Jump to content

Ghana vs Uruguay & South Korea vs Portugal, 3PM BST


GunmaN1905
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 299
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

9 minutes ago, bolton1987 said:

Let's face it, Brazil versus a knackered geriatric Uruguay in the L16 would have been dreadful

This team from today is everything but geriatric. It was just Suarez and Cavani rotating.

Coates 32 and everyone else who started under 30.

Their issue was that they played geriatric lineups in first two matches and today was apparently too late.

 

I'd say that them going out is on Cristiano missing a handful of sitters.

sonaldo.jpg

Edited by GunmaN1905
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mahzun_Savas said:

South Korea does it. 

3 teams from Asia

Australia beat Denmark

Japan beat Spain

South Korea beats Portugal

Remarkable effort

Europe pretty embarrassing this year, although they may still win in the end, like in 2014 when they looked bad at first too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rob1981 said:

Harsh on Ghana, they were the only team in that group that had a proper go in all three games.

Uruguay have only got themselves to blame.  Only one shot on target all game in their opening 0-0, ends up costing them later.

That's why 2 of 4 is good, just defending can cost you.

 

That Cavani shout clearly wasn't a pen, he just extends his leg rather than continuing running to buy contact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, PMLF said:

So Brazil vs Korea in the next round and then maybe Brazil vs Japan (or Croatia).

And Brazil can be the only team to win all group stage games, if Brazil beat Cameroon.

You've got to get past the wall of Kim's before you can start plotting your route through to the Finals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Golden boy said:

You've got to get past the wall of Kim's before you can start plotting your route through to the Finals.

Jokes aside, that wall wasn't an issue a few months ago when Brazil beat them 5-1 in a friendly game. :D 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, GunmaN1905 said:

Some EUROs had a lot of drama back when while we had 16 teams, but can't remember anything like this at a World Cup.

imo, just shows how much more evenly matched different teams are at international level... compared to 15-20 years ago.

Quick look back at 2006 you had 11/32 teams that failed to win any of their games

This year you've got 5-6 max., and that's only if Serbia and Cameroon lose later.  Could be as low as four, and then 28/32 have won at least once.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, PMLF said:

Europe pretty embarrassing this year, although they may still win in the end, like in 2014 when they looked bad at first too.

7/13, not bad considering the teams which qualified.

Germany, Denmark and Belgium being the disappointments.

 

South America is way worse. 2/4, with Peru being knocked out by Australia in the play-offs.

Argentina on it's last legs with best players being old and Ecuador being the third best team, with others in the region having way worse generations than before (Uruguay, Colombia, Chile).

Other than Brazil, future doesn't look bright.

1 minute ago, Rob1981 said:

imo, just shows how much more evenly matched different teams are at international level... compared to 15-20 years ago.

Quick look back at 2006 you had 11/32 teams that failed to win any of their games

This year you've got 5-6 max., and that's only if Serbia and Cameroon lose later.  Could be as low as four, and then 28/32 have won at least once.

Yeah, even the teams that obviously lack quality caught up with tactics. Wasn't the case before, as you said.

Edited by GunmaN1905
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rob1981 said:

imo, just shows how much more evenly matched different teams are at international level... compared to 15-20 years ago.

Quick look back at 2006 you had 11/32 teams that failed to win any of their games

This year you've got 5-6 max., and that's only if Serbia and Cameroon lose later.  Could be as low as four, and then 28/32 have won at least once.

It kinda does justify Fifa expanding the world cup to 48 teams really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now all the karmic justice which Uruguay brough upon themselves aside, VAR was an utter joke once again and decided the outcome of the group.

Wasn't the case in two previous instances (Argentina and Croatia matches), but now it was.

And those weren't intentional mistakes, just that they completely ruined the rulebook and the situation-to-situation criteria is changing based on nitpicking from that rulebooks instead of using common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Haguey said:

It kinda does justify Fifa expanding the world cup to 48 teams really.

Could instead keep 32 but reduce the amount of spots for Europe and South America (say one from each) and award them to Africa and Asia.

Edited by PMLF
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Haguey said:

It kinda does justify Fifa expanding the world cup to 48 teams really.

