it with Hoffenheim - from the beginning a good team for this tactic. Robert Skov ist great as WP, strong strikers (Kramaric, Belfodil, Dabbur), hard working midfield (Samassékou, Geiger, Rudy)...I´ve won the first four games (A-4:0 vs. an underdog in the cup, H-2:0 vs. Leverkusen (!), A-4:0 vs. Union, H-1:0 vs. Wolfsburg) in a really beautiful way.
0 -
What do you think about this one?
PI:
CD "Take fewer risks"
Front four "Close down more"
The left is too wide open...isn´t it? I thought that the DLP will help here but maybe it´s not enough...
0
FC PORTO QUINTUPLE 4-2-3-1 (107 GOALS, GD +80) WON CHAMPIONS LEAGUE, LEAGUE, SUPERCUP, DOMESTIC CUPS (all in first season)
in Tactics Sharing Centre (Upload/Download)
Posted · Edited by DocSnyder
Nice tactic! Works really good for me - I switched one of the IF - SU to IF - AT and the FB on the same side from AT to SU.
Why? Asynchrony (KI hates it), better stability in the defense than with two attacking FBs and more chances for a offensiv-minded striker playing as IF - AT.