FM_Master08 Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 ok first post, so here goes. IRL the compensation for a player under 24 when he moves on free transfer is negotiated by the 2 clubs, wheras in FM the computer sets the compensation before. I think in future versions it should be negotiated or if the teams can't negotiate then a tribunal should decide, like IRL. what do you guys think? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralphieconq Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 I can see what you mean but IRL the manager would not negociate the compensation and if a tribunal decides, then the FM computer is still setting the compensation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djhdjh Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 Incorrect - look up the case of a player called Dean Sinclair who moved from Barnet to Charlton this year as proof that clubs do reach agreement sometimes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FletchLad Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 That sounds more like a transfer than a under 24 compensation transfer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralphieconq Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 Incorrect - look up the case of a player called Dean Sinclair who moved from Barnet to Charlton this year as proof that clubs do reach agreement sometimes. I am not denying that clubs reach agreements. I am just saying its not the manager's job to work out a fee for the player in that instance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stomalomalus Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 But with the mechanics of the transfer system, you would not be able to agree a fee and therefore the computer would decide anyway. It would just add another irritating delay to signing young players Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chocapik Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 Originally posted by ralphieconq:<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Incorrect - look up the case of a player called Dean Sinclair who moved from Barnet to Charlton this year as proof that clubs do reach agreement sometimes. I am not denying that clubs reach agreements. I am just saying its not the manager's job to work out a fee for the player in that instance. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> How many managers do the negotiations when buying players? Some people forget that this is a game. It's suposed to be fun. You guys are always wanting realism and that's why the game is becoming less and less fun every year. Realism yes but fun first. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralphieconq Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 How many managers do the negotiations when buying players?Some people forget that this is a game. It's suposed to be fun. You guys are always wanting realism and that's why the game is becoming less and less fun every year. Realism yes but fun first. I agree but are you saying working out compensation is fun? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chocapik Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 No. I just want to do more things in the game. But everyone keeps saying it's not done in real life but don't realise that managers don't do many things that we can do in the game. Altough SI could implement better features than compensation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.