Jump to content

The Rangers FC Thread - Season 07/08


Frankie

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by jimbo22:

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Peacemaker7:

Cousin isn't good enough for the Premiership, he's barely good enough for the SPL.

If Cousin sorted his attitude he'd do well in the EPL IMO, he certainly has the ability. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Not sure he does have the ability but then part of that IS his attitude. His goals return rate in the SPL has been exceptionally poor, and you can argue a whole lot of reasons for that but even though he scored last week for instance and it was a decent strike, he simply didn't do enough to suggest he is a quality striker.

Good strikers do miss chances, hell McCoist missed millions, but then good strikers also slot them away and the misses tend to become insignificant. Cousin reminds me a bit like Negri, with the obvious exception that Negri actually did know how to put the ball in the back of the net. He might prove me wrong. Seriously can't see it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
At least over the last few games he has appeared to add the end product to his dribbling

Burke definately has the talent, he always has had. What he lacked before was not just the end product but possibly the attitude. I think he thought he just had to go onto the park and his talent would see him through but even good players have to work hard at it. If anyone can the best from someone it's Walter Smith so fingers crossed that Burke can start becoming the player he was touted to be from the youth ranks all those what seems like hundreds of years ago now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

quite surprised that we didn't score more than 2 there, young Dundee Utd keeper in class form and some missed chances including a penalty from Boyd icon_frown.gif

still a comfortable win puts back where we belong and hopefully a chance to open up daylight against St Mirren on Tuesday night icon14.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 going on 5. Showing good form and some consistency now. Solid at the back and creating plenty going forward, and with players bursting to get in that first XI.

Top of the league with the chance of extending that on Tuesday.... promising times!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest sav112

Team:

McGregor,

Hutton,

Cuellar,

Weir,

Whittaker,

Burke,

Ferguson,

Hemdani,

Thomson,

Naismith,

Cousin.

I actually really like the balance of that team, the only weakness is Cousins in my view I know Boyd does not have what some consider the full game but still I’d rather see him on than Cousins. If Whittaker slots well into left back we’ve won a watch…… also good to see Burke back on some good form long my he improve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

in the last 3-4 games, Cousin's game has really improved I feel icon14.gif

dunno if it's cause the transfer window is open, but his finish in the Hibs game last week was brilliant and his general work has been impressive with reference to linking up with Naismith/Burke

Not sure if Boyd would have made too many friends with what happened with the pen today, Nacho won it and I guess Boyd must have decided he was taking it and then missed it icon14.gif not exactly a problem at 2-0, but if the score was 0-0 he'd have been in trouble for that one

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by sav112:

Team:

McGregor,

Hutton,

Cuellar,

Weir,

Whittaker,

Burke,

Ferguson,

Hemdani,

Thomson,

Naismith,

Cousin.

I actually really like the balance of that team, the only weakness is Cousins in my view I know Boyd does not have what some consider the full game but still I’d rather see him on than Cousins. If Whittaker slots well into left back we’ve won a watch…… also good to see Burke back on some good form long my he improve.

Boyd is dreadful, anyone wanting him on the park before Cousin needs their head examined. Boyd offers nothing at all when he doesnt score.

We are in desperate need of a fit JCD or an new strike partner for Naismith.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest sav112
Originally posted by TM:

in the last 3-4 games, Cousin's game has really improved I feel icon14.gif

In fairness I’m not that up to speed on him, Boyd we all know. I’m having to go on what’s on the radio and some highlights if I catch them. Anyone sitting in Ibrox would have a far better Idea…

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by TM:

dunno if it's cause the transfer window is open, but his finish in the Hibs game last week was brilliant and his general work has been impressive with reference to linking up with Naismith/Burke

He's definitely benefited from having those two at either side of him. Put another good shift in today, had one cracking run down the left flank and should have scored 1-on-1 in the second half. Would personally have him in before Boyd atm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by sav112:

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by TM:

in the last 3-4 games, Cousin's game has really improved I feel icon14.gif

In fairness I’m not that up to speed on him, Boyd we all know. I’m having to go on what’s on the radio and some highlights if I catch them. Anyone sitting in Ibrox would have a far better Idea… </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

I watched the game today and Cousin played well. When we play football, Cousin plays IMO. When we play the long ball with one up front Cousin struggles as most would.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest sav112
Originally posted by jimbo22:

Boyd is dreadful, anyone wanting him on the park before Cousin needs their head examined. Boyd offers nothing at all when he doesnt score.

