Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 100 of 141

Thread: Si making a blatant attempt to deceive us?

  1. #1
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    5th May 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,425

    Default

    Match Overview
    Match Stats
    Player Ratings My Team's Stats

    Please look at those screenshots first. I am managing Canada.

    I am not even going to bother with the obvious bug or cheating or whatever you want to call it where Bahamas had 3 shots on goal and scored 3 while I had 19 and scored 4. I will not complain about the fact that I was loosing 3-0 to a team who I am much better then.

    But what I have a problem with is the fact that my goalkeeper let in 3 goals and made no saves and gets a match rating of 7. That performance deserves a 2 or a 3 but how does he get a 7? The opposition goalkeeper saved 15 shots and let in 4 and gets a 6. Now that performance should have a 7 or something but maybe a 6 is also fair? But compare the opposition goalkeepers performance to my goalkeepers performance and he should have a 10. This isnt the first time I have seen this. I have seen this many times. Almost always. The human controlled team's goalkeeper always gets higher ratings to make it look like he is playing better. Why would Si do that? Because the AI keepers are always performing better and this is used to disguise that fact. Si really need to fix this blatant attempt to deceive us.

  2. #2
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    5th May 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,425

    Default

    Match Overview
    Match Stats
    Player Ratings My Team's Stats

    Please look at those screenshots first. I am managing Canada.

    I am not even going to bother with the obvious bug or cheating or whatever you want to call it where Bahamas had 3 shots on goal and scored 3 while I had 19 and scored 4. I will not complain about the fact that I was loosing 3-0 to a team who I am much better then.

    But what I have a problem with is the fact that my goalkeeper let in 3 goals and made no saves and gets a match rating of 7. That performance deserves a 2 or a 3 but how does he get a 7? The opposition goalkeeper saved 15 shots and let in 4 and gets a 6. Now that performance should have a 7 or something but maybe a 6 is also fair? But compare the opposition goalkeepers performance to my goalkeepers performance and he should have a 10. This isnt the first time I have seen this. I have seen this many times. Almost always. The human controlled team's goalkeeper always gets higher ratings to make it look like he is playing better. Why would Si do that? Because the AI keepers are always performing better and this is used to disguise that fact. Si really need to fix this blatant attempt to deceive us.

  3. #3
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    Si is not deceiving us they are screwing us. I need to reload every match to get a result that reflect the chances. Right now i lost to real with Milan
    My shots on target: 15 off target: 15
    Their shot on target: 4 off target: 5
    Final score 2-1 for real. Just complete crap.

  4. #4
    Part-timer
    Join Date
    12th November 2004
    Location
    PSN: BURDENATOR85
    Posts
    935

    Default

    The problem is, these stats don't actually tell the whole story. For all we know, the Bahamas goalie may have been at fault for at least one of the goals, whilst, although your goalie diodn't make a save, we can't tell how many crosses plucked out of the air. Looking at the cross completion stat for the Bahamas, it looks like it's possible it could be quite a few, so it's possible this helped his rating. I won't deny that it seems odd, but there could be more to this then meets the eye.

    I also noticed that the Bahamas scored their final goal in the 47th minute. This is pure speculation on my behalf, as I have no eveidence to back this up, but, on my current save, I have noticed that if a goalie has been doing badly, but then goes for a long period of time with little to do, or anything of any importance, then his match rating may creep up a little, whilst if a goalie is playing a blinder, and then lets two quick goals in, his rating can plummit, and in the case of the Bahamas, this happened twice, so this is a possibility. Like I said though, I have no real evidence of this, bar one or two matches, which isn't really enough, but it's a possibility.

  5. #5
    Semi Pro
    Join Date
    17th November 2003
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    2,610

    Default

    The stats have been borderline useless for a few versions now and I was hoping this may have been reworked in FM08. But like EVERYTHING ELSE it's been left exactly the bloody same because "FM08 is our greatest game ever!"

    I beat a team 4-3 the other day and the opposition goalkeeper got a 10 ?? Sometimes my GK will save 10 shots, not concede a goal and get a 6 ?

    But outfield is where the main problem is. You can be a couple of goals down and all of your players just get rated 6 or 7 and possibly the occasional 5. They need to use the full range of ratings to give you an understanding of why your team is playing bad. Look at ratings in a newspaper after a team wins a game and find me one where the entire team gets 7's and 8's.

