Jump to content

Manchester City Pep Guardiola Analysis and Tactical Recreation


Recommended Posts

Having a play around with your latest version and one tweak I'd suggest to make it even more realistic is moving the DLP (S) to the CM position and adding the instructions: "Close Down More"; "Tight Marking" and "Tackle Harder". Seems to create more situations where the team defends as a 4-4-2/4-2-3-1, as opposed to having a single DM player between defence and midfield, which doesn't seem to be the way Pep defends these days (I think because the passing lanes either side of a DM can get exploited so perhaps better/more efficient to have 2 compact lines of 4).

Also, I'd suggest the PPM of "Stays Back At All Times" for the IWB(S) and DLP(S) as sometimes they can be too aggressive with their movements in possession (I like them as a stable "base" behind the attacking 6) and this PPM can mitigate that, without taking away from the reasons why those roles are more suitable than others in the first place. For example, I wouldn't take away "Overlap Left" as this would increase the mentality of the IW(S)  on the left, and probably cause this player to drift centrally too early/earlier - while a DLP on "Defend" would cause the DLP to not close down/mark players in front of the midfield when out of possession (when required). So I find simply that the "Stays Back At All Times" PPM for DLP(S) and IWB(S) is the best adjustment.

I'm also potentially looking at adding "Tight Marking" to the backline, but this one I am still undecided on.

The rest of the tactic I think is really pretty good and a solid effort in terms of realistically recreating Pep's positional play tactical philosophy.

Thanks for your ongoing efforts and analysis. :thup::)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 273
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

8 hours ago, Juego de Posicion said:

Having a play around with your latest version and one tweak I'd suggest to make it even more realistic is moving the DLP (S) to the CM position and adding the instructions: "Close Down More"; "Tight Marking" and "Tackle Harder". Seems to create more situations where the team defends as a 4-4-2/4-2-3-1, as opposed to having a single DM player between defence and midfield, which doesn't seem to be the way Pep defends these days (I think because the passing lanes either side of a DM can get exploited so perhaps better/more efficient to have 2 compact lines of 4).

Also, I'd suggest the PPM of "Stays Back At All Times" for the IWB(S) and DLP(S) as sometimes they can be too aggressive with their movements in possession (I like them as a stable "base" behind the attacking 6) and this PPM can mitigate that, without taking away from the reasons why those roles are more suitable than others in the first place. For example, I wouldn't take away "Overlap Left" as this would increase the mentality of the IW(S)  on the left, and probably cause this player to drift centrally too early/earlier - while a DLP on "Defend" would cause the DLP to not close down/mark players in front of the midfield when out of possession (when required). So I find simply that the "Stays Back At All Times" PPM for DLP(S) and IWB(S) is the best adjustment.

I'm also potentially looking at adding "Tight Marking" to the backline, but this one I am still undecided on.

The rest of the tactic I think is really pretty good and a solid effort in terms of realistically recreating Pep's positional play tactical philosophy.

Thanks for your ongoing efforts and analysis. :thup::)

Thank you mate for the kind words! I'm quite happy with the current version with the DLF-A as the striker it can play some brilliant football on a regular basis with a top side.

Yes I mean feel free to tweak like I mentioned before I wasn't trying to do the out of possession as specific as in possession. I will probably end the in possession tweaks now with just uploading different tweaks of the current tactic to match different "Pep" style such as a current 2017-2019 version, then a 2020-2021 version and lastly a Barcelona version from 2008-2011 which I think would probably have more success with a WB-A or CWB-A on the right side to replicate alves!

I like the thoughts about traits I never really attempt to add too many as once they've learned one it's VERY hard for me to get them to unlearn it! Traits probably could add a lot to it!

 

Thank you again for your thoughts and comments !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Real Sociedad Season 2:

League Winners

Cup Winners

Knocked out by Liverpool in Champions League

 

League Table:

 

1585436951_Screenshot2021-05-16at18_18_42.png.1026aca5ce33e8178a01e9fa03794747.png

 

 

Average Possession:

 

1466752808_Screenshot2021-05-16at18_18_50.png.6cb9fbdd53cac0fcad92130c5f5d13b2.png

 

 

XG For:

 

2090491734_Screenshot2021-05-16at18_18_59.png.9e758c66a2138009b13d5f39e226ebae.png

 

 

XG Against:

 

2124502482_Screenshot2021-05-16at18_19_15.png.7870d0d7c5fd8f852410fe6b325884a2.png

 

 

Clear Cut Chances:

 

1391718574_Screenshot2021-05-16at18_19_22.png.0a714341686ce5cd772f81c47061a463.png

 

 

The title race was very close and we were absolutely brilliant then a terrible January saw us lose to Real Madrid away, In a cup & Then also play Liverpool twice. This threw our form and ruined our morale making us drop points quite a few times in this period and if I would have handled it better I wonder if we would have had a better chance in the CL and got over 100 points maybe even undefeated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which version is this you're using? Love the idea!

