brandon Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 ive been playing FM/CM since its first outing on the amiga and have been a religious follower since. but it seems to me that my pretty good knowledge of players and systems is at risk with this new game. ive started 4 new games. the teams ive chosen are chelsea, man city, leeds and birmingham. all pretty good teams, more than capable of winning the title with great squads. ive been quite conservative with my descisions, only bringing in 1 or 2 signings that would benefit the side and getting rid of the obvious dead wood. my gripe is the 4-4-2. ive tried playing this simple, yet effective tactic with my much improved squads but to no avail. what have SI got against it? i appreciate its no killer tactic but surely with the squads and teams im playing with i should be having some good results? surely football is a simple game where you pick your 11 best players and win? low and behold 4-4-2 isnt what it seems anymore on the tactics. its got sliders here and there with boxes ticked. great i thought. that probably works because they no best. no it doesnt. my strikers are crap. my midfielders shoot from the dressing room. all im getting is the odd win by a goal and pretty un-outstanding performanances from what are supposed to be good players (when they are injury free!). i dont want to p*ss about with the sliders on the instructions tweeking tactics i just want to have fun! this game isnt providing it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scab Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 I have my doubts about the seriousness of your post - for all I can tell that might as well be a rather wordy sarcastic remark - but basically the default tactics are poor. If you want to play a football management game without ever dealing with tactics (a rather strange approach in the first place, but each to his own I guess), I'd suggest to go download something better from the Tactics & Training Tips forum. There are numerous 4-4-2's there. The game doesn't reward not even trying -- defaults in tactics, training, etc will work, but not work very well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kain Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 Football is a LOT more than just putting your best 11 players out and expecting a win. If it wasn't, the top teams could save a lot of money by hiring a less-skilled manager. Sorry to say, but if you want a game where you can just pick the players and not think about tactics,then FM isn't for you anymore. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandon Posted December 5, 2008 Author Share Posted December 5, 2008 I have my doubts about the seriousness of your post - for all I can tell that might as well be a rather wordy sarcastic remark - but basically the default tactics are poor. If you want to play a football management game without ever dealing with tactics (a rather strange approach in the first place, but each to his own I guess), I'd suggest to go download something better from the Tactics & Training Tips forum. There are numerous 4-4-2's there. The game doesn't reward not even trying -- defaults in tactics, training, etc will work, but not work very well. whoa, who are you sven? sling your hook. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandon Posted December 5, 2008 Author Share Posted December 5, 2008 Football is a LOT more than just putting your best 11 players out and expecting a win. If it wasn't, the top teams could save a lot of money by hiring a less-skilled manager. Sorry to say, but if you want a game where you can just pick the players and not think about tactics,then FM isn't for you anymore. i think you need a bird Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZaPPPa Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 Using 4-4-2 with great effectiveness.. too great for my liking. Taking a relegation candidate into the playoffs with it. 4-4-2 works fine if you have the players for it. However, if your teams comes with a true DM and AMC, don't try to force them into a regular 4-4-2 or you will suffer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddy Superstar Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 At the end of the day FM is a game ... i play for fun, not to get a real life football managers job. The harder the game gets the more it becomes not fun. I fear if it becomes to 'realistic' the game will loose some of its core fans Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmurfDude Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 At the end of the day FM is a game ... i play for fun, not to get a real life football managers job. The harder the game gets the more it becomes not fun. I fear if it becomes to 'realistic' the game will loose some of its core fans Don't assume that just because you don't like the way it's heading, that everyone will think the same Have you been in to the lower league forum? Tactics forum? FM stories forum? You will see plenty of people who thrive on the difficulty of FM and they are part of the "core fans" who have been here for years Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooch Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 ive gotta say i kinda agree. i think the 4-4-2 is definately neglected considering its the most common and reliable formation, and similarly whilst tactics play a huge part in how a team consistently performs, im not sure that minor tactical errors perceived by the game in how low/high man united have set their tempo (for example) should have such a drastic effect on the scoreline in a game at home to stoke? i think tiny tactical details have a bit too big of an impact in games, but hey im not complaining as such, i mean im still enjoying it. the problem is theres two 'teams' - those who love the realism and are mostly concerned with how lifelike the game is and those who are just lookin for more simple entertainment Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave byrd Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 Won 3 leauges and 10 cups with 4-4-2 so far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 I don't play 4-4-2, but then I'm managing in Italy. I sometimes revert to 4-4-2 to close games out and it works well enough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cynet Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 