Jump to content

[FM19] One night in Serravalle


_Ben_
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 477
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

On 15/07/2019 at 12:06, LUFCspeni said:

Very interesting route with your feeder clubs. How do you know of these clubs? Wonder if having the league loaded will have an effect on their efficacy?

The first one, Pols D'Esport was a random selection that was chosen by the board. I knew about SMS Lodz due to an old game but my plan is to search around and see how many I can find. Having the league load may help, yes. I have the French Ligue 1 loaded but may add on the Polish league at some point...

Link to post
Share on other sites

October/November 2032

90af0caa6cfd7691ab8985e943c29839.png

A tough couple of months for us but some vital wins, including an away trouncing of Bologna. The victory over 9-man Chievo was important as it's brought us a little bit of breathing space but I know, with a tough run coming, morale needs to be be maintained for us to stay up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, john1 said:

Not a bad month in general :thup: Also Juventus 12th?!

Yeah - picking up points is always a good thing. A point a game will almost certainly be enough to keep us up and that is my aim.

Juve have fallen away somewhat, finishing fifth last year but they aren't really the same team as they used to be.

c3615175c172991dc9f5b4eb754754c5.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonderkid watch

4b91eba4055aff56e79a7784ac87ec33.png

Playing in Serie A has clearly sped up the development of my players and this has been the major factor in Zavoli turning into a solid striker and now a wonderkid. He's got pace and makes great decisions, anticipates the situation really well whilst having great technique on the ball. He does lack in work rate and team work and this, to be honest, is not a trait that I really want within my team. I initially trained him as a WTM in the AML position to work on those mental attributes but he's now back on a CF schedule.

He's got four goals from 19 starts this season but, if I was to play more to his strengths, I think he's good enough to get more...

Link to post
Share on other sites

December 2032/January 2033

38f462526efa5c38f2a04c10073af7de.png

A solid set of fixtures, when all things are considered. December didn't look great in the league but the points we've picked up have been invaluable and it has stopped our goal difference taking a beating. Two really big wins over teams that (at one point) were around us has seen us move three points clear of the drop zone. Foggia look a really poor side and I expect them to go down - providing that we have enough to stay above a similarly poor Chievo side and one more (I presumed Udinese but they have pulled away somewhat) should see us keep our Serie A status.

Link to post
Share on other sites

New Affiliate

bde2172eb363075cd8f354149d893e99.png

990286f065515d748be692e2725f510a.png

This was an accident!

I was planning on going for RGUOR from Minsk but, when scrolling through the bottom of the list of potential feeders, I stumbled across a club with a logo from a megapack - to me, a sign that the club has had enough significance for someone to include it within the pack.  NK Zagreb play in the third tier of Croatian football and, whilst they are not a youth side, have a 0.5 star reputation but excellent training facilities and great youth facilities.

This looks a good deal for us, on paper, and buys me a bit more time to find myself more academy styled clubs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Preparing for a youth intake

My intake is imminent and, with the direction that I'm taking this save, my plans with the players once they are generated are very important. I want to be able to provide players from my academy to my own team but also make them good enough to be able to play elsewhere - widening the national pool and promoting success for the national team. Below is the squad depth sorted by potential ability. Removing the stars has made this a bit harder to show but I think the 'great,' 'good' and 'average' is a decent show of what my staff think of them:

e9db8793b474705929a49263cbc90c20.png

So - firstly, this includes every player in every position they are at least competent in. We have nowhere near the amount of real depth suggested above and these reports include the potential of a player in his best role transferred to any of the roles he is competent in - for example, a promising left back who is competent as a striker has the same rating for both. As of now - I can't think of a better way to show this, though.

First of all - my problem areas:

c14dc82a98043247609ef41d07b7c202.png

fc394f24ad75fc274c07002b759515be.png

8466c936f32d92ee790d04520358a57c.png

As an aim - I train full backs to play on both sides, hence why there are so many repeated names. Sadly, there are very few of them who are any good. I currently play with an IWB at left back, because my best left back happened to be the second best right back who was right footed, Muratori. Only Guidi and Santi are left footed (as is Manca but he's not cut out as a left back) from that list - a real area of weakness. Right back isn't much better- Valentini is the only one of the list in the actual first team and below him - the likes of Pascucci are weak. I have retrained two footed midfielder Gasperoni to right back but he does lack some of the physicality I want from this side as it's slightly more marauding in nature. Right wing also sees a problem with Casadei being the 'best' and most natural option, although he's only really Serie B quality. Molinari has been able to play their but isn't really the winger I want and Zafferani has played there a fair bit as an inside forward but that makes the team lack width, plus, he's needed on the other wing. 

There we go - a left back, a right back and a right winger plus a load of depth that can be utilised for the national team or continue professionally in Serie B and below.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Feeder club issues?

I have my youth intake, the game is saved and I'm going to go back and look at some things. I have been trying to create a network of feeder academies that are able to assist with the generation of talented youngsters for my first team or for sale. I played my previous FM19 save, in Beira-Mar, for 22 years and not once did I have a feeder club provide me a player for my intake - so I wanted to see just what would happen if I reloaded this game repeatedly and looked at the nationalities, alone. I have not even as much as clicked on another player, just screenshotted and reloaded, so no idea which world class players I may or may not have missed out on.