    The rating system is just one of many areas which is borderline broken on FM08.

  6. #6
    Star Player
    Join Date
    21st July 2002
    Posts
    29,457

    Default

    Of course the fact that your strikers probably have poor finishing, anticipation and composure skills doesn't come into the equation does it?

  7. #7
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    25th February 2000
    Location
    My liver is eating itself
    Posts
    1,618

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    Of course the fact that your strikers probably have poor finishing, anticipation and composure skills doesn't come into the equation does it? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    And that's if the manager knows how to use them properly.

  8. #8
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    21st October 2005
    Posts
    1,340

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    Of course the fact that your strikers probably have poor finishing, anticipation and composure skills doesn't come into the equation does it? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Why would the Bahamas have such brilliant strikers though?

    I just came on to talk about the same thing. Every time I concede a goal I look at the stats and mroe often than not it'll be their first shot.

    If I'm restricting the opposition to two chances in a game, then my defence is doing well. But in real life teams don't continually score every chance they get.

  9. #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    28th June 2004
    Location
    Guess you only get one chance in life to play a song that goes like this.
    Posts
    33,623

    Default

    Win every game? [Yes/No]

    Seriously.

  10. #10
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    21st October 2005
    Posts
    1,340

    Default

    No.

    But this happens way too often.

    You have to carve out 5 or 10 chances for ewach goasl but whoever you play can score with their first chance time after time.

    I don't want to win EVERY game. I want to have a fighting chance against oposition teams. And that means a modicum of reality in the chances/goals ratio on BOTH sides of the equation.

    These are my last two games and both of them have the opposition scoring with their first shot (or two with their first two)

    Fulham

    West Ham

    I could go back further for more examples.

  11. #11
    Star Player
    Join Date
    21st July 2002
    Posts
    29,457

    Default

    I always tend to give the same reply to this fault - are the same people complaining about this when it happens to them as vocal on here when they are dominate and yet win with their only shot on goal? Answer, no. I've had as many games where I've been dominated and yet won than I have where I've dominated and lost to a team's only two shots on target etc.

    People who complain about their teams' shot to goal ratio should perhaps look at real life football a bit more - even the best teams in England such as Man Utd, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool all have far more shots on goal than they actually score, with a fair proportion of them being off target. They lose to teams who have fewer shots on goal - in some cases an oppositions only shot - so I guess this is a bug and SI ned to sort it out in real life as well?

  12. #12
    Youth Team
    Join Date
    9th May 2003
    Location
    Wembley, Block 133, Row 23, Seat 296 - COME ON YOUR SPURRRRS!!!!
    Posts
    4,279

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    I always tend to give the same reply to this fault - are the same people complaining about this when it happens to them as vocal on here when they are dominate and yet win with their only shot on goal? Answer, no. I've had as many games where I've been dominated and yet won than I have where I've dominated and lost to a team's only two shots on target etc.

    People who complain about their teams' shot to goal ratio should perhaps look at real life football a bit more - even the best teams in England such as Man Utd, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool all have far more shots on goal than they actually score, with a fair proportion of them being off target. They lose to teams who have fewer shots on goal - in some cases an oppositions only shot - so I guess this is a bug and SI ned to sort it out in real life as well? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Actually yes, as this issue (which we all know is a known isse with the match engine) can be exploited by us as unlike the AI we know that there are certain chances we can allow in huge numbers that wont get scored.

    Using certain tactics (not outlandish or super tactics) this scenario happens game after game- this is not right.

    Gav, Yes it happens in real life- but not as often as it does in FM, and certainly the amount of chances created in FM at times is very rare in real life.

    There was no need for another thread, but also I cant believe people are actually also ignoring the fact that this is a known issue and one that should be fixed in the patch.

  13. #13
    Amateur
    Join Date
    16th July 2006
    Posts
    186

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    I always tend to give the same reply to this fault - are the same people complaining about this when it happens to them as vocal on here when they are dominate and yet win with their only shot on goal? Answer, no. I've had as many games where I've been dominated and yet won than I have where I've dominated and lost to a team's only two shots on target etc.
    </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I bet you understand yourself too how human mind works. Who really gets angry if they benefit? I think everyone would only be happy to win. And what you really would think if someone came here ranting that they are winning too easily ?

