Jump to content

kimjjj

Members+
  • Content Count

    123
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 "What we've got here is a failure to communicate"

About kimjjj

  • Rank
    Amateur

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. It makes sense — to me at least — that we would need midfielders charging ahead to make use of the space our wider forwards create. If they were stationary, the width would just push the forwards away from goal, as you say. I play a 4-1-3-2 Narrow with two mezzalas, so I guess extremely wide is useful for me.
  2. If you're the favorite. have the better team, and the opponent is playing defensively, is there ever any reason not to have attacking width on extremely wide? Thanks.
  3. I knew about the cost, yes. Thank you very much.
  4. Which one of these players is — all else being equal — the better player? Player A: CA 124, Consistency, 13, Decisions 8. Player B: CA 114, Consistency 20, Decisions 12. Thank you.
  5. I've been using version 1.0 and 1.1 and it doesn't work particularly well. The attacking play is fantastic with many beautiful goals, especially counter attacker ones, but the defense is horrible. I usually let in two or three goals per game.
×
×
  • Create New...