Firstly - just to recap, I have three 'youth' feeders - CREPS de Lorraine, from France, SMS Lodz, from Poland and NK Zagreb from Croatia. I also then get pretty much a 50/50 split of Sammarinese eligible players (first or second nationality) and then purely Italians. Here are the results:

fb36ef33e2c9b86bc3a3bdacae1acd22.png

What do I take from this very small sample? It looks like I can only get foreign newgens from one of my three clubs. It does seem strange that they are always sending me three but at this point it seems very pointless to have more than just the other foreign feeder.

Therefore, I then moved to removing the French feeder on the premise that maybe SMS Lodz, the second club I chose, would 'take the place' of CREPS. Here is another small sample size of those results:

08226b31d84489fa30673c59c62df964.png

This is strange. I know that it's only five intakes but, without CREPS de Lorraine as a feeder, neither of the others produce anything. I chose all three feeders in the 'same way' - starting as a scouting range and then upgrading to including youth players so I am unsure as to why I can't seem to get players from either of those clubs. The only thought I have had is that I don't have either the Polish or the Croatian leagues loaded whereas I do have the French Ligue 1 loaded. I may revisit this next year with one or two of those loaded. In the mean time - my actual intake...

Link to post
Share on other sites

2032/33 Youth Intake

d55c6c5cdd4e86bf9526162404e04d0f.png

As seemingly the norm - three Frenchman and one of them is a particular standout. I am feeling that, sometimes, the squad hierarchy can be a little misleading - take Giovanni Ripa as an example, a highly influential player but very very poor on paper. 

Elsewhere - I think that, somehow, I have managed to get two of the three positions I wanted filling in my previous post:

6a02aaca5c4e79cfd929bb4635c9412e.png

Joffrey is the left back I wanted, and more. He's left footed firstly, which is already enough to get him pretty close to the first team but has no holes within his game and is excellent technically and fast to boot. He's F.Ambitious and Level Headed so plenty of room to develop his personality to be in line with the squad (which sadly seems to be F.Pro and a good level of Determination). Neither Lachaud or Vadivelou have really cemented themselves in the team this season so maybe a triple loan for my best three Frenchman may be a go-er for next season.

b70ea3da132a84b0e455ee4375e9452d.png

Cervellini is not as good as Vigneron but is three years younger. He's another full back with a good base and is big enough to fit in at centre half, too. Light-Hearted and Unflappable/Media Friendly is a good combination and he should hopefully develop well. My coaches seem to think he'll potentially be good enough for Serie A so it's up to me to see if I can develop him to that point.

219d0c6468c547f2975ce69dc145fb58.png

Another striker who doesn't work hard! Marra is another very Italian/Inzaghi-esque poacher. He can finish, is good off the ball and could potentially be decisive and good at anticipating things in the future. He'll train as a CF in the first instance to begin to work towards any potential that he does have.

All in all, a very strong intake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

February/March 2033

e051a1b4924c3febea7c3ebcfc878f1a.png

Six points above the drop zone with a far superior goal difference to everyone around us means that we are in a very strong position to retain our Serie A status next year. Beating the teams around us has always been a goal and to see that we only dropped points against Cagliari from those teams below us is a great sign. A terrible performance against Sampdoria, who have now fallen apart themselves, was the only negative and we dominated Fiorentina, outshooting them 10-4 and even  the news headline made it clear that there was, in no way, three goals between the sides.

We play Chievo and Udinese in the run in but, aside from that, have a quite tough few games. Hopefully we have enough points on the board already...

Also - an insight into just how much Serie A brings in from sponsorships and TV money. We have sold out of 5,500 seater stadium every game, bringing in pennies, but have still managed to make a huge profit:

15ada1afff3c786b0eb5aa0c74ba2659.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, _Ben_ said:

Feeder club issues?

I have my youth intake, the game is saved and I'm going to go back and look at some things. I have been trying to create a network of feeder academies that are able to assist with the generation of talented youngsters for my first team or for sale. I played my previous FM19 save, in Beira-Mar, for 22 years and not once did I have a feeder club provide me a player for my intake - so I wanted to see just what would happen if I reloaded this game repeatedly and looked at the nationalities, alone. I have not even as much as clicked on another player, just screenshotted and reloaded, so no idea which world class players I may or may not have missed out on.

Firstly - just to recap, I have three 'youth' feeders - CREPS de Lorraine, from France, SMS Lodz, from Poland and NK Zagreb from Croatia. I also then get pretty much a 50/50 split of Sammarinese eligible players (first or second nationality) and then purely Italians. Here are the results:

fb36ef33e2c9b86bc3a3bdacae1acd22.png

What do I take from this very small sample? It looks like I can only get foreign newgens from one of my three clubs. It does seem strange that they are always sending me three but at this point it seems very pointless to have more than just the other foreign feeder.