Being a football manager is not about just sitting in the office drinking red wine and then deciding the usuall 11 will play the usuall 4-4-2 and it's like that 52 weeks of the year. Football managment is about pitting your wits against the opposition and trying to counter attack there tactics. If it was easy as just being handed a straight formation and just slapping in 11 players and off you go maybe fm09 is not for you and the original cm series and early fm series are. Prefer a challenge and this game is it and the game is not easy at times as it enquires you to use your brain and just goes to show how many would not make a good real manager out there with a post like this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suttface Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 Balance is the key. Surely you don't just want to be able to open the game and win everything without effort using the default 4-4-2? You would become bored very quickly. You CAN win and be successful with a 4-4-2 but it does require some management. Afterall, it is a management game. You need to know your players, understand a little the tactics that may suit them and make a few small changes. Then reap the rewards. No computer game should exist on a 'zero effort maximum rewards' basis. It would be challenge-less and dull. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomis07 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 to Suttface's post. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike007lp Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 I'm doing fine atm with 4-4-2, had troubles in the beginning though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 to Suttface's post. In that case, are you going to have a bash at getting into FM09? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artman Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 Balance is the key. Surely you don't just want to be able to open the game and win everything without effort using the default 4-4-2? You would become bored very quickly.You CAN win and be successful with a 4-4-2 but it does require some management. Afterall, it is a management game. You need to know your players, understand a little the tactics that may suit them and make a few small changes. Then reap the rewards. No computer game should exist on a 'zero effort maximum rewards' basis. It would be challenge-less and dull. Totally agree Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomis07 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 In that case, are you going to have a bash at getting into FM09? I'm trying, i've got a save going and it seems to be working out, the only problem is time it takes to play the game. I got three games played in an hour and a half last night, might have to consider a new computer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 I'm trying, i've got a save going and it seems to be working out, the only problem is time it takes to play the game. I got three games played in an hour and a half last night, might have to consider a new computer. That's what I had to do. It's a heck of an investment just to play a game, but I suppose it comes to us all eventually. It was a no-brainer for me. I knew I wanted to play the game enough for it to be worth buying a new laptop, and it was. But, you know, you've got a wife and a kid and stuff, so your considerations will vary wildly from mine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomis07 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 There are only a few things I actually spend money on i.e. cigarettes and dvd's, whereas my wife was all too happy to buy £100 coats from Urban Outfitters last night so in theory I should be allowed to get myself a toy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 Not just in theory. Go out there and do it! But if possible, try and come up with a way to make it seem good for her. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandon Posted December 5, 2008 Author Share Posted December 5, 2008 At the end of the day FM is a game ... i play for fun, not to get a real life football managers job. The harder the game gets the more it becomes not fun. I fear if it becomes to 'realistic' the game will loose some of its core fans i 100% agree mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suttface Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 There are 2 different issues here; can you use a 4-4-2? Yes. Does the game take too long now? Hmmm, opinions vary. But in answer to OP, 4-4-2 does work with minimal adjustment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandon Posted December 5, 2008 Author Share Posted December 5, 2008 Being a football manager is not about just sitting in the office drinking red wine and then deciding the usuall 11 will play the usuall 4-4-2 and it's like that 52 weeks of the year. Football managment is about pitting your wits against the opposition and trying to counter attack there tactics. If it was easy as just being handed a straight formation and just slapping in 11 players and off you go maybe fm09 is not for you and the original cm series and early fm series are.Prefer a challenge and this game is it and the game is not easy at times as it enquires you to use your brain and just goes to show how many would not make a good real manager out there with a post like this. 1. i dont work in an office. never have. 2. although i do enjoy a drop of red im more of a pint man. 3. i dont mind "pitting my wits" against opponents, im just fed up with messing about with sliders and ticking/unticking boxes on the tactics menus to find the holy grail of finding a 'perfect' one. 4. whats wrong with just "slapping in 11 players" if theyre the best in their position? at the moment how im feeling about FM, CM doesnt seem like a bad option. 5. you cant tell me that all managers in real life are tactical geniuses. for every arsne wenger theres a harry redknapp. football isnt a complicated game. i like a challenge, but i like having fun more and when i shell out the best part of £30 i expect it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomis07 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 football isnt a complicated game. With all due respect, if that was the case then you wouldn't be playing FM and you'd be a real manager. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandon Posted December 5, 2008 Author Share Posted December 5, 2008 With all due respect, if that was the case then you wouldn't be playing FM and you'd be a real manager. thankyou for your constructive and insightful response. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
