Jump to content

Budget adjustment illogical


Recommended Posts

The ability to freely adjust between transfer budget and payroll strikes me as illogical. I'm sure I'm not the only one to point this out, but if I spend $1 on a transfer, it is a one-time cost. But $1 spent on payroll recurs every year. One is a stock, the other a flow. 

I benefit from it, but I do always have to keep one eye on the finances of the club. My payroll has gone up four fold since I took over the club, as I sell players for a profit and keep moving the budget adjustment slider. I worry that this is only sustainable if I go deep into the CL every year. One of my main motivations for continuing the save is to see how long this financial balancing act can be sustained.

Anyway, I don't really have a broader point, just thought it worthy of discussion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will notice it’s not a one to one relationship between the two on a weekly wage budget. I believe it may be the annual cost of the wage added to the wage budget but have never checked the maths. 

equally I would believe that this has an impact on future transfer budgets for future seasons too (less funds for transfers as you are spending more on wages) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GuitarMan said:

You will notice it’s not a one to one relationship between the two on a weekly wage budget. I believe it may be the annual cost of the wage added to the wage budget but have never checked the maths. 

equally I would believe that this has an impact on future transfer budgets for future seasons too (less funds for transfers as you are spending more on wages) 

Money is one-to-one fungible between transfers and annual payroll. The only response I've seen by the board so far depends on the bank balance -- when it turns negative they reduce the amount of sales retained in transfers. (I had built a big balance from sales, and the board decided to build a new stadium, turning the financial balance negative. Then they cut the transfer retention to 30%. So essentially they are paying for the stadium using past and future future player sales.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...