    I find it funny when it happens, while it isn't too frequent nowadays because 9/10 times it goes against me. But it surely brings enjoyment and isn't any "injustice" against anybody. I really don't care if I win a "realistic" computer game by unrealistic way, but it bugs me very much to lose unrealistically every second match or something. It's different if I was playing against another human, it wouldn't be that satisfiable at all to "cheat".

  14. #14
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    Of course the fact that your strikers probably have poor finishing, anticipation and composure skills doesn't come into the equation does it? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    And what about this? all my strikers have at least 18 for finishing an are mental ok

    http://img204.imageshack.us/my.php?i...4059498lx7.png

    Start to open your eyes

  15. #15
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    21st October 2005
    Posts
    1,340

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Jimmyt:
    No.

    But this happens way too often.

    You have to carve out 5 or 10 chances for ewach goasl but whoever you play can score with their first chance time after time.

    I don't want to win EVERY game. I want to have a fighting chance against oposition teams. And that means a modicum of reality in the chances/goals ratio on BOTH sides of the equation.

    These are my last two games and both of them have the opposition scoring with their first shot (or two with their first two)

    Fulham

    West Ham

    I could go back further for more examples. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    And again.

    Shocker.

    Three times in four games that the opposition has scored with their first shot. This time, of course, it was the ubiquitous 25 yard free-kick supergoal that it's tactically impossible to defend against.

  16. #16
    Star Player
    Join Date
    21st July 2002
    Posts
    29,457

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    Of course the fact that your strikers probably have poor finishing, anticipation and composure skills doesn't come into the equation does it? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    And what about this? all my strikers have at least 18 for finishing an are mental ok

    http://img204.imageshack.us/my.php?i...4059498lx7.png

    Start to open your eyes </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    What are their anticipation stats? What are their composure stats? No point having a finishing ability of 18 if you don't have good anticipatyion and composure stats is there?

    My eyes are open by the way - they need to be to type!

    I just don't see it as the huge problem as everyone else does - but then part of that is that I'm still playing FM 2007 and not FM 2008, so can't really comment on that match engine.

  17. #17
    Amateur
    Join Date
    1st November 2007
    Posts
    135

    Default

    SI what is your reply to these very valid points???

    It's strange that this type of topic is never replied to by SI at all.............

  18. #18
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    21st October 2005
    Posts
    1,340

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Jimmyt:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Jimmyt:
    No.

    But this happens way too often.

    You have to carve out 5 or 10 chances for ewach goasl but whoever you play can score with their first chance time after time.

    I don't want to win EVERY game. I want to have a fighting chance against oposition teams. And that means a modicum of reality in the chances/goals ratio on BOTH sides of the equation.

    These are my last two games and both of them have the opposition scoring with their first shot (or two with their first two)

    Fulham

    West Ham

    I could go back further for more examples. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    And again.

    Shocker.

    Three times in four games that the opposition has scored with their first shot. This time, of course, it was the ubiquitous 25 yard free-kick supergoal that it's tactically impossible to defend against. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    And the final score there....

    ta da!

  19. #19
    Amateur
    Join Date
    16th July 2006
    Posts
    186

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    What are their anticipation stats? What are their composure stats? No point having a finishing ability of 18 if you don't have good anticipatyion and composure stats is there?
    </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I could bet again that as the date seems to be April 2008 and the team is AC Milan some who has even a slight clue about football could think that maybe in their best day those strikers could score at least a couple of "lucky" goals...

    But on the another hand I'd say that Kaka, Inzaghi and Ronaldo to begin with are sold or injured and therefore they lack that composure and ability to score. Not to mention those suckable other attackers like Gilardino and Pato. So it's pretty obvious that he just doesn't have the players and resources to cut it...

  20. #20
    Moderator
    Join Date
    28th June 2004
    Location
    Guess you only get one chance in life to play a song that goes like this.
    Posts
    33,623

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Silver Foxx:
    SI what is your reply to these very valid points???

    It's strange that this type of topic is never replied to by SI at all............. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    There's been plenty of reply from SI about this issue - have a search through some of the other 3million threads on this exact issue. If SI responded to every thread there'd be no time left to actually make the game.

  21. #21
    Amateur
    Join Date
    1st November 2006
    Posts
    77

    Default

    Got the opposite problem (or quirk, not sure if it really is a problem).

    Playing St Albans vs Oxford, tipped to lose, instead win 3-0 with Oxford taking 18 shots (7 on target) and my team had 19 shots (8 on target).