Therefore, I then moved to removing the French feeder on the premise that maybe SMS Lodz, the second club I chose, would 'take the place' of CREPS. Here is another small sample size of those results:

08226b31d84489fa30673c59c62df964.png

This is strange. I know that it's only five intakes but, without CREPS de Lorraine as a feeder, neither of the others produce anything. I chose all three feeders in the 'same way' - starting as a scouting range and then upgrading to including youth players so I am unsure as to why I can't seem to get players from either of those clubs. The only thought I have had is that I don't have either the Polish or the Croatian leagues loaded whereas I do have the French Ligue 1 loaded. I may revisit this next year with one or two of those loaded. In the mean time - my actual intake...

I think your questions are really interesting, (and something I am interested in too), but I think your sample size is WAY too small. 

If you could do it with a min of 100 intakes then it "might" give you something to look at. 

I also agree with you that the French league being active but neither the Polish or Croatian structures being active will also skew things. 

I have lost track of your save a little, (apologies), but I would love you do some more experimenting with this. I like the way you ask questions but don't just assume results. 

You have also reminded me to look at some more feeder clubs myself. :thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GottaBeatThemAll said:

big fan of this thread and i love how you don't use the faulty star system can i ask what skin do you use? 

Thanks!

I wouldn't say it is 'faulty' as such but I think that it could be done better, so I just use other methods of assessing. It's the standard dark skin with a few tweaked panels to hide them which I have gathered from various places.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jimbokav1971 said:

I think your questions are really interesting, (and something I am interested in too), but I think your sample size is WAY too small. 

If you could do it with a min of 100 intakes then it "might" give you something to look at. 

I also agree with you that the French league being active but neither the Polish or Croatian structures being active will also skew things. 

I have lost track of your save a little, (apologies), but I would love you do some more experimenting with this. I like the way you ask questions but don't just assume results. 

You have also reminded me to look at some more feeder clubs myself. :thup:

I agree - I had half an hour yesterday to act on a question I had - why have I had three French newgens in both of the years, when I presumed that I would maybe be sent 'some' and don't recall ever seeing that many from one club before.

I have added the Polish and Croatian leagues (just top tier as I have that with France) to become active this summer so at the youth intake next year I plan to conduct a far more thorough investigation of a minimum of 50 intakes shown through an excel document or at least a more efficient way than screenshots! I might find that one intake is enough to solve this - I get a few Polish and Croatian kids and I know that having the leagues loaded is key to unearth players from these lower league clubs.

Thanks for the kind words, too. I keep reading your thread on my phone and then never reply when I'm at my PC because I've already read through it. Must remember to bring up a few things I wanted to find out at some point soon...

Link to post
Share on other sites

2032/33 Review

Our first season as a Serie A side comes to an end, our coffers significantly fuller than a year ago, the majority of our players tied down on long term deals and a youth academy that is continuing to produce solid players. Here is how we fared on the pitch:

b1bec174841a2d27ae001de3522988bc.png

I'm obviously delighted with this. My aim for 38 points would have just about kept us up and, to be fair, that is a target once again for next year. It has been almost symbolic of this game that we struggle in front of goal with my sometimes too bigger focus on possession retention as opposed to goal threat and that continued this year - Lorenzo Zavoli reaching ten league goals despite a thirteen hour drought.

Here is the individual statistics:

9cdd613f94eb6d394bac744a9bfe50be.png

Every minute for Stefanelli, who, at 26, has made 517 appearances for club and country. He is on-track to hit 1000 career games for me in what would be a remarkable career from Serie C to Serie A and beyond. I have struggled to rotate or give game time to younger players this year, simply due to the worries around quality against this better opposition. Those that have played though have played reasonably well - D.Zafferani showing that he is a class act with 7 goals and 4 assists and Andrea Canti chipping in with 8 and 6 too. My only worry now is that we have stagnated a little player wise - new players haven't had the chance to bed in to the first team and a significant number of this squad are out of their depth in this league.

Off the field, we had these two things, too:

d1c4a2aa322cce4d2eeaa61b78700b99.png

4e50d47dbfa693bef5b80aa944978082.png

I am very happy with the direction we are going in.

d683beb8edb4a5be8f06ef4fb68301fa.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

2032/33 Youth Development

9b994398602a4f33ad12af9c5d1acd6e.png

Above is my spreadsheet that documents the progress of the youth over this year on the customised schedule I have prepared in order for them to become the best, and most rounded, footballers i can make them. Firstly, I think that this shows the necessity for a good personality straight off the bat - the Low. Det and Balanced profiles have made significantly less progress than ones with higher professionalism and determination.