We are in desperate need of a fit JCD or an new strike partner for Naismith.

Naismith would do most of the work, I’d be happy for Boyd to just to score…..Yes we really need a forward of class and if we can find another Mol’s standard. icon14.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah a great performance today culminating with a return to the top of the league....

Like Hibs and Aberdeen before them, we really played Utd off the park today and should have won by 7 or 8 goals instead of the paltry 2. However, we can be happy with the result and our form as the games get tougher and the pressure rises into the business end of the season.

Whole team played well and with our long-time injured players also on their way back and the chance to add a couple of first choice players to the side, the future is certainly bright.

Add in a touch of stadium regeneration and board-room changes and the wine tastes sweet this evening.

Ignore the ignoramuses fellow bears and let's enjoy the Rangers returning.

WATP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest sav112

ignoramuses ? Love to know who that directed at……

stadium regeneration? You adding a roof then.

Although regeneration of the surrounding area around the stadium would be nice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FOLLOWING media enquiries today, the club would like to inform its fans that it is currently assessing a number of proposals for the development and regeneration around Ibrox.

At present we are analysing three strategies which would enhance the development of the existing outline planning proposals for the Hinshelwood area to the south of the stadium.

One of the strategies includes the total rebuilding of Ibrox Stadium while retaining the brick facade, the tradition and the integrity of the Bill Struth Main Stand. The Club stresses that at this time it is assessing these proposals and no decisions will be reached imminently.

Further details will be announced at the appropriate time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by sav112:

ignoramuses ? Love to know who that directed at……

stadium regeneration? You adding a roof then.

Although regeneration of the surrounding area around the stadium would be nice.

Who do you think it's aimed at? At the green and grey trolls of course... icon_wink.gif

As for the Ibrox regeneration it appears the stadium and the surrounding landbank improvement consulations may have been leaked - hence the rather general news release on the official site.

icon_smile.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Jorg:

Was there not talk of a casino near Ibrox owned by the club or have I made that up?

think that was going to be part of that Glasgow casino thing, but Glasgow never got the nod

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Jorg:

Was there not talk of a casino near Ibrox owned by the club or have I made that up?

Yes, we applied to have the regional supercasino to be built on the current site of the Albion car park.

We weren't successful then but the chairman did say the club would explore other ways of regeneration for the landbank.

I wouldn't read too much into this release at this stage.

icon_smile.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by tony_cfc:

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by GingerFurball:

Real Madrid did brilliantly between 2002 and 2007 signing only attacking players, didn't they?

good point because huddlestone, malbranque and jenas are in the same class as figo zidane and makalele icon_rolleyes.gif </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Eh? Tottenham have nothing to do with the point I'm making you cretin.

Strikers go for higher transfer fees because in football the most valuable currency is goals. However, if you're going to create the best team, you need to do more than just load it with creative players. You need good players in all 11 positions.

Real Madrid had 3 of the best players in the world between 2002 and 2006 in Figo, Zidane and Ronaldo. In that period, they won nothing, which would suggest that having good defensive players is just as important.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by GingerFurball:

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tony_cfc:

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by GingerFurball:

Real Madrid did brilliantly between 2002 and 2007 signing only attacking players, didn't they?

good point because huddlestone, malbranque and jenas are in the same class as figo zidane and makalele icon_rolleyes.gif </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Eh? Tottenham have nothing to do with the point I'm making you cretin.

Strikers go for higher transfer fees because in football the most valuable currency is goals. However, if you're going to create the best team, you need to do more than just load it with creative players. You need good players in all 11 positions.

