PERCIVA11 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 I didn't know where to post this, but I'm rather curious anyway Do you think Vidic would be as good as he is on Football Manager if United hadn't signed him? Potential wise, seeing as United made him into the player he is if you get me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherica- Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 maybe you should ask this question on the Man Utd thread. anyway it was SAF that saw the potential in him and signed him. he repay SAF faith by putting some solid performance beside Rio Ferdinand thus making him one of the best DC in the world now. how often we saw players with huge potential but fail to impress after signing on for a big club, it still depend very much on individual. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purefun Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 This is more for GD imo. I'll move it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenwyne Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Well, if United hadn't signed him, would he have performed week in week out in one of the top domestic leagues in Europe, not to mention the Champions League? It's hard to gauge how good a player is until they are playing against the best every week. A weaker league doesn't necessarily allow this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eshaan Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Vidic is probably fergies best EVER defensive signing and on of his best signings overall. He is absolutely immense! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenwyne Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Vidic is probably fergies best EVER defensive signing and on of his best signings overall. He is absolutely immense! Steve Bruce/Denis Irwin ftw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 You could ask this about any number of players at top clubs. It's wholly irrelevant, though. Incidentally, Vidic is up there with Bruce and Irwin, for me. Evra too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenwyne Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 If you're going on purely value for money, then Irwin and Bruce can't be beaten. For impact, Vidic and Evra are comparable with any of Fergie's best signings, apart from Keane and Cantona who are in a class of their own. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 I didn't realise value for money was a consideration, but if it is, fair enough. Having said that, it's not like we overpaid for Vidic and Evra (they're about the only players we haven't overpaid for lately) and times are different now. The only players you'll ever get for what we paid for Bruce and Irwin are 16 year-olds with a bit of potential. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GillsMan Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 If you want to talk about IRL football, I can always move this thread to the Football Forum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giarc Ronyag Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 For impact, Vidic and Evra are comparable with any of Fergie's best signings, apart from Keane and Cantona who are in a class of their own. Except Vidic can play in europe as well, Cantona was never good on the european stage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phnompenhandy Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 I rate him IRL but not in FM. I go for pace throughout my side, especially in defence so I can play a high D-line. The likes of Vidic and Terry are too slow to work in my system, whereas technically less-gifted but pacier DCs work a treat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.