I am looking at the numbers for the mean end of season but I think I am looking at these without enough context. Firstly, I pointed out that we are not technical enough but there are four defenders on that list and I'm not comparing them with anything. To help that - here is the data from the last two years of me following this:

 

Intake 1 (2030/31) and included Ciavatta, L.Zafferani, Valentini, Zavoli, Muccioli

End mean technical - 6.69 (0.68 increase)

End mean mental - 10.74 (1.52 increase)

End mean physical - 11.94 (0.97 increase)

 

Intake 2 (2031/32) and included Muccioli

End mean technical - 6.03 (0.65 increase)

End mean mental - 9.05 (0.60 increase)

End mean physical - 11.11 (0.81 increase)

 

The first intake really stands out both in terms of numbers on the board but also the amount of those who are now first team players. Interestingly, from that list for intake 1, only Valentini is a defender so that would, more than likely, skew the bias towards technical proficiency. It worries me that, year on year, we have got weaker mentally following a year of youth training but, again, I must remember that my first intake had players with first team minutes whilst in the U18 team - none of my current crop have done this. However, I am happy that we have made more technical increases than in any other year and, given the types of player we have had, this has not come at the expense of physical development, which is also the highest. Considering I am only running two physical schedules a week - this is magnificent news.

This is clearly not a way of me finding the solution but I feel that it is giving me a much better understanding of what I need to do with youth training.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, _Ben_ said:

Thanks!

I wouldn't say it is 'faulty' as such but I think that it could be done better, so I just use other methods of assessing. It's the standard dark skin with a few tweaked panels to hide them which I have gathered from various places.

interesting i've tried for hours to replicate this but i'm not savvy with a computer at all is there any chance you could share your a file of your skin. Love your approach to the game and would love a chance to try and do it my own way

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tactical tweaking

It has come to my attention that we do actually have some really decent players here and that, if they are firing, we are capable of doing a job against a number of teams in this division. I don't, for any minute, think we can challenge for Europe yet, but I also don't believe that the top half is too far away. I have favoured my 4-1-4-1/4-1-2-3 formation for the majority of the save but I want to become far more fluid in roles and positions. Below, I've started to create a kind of 'cheat sheet' about where I can play my players in different circumstances.

9c7f409f1414e8dfd35a42192dfed00e.png

Anyone with a yellow role/position is ineffectual there but this is currently just a thought process. More on this as it progresses on to the pitch...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loan Watch

I have put a lot of work into the U18 training and spend a long time working with the first team on and off the pitch but I am wary that there is a gap, between the ages of about 18 and 20. We haven't really been able to integrate any new faces into the first team in the past two years because of this and those that are on the periphery are not really good enough to actually be there. Essentially, I am missing a big chunk of their development.

I have made the following loan deals this summer:

90c81d0e382ea46e46cb0e061ffc77ca.png

Of those, I believe that a fair few have the potential to be first team material. To follow their progress a bit more closely, I have created this:

29d3666b475fa9e32742adca64d04c00.png

I have excluded goalkeepers from this - even though both Arnould and Benassi are good - this is so that I can track their attribute development and, at present, I only have that set up for outfield players. What am I looking for in a loan? Well, one that allows the player to play at a level beneficial to him. As you can see, all of these players are good enough for Serie B or Serie C but I would, ideally, like them all to be good enough for Serie A by the time they enter my first team. This might take a year, two or even three but that is ok. I don't really want players playing below the level that they are capable of but there are some exceptions for that, as you can see.

  • Della Valle, in my coaches opinion (not really mine) is good enough for Serie B but I've sent him to Catania as they have great training facilities (mine are only average) and are predicted to be the strongest team in their division, with a manager who plays in a very similar way to mine.
  • Cesarani is going to a club who also play in a very similar way, have better youth facilities and are predicted to be around the top of the league. It is also worth noting that Paco Alcacer has a great reputation (somewhat of a great managerial coup for Vicenza) as a full Spanish international and is good at working with youngsters.
  • Lachaud is moving to Suditrol as Quagliarella is a M.Pro and good working with youngsters. They have good training facilities and their use of a 3-4-2-1 will mean they need more DC's and, as such, Lachaud is likely to get more game time. A three man defence also usually uses at least one ball player and this will help improve the area of the game that I want to.
  • Vigneron moves to Lupa Roma, who, despite having worse training facilities than us, are predicted around the top of the league, have a manager who is good at working with young players and play a formation similar to our own. Also - Joffrey will more than likely play every minute of the season as he's there as a key player.
  • Gasperoni moves to a club that are likely to perform well and, even though their manager doesn't share the same style of play as me - he'll get regular football and a similar level of training facilities.
  • Fabre moves to a club who is managed by someone not great at using youngsters and a club that doesn't have great facilities but they do play a 4-1-4-1 and, with Fabre being a key player, will allow him time in the role/position I want him to use - the DM.
  • Vadivelou moves to a Serie B club and a great one at that. Foggia went down last year and are a big club, predicted third with great youth facilities. Whilst Duda isn't the best with youngsters, they play a passing style in a shape similar to my own. Vadivelou is going to be a key member of that team and will be getting a good standard of football

Again, like the youth development - I am going to track mean attributes. This won't be, again, finding the formula that is correct, but will be about informing my decisions for future years.

b2d085db83797a1d7cbc4d2390743d77.png

Similarly to the youth development - I would expect Fabre and Gasperoni to develop the best based on their personalities but now I am adding in other factors such as quality of game time and the aforementioned factors will made me chose their loan destinations.