damienroden Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 Then this game isn't for you, there are plenty of alternative games for you to play. Fifa looks like what you want. And it was just as constructve as saying whoa, who are you sven? sling your hook. when somebody gives you a serious answer to what was basically a rant about not being good enough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomis07 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 thankyou for your constructive and insightful response. TBH it's about as constructive as your post. You're claiming that football management is not complicated and so the game shouldn't be complicated, a ridiculous statement almost commands a ridiculous response. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 thankyou for your constructive and insightful response. He was just disagreeing with that particular point. It was constructive enough. Football is a game where the beauty is often in simplicity. However, that simplicity is actually in appearances. Like Arsenal at their best. It looks so simple and so beautiful. But it is actually a complicated business getting them to do that. Oh yeah, and telling someone they need a bird is hardly constructive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandon Posted December 5, 2008 Author Share Posted December 5, 2008 nomis07 and mike7077. you both have far more posts than me. therefore your either more knowledgable about the subject or dont have a life. ill go for the later rather than the former and bow down to your superior posts. your right. i am silly, stupid and dont know what im talking about. i will cease to post from here on in. forgive me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 I would question the need for the personal attacks. All we did was disagree with you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPlanet Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 I've got a good working 4-4-2 formation that I've developed myself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomis07 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 nomis07 and mike7077. you both have far more posts than me. therefore your either more knowledgable about the subject or dont have a life. ill go for the later rather than the former and bow down to your superior posts. your right. i am silly, stupid and dont know what im talking about. i will cease to post from here on in. forgive me. I always feel slightly sorry for someone when they are obviously so totally inept that they must resort to childish finger pointing and insuffereable stupidity. Thhis forum is for debate, and if you want to have a debate about subjects then i'll happily have one with you, atm it looks like you're incapable of accepting someone disagreeing with you and you're so precious that you see it as a personal attack. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wwfan Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 nomis07 and mike7077. you both have far more posts than me. therefore your either more knowledgable about the subject or dont have a life. ill go for the later rather than the former and bow down to your superior posts. your right. i am silly, stupid and dont know what im talking about. i will cease to post from here on in. forgive me. If you are going to argue that playing your best eleven should simply win you games in a forum supporting the most complex and complete management simulation on the market, you are not going to get much joy. Hitting your head against a brick wall might be a better option. If you wish to learn how to play FM09, a little humility and less personal abuse might help. Failing to listen to anyone on the forums who might disagree with you is wasting everybody's time. Or perhaps you don't want to enjoy playing FM again? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 I really question what posts have to do with it. All I did was explain why, in my opinion, football is not as simple as it seems and why he was hardly in a position to criticise the level of constructiveness of other peoples' posts after telling some they needed a 'bird'. His reaction was pretty childish, to be honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Law_Man Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 With all due respect, if that was the case then you wouldn't be playing FM and you'd be a real manager. He's right football isn't a complicated game. Its very simple, which is why it was once referred to as "the opiate of the masses" (Marx). However, FM isn't, and I love it! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 He's right football isn't a complicated game. Its very simple, which is why it was once referred to as "the opiate of the masses" (Marx). However, FM isn't, and I love it! It was religion that Marx called the opiate of the masses. That said, I'm sure he would have said the same about football! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tajj 7 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 I see what hes getting at, I mean from the lowest level of football to the top, its about the players, yeh tactics can help, same with morale, team talks etc, but really if you have a team of better players you are more likely to win, tactics is about getting that extra 10% out of them, so say you have get the tactics right, the morale right, training etc then you can punch above the sum of your players ability, but you should at the same time take a top team like Man Utd who have superior players in most positions, use a 4-4-2 with players in their right positions and defualt tactics or pre-set tactics and win most of your games, not necessarily against say Chelsea or Arsenal etc, but most of your games without much effort, the extra skill is to get them to win against the other top teams, but if you cant do that then the game has lost something because as their is no 'easy' option like most computer games have, if you wanted an easy game you choose a good team, if you