scribs Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 so i was 3-1 up with 10 minutes to go and then this happens... so its bad enough they score to make it 3-3 when 2 minutes of injury time are added... then i concede in the 90+9 <<!!!! thats some ridiculous bs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nottingham Forest Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 That is serious bad luck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scholes=legend Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 That really takes the p*ss, i would be fuming!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioGio85 Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 From the 83rd minute there were 3 goals and 1 injury. I hope no one left early to miss the traffic!...although by the looks of it your defence did! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribs Posted September 15, 2010 Author Share Posted September 15, 2010 the worst thing is i hit the post 3 times aswell and thought i had the game wrapped up... then everything started to go wrong but these things happen ive just never seen a goal scored this late so i thought id share my failure of my team with u guys lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioGio85 Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 +9 minutes is pretty unusual to be honest! Although I recall in real life a Gills vs Man City game which was around that amount of extra time. Man City completed a spectacular come back that day too courtesy of Paul Dickov! Must be a Man City thing! Hows the season going in general? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevoRobbo Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 +9 minutes is pretty unusual to be honest! Although I recall in real life a Gills vs Man City game which was around that amount of extra time. Man City completed a spectacular come back that day too courtesy of Paul Dickov!Must be a Man City thing! Hows the season going in general? Wasnt that the playoff final. 1999 i think :confused: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioGio85 Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 Wasnt that the playoff final. 1999 i think :confused: It was indeed. Gills are my 2nd team and I watched the ground empty of Man City fans only for Gills to crumble lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribs Posted September 15, 2010 Author Share Posted September 15, 2010 +9 minutes is pretty unusual to be honest! Although I recall in real life a Gills vs Man City game which was around that amount of extra time. Man City completed a spectacular come back that day too courtesy of Paul Dickov!Must be a Man City thing! Hows the season going in general? seasons going good but with birmingham it isnt really a challenge because they let u spend so much money and with dzeko! hes incredble in my first season i got champions league in my second season i done the treble , we are now in the third season and im currently 60 million in debt lol and im just waiting for the window to open so i can sell half my squad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevoRobbo Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 It was indeed. Gills are my 2nd team and I watched the ground empty of Man City fans only for Gills to crumble lol Yeh my City mates still bang on about it. They was there. I remember 1999 for a different reason though being a red lol. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioGio85 Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 seasons going good but with birmingham it isnt really a challenge because they let u spend so much money and with dzeko! hes incredblein my first season i got champions league in my second season i done the treble , we are now in the third season and im currently 60 million in debt lol and im just waiting for the window to open so i can sell half my squad How do they have so much money?! Sounds like you have done extremely well. It normally takes me a while to win anything. My quickest success has beenin FM10 actually (in previous FM's it has taken me a while to win anything big) where I won the Prem with my beloved Spurs in the 2nd year, struggled in the 3rd season though. I would say Spurs are ahead of Birmingham at the start of the game, so your achievement is even more impressive....how the hell did you get Robinho, Dzeko and Sissocko in your 2nd year?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioGio85 Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 Yeh my City mates still bang on about it. They was there. I remember 1999 for a different reason though being a red lol. lol I wonder what you woukld rather be doing, winning the treble or scrambling around in Division 2 (as it was then) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
either and or Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 Another classic FM bug. It's Man Utd that get ADDED added time, not Man City! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nottingham Forest Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 How do they have so much money?! Sounds like you have done extremely well. It normally takes me a while to win anything. My quickest success has beenin FM10 actually (in previous FM's it has taken me a while to win anything big) where I won the Prem with my beloved Spurs in the 2nd year, struggled in the 3rd season though.I would say Spurs are ahead of Birmingham at the start of the game, so your achievement is even more impressive....how the hell did you get Robinho, Dzeko and Sissocko in your 2nd year?! Dzeko sometimes becomes unsettled and transfer listed so I can see why Robinho becomes transfer listed and the 3rd he must of had the money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevoRobbo Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 Another classic FM bug. It's Man Utd that get ADDED added time, not Man City! No they get the same ammount of time as everybody else. Its just that they always score in it so it looks worse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Furia Roja Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 the 9 minutes was obviously due to the injury in the 94th. Still would hurt though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioGio85 Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 Everton may have taken that crown now though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribs Posted September 15, 2010 Author Share Posted September 15, 2010 How do they have so much money?! Sounds like you have done extremely well. It normally takes me a while to win anything. My quickest success has beenin FM10 actually (in previous FM's it has taken me a while to win anything big) where I won the Prem with my beloved Spurs in the 2nd year, struggled in the 3rd season though.I would say Spurs are ahead of Birmingham at the start of the game, so your achievement is even more impressive....how the hell did you get Robinho, Dzeko and Sissocko in your 2nd year?! they get 30-40 mil to start with and if u spend it over 48 