19 hours ago, Cult of Football Manager said:

Real Sociedad Season 2:

League Winners

Cup Winners

Knocked out by Liverpool in Champions League

 

League Table:

 

1585436951_Screenshot2021-05-16at18_18_42.png.1026aca5ce33e8178a01e9fa03794747.png

 

 

Average Possession:

 

1466752808_Screenshot2021-05-16at18_18_50.png.6cb9fbdd53cac0fcad92130c5f5d13b2.png

 

 

XG For:

 

2090491734_Screenshot2021-05-16at18_18_59.png.9e758c66a2138009b13d5f39e226ebae.png

 

 

XG Against:

 

2124502482_Screenshot2021-05-16at18_19_15.png.7870d0d7c5fd8f852410fe6b325884a2.png

 

 

Clear Cut Chances:

 

1391718574_Screenshot2021-05-16at18_19_22.png.0a714341686ce5cd772f81c47061a463.png

 

 

The title race was very close and we were absolutely brilliant then a terrible January saw us lose to Real Madrid away, In a cup & Then also play Liverpool twice. This threw our form and ruined our morale making us drop points quite a few times in this period and if I would have handled it better I wonder if we would have had a better chance in the CL and got over 100 points maybe even undefeated!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MrGreen555 said:

Which version is this you're using? Love the idea!

 

That's the Poacher version and Pass into space the latest one. I use the defensive tactic if 1 goal up with 10 minutes to go and as an emergency to get a goal switch to the attacking tactic for the last 10 mins on Very Attacking to get a goal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wondering what are some good player traits for this tactic? I've been thinking and it seems like a good idea for wingers to have move into channels trait. I'm not a super expert on this so I can be wrong but please do let me know what are some good player traits for this tactical style. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I've made a couple of tweaks to my setup with real success recently, partly inspired by Ozil-to-the-Arsenal's classic threads, including the use of Support duties for 'Very Fluid' total football.

I also wanted to really minimise TIs, and come up with something like a universal tactic for this style of play - I tested it on FM20, but I think it could be applied to any of the recent games.

Positive

Much Shorter Passing, Play Out of Defence

More Urgent

SKd

IWBs - CDd - CDd - IWBs

MEZs - CMd - MEZs

IWs - F9s - IWs

The IWs have PIs to 'Stay Wider' and 'Get Further Forward'. And that's it!

Here's why I think it works so well:

The full backs, Mezzalas and wingers are on Positive mentality, the False Nine is on Balanced, and the rest on Cautious.

I experimented with an Attack duty up front, but I do think the False Nine is perfect for this style of play. The key was playing on Positive team mentality or higher - the role is too passive otherwise, being Cautious with a Balanced team mentality.

With a higher team mentality, I found my IWBs were getting too far forward with Underlaps - this creates an Attacking mentality, and we were being exposed on the counter.

It also led to them sitting on top of the Mezzalas, which is completely contradictory to positional play principles. 

I took off the Underlaps, and also found great success in moving the DM to CM, which forces the Mezzalas wider. They make runs outside more often, they press the flanks better to stop counters, and there is generally excellent spacing and interplay between them, the IWBs and IWs - I cannot recommend testing this out strongly enough.

Without a DM, I found the Support duty worked well for the Mezzalas, rather than Attack. They helped out in defence more, so we weren't exposed in the middle, and as I increased Mentality to Positive, they still got forward plenty. I didn't want them shooting constantly on Very Attacking mentality.

The CMd also seems to have the effect of pushing the defensive line higher, indirectly, and works really nicely supporting attacks in a line of '3' with the IWBs in possession, whilst dropping deep as a holding midfielder out of possession. I often use a 'Tighter Marking' OI on opposition AMs, which works well. 

