Jump to content
Sports Interactive Community

Transk53

Members
  • Content Count

    629
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Transk53

  • Rank
    Amateur

Biography

  • Biography
    Getting back to IT by recertification of A+ and MS. Looking forward to FM again.

About Me

  • About Me
    Aboard the clock cycles and falling more than rising

Interests

  • Interests
    Gaming. Keeping fit and the Martial Arts. Reading and writing fan fics.

Favourite Team

  • Favourite Team
    Everton FC

Currently Managing

  • Currently Managing
    Everton soon

Recent Profile Visitors

1,620 profile views
  1. Yes of course I correct myself on that, That was my mistake on mis reading. However, this new graphics engine is very much incorrect. Broadly speaking, the term new in computing terms is a misnomer. This new graphics engine you say, is the SI speak, and as a MOD for SI, I understand your position, there is no new ME, just an update in simplistic speak here, but an update all the same. Yes, SI have made the ball curve well, and yes the inexplicable player action where they stand still doing naff all has been improved, but there is no tangible new ME Kubi, just a improved version that SI want to push on us that has actually regressed. I understand though that being an SI Mod that you have to follow the corporate line, but this ME inst new and never was. Yes I understand, but some will actually step up with two CPU ratings. However, I should have made it clear, on the commentary only, any U rated CPU will handle it fine. In fact this game, will also handle it on fine on a U rated CPU with graphics as well. U rated CPU's have a step up grade, so they will handle intensive tasks. However, you do dispense great advice, and yiou are a greta credit to this site, more over tahn some of the mods Just try to remember what you said in previous posts. You said U rated processors would not run FM
  2. The Stars mean nothing apposed to the hardware that the game scans. This question has been asked for years with the same answer. No point in this thread, no point in taking any notice of the stars.
  3. The Stars mean nothing apposed to the hardware that the game scans. This question has been asked for years with the same answer. No point in this thread, no point in taking any notice of the stars.
  4. Maybe not both, but depends on whether have integrated GPU memory. Celerons are the budget range, but the C2D is pre first gen i5 and i7, may struggle a bit system wise, but not graphically, well it may, but graphics and FM is a laugh.
  5. Both those graphics chip sets will be pushing it. Then again (Smurf says it doesn't) the game runs fine on U chip set lappys. It runs well enough on U rated CPU's, BTW, Intel don't make Graphics cards, but have their stuff on die (although they are making an attempt). In other words forget the graphics, just the CPU grunt.
  6. Sorry to hera that you are afflicted too. This is the thing, the issue isn't with nVidia or AMD, it is clearly with SI and their programmers with the reference graphics dvrs they would have requested. I have a 1060 GTXM and I knew know amount of dvr updates would have made a difference. SI are responsible with the graphics, not anyone else simply put. They are what they are, push a **** ME, and hit and hope. They are becoming like EA day by day. But of course the forum whores on here may have a differ opinion.
  7. Just to add, all it takes is a little research and just check Intel and AMD for any info on CPU info on recommended minimum specs for this game. It i easy to cross reference any codenames etc, while using notepad to copy any CPU models. Seriously, even if you are not up on current tech, it is really quite easy.
  8. Which are things not that make much difference. Yes you are right on the integrated graphics, any dedicated graphics would be a poor return on this game. This game wouldn't stretch an old 6600GT on processing GPU power. As Smurf says, the SSD doesn't gain any returns in the game, so the question remains, will FM ever stretch the modern hardware, no of course it won't. So stop with the rubbish on dedicated graphics, this game doesn't even stretch any post 6800. I like your skin, but the same old SI corporate bollocks. No personal offensive intended.
  9. an SSD will help with loading times, but as to the game itself it is pretty much minimum gains. Tbh, as long as the integrated gfx run the minimum (IE comment mode, which itself has some flaws) , the game will run fine. Extra processing grunt will help, as this game is pretty much a bunch of spread sheets, but the game is not all that. So yes, any cheaper option on hardware may well suit your needs. The game is very simplistic and hasn't improved over the years. Simple game fella.
  10. Look for a strong CPU, the amount of leagues has no Bering on graphics, or anything else tbh. The amount of leagues that can be processed, is off set by the amount of DRAM to take the load of the CPU. Would be a stretch for 450. In fact, don't do it fella, save up for a bit more. Everything at that price would be value only, and in the long run it is not worth it. Cheap lappys are what they are, cheap.. What you want is a semblance of quality, not cheap **** for the sake of playing this game, FM19 seriously isn't worth it
  11. Historically the AMD APU's haven't been that strong, but it does come with the Vega chip set. In terms of FM that should be fine. 3D support is something this game is miles, and I means miles behind. In terms of the APU, it matters little, this game is referenced for the low end. Tbh, the graphical capabilities of this game are architecturally pretty low standard, so my graphics card do much more tbh.
  12. When are the ever lol. That's the issue with have having a meaty GPU, this game will never stress test it. That is what annoys me with the game asking the user to update the dvrs, nVidia or AMD are not going to waste time on changing the reference dvrs it gives SI, there is no point for them. The game has asked me including FM18 to check for newer vers, it makes no difference.
  13. When are the ever lol. That's the issue with have having a meaty GPU, this game will never stress test it. That is what annoys me with the game asking the user to update the dvrs, nVidia or AMD are not going to waste time on changing the reference dvrs it gives SI, there is no point for them. The game has asked me including FM18 to check for newer vers, it makes no difference.
  14. Sadly it wont. This should run fine on your card. AMD has nothing to do with the 960M card, or any desktop app. nVidia apps directly reference the hardware with your equipment, and as such will be the benchmark with which you should go. In terms of FPS, this game will get nowhere near 60FPS, and with modern dedicated gfx, this is SI and there woeful programming. Got nothing to do to with your 960M, which is a good card. Dont take any notice of the SI bods, they (along with the mods) are talking the miles bollocks.
×
×
  • Create New...