cant do that then the game has lost something in my opinion. I always thought the challenge of CM was to get a team to acheive better than what they usually do, if you have to put a lot of hours and detial and effort into a team to just get them to acheive what they are supposed to then thats not right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPlanet Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 but really if you have a team of better players you are more likely to win 100% categorically incorrect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galactus Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 LOL @ this Keegan wannabe. Play a 1-2-7 like in the olden days and see how you manage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Law_Man Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 It was religion that Marx called the opiate of the masses. That said, I'm sure he would have said the same about football! I think its safe to say I was using "poetic license" But thanks..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Law_Man Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 100% categorically incorrect. Hmm lets hang on a sec and think about this. I don't agree with the OP, but I'm sure that if you had better players man for man in all 11 positions then statistically you surely must be at least more likely to win than lose. I'm no mathmo but I'm sure it can be worked out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
damienroden Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 as he said more likely then he is most probaly right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedBones Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 From my corner, everyone above is correct (abuse aside). I'm a CM/FM veteran, and am really struggling with 09. I've tried various customised tactics, including a 4-4-2 one that worked okay for while (a dozen games) before the opp/AI found a way to stop me winning more than 1 game in 3 or 4. I love the challenge, and IMO all FM/CM players always have (otherwise we'd play FIFA I guess?) but I'm a season and a half into my career with Liverpool and I feel like I'm still a million miles away from getting the best out of a good squad, which is frustrating. Getting back to the OP, I suggest, as other have done, that you spend some time in the tactics forum. Good luck (and wish me luck too please ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPlanet Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 Hmm lets hang on a sec and think about this. I don't agree with the OP, but I'm sure that if you had better players man for man in all 11 positions then statistically you surely must be at least more likely to win than lose. I'm no mathmo but I'm sure it can be worked out. The point is, just having the best 11 players is not the majority of what makes you likely to win. I wouldn't even say it was 50%, let alone the 90% that he said. If it was, I could take charge of a big team, and play a basic 4-4-2 with the best 11 and I would be 90% toward winning? I don't think so Tim. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomis07 Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 The point is, just having the best 11 players is not the majority of what makes you likely to win. I wouldn't even say it was 50%, let alone the 90% that he said.If it was, I could take charge of a big team, and play a basic 4-4-2 with the best 11 and I would be 90% toward winning? I don't think so Tim. Indeed, Chelsea would be invincible IRL and in game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daley Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 Indeed, Chelsea would be invincible IRL and in game. Ooo, not sure about the Chelsea analogy there Nomis07 However tactics play a massive part of the game IRL, lets look at Ronaldo for example, if you were using a standard 4-4-2 formation and had him with individual instruction such as: No Forward Runs, Tight man Marking, don't take freekicks or penalties, stay back for your corners, never run with ball (I know a couple of those are a little far fetched but I'm making a point) then he would not be the player he undoubtedly is IRL in FM would he? So with just the wrong individual instructions for 1 player can ruin your teams success in both the game and IRL. As has been said, 4-4-2 will work but you shouldn't just expect to pick your players, sit back and watch them win every competition they enter! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPlanet Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 Imagine if you put Fat Frank on long shots rarely. He wouldn't get anywhere near 20 deflected goals a season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daley Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 Imagine if you put Fat Frank on long shots rarely.He wouldn't get anywhere near 20 deflected goals a season. LOL! Brilliant! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schotsmannetje Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 Ever since CM2, I've only used 2 formations, and I've been successful in every edition, including FM09. Both with big Premiership clubs and small 3rd division clubs. And I don't spend a lot of time tweaking tactics, hence why I'm always wondering why people spend 3 hours adjusting their tactics for 1 single match. A waste of time if you ask me. The way I play is this, I have 2 formations, both with an attacking mentality: 1. 4-3-3: GK, DR, DC, DC, DL, DM, MC, MC, AMR, AML, STR 2. 4-4-2 diamond: GK, DR, DC, DC, DL, DM, MR, ML, AM, STR, STR What I do is; When I start a new save game I turn the before-mentioned formations into presets. During pre-season I decide which of the 2 formations works best for my team. Then I always see that after a few months the results go backwards. This results in me changing the formation to the other one, and low and behold! suddenly the team is performing again. Works for me every single time, it's so incredibly easy. I can't explain why it works though, but it just does, every single time. Mind you, I do put a lot of time in tweaking my training and hiring specialized coaches (if my budget lets me that is), but I don't believe that explains why I can be successful in every edition of CM/FM with only 2 formations. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.