The IWs also benefit from a Positive mentality, as the lack of Underlaps means they get forward a little more, and form a proper front three with the False Nine - I still think this role is the best way to give Pep-style width in buildup, before attacking the box at the right moment.

The only essential team instruction is Much Shorter Passing, genuinely. Shorter Passing gives me around 62% possession on average, Much Shorter Passing gives around 68% - it seems to prevent the CBs from ever kicking it long on Positive, and everyone focuses on neat, simple passes all over the pitch. 

We naturally work the ball into the box - the IWBs cross less often by default, and we don't use Wingers, who Cross More Often. We are patient, but always building towards creating chances.

This means the attacking play is varied without being over complicated and players have the freedom to score all types of goal, without being given too many instructions, or forcing the ball to a designated playmaker. Again, try it out, and I think you'll see how a very simple approach can give really effective patterns of play, as players decide how to best unlock the defence, using the overloads created by a 235.

A truer Pep recreation may be achieved with more tinkering, but in terms of results on FM, this has given me the best results with a 235 by far, as well as some seriously beautiful football.

Edited by Mike_Cardinal
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Djeon36 said:

Just wondering what are some good player traits for this tactic? I've been thinking and it seems like a good idea for wingers to have move into channels trait. I'm not a super expert on this so I can be wrong but please do let me know what are some good player traits for this tactical style. 

Good question. DLP dictates tempo would probably help for those games where teams are sat back and the tempo and passing isn't quick enough and he plays at his own pace therefore helping the team? 

Moves into channels would be interesting to see the difference between a wide player having it, then also the CM's having it.

Hugs touchline is that still one? If so I would put all 4 of my wingers on that and I would probably start with that and the DLP with dictates tempo and start from there. The IWB you could put get forward whenever possible if you're a top side and find yourself drawing a lot going into the last 20 minutes. It makes the IWB - A more aggressive with his movement and the IWB-S L more likely to overlap if the opposition have set up a camp in their own box rather then being apart of the retain unit across the back with the other CB's.

DLF-A with break offside trap might be good for recreation and results.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mike_Cardinal said:

I've made a couple of tweaks to my setup with real success recently, partly inspired by Ozil-to-the-Arsenal's classic threads, including the use of Support duties for 'Very Fluid' total football.

I also wanted to really minimise TIs, and come up with something like a universal tactic for this style of play - I tested it on FM20, but I think it could be applied to any of the recent games.

Positive

Much Shorter Passing, Play Out of Defence

More Urgent

SKd

IWBs - CDd - CDd - IWBs

MEZs - CMd - MEZs

IWs - F9s - IWs

The IWs have PIs to 'Stay Wider' and 'Get Further Forward'. And that's it!

Here's why I think it works so well:

The full backs, Mezzalas and wingers are on Positive mentality, the False Nine is on Balanced, and the rest on Cautious.

I experimented with an Attack duty up front, but I do think the False Nine is perfect for this style of play. The key was playing on Positive team mentality or higher - the role is too passive otherwise, being Cautious with a Balanced team mentality.

With a higher team mentality, I found my IWBs were getting too far forward with Underlaps - this creates an Attacking mentality, and we were being exposed on the counter.

It also led to them sitting on top of the Mezzalas, which is completely contradictory to positional play principles. 

I took off the Underlaps, and also found great success in moving the DM to CM, which forces the Mezzalas wider. They make runs outside more often, they press the flanks better to stop counters, and there is generally excellent spacing and interplay between them, the IWBs and IWs - I cannot recommend testing this out strongly enough.

Without a DM, I found the Support duty worked well for the Mezzalas, rather than Attack. They helped out in defence more, so we weren't exposed in the middle, and as I increased Mentality to Positive, they still got forward plenty. I didn't want them shooting constantly on Very Attacking mentality.

The CMd also seems to have the effect of pushing the defensive line higher, indirectly, and works really nicely supporting attacks in a line of '3' with the IWBs in possession, whilst dropping deep as a holding midfielder out of possession. I often use a 'Tighter Marking' OI on opposition AMs, which works well. 

The IWs also benefit from a Positive mentality, as the lack of Underlaps means they get forward a little more, and form a proper front three with the False Nine - I still think this role is the best way to give Pep-style width in buildup, before attacking the box at the right moment.

