The.. Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 :confused: Im in january of second season with arsenal Kun Aguero has a min realese clause of 52 million ive just bidded 53 million upfront and they rejected any ideas why ?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smurf Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 If he's got 52m release clause why are you bidding 53m? Was a in lieu of other payments? As far as I know it has to be in monthly installments or cash up front or a bit of both. €26.5 m for 50 appearances and 26.5m after 50 goals won't cut it for the release fee. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chopper99 Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Firstly, why would you bid £53m when he has a release clause of £52m Have you tried bidding the exact amount of his release clause? It shouldn't matter, sounds like something strange is going on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grasu Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Minimum release clauses can only be activated if you bid that amount, or higher, upfront. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddymunster Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Minimum release clauses can only be activated if you bid that amount, or higher, upfront. Over x amount of months is ok as well. See eugene's post above. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smurf Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Why would you bid higher than the minimum release fee though? *Wishes there was a button saying "match release fee"* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord_Seifer Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Over x amount of months is ok as well.See eugene's post above. No. defiently not. Way law works in Spain, either you pay it upfront, or the other team has the right to reject the offer. Else, what's to stop Real Madrid to make a 200m bid for Messi, paying in "4000 months"? When the whole Figo issue happened, people were joking here about a possible 10.000 peseta note with the head of Figo and the Real Madrid badge Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smurf Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Actually yeh I think Spain won't allow the 48mth transfer thingy? Can't remember. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon07 Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Its deffinatly upfront, or otherwise United could buy say Messi, for £200 million, over 200 million months! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robzilla Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Actually yeh I think Spain won't allow the 48mth transfer thingy? Can't remember. Only all the cash up front can activate the minimum fee release clause. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddymunster Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Only all the cash up front can activate the minimum fee release clause. In that case A.Madrid accept 52m over 48 months out of choice every time for me then. My mistake.:o Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayahr Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 No. defiently not. Way law works in Spain, either you pay it upfront, or the other team has the right to reject the offer. Else, what's to stop Real Madrid to make a 200m bid for Messi, paying in "4000 months"? When the whole Figo issue happened, people were joking here about a possible 10.000 peseta note with the head of Figo and the Real Madrid badge Irl you are right. In FM you are wrong. It works with just offering instalments, which it shouldn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smurf Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Hmmmm.... thought it did, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord_Seifer Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Its deffinatly upfront, or otherwise United could buy say Messi, for £200 million, over 200 million months! Not quite, either. Despite being implemented otherwise in FM (I suppose for complexity's sake) the min fee release clauses are supposed to apply to Spain only. Then again, we've never really had an incident concerning that, so I guess the whole thing is in the air XD Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robzilla Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 In that case A.Madrid accept 52m over 48 months out of choice every time for me then.My mistake.:o Yup. It is a lot of money after all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Shanahan Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 *Wishes there was a button saying "match release fee"* Just click on the amount of the release fee, that will set your bid ot the amount. It will be the last item in the comments section of the make a bid page. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grade Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Let me get this straight. The release clause is 52m and you offer 53m? It is bug, because the owner club have no choice in accepting or not the buy offer, because you cover the release clause and due to rules (not sure which one) the club is obligated in accepting no matter what if it upfront or installments. Now the player can decide to join or not the club that pays the release clause. (if this is the case then it is not a bug) Because that depends salary you are offering the player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.