The opposite for me. This is the right amount of teams for great drama and upsets like we’ve seen so far. Adding dross only dilutes the quality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Weezer said:

The opposite for me. This is the right amount of teams for great drama and upsets like we’ve seen so far. Adding dross only dilutes the quality.

Depends what the dross is. Football in the lower nations is growing strong. 

Canada would’ve been classed as dross couple years ago and they were good entertainment. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, pearcey_90 said:

Depends what the dross is. Football in the lower nations is growing strong. 

Canada would’ve been classed as dross couple years ago and they were good entertainment. 

Beyond the nations that have already qualified Asia is terrible and the strongest African teams have made little impact at the tournament and there’s not much to suggest the 8th best African team would either.

Also 48 is a stupid number to sensibly divide into a tournament format.

All Canada have done is replace another interchangeable Central American nation that wouldn’t have made it past the first round.

The World Cup should be kept exclusive, not let every man and his dog qualify like the Euros. It’s what makes it special.

Edited by Weezer
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Euros is proper ruined and it really upsets me. The 16 team Euros was the perfect international tournament. You might get the odd Bulgaria or Latvia some years but you'd have 10 minimum solid teams and it's all go from the start. Proper groups of deaths. It was pinnacle of quality international football

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
8 minutes ago, Heartwork said:

How far do South Korea need to go in order for the younger players to escape military service?

They won't (escape military service). 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
3 hours ago, Weezer said:

Beyond the nations that have already qualified Asia is terrible and the strongest African teams have made little impact at the tournament and there’s not much to suggest the 8th best African team would either.

Also 48 is a stupid number to sensibly divide into a tournament format.

All Canada have done is replace another interchangeable Central American nation that wouldn’t have made it past the first round.

The World Cup should be kept exclusive, not let every man and his dog qualify like the Euros. It’s what makes it special.

Need to have teams from other confederations qualifying or it's not really a World Cup. 

There's better ways they can slice the 48 to make the format better than is the current plan, and it sounds like it might still change. It's still not really clear how they can sustain a tournament that big going forward. 

Canada were great, could have been a different final game for them had they got their deserved point vs Belgium. They were also the best team from CONCACAF as well :D 

Can't really agree that Asia and Africa are terrible, both have sides in the R16 and at least one should reach QFs.

I'd agree the main World Cup should stay at 32 teams, but I'd like to see a few less European and more elsewhere. Increase the playoffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Lucas said:

I'd agree the main World Cup should stay at 32 teams, but I'd like to see a few less European and more elsewhere. Increase the playoffs.

Yes, keep 32 teams, then remove one spot from Europe, remove one from South America, give one spot to Africa, and another one to Asia.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Lucas said:

Need to have teams from other confederations qualifying or it's not really a World Cup. 

We do, it’s fine as it is.

10 hours ago, Lucas said:

Canada were great, could have been a different final game for them had they got their deserved point vs Belgium. They were also the best team from CONCACAF as well :D 

Yes Canada were great, everybody loves plucky Canada. They still lost 3 games and only Qatar had a worse record. Could have replaced them with Honduras or Panama and got the same outcome.

10 hours ago, Lucas said:

Can't really agree that Asia and Africa are terrible, both have sides in the R16 and at least one should reach QFs

How often have African and Asian teams got to a QF out of the strongest 4 or 5 teams of those continents to qualify? What do you think the 8th best African and Asian team is going to add to the quality of the tournament?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aitutaki said:

Africa have very good teams that don't qualify every time (Nigeria, Ivory Coast, Egypt etc) and deserve the 9 places they'll get next time, if not more.

 

Are they 'very good'? Or are they just recognised names in terms of African football? 

I'd like to see Africa get an extra spot just because I like seeing those names and teams in the event - just a bit cult seeing Nigeria at a World Cup - but I don't really think they're particularly good. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nigeria have only made it out of the groups twice and 5 of their 6 World Cup wins have been against Bulgaria (x2), Iceland, Bosnia and Greece (the other against Spain in 98). Egypt have never won a World Cup game.

They're recognised names, they’re not going to light up the tournament with their inclusion.

Take a couple of places off Europe and give them to Africa and Asia if you must but having 8 teams each from those continents is ridiculous and you just turn the World Cup into what the Euros is becoming.

Edited by Weezer
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...