months it becomes 120 mil... i didnt think dzeko would come but i bid 22 mil and gave him 94k a week and he joined sissoko cost me 14 mil and ive developed him into a world class midfielder i signed robinho in the 3rd season and a whole host of other stars and after winning everything in the second year i decided i want 2 world class centrebacks in my squad so i spent 150 mil on vidic and chiellini but now im in some serious debt... im having to sell ribery who i just signed this year along with a few other players and its too bad ur a spurs fan! go goonersssssss Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevoRobbo Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 the 9 minutes was obviously due to the injury in the 94th. Still would hurt though Apparantly only 2 minutes was added though so they should never have got to the 94th minute for the injury to take place. Unlucky really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribs Posted September 15, 2010 Author Share Posted September 15, 2010 Apparantly only 2 minutes was added though so they should never have got to the 94th minute for the injury to take place. Unlucky really. exactly i was shocked they didnt just end the match after the injury instead they made me substitute him and then forced me to watch my team concede in the 99th min Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioGio85 Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 Is it common practice for refs to add 30 secs per sub and per goal? 3 gols (excluding the winner), 2 injuries and 6 subs (?)...I make that 5 and a half minutes. So 3 and a half minutes has come from somewhere....I guess we have to asusme players did some mental celebrations and the injuries were serious! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribs Posted September 15, 2010 Author Share Posted September 15, 2010 Uploaded with ImageShack.us dzekos goalscoring record so far he takes all my penaltys is who i aim my setpieces too and also the guy who headers my corners Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
either and or Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 I bet he's also the guy who drifts outside the penalty box for corners, right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Furia Roja Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 Apparantly only 2 minutes was added though so they should never have got to the 94th minute for the injury to take place. Unlucky really. You mean a minimum of two minutes. Im sure you all know but just cause the ref says a minimum of 2 minutes added doesnt mean it will stop bang on 2 minutes.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioGio85 Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 He's a goal scoring machine...is he exploiting the corner weakness? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph Davis Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 You must have a very good attacking/shooting coach because he's certainly improved since joining you Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevoRobbo Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 I bet he's also the guy who drifts outside the penalty box for corners, right? He said he HEADS the corners. He must be really good at heading to keep scoring them from outside the box Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silent Alarm Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 There's also another corner exploit where you aim the corners to the far post and get a player who's a monster in the air to stand on the far post. They get a goal every game or so from that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontask Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 dzeko wasnt that brilliant for me in holland. i sense a corner exploit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevoRobbo Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 There's also another corner exploit where you aim the corners to the far post and get a player who's a monster in the air to stand on the far post. They get a goal every game or so from that. This could be the case with Dzeko but if a perfectly good normal corner routine exploits the ME in some way, what are you supposed to do? How many teams IRL cross the ball to their best header at the back post? The actuall corner setup isnt to blame, its how frequent you can score from them. Where do you draw the line with what is an acceptable routine and what isnt? Thats a discussion for another thread though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powermonger Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 I had the same thing happened to me last night with my Luton game. It is the 4th round of the FA Cup and I'm playing away to Stoke, by some miraculous good luck I am leading 2-1 and in the dying seconds of the game (must be like 30 seconds left on the clock in injury time) I'm thinking my boys have done it. Low and behold, Stoke get a corner and score, whistle blows and we head to extra time. I then lose 4-2, was very ****ed off Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
W I L M Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 How is it possible to get that many decent players to Birmingham in 2 seasons... Im sure that a clubs reputation doesn't go up that quick in such a short space of time. Correct me if I am wrong Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribs Posted September 16, 2010 Author Share Posted September 16, 2010 This could be the case with Dzeko but if a perfectly good normal corner routine exploits the ME in some way, what are you supposed to do? How many teams IRL cross the ball to their best header at the back post? The actuall corner setup isnt to blame, its how frequent you can score from them. Where do you draw the line with what is an acceptable routine and what isnt? Thats a discussion for another thread though. my corner routine is back post but i dont see that as an exploit, if my best striker can header over a defender then he deserves to score but furthermore proof that it isnt a corner exploit can be seen in these screenies dzeko has scored 20 goals but see how many were from corners Uploaded with ImageShack.us Uploaded with ImageShack.us 13 games into the season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiitastic Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 OP - what happens if a goal is scored in extra time of a cup game ? then it would be later than the 99th minute goal for your opponents Almost forget - how on earth could Birmingham win the League title in the 1st season ? Should I ask the question ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Furia Roja Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 i really dont think its needed to be honest, pretty obvious.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UAF_85 Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 corner cheat lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Furia Roja Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 corner cheat lol did you even look at the screenshot pal? 5 goals from a corner and its november, i dont think it is hate this damned corner cheat, all anyone goes on about if someone has a striker that scores goals! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioGio85 Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 did you even look at the screenshot pal? 5 goals from a corner and its november, i dont think it ishate this damned corner cheat, all anyone goes on about if someone has a striker that scores goals! Hopefully this wont be in FM11 as like you say, it takes away from the creditable achievements of posters here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trents Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 Most added on time I've had is 7 minutes. Those must have been some serious injuries. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neji Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 Another classic FM bug. It's Man Utd that get ADDED added time, not Man City! Not only that but they've started taking time off if they think the other team is going to score! Is it common practice for refs to add 30 secs per sub and per goal? The 30-second thing is a myth, the ref adds on whatever he thinks is approriate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philly_flyer10 Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 I often get more than double the injury time announced with no injuries. Something needs to be tweaked. Matches never go over 1 min more than announced unless theres a serious injury. In FM, it happens virtually every game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribs Posted September 16, 2010 Author Share Posted September 16, 2010 OP - what happens if a goal is scored in extra time of a cup game ? then it would be later than the 99th minute goal for your opponentsAlmost forget - how on earth could Birmingham win the League title in the 1st season ? Should I ask the question ? i didnt win it in my first season, i got champions league then in my second season i won everything im in my third season now and im in the final of cl fa and about to win the league but im going to sell everyone now and keep dzeko and my youngsters and try win the league without going bankrupt and i was talking about the latest goal scored without extra time lol i finished the season scoring 9 corners from the league and ive still won it and once again no i wasnt using no ****ing corner cheat but funnily enough dzeko cracked his skull and was out for 3 months after i took those screenies Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philly_flyer10 Posted September 18, 2010 Share Posted September 18, 2010 Not only that but they've started taking time off if they think the other team is going to score! The 30-second thing is a myth, the ref adds on whatever he thinks is approriate. Not true, confirmation refs add on 30 seconds direct from Neil Warnock. http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/neil-warnock-we-are-top-of-the-league-and-there-are-only-another-40-matches-to-come-2082464.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cause = Time Posted September 18, 2010 Share Posted September 18, 2010 Not true, confirmation refs add on 30 seconds direct from Neil Warnock.http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/neil-warnock-we-are-top-of-the-league-and-there-are-only-another-40-matches-to-come-2082464.html Neil Warnock saying it doesn't make it true; Neji was right. It's supposed to be however much time the goals/substitutions/etc. in added time take - at the referee's discretion, not some arbitrary "30 seconds per goal". (from Keith Hackett: http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Referees-chief-Fergie-time-Atkinson-s-stopwatch-was-spot-on-in-Manchester-derby-article167431.html and the FIFA Laws of the game (rule 7): http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/generic/81/42/36/lawsofthegame_2010_11_e.pdf ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishu Posted September 18, 2010 Share Posted September 18, 2010 No they get the same ammount of time as everybody else. Its just that they always score in it so it looks worse Makes it much better against certain opponents Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philly_flyer10 Posted September 18, 2010 Share Posted September 18, 2010 Neil Warnock saying it doesn't make it true; Neji was right.It's supposed to be however much time the goals/substitutions/etc. in added time take - at the referee's discretion, not some arbitrary "30 seconds per goal". (from Keith Hackett: http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Referees-chief-Fergie-time-Atkinson-s-stopwatch-was-spot-on-in-Manchester-derby-article167431.html and the FIFA Laws of the game (rule 7): http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/generic/81/42/36/lawsofthegame_2010_11_e.pdf ) Theres lots of things not in the laws of the game that are changed all the time. ie The directive that players in the English league shouldnt kick the ball out of play for an injured player. Youre wrong, its widely accepted by everyone, even in official meetings. Of course the refs boss is going to come back and say its not official, it isnt. But Ive shown proof the managers are told that. You think Moyes got mad for no reason or he was told the same thing at the same types of meetings. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabio MVP Posted September 18, 2010 Share Posted September 18, 2010 Makes it much better against certain opponents Welcome to Manchester!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aderow Posted September 18, 2010 Share Posted September 18, 2010 Hey scribs question......did fergie lose it and become manager of Man City? Cuz thats the only way I see this happening :D Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suzie MUFC Posted September 18, 2010 Share Posted September 18, 2010 Not conceded that late, but my FM09 Liverpool team did score in the 97th minute away to Manchester City to make it 1-0. I was delighted: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cause = Time Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 Theres lots of things not in the laws of the game that are changed all the time. ie The directive that players in the English league shouldnt kick the ball out of play for an injured player. Youre wrong, its widely accepted by everyone, even in official meetings. Of course the refs boss is going to come back and say its not official, it isnt. But Ive shown proof the managers are told that.You think Moyes got mad for no reason or he was told the same thing at the same types of meetings. No. I think Moyes got mad because the time added on beyond the announced stoppage time was plainly far less than the time the ball had been out of play during stoppage time. The referee got it wrong either way, but that doesn't mean there's a 30 second rule. If it comes down to Neil Warnock's word against Keith Hackett's and the FIFA rulebook, I'm not sure why I should believe Warnock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.