    My keeper saves a penalty in the 47th minute (which would have made the score 2-1 to us, but brought Oxford back into the game) and keeps a clean sheet.

    He only gets a rating of 7. I'd have given him a 9 at least!

    So, I'm confused as to how a rating is calculated. The ratings have a big affect on confidence (especially in this version of the game) which could ultimately cost a manager his job, so does it need a tweak or is it working as expected, as far as the developers are concerned?

  22. #22
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    As I pointed out in this thread, there's not a great deal of difference between what we're seeing in FM, and what we see IRL. Take a look at the comparisons between FM stats (both manager-controlled and AI controlled) and IRL stats).

  23. #23
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

  24. #24
    Amateur
    Join Date
    15th September 2000
    Location
    Perth, W.A. Australia
    Posts
    36

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:

    I just don't see it as the huge problem as everyone else does - but then part of that is that I'm still playing FM 2007 and not FM 2008, so can't really comment on that match engine. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Mate...I find it funny that you're defending a match engine you admit not to know anything about...

  25. #25
    Third Team
    Join Date
    2nd June 2003
    Location
    Probably the only Chinese guy goes to Leeds' away game. Occasionally accompany by the missus
    Posts
    6,928

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Wizard:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:

    I just don't see it as the huge problem as everyone else does - but then part of that is that I'm still playing FM 2007 and not FM 2008, so can't really comment on that match engine. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Mate...I find it funny that you're defending a match engine you admit not to know anything about... </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    because it's the same crap every year from the SI-Bashing gang. EVer since I visited this forum, there are people who complain their strikers don't score enough. As Gav said, they only ever complain if it's against them. I never heard of anyone come here to moan they won a game even though they only have one shot and the other team has 40.

    As for the comment about "it doesn't happen that often in real life". Yes it does. More often than people think. But they wouldnt know because all they watch is highlight football where Rooney score a goal from every one or two shot

  26. #26
    Amateur
    Join Date
    8th June 2007
    Posts
    14

    Default

    I don't think there are too many shots, rather that the game creates an unrealistic number of 1-on-1 chances (much more than in real life). Because there are normally not too many of these in real life in each match, a lot of these aren't scored in the game so as to keep the scorelines from becoming too large.

    It's always frustrating for me if my strikers blow a large number of 1-on-1 chances in my games, but then I just remember that in real life they wouldn't have so many of these chances anyway (but it is always fun when I have a string of 2-0/3-0 victories and the opposing goalkeeper is the MoM). I hope for this to be sorted out in next update/patch.

  27. #27
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Jopo12:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    What are their anticipation stats? What are their composure stats? No point having a finishing ability of 18 if you don't have good anticipatyion and composure stats is there?
    </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I could bet again that as the date seems to be April 2008 and the team is AC Milan some who has even a slight clue about football could think that maybe in their best day those strikers could score at least a couple of "lucky" goals...

    But on the another hand I'd say that Kaka, Inzaghi and Ronaldo to begin with are sold or injured and therefore they lack that composure and ability to score. Not to mention those suckable other attackers like Gilardino and Pato. So it's pretty obvious that he just doesn't have the players and resources to cut it... </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I would agree with you, but i made Milan better in the database so it is not really an issue. Also Gilardini is good enough for Milan in that way. Also i use the real-time editor to fix the dropping mental stats, because it is unrealistic.

    So it are not the players, it's the complet ****ed up, prehistorical, screwed match engine

  28. #28
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    Please people open your eyes and see what the problem is. SI is already letting us wait until Fevruary, the last thing we need now are some nincompoops who say "it are your players, it's your tactics"

  29. #29
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Jopo12:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    What are their anticipation stats? What are their composure stats? No point having a finishing ability of 18 if you don't have good anticipatyion and composure stats is there?
    </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I could bet again that as the date seems to be April 2008 and the team is AC Milan some who has even a slight clue about football could think that maybe in their best day those strikers could score at least a couple of "lucky" goals...

    But on the another hand I'd say that Kaka, Inzaghi and Ronaldo to begin with are sold or injured and therefore they lack that composure and ability to score. Not to mention those suckable other attackers like Gilardino and Pato. So it's pretty obvious that he just doesn't have the players and resources to cut it... </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Another thing: All m ycoaches say in their rapports: "would be a star-player with every Serie A-club". What idiotic explanaition are you giving there?

