BC_Tiger Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 ok, so ive had a quick look and cant find a similar poll, if there is maybe this will give a more up to date result. do you use 3d? or stick with 2d? can your computer handle 3d? etc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsallaboutthierry Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 If you want to enjoy the game a bit more try 'only commentary'. All of a sudden the ME makes more sense because you only get the info it tries to tell you rather than interpreting it yourself. Also you don't see how stupidly easy those clear cut chances are and (I think) you get a better feel for how the momentum shifts during a match. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grade Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 I use the 2D classic, because the 3D still feels like so 90's. I can run the 3D with five stars. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FMAnderson Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 I use the 2D classic, because the 3D still feels like so 90's. I can run the 3D with five stars. What specs do you have? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grade Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 I have Quad Core 2.83, with 4 GB of Ram with ATI Radeon HD 4800 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fabioke Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 2d on laptop. 3d on desktop. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edle Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 2D for me, such is a crap integrated GFX card. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hershie Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 DDD. Most of the time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saithis Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 3d just because I like the match day info boxes and they cover too much of the pitch on 2d.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baker.simon Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 Converted fully to 3-d now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veg1ta Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 i like 2d classic, i just cant get into 3d am just to use to the classic way of doing things, also with tacticsa as well i convert to classic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest markyosullivan Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 3D. Though because of my old graphics the framerate goes a bit bad when there's a big stadium. (30,000+) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 I use commentary only for most games, but 3D for big matches. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt_forest Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 2d for me. My laptop can run the 3d view at a decent rate but even on a top spec computer I think it is still quiet poor graphically. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baker.simon Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 This poses another question which is kind of relevant so I won't open another thread Say my laptop can run 3-d perfectly well, if I just stuck to 2-d would the game be quicker at all? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ism-scfc Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 3D every game Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Younger Crayola Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 3D, always. There's just so much more information there that you don't get with the 2D view. All that remains now is for SI to have the option to remove the commentary bar from the bottom during the game, because I never look at it. I need that screen space for more little 3D wobbly guys! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quboid Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 3D, always. There's just so much more information there that you don't get with the 2D view. All that remains now is for SI to have the option to remove the commentary bar from the bottom during the game, because I never look at it. I need that screen space for more little 3D wobbly guys! Blasphemy! Back when I were a lad that's all we had. And we were glad of it! Actually I was very keen for 2D and going to 3D is a continuation of that. I'll always want better animation and detail so I get more information on what exactly my players are doing, but I think it's at an excellent standard now. The ME problems are nothing to do with graphics or how you view the match and it's that which I hope 10.3 and 11 work on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deisler26 Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 2D for me. I can see more of how the team plays. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chopo Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 2D, much prefer it. Too much about the 3D annoys me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grade Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 This poses another question which is kind of relevant so I won't open another thread Say my laptop can run 3-d perfectly well, if I just stuck to 2-d would the game be quicker at all? Well that is a good question. Personally my problem with 3D is more a look a problem the speed. For me it looks something out of 90's football game. if 2D is more is it quicker then 3D? I really don't know, never made such comparison. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lee50_11 Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 3D all the time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themoffster Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 2D for me, such is a crap integrated GFX card. snap . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.