Jump to content

Board Satisfaction Seems Off

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure this is the most appropriate place for this (so, Mods, please feel free to move), but I've never had an "E" rating before, especially when you consider:

  • With the exception of going out a round early in the Pokal, I'm "on course," or better on all of the metrics.
  • I was predicted to finish ninth, but am currently second, nearly halfway through the season.
  • Other vision metrics (graduate players from the youth team and sign four-year contracts) are premature to judge on (I've been in the job seven months)

Is this a bug?  Is there something else I can do about this?  I had a bit of a bad run of form in the Bundesliga, but have turned it around the last few games.

Screen Shot 2020-07-13 at 4.51.59 PM.png

Screen Shot 2020-07-13 at 4.52.46 PM.png

Screen Shot 2020-07-13 at 4.52.17 PM.png

Edited by Toronto Blizzard
Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, FrazT said:

To be honest, this module is flawed and needs some adjustment. The idea is good but the boards interpretation of your performance is sometimes way off.

I find their attitude to transfers to be the weirdest part.

There seems to be no interest from my board in whether the player I've signed is actually good and playing well- instead it is all about what add ons were in the deal or if the wages were reasonable. It also can't differentiate between deals done by me, the board or my DoF. The board signed two players for me when they arrived yet those deals still appeared in my performance review.

Competition performance seems to work reasonably well though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...