    Even if their rating is not ultimate good, how do you explain that a lot of minor teams (parma, sampdoria livorno) get a score percentage of about 40-50%? while my team can't even reach 5%. It's time you cut your crap. If you can't say anything that makes sense, just **** off

  30. #30
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    Even if their rating is not ultimate good, how do you explain that a lot of minor teams (parma, sampdoria livorno) get a score percentage of about 40-50%? while my team can't even reach 5%. It's time you cut your crap. If you can't say anything that makes sense, just **** off </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Are those percentages accurate, or have you just made them up?

  31. #31
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by GillsMan:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    Even if their rating is not ultimate good, how do you explain that a lot of minor teams (parma, sampdoria livorno) get a score percentage of about 40-50%? while my team can't even reach 5%. It's time you cut your crap. If you can't say anything that makes sense, just **** off </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Are those percentages accurate, or have you just made them up? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Look at my posted screenshot. i got 1/19= 6%
    Real got 1/3= 33%.
    But against minor teams they just need one-two chances and they score.

    I can't give an accurate percentage, that's why i said 40-50%. But cut the ******** and look at the real problem!

  32. #32
    Amateur
    Join Date
    6th December 2004
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    768

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    I just don't see it as the huge problem as everyone else does - but then part of that is that I'm still playing FM 2007 and not FM 2008, so can't really comment on that match engine. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Why did you then?
    The match engine didn't seem too bad after a couple of patches to 07, 08 is a shambles but because it made #1 on the charts it's the greatest game ever according to SI.
    SI admitted the stuff up early in the piece and the tweaks they made after that have resulted in the dodgy stats.
    I have had some of those games where I had less shots than the opposition and still won, but it is still a problem whether we win or lose. Hell, the best way to win on this game is probably to try and have a lot less shots than the opposition.

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> I don't think there are too many shots, rather that the game creates an unrealistic number of 1-on-1 chances (much more than in real life). Because there are normally not too many of these in real life in each match, a lot of these aren't scored in the game so as to keep the scorelines from becoming too large. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Nail-on-head.
    SI didn't know how or couldn't fix it so they fixed it.

    I still play and it probably is playable, but there are problems with this game that cannot be denied.

  33. #33
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    The problem is there are still nincompoops who deny them

  34. #34
    Star Player
    Join Date
    21st July 2002
    Posts
    29,457

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by HonkyDick:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    I just don't see it as the huge problem as everyone else does - but then part of that is that I'm still playing FM 2007 and not FM 2008, so can't really comment on that match engine. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Why did you then?
    </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    How about because every single year you get the same posts from people kmoaning about something that I just don't see as being an issue. If you compare shots to goals ratios between real life football and the game there is not too much difference.

    People often look for someone to blame when they don't pick up a win on the game and in this case, the match engine seems to be the easy target, instead of looking at their own players - and dare I say - tactics, or even thridly just putting it down to one of those days that even the best teams have from time to time.

    You can't win every game you play and losing is frustrating, particualrly when you have dominated but as I said earlier I have had just as many occasions on the game where I have been dominated yet still won the game as to when I have dominated and lost.

    To me this is like the so called superkeeper 'bug' that people are always complaining about - it's something that doesn't exist despite what people think.

    Bottom line is if they win they they are God's gift to management, if they lose then it's SI to blame because they've made the AI biased against them.

    End of the day it's only a poxy computer game, it's hardly life or death.

  35. #35
    Star Player
    Join Date
    21st July 2002
    Posts
    29,457

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    The problem is there are still nincompoops who deny them </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    And there are still nincompoops who look for things that don't even exist. They fall inbto the same stupid category as conspiracy theorists.

  36. #36
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    The problem is there are still nincompoops who deny them </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    And there are still nincompoops who look for things that don't even exist. They fall inbto the same stupid category as conspiracy theorists. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Look i wouldn't care if my opponent also needs 15 chances. But look at the facts. look at the screenshot! 1/19 versus 1/3. And you say their isn't a problem?
    Please go back to the stupid hole you came from

  37. #37
    Star Player
    Join Date
    21st July 2002
    Posts
    29,457

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    The problem is there are still nincompoops who deny them </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    And there are still nincompoops who look for things that don't even exist. They fall inbto the same stupid category as conspiracy theorists. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Look i wouldn't care if my opponent also needs 15 chances. But look at the facts. look at the screenshot! 1/19 versus 1/3. And you say their isn't a problem?
    Please go back to the stupid hole you came from </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    That'd be my mothers hole, and at 33 years of age, then I don't think there's much chance of that happening dear.

