mr_pimpnuts Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 Just started a new lower league game (Maidenhead in Blue Square South). I haven't played many lower league games. Is there any reason I would offer a player a part time contract rather than a full time one? Signing players at this level they seem to ask for part time by default, which I then switch to full time (without adjusting the wages) and they accept anyway (no players have refused so far). Full time means they can train more and helps towards gaining professional team status right? Is there a scenario when it's better for the club to give them a part time contract? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmyriddle Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 part time they train less and i dunno if it is better for people to have P/T contracts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gauvner Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 J Full time means they can train more and helps towards gaining professional team status right? Practically got it there matey. Only good time for a club to offer Part time contracts is if the club is in severe debt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_pimpnuts Posted January 4, 2009 Author Share Posted January 4, 2009 part time they train less and i dunno if it is better for people to have P/T contracts I wonder if players with less natural fitness on part time contracts get injured less? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmyriddle Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 that could depend as they could still get injured in matches but they would be probs less likely to get injured Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_pimpnuts Posted January 5, 2009 Author Share Posted January 5, 2009 Practically got it there matey. Only good time for a club to offer Part time contracts is if the club is in severe debt. Hmmm, players seem to accept F/T or P/T contracts for the same wages at the moment so does it really make any difference? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gauvner Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 Hmmm, players seem to accept F/T or P/T contracts for the same wages at the moment so does it really make any difference? Hmm thats true, so just could be training purposes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les Girondins Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 In my save there is a minimum salary of £375 equiv per week full time. Part time this is £110, which can mean effectively 1/3rd the total wage bill for a smaller club. The training benefits show with regard achieving and maintaining peak fitness .. Its a PITA without full time fitness training. Also young players really only develop well full time. Just my observations .. Be careful though, as I have offered my best players full time deals and we are now £3, 000 p/w over our wage budget. Which will probably see me sacked .. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.