ReggaeBwoy Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 This is ridiculous, the worst signing has been given to one of my youth players who I bought at the age of 16, who has now turned 17. I played him in the reserve team so he can be playing in a competive league for my reserve team, he sometime sfeatured in the U19s as well. Because he scored a few goals for the reserves and u19, I played him in the first team for his progress and he did well, not scoring too many but he always came from the bench. Now I see the summary and see he is given the award for worst signing of the season, how is this possible? He is a youth player still with many years to play, WTH heck is this about, remember he is only 17 years old and I did not buy him to start inthe first team, he is obv one for the future. Is this a bug or what? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom2k8 Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 What was his average rating in the league? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReggaeBwoy Posted May 1, 2011 Author Share Posted May 1, 2011 Well he only made one appearence in the league and his rating was 6.60 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew! Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 i once bought a 17 year old in JANUARY and he played ~7 times, and got worst signing of the season. I know how you feel! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stant Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 This is just silly SI. The game should base the results with a minimum 10 games played. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Themer Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Its hardly the end of the world guys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReggaeBwoy Posted May 1, 2011 Author Share Posted May 1, 2011 Well obv it is not the end of the world, it is good that this did not affect his confidence/morale but this doest make sense, that's ridiculous, he is a hot prospect and I brought him into the first team to play 1 game because as a 17 year old he scored many goals in the reserve league despite being younger than everyone else Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiggusD Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Worst signings of the season should never be players costing £1.5m anyways... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPlanet Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 I hate it in the confidence section when the fans moan that a youth signing hasn't played enough games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_numbers Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 How much did you pay? Remember, Bebe was signed with the all too obvious intention of being one for the future, but we all spent the first few months of the season declaring him the biggest waste of money ever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReggaeBwoy Posted May 1, 2011 Author Share Posted May 1, 2011 But Bebe was bought at the age of 20, and that is an age to expect some kind of performances in football if you are being bought by Man United and with Zohore I only spent 1.5 million on him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robioto Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 This is just silly SI. The game should base the results with a minimum 10 games played. Is it really that big of a deal? No it isn't. You make it sound like it's the end of the world, this feature is mainly cosmetic and is hardly going to affect your enjoyment of the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPlanet Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 What squad status did you offer him as part of the contract? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReggaeBwoy Posted May 1, 2011 Author Share Posted May 1, 2011 Hot prospect is the sqaud status I gave him, and when he turned 17 he would be earning 4,000 a week Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPlanet Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 I'm assuming that in the German first league that 1.5m is quite a decent fee then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stant Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Is it really that big of a deal? No it isn't.You make it sound like it's the end of the world, this feature is mainly cosmetic and is hardly going to affect your enjoyment of the game. Depends, if the player has lost confidence by the fans by his "poor performances" then I guess it would be detrimental to his moral. But if it is a cosmetic thing to add flavor then I guess you're right no harm done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReggaeBwoy Posted May 1, 2011 Author Share Posted May 1, 2011 No harm done, course not, just totally unrealistic, he should be the uprising star of the season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBKalle Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 It's cosmetic, yes... it's not gonna ruin the game, sure. BUT it's stupid nonetheless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.