The only essential team instruction is Much Shorter Passing, genuinely. Shorter Passing gives me around 62% possession on average, Much Shorter Passing gives around 68% - it seems to prevent the CBs from ever kicking it long on Positive, and everyone focuses on neat, simple passes all over the pitch. 

We naturally work the ball into the box - the IWBs cross less often by default, and we don't use Wingers, who Cross More Often. We are patient, but always building towards creating chances.

This means the attacking play is varied without being over complicated and players have the freedom to score all types of goal, without being given too many instructions, or forcing the ball to a designated playmaker. Again, try it out, and I think you'll see how a very simple approach can give really effective patterns of play, as players decide how to best unlock the defence, using the overloads created by a 235.

A truer Pep recreation may be achieved with more tinkering, but in terms of results on FM, this has given me the best results with a 235 by far, as well as some seriously beautiful football.

I really like the thoughts behind the tactic and the "clean" setup with few TIs and well thought roles. I will test it with my Roma save! How about chance creation and goals? I struggle with getting Roma to score more - normally only winning 1-0 or drawing against better teams - so could be worried just ending up passing the ball around without scoring :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Giacch said:

Impressive with your 3 tactics, i won the ligue 1 with Nîmes with 90 point at first season. Very good Job thx. :D

 

Really? That's Brilliant ! So happy to hear that! That's an incredible achievement and even better then mine!! Congratulations on that and i'm glad the tactic was able to provide you with that success that early on!

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ivanbox said:

@Cult of Football Manager Amazing work! Are you considering recreating Pep`s Barcelona 2010-2011 tactic?

Thanks mate I appreciate it!

I did straight away after but I thought I'd do something a little different so I've been spending time on another recreation. I don't know if I'll have time to post it on here in written format will more then likely be a video on Youtube. 

 

I might save Pep's Barca for FM 22 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 13/05/2021 at 16:50, Ripamon said:

Following on from my comment on the previous page, where I uploaded various pkms of my beloved Schalke carrying out Guardiolae-esque principles of play (see here) I felt it was time for a new challenge. A new environment in a new country. A country where there existed a heavyweight which needed to be toppled, whose financial strength could never be matched. It was time of course, to head to the so-called farmer's league to dethrone the mighty PSG. 

The year was 2022. The team, Lyon. I wasted no time in applying my tactics and buying a couple of players who could carry out my vision for the team. 

image.thumb.png.a53c2c83baf1e892584eca18f1684010.png

 

image.thumb.png.9daf8b93fe81e31182baad287a52f558.png

These are the results of the two seasons I've managed so far. In the first, I also reached the Europa league final but got pumped 5-0 by Arsenal (lol). In my second, as you see here, we managed to outdo our previous record, scoring a mighty 122 goals and only conceding 19. The title race went down to the final day, where a 9-0 win over Strasbourg sealed my 2nd title in a row. PSG were well and truly dethroned. Additionally, we have managed to qualify for the Champions League Final, where premier league winners Manchester United await in 2 weeks time.

image.thumb.png.4c666faf39dd37c1ebc994cc084d5e9a.png

My beloved squad

image.thumb.png.45df4f5002b816e4b17d408686f056e1.png

Possession stats and pass percentage are excellent. I'm also really pleased with the few amounts of goals conceded, combined with our offensive potency. We dominated the competition in almost every attacking statistic, including a hilarious 17 goals from corners (Konate bagged 13 goals)

Almost all my goals were the results of the attacking patterns outlined in my last post. As my players trained and developed, their offensive potency grew to truly scary levels

image.png.d69f86ecaa53bd4b3029286aafc68e1c.png

like this

image.png.8cf629c3d7146741609a3e2be398e6cf.png

or this

 

oimage.png.0e5bffcf7d9126c6bc4577838e846e5c.png

or this!

image.png.592223ede417aac0baace5fa67da7781.png

The TACTIC

As you can see, it's nothing too revolutionary. I used to use a bunch of PI's and TI's. But over the course of my testing, I began to strip down the unnecessary ones, one by one, observing keenly and taking copious notes. What you see here is the final result of hours spent watching full matches and plenty of spent ink on written notes.

What instruction made the biggest difference? 

Without a doubt, whipped crosses. Think again about how Manchester City play. The majority of their crosses (not cutbacks!) are absolutely fizzed into the penalty area at great pace. Principally by Mendy and KDB. These are equivalent to whipped crosses. You don't need jumping reach to get on the end of them. Nor much heading ability. In fact I found the majority of whipped crosses to be drilled at knee height or so. The higher ones would be fizzed right on top of the attackers head, needing only a slight redirection to take it past the keeper.