All being well I will have four or five new players for the first team in a few years with Gasperoni being the first player to be part of the 'whole process' from intake day to first team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

August/September 2033

bce3c58d6be345907e90d319ea2e6a2f.png

Stop the league now?! Not a single lead goal conceded, a win over juggernauts Napoli and a hard earned draw at the San Siro. We have been, as usual, a little lacking in front of goal, and, as I've repeatedly said, this is fine and fits in with my methodology for this save - 'if we have the ball, they can't score and if they can't score, the worse we can do is a 0-0.' 

Clearly this run won't last but we do have a tie against Serie B side SPAL in the 4th Qualifying Round of the Coppa Italia. Whilst we are not a settled top flight team, as such, I do want to start identifying areas for a success and a good cup run could give me that.

Lastly - the loanees have made a solid, if unspectacular start to their time away:

16d250591a071fc4cf09d2f38f0e83ef.png

It is worth noting though that all of these players have already had more first team minutes that I'd be able to offer them for me - so that can only be beneficial to their development.

Link to post
Share on other sites

October/November 2033

3623ee25773d1b01188d50ec15b54d9d.png

See why I wanted the league to end? A tough month in October, although coming back from 2-0 against Juve must surely be seen as a victory. Just the solitary win over struggling parent club Palermo but we deserved more against Fiorentina (another game against them where they have scored their only 2 shots), Cagliari and maybe Chievo. At the top of the table, somehow Atalanta lead by six points but I expect Inter to catch them before the season is out.

Also, a quick national team update, who, remember, aren't being managed by me...

69765165f86c60cfc3382c8c43bcc1df.png

Sadly, San Marino haven't qualified for Euro 2034. It is really strange that I say 'sadly' here because normally that sentence would be complete rubbish - but they have made massive strides over the last fifteen years - as seen by their rankings since December 2023.

abb3f594fb1903a10192076c385c0b61.png

Now 81st in the world and with a squad made entirely of my own players or players that came through my academy - I do question how far the team can go but I am pleased to see that Udinese have a 16 year old goalkeeper who is in their youth squad - he was generated at their club through the Folgore academy.

Next up for San Marino is, astonishingly, a Nations League B (the 2nd tier) league group. Below is their winning C (third tier) campaign:

c7768b4869232d8f318b8630d6ffc549.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, scarp said:

Wow, fantastic Nations League run for San Marino. Who are their best players that are not yours?

I know - considering it is an AI manager as well, who usually underperforms.

Here are the 'best' players:

a4a708171124d1f48993b1123979eb44.png

There are 4 players who are no longer with me, here they are:

397ca98ea653017481dff1a373bf2f65.png

71dee92dfffb11283157b0e4651bf694.png

 

badcacfb0451b8ade84e7018bca0ea7f.png

ceac4de936657b768a2c9e7d65277d9b.png

 

b9de5b4efec9e41828b0a56fca0d6922.png

3526afda13a424bf2da12500fd880f05.png

 

0fd304527534e645020e4dfcf160065f.png

f926f1eb0d1cf8797733f547d2c5d92b.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

December 2033/January 2034

a12a41592fcd5094b8d5ca1aceb2f7ae.png

As I wanted, we prioritised the cup, knowing it'd be hard to get anything from Inter and then Lazio in the following league matches. Sadly, our run was ended by Inter in the Quarter Finals - but we have picked up £1m in prize money and pleased the board. In the league - we have struggled - we might have only conceded 15 goals but at the other end, we have only scored 14 and that is partly down to my striker Lorenzo Zavoli and his 25-game barren streak, which he finally broke against Virtus Entella in the last game of the month. We picked up 12 points from the first six games and now have 14 from the following 15 - whilst that points per game record over the season historically would keep us up (and looks sure to this season) - we are not yet at all comfortable in this division and I need to look at ways to manage these slumps much better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loan Development

Whilst I will run it through the spreadsheet and further analyse exactly how he's done - this is nice news to see that tells me that his loan is working:

c517ddb6af80d2d223f25aeffd85ea76.png

Here is his profile:

2c53b975bfd9aabec9525a0873bd91d8.png

He has been employed at both MC as an RPM or CM and as an AP in the AMC role which is great as those are the roles I would plan to use him in.  Below is how he has performed for Foggia:

b0d7a778e6d10e14495dab757d000955.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

Youth Intake

One for you, @Jimbokav1971. Last year - I mentioned that I was unsure as to why I was only getting players from one affiliate when it seemed that I had all three set up to do the same. Here are the agreements, below. It is also worth noting that I chose all three of these in the same way - a scouting 'assistance' affiliate and then I added the ability to gather youth players from their academies. The only difference is that Pole Espoirs was put on a shortlist created by my staff, and not chosen by me.

