Jump to content

benfm2010282

Members+
  • Posts

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by benfm2010282

  1. 7 hours ago, HUNT3R said:

    40 shots? That's a LOT. Sounds more like quantity over quality. In matches where I dominate, my shot count is 15-25 shots per match. I focus on creating space and shooting (mostly) when the opportunity presents itself. I obviously haven't seen your match, but it just sounds like your players are far too eager to shoot.

    xG can sometimes be deceiving as blocked shots can still have decent xG when it actually has very little chance because there are 1/2 defenders right in front of the ball. Penalties can also inflate the overall xG so that it looks like you're creating good enough chances in general. Again, not sure if that's happened in some of the matches you mention, but just putting it out there. I really like xG, but I always watch and analyse the chances I'm creating as well.

    My screenshot above shows that this isn't the case. All my matches are human vs AI and I have 11% conversion rate, which is decent. As stated above, it's usually even higher than that.

    Was also a good amount of them as clear cut, and the amount that’s missed is ridiculous but again, can happen.

     

    Right but that’s change conversion for the computer over a season, so the rest of the games against each other. I think if there was something that showed AI conversion as a whole solely against the player and not counting their other games there’d be a mammoth increase

  2. I think as an example, I’ve just 3 games in a row where I’ve had over 30 shots. First game AI, had 1 shot, naturally goes in, it happens fair enough. Then play a Europa league QF, I have an xg of 5.2, over 40 shots and computer has 3 shots. Score? 3-2. Then over 30 shots again and tons of clear cut chances, computer has 2 shots. Lose 1-0. Lucky what quit game and exit is for 😂 it’s like fighting a losing battle sometime, can’t remember the last time I was dominated but ratted out a result. Conversion rates may even out over a season, but if you like at a human vs ai conversion percentage in games the human is in, would be significantly lower compared to the AIs

  3. Just wondering what peoples opinions are on AI to person chance conversion? I’m finding that the computer will always score with one of their first handcrafted on goal, whereas my players are never as clinical when presented with the same amount of chances.

    I’m not trying to call the game fixed as obviously players do miss chances more sometimes than others, but even if I’m say winning 3-0, the computer will still score with its first shot on goal. Can be very frustrating dominating teams to then see the computer consistently score to equalise/get back in the game after one or two chances when my players have had 7 or 8 equally good chances. This is isn’t all the time but chance conversion feels weighted in the computers direction 

×
×
  • Create New...