Real Madrid had 3 of the best players in the world between 2002 and 2006 in Figo, Zidane and Ronaldo. In that period, they won nothing, which would suggest that having good defensive players is just as important. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

your completely missing the point im making, please tell me when i said anything about only signing attacking players is a good thing?? icon_confused.gif

the point im making is i believe teams make signing players in other positions a priority before full backs.

full backs go for smaller transfer than every other position not just strikers, goalkeepers and centre backs dont score a great amount of goals do they?

How many times do you see players in other positions filling in at fullback, you see plenty of midfielders and CB covering that position then compare that with the amount of times it happens the other way round

cant you see the point in making?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but when your starting right back is Pascal Chimbonda, then signing a good right back suddenly becomes a huge priority.

Incidentally, Celtic's first signing of the month was a full back. Are you honestly telling me that Strachan would have been better off saving the £2m and playing Paul Hartley or Gary Caldwell there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

im not talking from spurs point of view, im talking from rangers. does having a good right back really help in the spl or would you rather have that money spent on a few players round the team thats my main point?

ok but how long has it taken for him to do so overall, he bought players in the summer in different positions even though a FB should have been our priority.

i dont think he would even have signed him if we never had the injury problems with wilson and doumbe, i think thats forced him tbh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest sav112
Originally posted by Gary Toner:

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> FOLLOWING media enquiries today, the club would like to inform its fans that it is currently assessing a number of proposals for

At present we are analysing three strategies which would enhance the development of the existing outline planning proposals for the Hinshelwood area to the south of the stadium.

One of the strategies includes the total rebuilding of Ibrox Stadium

</div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Total Rebuilding What’s that all about, Ibrox has a five star rating does it not, plus it’s the best looking stadium in Scotland in my View. icon_wink.gif

If we were thinking about a total rebuild don’t bother looking further than Cardiff Millenium Stadium. has the capacity for 74,500 supporters and features a retractable roof but cost 126 Million, best in the UK I'd say easy.

http://www.stadiumguide.com/millenium.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you replace him with whittaker then a few new players in other positions then i think you would potentially be better, thats a reason i want him to stay.

i also want him to stay becuase i think the presence of him makes OF games and the title race more intense, i think some of that gets lost with players who never had much interest in the OF before they signed. i've got a feeling rangers fans might lose a bit of that now lennons left

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by tony_cfc:

if you replace him with whittaker then a few new players in other positions then i think you would potentially be better, thats a reason i want him to stay.

i also want him to stay becuase i think the presence of him makes OF games and the title race more intense, i think some of that gets lost with players who never had much interest in the OF before they signed. i've got a feeling rangers fans might lose a bit of that now lennons left

I'd rather have Hutton.

Having £8m to spend is no guarantee of getting in quality replacements. Sure, you could pick up Cuellar, Thomson and Naismith for £2m each, or you could sign Sebo, Buffell, Gravesen and Jarosik for £8m in total.

If we want our league back, we need to keep our best players.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly don't understand some peoples problem with Cousin, okay he's not as hard working as Novo but as he is our only striker that actually has a first touch and can hold up a ball i'll forgive him for that.

We have played some of our best football this season past two games with Cousin as lone frontman due to his ability, something you will never get with boyd.

What you get with Boyd is a fat lazy guy with no ability, he scored goals for us the past 2 seasons some of you will reply, but my argument is, where did the team as a whole end up?

Cousin might have 5-6 league goals but look at how the team is performing, and for me it is all about the team.

I'd have boyd shipped off ASAP, his attitude during the le guen era spoke volumes and now it has come back to bite him on the bum, the boy is more interested in bevying that trying to improve as a footballer. Get him out the door.

And that imposter JCD can follow him, guy has played about 3 games for us, he looked good yeah but its all good having a good player but if your paying him big bucks and he isn't on the park, then, why bother? GTF JCD.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • SI Staff
Originally posted by Frankie:

Ah a great performance today culminating with a return to the top of the league....

