Jump to content

1967

Members
  • Posts

    214
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 1967

  1. I'm confusing myself here!

    uOCu2.png

    Team is predicted 4th with above average technicals and work rate. Defence is solid and one CB aside averagely quick.

    I want us to play possession football with some urgency in the final third. So from the keeper up to Fleck or even higher slow, controlled, risk free. Then we try to open teams up which we're not going to do if we're just passing sideways.

    I think what I need to do then is use a mentality with lower risk - either standard or counter. TI play out of defence (with GK PI).

    Looking at my roles (and the fact that most teams should sit deep) that should see lots of safe possession? 

    I said I wanted some urgency in the final third, some players aiming to take the game to the opponents. Therefore is the best way to do this to add more attacking duties or do I have enough? I know I only have one but an inside forward is fairly offensive and wingers run at defences on support too. Then I have Carruthers acting like a second striker (I think) and Fleck fairly close too. I don't want to get done on the counter.

    Speaking of getting done on the counter, low risk mentality plus those defensive 6 (with Fleck) should see us in a good shape in the transitions. Another reason as to putting Carruthers on attack and leaving the wide players on support is to have them tuck back in quickly. I think I can leave shape on flexible because I need a bit of creativity but not too much for my possession aim, and fluid may be too much but at the same time structured may see my front four stuck up the pitch in transitions.

    So to clarify I've talked myself into adding: counter mentality, play out of defence TI, and GK distribution PI. What does anyone think?

    TI under consideration:

    Short passing + work ball into box - but I'd like to think they are intelligent enough to do this anyway.

    Push higher up + Close down - I quite like the idea of a solid defensive base yet these would help possession stats and controlling the game.

    I think I just needed a place to write down my thoughts? Am I talking jibberish?

     

     

  2. I've had zero issues partnering a DLF with an AF and having the DLF drop deep. Are you sure you weren't missing anything glaring that could have made your striker play like an AF? I find it weird.

    How often was it actually happening? What's his PPMs? Average position? Have you switched the BBM to his side? What was his off the ball rating? Teamwork/ Workrate?

    Also, duude, what sort of a squad have you assembled? I'm not having a dig.

  3. I didn't know where to put this!

    How about a sticky of threads which emulate real life tactics? I know I'm always searching the forum for historic tactics and such and I can't always find them, it'd be nice to just be able to check a sticky for the style I wanted to read about. Maybe up to the discretion of the moderating staff as to what gets added.

    I'm thinking threads like Barcelona my interpretation, Sacchi, the magical magyars thread that kind of thing. There's a lot of great threads which are long off the first page.

  4. What about when teams give you the ball? The mentality plus the supporting roles will allow, I think, you to dominate possession and start probing. You have wide midfielders offering a bit of width, a box to box really pushing forward, a wing back with a bit of license and a deep striker. The rest of the team, I shouldn't think they stretch the opposition too much (or only in very low risk situations (how frequent are these?)?)? Is that enough to consistently beat the poorer teams? How many 0-0's do you have, or how many 0-0's were you on course for before you tinkered, although I saw that 99% of the time you don't tinker so they must offer threats?? You're playing as Sheffield United who a good team in League One, I'd guess that at least the bottom half clubs play negatively against you. Could you show a few examples of how the support duties play out when they are forced to build attacks?

    Edit: I've just seen the Sporting Lisbon example from RTH, again it seems to be playing fine for big teams but how and why?

  5. Yes, but a wingback who mainly looks to cut inside with the ball just isn't a terribly useful idea.

    Tell that to Pep! Oh is it just a with the ball movement? Do they do it off the ball, for example stay in a central area when your play advances further forward or drift wider? I know they'll go back to the more standard FB position when the opposition win the ball back.

  6. I don't think this is a stupid question, but I don't think it merits an actual thread of its own.

    I want to know what the most common formation is. I don't mean from the player, from the AI manager. This probably varies from league to league but it would be great if some research has been done on this topic.

    The reason I ask is that I want to play reactively, and set up to exploit the majority of formations. Exploit is a strong word, but all I mean is for example to play 352 against 442.

    Three tactics or the three most common formations would be ideal.

×
×
  • Create New...