734714cdbdc75f2ec0e061e98f6f56cc.png

bd6e43f315883799dd5b8ed29492430c.png

48d57f85fb4f9895240a35b0cd4e6da8.png

Now I asked this question at a difficult point last year - I had just added the two affiliates and they were in their first year with me - maybe we didn't get any come through because the youth players didn't have time to 'move to the club' or something similar? We have now entered a second season with them as affiliates. The next issue I thought may be because I didn't have the leagues loaded - I used the summer to load the Polish and Croatian top flights so that they now mirror the set up I am running for France - maybe I needed the league loaded to be able to benefit from lower league teams' players? I also used just five intakes to test this - maybe my data was too small to really see what would happen to these intakes.

So tonight, I have sat and reloaded my game a total of 50 times. I haven't looked at the attributes of a single player so may have had sons or brothers (no son of mine though as I would have spotted a Brazilian national) and also world class players, Instead - I recorded on an Excel document where the players had come from. Here is the results below:

4ae6c1a1d5a68bdea74709f295ce7e94.png

50 intakes - each with three players from Pole Espoirs - a variety of nationalities: mainly Cotonou or African but the odd Italian/Portuguese/German/Swiss dual nationality. Not a single player from SMS Lodz. Not a single player from NK Zagreb. Not a single player 'stolen' from another academy. The rest made up of Sammarinese, Sammarinese/Italian or Italian players from my own academy.

I've got so far into this that I decided to pay the cost to download FMRTE and see if I could, in this experiment, alter the way these clubs work. This is what I have been drawn to:

87185e6d97332e5baf472759e2cb54cb.png

d32211d2dbab091f2342d1857277e471.png

fb4a974a455c49e033a6299af86599ab.png

There is one distinct difference here - the line where it lists the 'type' of feeder club. Zagreb and Lodz are both listed as 'Feeder Team' whereas Pole Espoirs are not. Here is what the youth intake looks like when the French club are changed to mirror that - not a single player from their academy. Sadly, there appears no way to remove that field and leave it blank, because, if I could, then I think that would be the answer. Maybe the limit of 'extra' players is three and because no other clubs have the ability to do that, Pole Espoirs give me the three.

 

I think I have the answer from this:

A feeder club, chosen by myself, will not produce youngsters from their academy, whereas one shortlisted by the board 'might*'

* This needs more testing as I have one feeder club chosen by the board and that one does produce youngsters.

I believe that, somewhere deep in the coding, choosing an affiliate lists them as a 'feeder team' whereas them being chosen for me might not. My plan is to see if the board will allow me a foreign feeder over the course of the year and then, this time next year, I will try this out again.

-----

That was the biggest waste of £5 ever now that FMRTE has been uninstalled - particularly as I didn't realise it was free to view the information rather than edit it. I also won't be logging this as a bug or anything as I'm running some custom leagues and these normally invalidate that kind of thing. I was just curious as to why it happened the way it did...

Edited by _Ben_
Link to post
Share on other sites

2033 Youth Intake

0d53bcf3c429380b72cd4178c95df650.png

A relatively weak one here. Highly influential player Colombi may have some potential because his ability is certainly not what I would consider good enough when you follow the general protocol of 'higher PA = higher hierarchical standing.'

The one player I do like is Valentini:

a169b0036f0c240515c9de35f6497a7c.png

My coaches believe he's good enough to play in Serie A one day and he's got a solid base of attributes - if, like always, a little weak technically. I like that he's either footed too and I may attempt to utilise him on both wings as he develops.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, _Ben_ said:

Youth Intake

One for you, @Jimbokav1971. Last year - I mentioned that I was unsure as to why I was only getting players from one affiliate when it seemed that I had all three set up to do the same. Here are the agreements, below. It is also worth noting that I chose all three of these in the same way - a scouting 'assistance' affiliate and then I added the ability to gather youth players from their academies. The only difference is that Pole Espoirs was put on a shortlist created by my staff, and not chosen by me.

734714cdbdc75f2ec0e061e98f6f56cc.png

bd6e43f315883799dd5b8ed29492430c.png

48d57f85fb4f9895240a35b0cd4e6da8.png

Now I asked this question at a difficult point last year - I had just added the two affiliates and they were in their first year with me - maybe we didn't get any come through because the youth players didn't have time to 'move to the club' or something similar? We have now entered a second season with them as affiliates. The next issue I thought may be because I didn't have the leagues loaded - I used the summer to load the Polish and Croatian top flights so that they now mirror the set up I am running for France - maybe I needed the league loaded to be able to benefit from lower league teams' players? I also used just five intakes to test this - maybe my data was too small to really see what would happen to these intakes.

So tonight, I have sat and reloaded my game a total of 50 times. I haven't looked at the attributes of a single player so may have had sons or brothers (no son of mine though as I would have spotted a Brazilian national) and also world class players, Instead - I recorded on an Excel document where the players had come from. Here is the results below:

4ae6c1a1d5a68bdea74709f295ce7e94.png

50 intakes - each with three players from Pole Espoirs - a variety of nationalities: mainly Cotonou or African but the odd Italian/Portuguese/German/Swiss dual nationality. Not a single player from SMS Lodz. Not a single player from NK Zagreb. Not a single player 'stolen' from another academy. The rest made up of Sammarinese, Sammarinese/Italian or Italian players from my own academy.

