Dusan Stamenkovic

FM Head Researchers
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Dusan Stamenkovic

  • Rank
    Serbian and Slovenian Head Researcher
  • Birthday

About Me

  • About Me
  1. Thanks. Don't worry, the club has been marked as extict, and will not appear in the game after the update.
  2. Farmtech is their current sponsor... But there is absolutely no need to use it in the short variant. It might be eligible for the long name, but I do not think it is really needed. No one really calls the club Farmtech Veržej, and we are trying to avoid sponsor names as much as possible, as they change every now and then... You can see that their logo remained unchanged, whereas a big banner in their stadium still says NK VERŽEJ. If you check the documents published by the Slovenian FA (such as this one, released a couple of days ago, http://www.nzs.si/Doc/Info/Registracijski zapisnik_02_2017.pdf), you will see that the club is referred to as ŠD NK Veržej, no Farmtech added. So, on the whole, I don't think that adding the sponsor name is important in this case.
  3. I'll set a 300k clause then. It's just an estimate fee.
  4. In order to add such a clause, we need to have the exact or nearly exact buy-off fee - no fee has been mentioned when he joined Partizan, there is no fee set at Transfermarkt.
  5. No, I am not calling it a fix, I am just saying I would rather classify it as a moderate issue, as there is a workaround for the human managers. There are only two people who have mentioned this issue to me so far. A BIG issue is usually reported within 3 days following the beta or the release. You can disagree with me, I have no problem with that. As I have stated, this bug has been claimed as fixed, so there is absolutely no need to go on about this.
  6. This has been reported as fixed, now it really depends on when it will get into the pack that patches the game. I would not call it a pretty big impact, its impact is moderate - the difference between the two windows is five days - if you bring players in on time, you should be fine. Anyway, you will have to start a new game.
  7. Thanks for reporting this, it will be looked into.
  8. Are you running the original structure of the competitions? That is, have you installed any add-ons that perhaps add the third league or something similar?
  9. Hi! As in reality there are no reserve leagues in Serbia, last winter we had a vote at the Serbian FM Community and the resolution was to remove reserve leagues from the game, but to keep the reserve teams in for practical reasons . The reasons to keep them in included the fact that some teams do have sort of a B team which plays friendlies throughout the season, the need to filter out those that are not really needed in the first team, and to be able to maintain their form. In relation to the last point - reserve teams should be scheduling friendlies. If they are not playing friendlies, then this it is a bug.
  10. Indeed, this appears to be a bug - will try to send an instructions to the coders to fix it. Thank you!
  11. Thanks, will be fixed in the database
  12. Thanks - this one will have to wait for the net patch, but we have recorded it now.
  13. Thank you for the post. No, these groups shall be named Group A and Group B, not "Championship" and "Relegation". Please check the official rulebook of the Serbian FA - http://www.superliga.rs/images/pdf/Propozicije-Super-liga-2016-17.pdf The groups are named A and B in it, so it shall remain like that in the game.
  14. We have two separate and dedicated researchers for both Maribor and Olimpija and I fully trust their judgment. Maribor has had a couple of good European spells in the previous years and this performance was well reflected in the database. Olimpija has been building a must better squad lately. There is also the adaptability rating which might account for Zahovic's and Vrsic's case. After all, this is not how one shall report data issues. Please go back and read the instructions, and I will invite Alen and Klemen to participate in this debate. Your objections are quite subjective. If you take a look at numbers, Maribor's Top16 Average CA is 114, Olimpija's is 113. The average Top 16 CA in Premier League is 142, whereas in the Championship is 121, which means that the best two Slovenian teams are positioned somewhere around the Championship mid-table. Therefore, I do not find them overrated. It would be nice to provide the answers to the following: What particular attributes are overrated, player by player, attribute by attribute? Why do you think these attributes are higher than they should be and what is your reference point? What would the correct ratings be? Please provide a proof for these corrections. This would help Alen and Klemen. or, just read the instructions: State what you think is specifically wrong with a particular piece of data. State what you think the data should be. State reasons/proof for your suggested corrections/improvements.
  15. This is not a question for me, or any other researcher - if coders can link Bosnian, Croatian, Montenegrin and Serbian into one South-Slavic language with four different names, it would solve this issue by saving three language slots.