Jump to content

Jonnyffc

Members
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 "What we've got here is a failure to communicate"

About Jonnyffc

  • Rank
    Amateur

About Me

  • About Me
    Adelaide, Australia

Favourite Team

  • Favourite Team
    Fulham

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Ah, that makes sense. I'm only basing this on my own (not too successful) experience with this TI . Did you find that this change had an impact on the areas the supply came from? A greater spread of assists and key passes etc. One issue I seem to have with Retain Possession is an over reliance on a Play Maker (or a player with Tries Killer Balls PPM) to finally breakthrough. Obviously we're using different tactical systems etc. but it's interesting that you've managed to overcome this! KUTGW.
  2. A highly enjoyable and informative thread. A quick thought on the above: I would have thought that removing the Retain Possession TI would have had a greater success in achieving the desired results. I find that with retain possession that spark of creativity needed to unlock teams is extinguished by the need to keep the ball at all costs. Another downside of this is a horrifying mimicry of the way England have played for the last 10 years or so (perhaps longer). I know your philosophy calls for high possession, though against teams sitting back, did you find that this was a given withou
×
×
  • Create New...