pjburrage Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Shot! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thefinalbroadcast Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Belly, ffs. Little tiny Bell. Come one KP not getting out in a blaze of glory. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reg DeKram Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 need a big innings from strauss here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjburrage Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">then play a stupid shot </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Almost did! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gianichedda Rules Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 no, you've done enough damage as it is Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjburrage Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Another boundary! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjburrage Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 10 for Pietersen before Lunch! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haz Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Good to see Tait is at his best Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gianichedda Rules Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 To be fair to Bell, it was just brilliant, tactical bowling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjburrage Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Apart from Vaughan's wicket, again we are playing Warne too defensive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjburrage Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Bremner Bird and Fortune ad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theboydonegood Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 nice argument you've got there pjburrage, so if we ignore the fact that vaughan got out being aggressive against warne you can support your claim that we are too defensive against him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranjith Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by pjburrage: Apart from Vaughan's wicket, again we are playing Warne too defensive. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> He's going for almost four runs per over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DarthVader Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 If Warne carries on like this England are looking at 250 runs max. Someone needs to get after him and be more positive. Amazing mental battle going on out there. Warne is simply a class act. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haz Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 They don't need to get after Warne at all, there's plenty of runs to be had from the other end Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
guzz87 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Great contribution from Bell again eh. Warney at his best though. Sven Out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
benkeat Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 alright guzz, havent seen you for years! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranjith Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Haz: They don't need to get after Warne at all, there's plenty of runs to be had from the other end </div></BLOCKQUOTE> True, that last Tait over was the kind you see in junior club cricket! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DarthVader Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Haz: They don't need to get after Warne at all, there's plenty of runs to be had from the other end </div></BLOCKQUOTE> They will have to get at Warne at some stage in terms of cancelling him out, otherwise he will just get into their heads - he's doing that now. At the moment Aus are on the up because of Warne - if England can control him then they will do well. Bowling figs speak for themselves: O M R W S K Warne 7.0 1 27 3 FOW 82, 102, 104 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haz Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 No, by going for big shots they will play into his hands. All they need to do is look to milk him for 3 singles an over, rotate the strike and give him frustration that he can't get into a groove against either batsman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranjith Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Almost every innings England have had this series has been due to Warne not being involved until the 15-20th or so over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjburrage Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by theboydonegood: nice argument you've got there pjburrage, so if we ignore the fact that vaughan got out being aggressive against warne you can support your claim that we are too defensive against him </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Vaughan was unlucky as his rose a bit more, but the other two wickets were thesame old overcausous (sp) shots from the English batsman. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranjith Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Haz: No, by going for big shots they will play into his hands. All they need to do is look to milk him for 3 singles an over, rotate the strike and give him frustration that he can't get into a groove against either batsman </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Exactly. It's interesting that he is bowling over the wicket to the leftie in this Test (from what little I have managed to see so far). He doesn't want England padding up to him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DarthVader Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Haz. Yes, they'll have to cancel him out somehow - my reference to going after him was not about going for big shots, but about fending him off, somehow, which is effectively what you are saying. You can defend positively against Warne, if you see what I mean. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjburrage Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Mind t'windows Tino Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaddy the Owl Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by pjburrage: Mind t'windows Tino </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Philip Rolfe Posted September 8, 2005 Administrators Share Posted September 8, 2005 Look, The Oval is notorious for being a spinner's paradise in the final test of an ashes series, at least over the last decade. Warne and Tufnell to my memory have both recorded 10 wicket match hauls here, and although it's very early, it's no surprise he's getting joy. Oh, he's also a world class bowler facing batsmen who STILL haven't a clue how to face him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranjith Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by DarthVader: Haz. Yes, they'll have to cancel him out somehow - my reference to going after him was not about going for big shots, but about fending him off, somehow, which is effectively what you are saying. You can defend positively against Warne, if you see what I mean. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> There's nothing wrong with playing every ball on it's merits. England don't have to chase the game. Against a world class bowler, you must be watchful. Getting runs off Lee and Tait should be the gameplan. The test matches have been good to watch this series and the runs have flowed, but none (barring rain delays) have lasted five days so far due to this cavalier attitude. England should be thinking of batting today and pretty much all of tomorrow on this wicket. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranjith Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Juni: Look, The Oval is notorious for being a spinner's paradise in the final test of an ashes series, at least over the last decade. Warne and Tufnell to my memory have both recorded 10 wicket match hauls here, and although it's very early, it's no surprise he's getting joy. Oh, he's also a world class bowler facing batsmen who STILL haven't a clue how to face him. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> true but they would normally take more wickets later in the match. Not the first session of the first morning against the top order. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DarthVader Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by pjburrage: Vaughan was unlucky as his rose a bit more, but the other two wickets were thesame old overcausous (sp) shots from the English batsman. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> That's exactly my point - overcaution. And that's what Warne does so well - just makes batsmen insecure when playing shots. I'd just like to see someone win that mental battle on the pitch against Warne. Break him and a win will come. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItS_A_RaP Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 heres flintoff the tool Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gianichedda Rules Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 150 from Strauss please. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moreclaw Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ItS_A_RaP: heres flintoff the tool </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim2 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Gianichedda Rules: 150 from Strauss please. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Seconded. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DarthVader Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Ranjith: The test matches have been good to watch this series and the runs have flowed, but none (barring rain delays) have lasted five days so far due to this cavalier attitude. England should be thinking of batting today and pretty much all of tomorrow on this wicket. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Isn't that down to the quality of bowling by each side as much as anything else? England are in a tough spot. If they can get through the next 10-15 overs OK then I would expect them to make a reasonable score. However, another wicket after lunch and things could collapse completely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick OGS20 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Huge innings for KP this one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranjith Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by DarthVader: <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Ranjith: The test matches have been good to watch this series and the runs have flowed, but none (barring rain delays) have lasted five days so far due to this cavalier attitude. England should be thinking of batting today and pretty much all of tomorrow on this wicket. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Isn't that down to the quality of bowling by each side as much as anything else? England are in a tough spot. If they can get through the next 10-15 overs OK then I would expect them to make a reasonable score. However, another wicket after lunch and things could collapse completely. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Each time in the last few matches Australia have batted much more watchfully in the second innings and got more runs. Even looked a touch more comfortable. Back in the day teams would go along at around 3 an over and play 5 whole days. Now it's more exciting at over 4 an over, but matches are hardly lasting 5 days. I guess it's better for cricket, but the skill of concentrating and lasting has gone now. Not as many seem to be able to do it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjburrage Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Boycs verbally attack Slats over his [slats] inane knowledge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Senegal Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Nick OGS20: Huge innings for KP this one. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Stop with the jinxing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick OGS20 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Father Senegal: <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Nick OGS20: Huge innings for KP this one. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Stop with the jinxing </div></BLOCKQUOTE> I thought that as soon as I posted it /o\ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshyboy1984 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ItS_A_RaP: heres flintoff the tool </div></BLOCKQUOTE> ffifb Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moreclaw Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Threw it as fast as my grandmother could Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wycombe Posted September 8, 2005 Author Share Posted September 8, 2005 hahahahahahahahahahaha boycs THE KING I TELLS YE Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moreclaw Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 50 for Strauss \o/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SI Staff Olly Kenney Posted September 8, 2005 SI Staff Share Posted September 8, 2005 50 up for Strauss Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boltman Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Ranjith: <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by DarthVader: <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Ranjith: The test matches have been good to watch this series and the runs have flowed, but none (barring rain delays) have lasted five days so far due to this cavalier attitude. England should be thinking of batting today and pretty much all of tomorrow on this wicket. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Isn't that down to the quality of bowling by each side as much as anything else? England are in a tough spot. If they can get through the next 10-15 overs OK then I would expect them to make a reasonable score. However, another wicket after lunch and things could collapse completely. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Each time in the last few matches Australia have batted much more watchfully in the second innings and got more runs. Even looked a touch more comfortable. Back in the day teams would go along at around 3 an over and play 5 whole days. Now it's more exciting at over 4 an over, but matches are hardly lasting 5 days. I guess it's better for cricket, but the skill of concentrating and lasting has gone now. Not as many seem to be able to do it. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Must be a few frustrated ladies out there then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick OGS20 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Heh, what a stat Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moreclaw Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Oh **** Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SI Staff Olly Kenney Posted September 8, 2005 SI Staff Share Posted September 8, 2005 Warne Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjburrage Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 D'oh! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.