Secondly, they are so effective because they connect to the foot or head of an onrushing attacker. My players aren't static in the penalty box, often making darting runs into the box just in time to meet the cross at pace. The pace of both ball and man results in a powerful bullet header or half volley that almost always goes in unless it's straight at the keeper or just narrowly goes over. I'm almost tempted to call it broken.

Tsygankov's 25 assists and Aouar's 21 assists were mainly from these whipped crosses.

Other random tidbits

- None of my players in both seasons ever reached 30 goals. The goals were often spread evenly around the team, with six players scoring more than 10 goals this season, and 3 of those scoring 24 (Esposito), 23 (Moukoko) and 21 (Brenner). The spread of goals was delightful and reinforced the fact that this is a fluid, flexible team with varied goalscoring avenues.

- The tactic performs surprisingly well in tough away games as well. During the 2 seasons at Lyon, I only suffered 2 away defeats to juggernauts in France or in Europe (1-2 to PSG and 0-1 vs Monaco). The team was also able to maintain excellent possession and superior XG vs these teams as well. The superb away performances are a major reason the team was able to make Europa league finals in the first season, and the upcoming CL final in the second.

Great looking tactic, @Ripamon. Congratulations on deposing PSG and reaching the 100 point mark! What's the thinking/reason behind the offset AML/MR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am utterly bemused to what I have just witnessed in real life. Chelsea were very good against City again but some of the tactical instructions or player decisions ( depending on which it was ) for City seemed utter nonsense. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Playing without a DM or a midfielder with any defensive responsibilities was probably also a bit dumb. Almost like someone who comes on these forums with a mint team and all mezzalas in midfield and are like 'why I no win?'.

Nice to see that even Pep falls into the same old traps tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Wavelberry said:

Playing without a DM or a midfielder with any defensive responsibilities was probably also a bit dumb. Almost like someone who comes on these forums with a mint team and all mezzalas in midfield and are like 'why I no win?'.

Nice to see that even Pep falls into the same old traps tbh.

lol the OP's tactic uses all mezzala midfield

Edited by crusadertsar
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 29/05/2021 at 17:02, Cult of Football Manager said:

I am utterly bemused to what I have just witnessed in real life. Chelsea were very good against City again but some of the tactical instructions or player decisions ( depending on which it was ) for City seemed utter nonsense. 

 

 

Agreed. When I saw Gundogan was essentially the DM, I was like, "This is going to be a problem."

The amount of space in the midfield for Chelsea's goal was reminiscent of arsenal's midfielder over the last decade.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think I can tweak this tactic slightly so on the left side I have overlap from the full back.

I am thinking like Wb(Au) with get further forward, carrilero in midfield and inside forward on the wing without 'Stay Wider' PI, 

Do these roles make sense? thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Beni150 said:

Do you think I can tweak this tactic slightly so on the left side I have overlap from the full back.

I am thinking like Wb(Au) with get further forward, carrilero in midfield and inside forward on the wing without 'Stay Wider' PI, 

Do these roles make sense? thanks

Tweak yes absolutely! An overlapping full back would probably make it a better overall tactic especially for the moments where the IW goes in too narrow too early. In terms of what to combine that with I would just start with that and then see what changing the Mezzala does in the patterns and movements that you're seeing.

The issue with the inside forward is the mentality check his mentality when combining it with the other roles. I'm not saying you can't use it but it can behave very differently to the other roles used previously. 

Start with the wingback and go from there I personally would then doing the 3 at once if you see what I mean? Let us Know how you get on!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me personally I have tweaked it differently, moved the DM to Defend role, for more defensive stability and make sure the DM has a more defensive mentality to prevent counter attacks from the opposing team as he stays more backward...from my experience he also contributes well in attack but has a more defensive minded utility...

Another tweak I made is the defensive line, one notch done from current present, is way better at preventing counter attacks...

image.png.07edc6b3adc8333e9ce1b64aedca8c61.png

And this is something always present in my tactics, is Pressing at Max and tight marking...one thing you didn't add in in your screenshots or philosophy behind the way you give opponent instructions...I follow the ones on the passion4fm website with the Barcelona Tiki Taka guardiola tactics...which have a logical and interesting point of view, altering the instructions according to the players I will be facing...