I've got so far into this that I decided to pay the cost to download FMRTE and see if I could, in this experiment, alter the way these clubs work. This is what I have been drawn to:

87185e6d97332e5baf472759e2cb54cb.png

d32211d2dbab091f2342d1857277e471.png

fb4a974a455c49e033a6299af86599ab.png

There is one distinct difference here - the line where it lists the 'type' of feeder club. Zagreb and Lodz are both listed as 'Feeder Team' whereas Pole Espoirs are not. Here is what the youth intake looks like when the French club are changed to mirror that - not a single player from their academy. Sadly, there appears no way to remove that field and leave it blank, because, if I could, then I think that would be the answer. Maybe the limit of 'extra' players is three and because no other clubs have the ability to do that, Pole Espoirs give me the three.

 

I think I have the answer from this:

A feeder club, chosen by myself, will not produce youngsters from their academy, whereas one shortlisted by the board 'might*'

* This needs more testing as I have one feeder club chosen by the board and that one does produce youngsters.

I believe that, somewhere deep in the coding, choosing an affiliate lists them as a 'feeder team' whereas them being chosen for me might not. My plan is to see if the board will allow me a foreign feeder over the course of the year and then, this time next year, I will try this out again.

-----

That was the biggest waste of £5 ever now that FMRTE has been uninstalled - particularly as I didn't realise it was free to view the information rather than edit it. I also won't be logging this as a bug or anything as I'm running some custom leagues and these normally invalidate that kind of thing. I was just curious as to why it happened the way it did...

Interesting. 

Would you mind posting your facilities page and also that of teh 3 feeder clubs please? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Jimbokav1971 said:

Interesting. 

Would you mind posting your facilities page and also that of teh 3 feeder clubs please? 

Of course - here are my facilities:

9943b51a5c0226ccb95b3375628b7fd1.png

 

Here are NK Zagreb and SMS Lodz:

b2ec8a442cccda2552143d57297a6568.png

46d399c5e40d3a82b13515f9711bd57f.png

Pole Espoirs are a weird one - there are several clubs in the database that have no stadium attached to them. It shows up in game like this:

b659c37bcf68c02d3575f0e97b53f3c2.png

Because of that, their facilities screen looks like this:

7661156b586b0b6d1370257d53f6dfdd.png

However - when I was able to choose from the list of teams that the board gave me - it does show their youth and training facilities and, as I recall, both were very good (but not quite state of the art).

---

With this confusion around the youth academy of Pole Espoirs, I really want to run it again next year from a team that my board has provided for me. I believe that then I will have some more conclusive evidence around why this might be happening. What are your thoughts @Jimbokav1971?

Link to post
Share on other sites

February/March 2034

17a3f2ab56960e5692030fe6c7dd1b79.png

The season is quickly petering out into something very poor. Our goal difference has taken a huge hit over this period and we're really struggling. Probably safe from relegation but unlikely to finish any higher than 12th, currently occupied by a Milan side who have fallen off the rails. We've just come through a pretty tough run of fixtures and in our remaining eleven games do face Chievo, Cagliari, Torino and bottom side Palermo - so there should be scope for some more points.

Realistically - I'm thinking ahead to next season already: who is capable of coming back to feature in the first team, who has stagnated and what am I missing in the development phase between 16 and 20.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is nuts man, I'd go crazy without the attributes and the stars. :D Deep commitment to finding the details of youth development, too. Brilliant to see a few Sanmarinese wonderkids around!

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, noikeee said:

This thread is nuts man, I'd go crazy without the attributes and the stars. :D Deep commitment to finding the details of youth development, too. Brilliant to see a few Sanmarinese wonderkids around!

Cheers @noikeee - always enjoyed reading your old threads - particularly those journeymen and that hasn't changed in your Madeira save! 

Yeah, it's a bit deep but, as I've said a few times, taking the numbers away has simplified it for me. I look to see if they are poor/average/good/excellent in their area rather than trying to pin that on a number. I also revert to the octagon much, much more now.

Youth development has always been the thing that has drawn me to FM and this new training mechanism is making it even deeper. I worked an internship at a (now Championship but then Premier League club) academy as a data analyst so this kind of stuff goes hand in hand really.

As for the wonderkids - we are doing an amazing job with such a tiny population and relatively poor facilities. One day though, we will have the best academy in world football!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Youth Intakes

Ok - to test my hypothesis for next intake day, I'm going to allow my board to pick me an affiliate and go from there:

Step 1:

bc06bd058c04efa0ba291c17f498214a.png

Step 2:

ae69956b69255889632b97918b24036a.png

e6b30d53a05bcc19b841be26690940d3.png

They are the best of a very bad bunch to be fair!

Step 4:

5734f87fb60a86d371fa9844a2ca66b9.png

---

This is exactly the method I used when getting Pole Espoirs as a feeder club, letting the board give me a shortlist and going from there.