Like Hibs and Aberdeen before them, we really played Utd off the park today and should have won by 7 or 8 goals instead of the paltry 2. However, we can be happy with the result and our form as the games get tougher and the pressure rises into the business end of the season.

Whole team played well and with our long-time injured players also on their way back and the chance to add a couple of first choice players to the side, the future is certainly bright.

Add in a touch of stadium regeneration and board-room changes and the wine tastes sweet this evening.

Ignore the ignoramuses fellow bears and let's enjoy the Rangers returning.

WATP

The way we're playing at the moment we're due to give someone an absolute doing. Long may it continune.

Stadium plans are interesting as well. Wonder how they would do it without having to have a massively reduced capacity for a season or however long it would take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Ter:

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Frankie:

Ah a great performance today culminating with a return to the top of the league....

Like Hibs and Aberdeen before them, we really played Utd off the park today and should have won by 7 or 8 goals instead of the paltry 2. However, we can be happy with the result and our form as the games get tougher and the pressure rises into the business end of the season.

Whole team played well and with our long-time injured players also on their way back and the chance to add a couple of first choice players to the side, the future is certainly bright.

Add in a touch of stadium regeneration and board-room changes and the wine tastes sweet this evening.

Ignore the ignoramuses fellow bears and let's enjoy the Rangers returning.

WATP

The way we're playing at the moment we're due to give someone an absolute doing. Long may it continune.

Stadium plans are interesting as well. Wonder how they would do it without having to have a massively reduced capacity for a season or however long it would take. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

I imagine we could ground share with Queens Park icon_smile.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ground redevelopment is fine if (and it does seem to be the case happily) they ensure that the history, tradition and character of the stadium are maintained. I can't think of anything worse than ending up in one of those soulless plastic bowls that some teams now call home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • SI Staff

I see Walter has said he won't be letting any of the senior members of the first team squad go out on loan but he would be willing to listen to any offers for the younger players.

Be good to have the likes of Furman and Lennon going out on loan to the first division or another SPL side to get some first team action. icon14.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Haz:

Ground redevelopment is fine if (and it does seem to be the case happily) they ensure that the history, tradition and character of the stadium are maintained. I can't think of anything worse than ending up in one of those soulless plastic bowls that some teams now call home.

I seriously dont think we need to do anything to Ibrox. A tidy up is needed, but the stadium is fine the way it is.

A Museum is a must though, a club like ours should have one around the stadium somewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • SI Staff
I seriously dont think we need to do anything to Ibrox. A tidy up is needed, but the stadium is fine the way it is.

I think that plan is a complete overhaul and ensuring it can be used for other things easily like concerts etc. Be interesting to see how it develops, although if that plan goes ahead it wouldn't be the same playing at Hampden for two years icon_frown.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Utter Utter Loser (Ned):

Has Naismith been playing up front with Cousin recently, or on the left wing leaving Cousin on his own up front, or something in between? Naismith's an injury doubt for the St Mirren game you know. Who's most likely out of Novo, Adam, Boyd or someone else to come in and replace him?

damn icon_frown.gif Naisy has been playing really well with him and Burke off Cousin in a sort of 4-3-3, Not really sure who'd come in, probably another midfielder for 4-5-1, but I hope not

maybe Boyd getting his chance with Cousin upfront, or maybe JCD will be able to appear

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Ter:

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">I seriously dont think we need to do anything to Ibrox. A tidy up is needed, but the stadium is fine the way it is.

I think that plan is a complete overhaul and ensuring it can be used for other things easily like concerts etc. Be interesting to see how it develops, although if that plan goes ahead it wouldn't be the same playing at Hampden for two years icon_frown.gif </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yeah thats a big IF. We've heard the Murray ******** so many times before it's hard to take it seriously these days. Certainly bringing in other avenues of revenue can never be a bad thing in the long term, but we need to wait and see what the exact plans are really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • SI Staff

Never heard of him icon_wink.gif

I see that Steven Smith is back in full training and could feature in the team as early as the end of this month if all goes well. Hopefully he'll not be too rusty and should really go into the reserves first to be honest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...