  38. #38
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    Typical. I say 2 lines. One about the game and one offending. You should respond to the one the most important.(= the one about the game)
    This time i say it clear because you are obviously stupid.

  39. #39
    Star Player
    Join Date
    21st July 2002
    Posts
    29,457

    Default

    Obviously I must be, after all I keep looking at the same stupid comments about problems that do not exist.

    Try going away and looking at some stats from real life football matches, compare the goals to shot ratios and then come back and tell me if there is a problem. The results will surprise you but of course this would involve you actually making some sort of effort on your part, which I doubt you actually want to do because you don't wish to be proved wrong.

  40. #40
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th September 2007
    Posts
    167

    Default

    If you dig around there's a thread I started somewhere in GQ where I managed to lose a game where the other team played with ten players for almost two hours and had either one or zero shots on goal.

    The fans must have had a proper head scratcher on the busses home.

  41. #41
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    Obviously I must be, after all I keep looking at the same stupid comments about problems that do not exist.

    Try going away and looking at some stats from real life football matches, compare the goals to shot ratios and then come back and tell me if there is a problem. The results will surprise you but of course this would involve you actually making some sort of effort on your part, which I doubt you actually want to do because you don't wish to be proved wrong. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    But this is not a real fotball match. And even then. A week ago, i looked at the bbc about the FA cup matches. They showed the statistics of every match. And as far as i could see, there wasn't a single game that where one team had 6x more chances, but the game still ended in a draw. Yes there were game were it should have been a draw when someone won, or games where there should be a winner where there was a drawn but never something that obvious.

    Are you a human or an ostrich who puts his (empty) head in the sand?

  42. #42
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    9th November 2005
    Location
    Dafuge's Challenge - King's Lynn - Dorey, Neil and Bowen, living legends!
    Posts
    1,856

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    The problem is there are still nincompoops who deny them </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    And there are still nincompoops who look for things that don't even exist. They fall inbto the same stupid category as conspiracy theorists. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Look i wouldn't care if my opponent also needs 15 chances. But look at the facts. look at the screenshot! 1/19 versus 1/3. And you say their isn't a problem?
    Please go back to the stupid hole you came from </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Gavnoble has looked at the facts. Actually, he has compiled some statistics which I am sure you completely ignored in favour of using one example to prove your point.

  43. #43
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    I have this every match, but i'm tired of making every time a screenshot to proove something every one here with a bit of commonn sense knows

  44. #44
    Part-timer
    Join Date
    12th November 2004
    Location
    PSN: BURDENATOR85
    Posts
    935

    Default

    Out of interest, how many people who experience a poor shot to goal ratio have gone back through the match report to look at all of the shots and see if there is a reason why so many are being missed? It is incredibly boring, but I found it worthwhile.

    I have created one tactic that was seeing my team creating chances but not taking them, so I decided to go through the match reports and look at the shots I my players were having. It turned out many of the shots rushed, blocked or from poor positions. One thing I considered is that perhaps my high attacking mentallity was causing my players to shot on sight instead of trying to carve out a decent oppurtunity. As a result, I decided it may be better to to reduce my mentallity a bit. As a result, whiolst my team were creating fewer chances, they were of better quality, and more were going in.

    I'm not going to say that there is no issue here (I am undecided as of yet) but surely it would make more sense to try and find a solution to the problem rather then to continually whinge about it?

  45. #45
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    The match engine is the problem, not the tactics. I set all my players "very rare" with distace shot. And still they do it. Also every one-on-one turns out to be pointless.

  46. #46
    Amateur
    Join Date
    26th June 2001
    Posts
    716

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    Obviously I must be, after all I keep looking at the same stupid comments about problems that do not exist.

    Try going away and looking at some stats from real life football matches, compare the goals to shot ratios and then come back and tell me if there is a problem. The results will surprise you but of course this would involve you actually making some sort of effort on your part, which I doubt you actually want to do because you don't wish to be proved wrong. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    You are wasting your time, as the boy is obviously half-witted. Earlier on in the thread he was telling us how he had to reload every game if the result didn't match what he perceived as matching his world class mangerial skills.

  47. #47
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by YOUNGSTEVE:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    Obviously I must be, after all I keep looking at the same stupid comments about problems that do not exist.