---

I will rinse and repeat that over the next year if possible and see what happens on intake day. To conclude my findings - I would hope to see a mix of French and Cypriot youth players added to my youth squad. Anything other than that and I must say that I am perplexed...

Link to post
Share on other sites

2033/34 End of Season

e6832814f0ecac6ed191ae5b810cf4c7.png

We have, if anything, gone backwards this season and I know why. We haven't added anything new to the team, the best players are already established and, as such, aren't improving and teams are still seeing us as weak so are naturally attacking - something that we can only hold out for so long. We face quite a long spell in these doldrums, I feel, but I'm hoping that just the odd tactical tweak can allow us that extra 5% where needed and allow us to improve over the next few years.

However - we did win this - so whatever!

3a434416d06d72166795b2e544aa24e1.png

Onwards and hopefully upwards...

c24cb417bfbe6417e15ae7073f1fe13b.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loan Development

My first batch of loanees are just finishing up their spells and I want to see what I can learn from youth development taking place outside of my club. Firstly - here is the overview of their performances:

5b379e0c21a5c1d7d567dac5b4357357.png

Considerable amounts of minutes played as each of the players was considered an important first team player, normally a pre-requisite for me. Three of the players have averaged over 7 and Bologna reached double figures for AlbinoLeffe. Firstly - here is a run down of how each of the teams got on:

  • Catania finished 2nd.
  • Feralpi Salo finished 18th.
  • Parma finished 1st.
  • Vicenza finished 3rd.
  • Lupa Roma finished 14th.
  • Crotone finished 17th.
  • Gubbio finished 10th.
  • Suditrol finished 9th.
  • AlbinoLeffe finished 13th.
  • Foggia finished 1st.

At the start of the season, I plugged their attributes into the excel document and I've done that again at the end of the season. Here are the changes:

37cdab91b97e73c2f76dab0685be769e.png

I find this really interesting. These players are playing first team football, at their level, but have made significantly less progress across the board than the players in my youth team. I know that youth development isn't going to be a more/more relationship and will naturally slow as they age but I would have expected improvements. Seeing Gasperoni and Della Valle actually decrease on paper (and that is important - they have gained 30+ matches of first team football and I'm not tracking hidden attributes etc) does worry me - what has gone wrong? It can't be league position as Catania (Della Valle) did well. Personality (although this is a very very broad area and Balanced can mean a huge amount) can't solely be to play as Lachaud has developed. Here is that breakdown:

Bastian Lachaud -Balanced/Outspoken

Balanced
Balanced is pretty much anything that doesn't fall under another label. Also covers all negative personalities for real life players.

Outspoken
Controversy 15-20

Fabio Della Valle - Balanced/Media Friendly

Balanced
Balanced is pretty much anything that doesn't fall under another label. Also covers all negative personalities for real life players.

Media Friendly
This is similar to balanced and covers options which aren't covered by anything else.

Not a lot between them, that is visible anyway.

Injury wise, Della Valle has just torn his hamstring but that won't have impacted too many of his attributes.

 

Also - should I be expecting more from Vadivelou? He's been playing at a higher level than the rest (albeit the level he should be playing at) and he played well with his team winning the league. He had a couple of minor injuries which limited his playing time a bit. He might be classed as now good enough for Serie A but I feel that he looked a long way off when he played for me last season - it will be interesting to see what the loan has done for him beyond his (visible) attributes.

---

So, a lot to think about here. I will be using the loan system again and some of these players will be returning, but I am yet to a) see anything that is hugely exciting but b) have enough data to say that for definite about their progress.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Youth Development

Another year done and this youth cohort has been my youngest yet to be monitored. Here is how they have developed:

56d5af1bf666d596824bc69c2f58e04e.png

Intake 1 (2030/31) and included Ciavatta, L.Zafferani, Valentini, Zavoli, Muccioli

  • End mean technical - 6.69 (0.68 increase)
  • End mean mental - 10.74 (1.52 increase)
  • End mean physical - 11.94 (0.97 increase)

Intake 2 (2031/32) and included Muccioli

  • End mean technical - 6.03 (0.65 increase)
  • End mean mental - 9.05 (0.60 increase)
  • End mean physical - 11.11 (0.81 increase)

Intake 3 (2032/33) and included nobody that has made the first team yet.

  • End mean technical - 6.46 (0.88 increase)
  • End mean mental - 8.79 (0.76 increase)
  • End mean physical - 11.72 (1.33 increase)

Next year - the 18 year olds move on and are replaced by a few younger players. I'll plug their info in and see how I want to approach their development next season.

Edited by _Ben_
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really sure re: how much, but the match will be in full detail so they will be playing in their roles, etc and you'd get better insight into how they are performing, particularly with being able to see highlights. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Lucas said:

Not really sure re: how much, but the match will be in full detail so they will be playing in their roles, etc and you'd get better insight into how they are performing, particularly with being able to see highlights. 

This is what I can see when I look at the form on a player on loan:

56937fcb6bb2acbd14cc77b39d4f7f8b.png

I'll add them in on full detail (just Serie B and C) and see what next year brings. Thanks for the insight...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...