 

Another thing I add is the instruction to be more expressive, because when you have really creative players, mainly when using the Pass into Space option, you will see amazing football, and increase the potential for opportunities created using the movements created by the Mezzalas, Wingers and IW...

 

By the way amazing tactic, I always wanted to recreate Pep's tactics, but I always needed a bit of help in order to obtain clear instructions on how to set it properly, and then give it my final personal touch regarding defensive movements and transitions...I hope we will get more instructions on how to apply pressure and in which areas of the field...

 

I also make some changes match by match, but this can only be done properly doing a tactical analysis of the opponent, mainly see where is their weakest point in defense (where do the assists for the goals they suffer mainly come from), right or left side, through the middle, or through long balls, and you have in this situation to make small tweaks....for example a team that is weaker on the right side, you need to force your game more through the left side, so I make sure my left winger is left footed and try to enforce more crosses through that side, change the right CM to AM-A to have more players appearing , those are very small details that make the difference...

If a team is weak through the middle, I force the play by the middle and play narrower...

If a team is weak on both sides, I make it wider, try to create 2 separate blocks, the right side and left side, keeping the midfield wide open to then switch quickly to other side and create overloads, the idea is to have crosses coming from all sides and positions for opposing wingers to appear on the far post...

This is my main thought of process facing the opponents...

For opponents that play very high and use counter I do other changes, like switching the mentality to attacking or very attacking. Just because you lower the mentality does not mean your team will defend or attack more, it's just the amount of risk you are taking, mainly on my cases which I want is passes, they will try to get rid of the ball  quicker with higher risk passes, mainly long distance through balls 

These are mainly micro adjustments, I don't touch other instructions, just try to make small adjustments depending on the opponent, and the speed at which I watch the game will bore most of you...It takes me around 30-45 minutes per match...I play at default speed and on the second position from top on the commentaries...when I see the opponents is create more chances I switch to full match and try to correct for the opponent and the game moment to try and become on top...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am currently playing Perak FA in Malaysian Super League and this is how I set up the team. Won the league in the first season unbeaten.

IWBs on the right usually play like a normal WB so I bought a midfielder who can play as a right back an it works well. He plays more centrally than a normal right back. FB on the left has PI like an IWB but still play wide although he would not go further forward too much. So I have a lopsided back three. I used a 4231(2DMs) in my old tactic and I got the back three I wanted but can't get it work in this 433 setup.

The wingers all have hug the touchline trait and play killer balls. At first I used a striker and attacking midfielder who aren't natural as false nine so the movement aren't great. Tried CMa at first but they aren't wide enough. They usually attack the box but the wingers weren't able to make the pass. So I used Mezzalas(a) now with one of them having a close down more PI. So when out of possession, I do get the 442 shape. I found that extremely urgent pressing doesn't work well as the opposition usually able to bypass our pressing with one long ball from the CB. So I tone down one notch. There's also Opposition Instruction mainly to limit the wide players from opposite team to play crosses.

Pass into space also helped to make more through balls. We have a lot of possession but not so much shots and pass into space helped change that. The team usually have 60% possession with 85% passing completion.

image.png.543631bb8c615d1a3a1b7e592beca754.png

I thought about this for sometime, but do you think Pep's Barca tactic works better than Man City's tactic? @Cult of Football Manager

image.png.b8013d14c893b326f1cf580d7100d920.png

Second tactic I'm using as I have a winger with better finishing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@soft tofu

Yeah it sounds like you came across some of the same frustrations  I had. In terms of your question if you went undefeated with that version I wouldn't look to change it too much? Maybe test it in a different league also?

In terms of Pep's Barca I obviously didn't touch on that in the thread but you'd have to get your RB to be the occupier of the wide zones if you think about the pitch in this type of break down

 

1798305246_Peppitchnumbers.thumb.jpg.90c4b45c19154b33a178d3acf46908e5.jpg

 

 

 quite often So in my head I would think CWB-A or CWB- S for when your RW moves inside. Not sure whether Mezzala would be the best role for RCM if you're going to go down the Barca route and you do go with something like CWB-S etc for the RB. 

I did think about this for a recreation but didn't want to recreate the same manager again straight away so I looked at Ancelotti and Simeone instead.

 

The only thing I would say is if you're happy with what you're seeing in the match engine and you're being successful then enjoy it !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...