DeadlyBren Posted April 27, 2013 Share Posted April 27, 2013 What are peoples opinions on this? As I am preparing to start my first and only FM13 save with Arsenal I am unsure whether to have transfers allowed in the first window for different reasons: It keeps things realistic, as we have just signed players in that Summer 2012 window in real life anyway, it also offers a different kind of game as teams will buy corresponding to how they are performing and not the usual targets at the start... However, it is July when the game starts, so on the other hand should I have this time to make the changes I want/can do... I know its down to preference but I'm unsure what to do! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nottingham Forest Posted April 27, 2013 Share Posted April 27, 2013 No one can really decide for you tbh. What I will say is, usually depending on how you're doing. You might get some money in January and if players haven't moved, most of the time they will after a season. I'd say it's nicer to start without budgets as you have to work with what you've got. Which is good and bad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raymondafc Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Personally, I start without the first window budgets as it makes the game more realistic and also means you have that bit of extra time to get your new players to gel. With Arsenal it also gives you something to think about with Sagna, Wilshere etc injured at the start and you can't just buy a replacement straight away. But as Nottingham Forest says, only you can decide if it will make your game better Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevie_G_32201 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 yeah, start without. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.