rwidodo

That's why I bought 2 decent players for the position (Fresneda & Hickey) because at first I thought I didn't have good enough players to play that position. But Fresneda has been below par for 2 seasons now. Both players don't have Trent's vision and passing but possess good enough composure and decision to play the IWB position. I never expect them to top the league in assists nor average match rating, but I expect around 7.1 average (around my team's average). I also did not add anything on their PIs since both players don't have superb vision and passing.

Yeah, I played 2 seasons using IWB with good results. However, I still want my IWB to stand out (in positive fashion obviously). In real life, players like Trent, Cancelo, Rico Lewis, Zinchenko are different makers. Stats might not show it but they really help teams in build up play and overloading the middle. IMO good IWBs should stand out more even if they're not assisting or scoring.

He lost possession a lot, and failed to make a single key pass for the whole match. Only goals and assists will get him a decent rating sadly

My team is doing well overall, but I keep getting below average rating for my IWB. I bought Ivan Fresneda (supposedly one of the better players on FM24), but he also underperformed. Here's my tactic: I'm perfectly happy with my results, but unfortunately not my IWB. Is there something that I can try to rectify this problem? Thanks!

Good to know. Hopefully the fix will come sooner rather than later...

I'm managing Everton with Pickford (obviously) in goal and Virginia as my deputy. At the end of my first season, squad were unhappy with lack of depth in the GK department. So I went and bought a cheap goalie (Chris Walton) with 2.5 ⭐ rating at that time. Now halfway through my 2nd season, squad is again unhappy with lack of depth in GK department. Walton has 2 ⭐ rating at the moment. Do we need a third goalkeeper or the problem lies in Walton is not good enough to be a backup?

No. 10 is an absolute annoyance of mine. More than 50% of my key highlights that leads to goals are from short throw-ins followed by a few passes into the box.

Been using the same 433 and philosophy. What I found is whenever I put my MEZ(s) in combination with IW(s), my IW tend to get bad ratings. Any clue as to why his is happening?

Sorry if this has been asked before, but they have not fixed the scouting bug where estimated fee and salary are displayed as N/A. Have they?