    Try going away and looking at some stats from real life football matches, compare the goals to shot ratios and then come back and tell me if there is a problem. The results will surprise you but of course this would involve you actually making some sort of effort on your part, which I doubt you actually want to do because you don't wish to be proved wrong. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    You are wasting your time, as the boy is obviously half-witted. Earlier on in the thread he was telling us how he had to reload every game if the result didn't match what he perceived as matching his world class mangerial skills. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    What does manager skill matters if the match engine is completly screwed?

  48. #48
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    I can't give an accurate percentage, that's why i said 40-50%. But cut the ******** and look at the real problem! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Don't be an arse. You've given a few isolated examples of your percentages but have provided absolutely NOTHING to say that these figures are indicative of what happens usually. So maybe it's you who should cut the BS and start providing some evidence to back it up?

  49. #49
    Part-timer
    Join Date
    12th November 2004
    Location
    PSN: BURDENATOR85
    Posts
    935

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    The match engine is the problem, not the tactics. I set all my players "very rare" with distace shot. And still they do it. Also every one-on-one turns out to be pointless. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    How much creative freedom do these players have? Do any players have "tries long shots" as a PPM?

  50. #50
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by GillsMan:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    I can't give an accurate percentage, that's why i said 40-50%. But cut the ******** and look at the real problem! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Don't be an arse. You've given a few isolated examples of your percentages but have provided absolutely NOTHING to say that these figures are indicative of what happens usually. So maybe it's you who should cut the BS and start providing some evidence to back it up? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Like i said: i'm tired of taking a screenshot of every match, because there are some idiots here who are paid by SI to proclaime "there is nothing wrong with the match engine"

    Why should i put effort in prooving something everyone with common sense knows already

  51. #51
    Third Team
    Join Date
    27th December 2006
    Posts
    7,275

    Default

    There's no doubt theres a problem but it works both ways i had 2 shots to sportings twenty something and won 2-1.

  52. #52
    Part-timer
    Join Date
    29th May 2003
    Location
    ]Expecting new pc around 2009 and looking forward to FM 2010
    Posts
    1,703

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:

    Why should i put effort in prooving something everyone with common sense knows already </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Nice.
    With that arguement you're claiming that everyone who has a different opinion than yours has no common sense.
    Not only going in against good manners but also against forum etiquette.

    *ploink*

  53. #53
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    9th November 2005
    Location
    Dafuge's Challenge - King's Lynn - Dorey, Neil and Bowen, living legends!
    Posts
    1,856

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Bongo-Bongo:
    Out of interest, how many people who experience a poor shot to goal ratio have gone back through the match report to look at all of the shots and see if there is a reason why so many are being missed? It is incredibly boring, but I found it worthwhile.

    I have created one tactic that was seeing my team creating chances but not taking them, so I decided to go through the match reports and look at the shots I my players were having. It turned out many of the shots rushed, blocked or from poor positions. One thing I considered is that perhaps my high attacking mentallity was causing my players to shot on sight instead of trying to carve out a decent oppurtunity. As a result, I decided it may be better to to reduce my mentallity a bit. As a result, whiolst my team were creating fewer chances, they were of better quality, and more were going in.

    I'm not going to say that there is no issue here (I am undecided as of yet) but surely it would make more sense to try and find a solution to the problem rather then to continually whinge about it? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I found that whilst playing as Aldershot in the Blue square Premier I was getting a large amount of shots compared to goals. I was using a tactic set I imported from my FM2007 game which needed a bit of tweaking. After looking back through match reports and highlights I started noticing that my wingers were getting a lot of chances one-on-one with the keeper after beating the full back with sheer pace and cutting in from the wing. However, so many of their chances were from such bad angles, which combined with their poor finishing, meant they were blazing them wide. I changed their crossing slider so that they would square it for a striker rather than take it on themselves and my team started scoring goals for fun.

    I think that a lot of people who complain about things like this have never even has a look at their tactics, let alone try to adjust them to sort out a problem with their team. The logic that "I've got better players, so I don't need tactics!" has been proven to be flawed. Stand up Mr Eriksson and McLaren!

  54. #54
    Amateur
    Join Date
    16th December 2003
    Posts
    97

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">And there are still nincompoops who look for things that don't even exist. They fall inbto the same stupid category as conspiracy theorists. Roll Eyes </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    How can you say this when you have admitted that you have not played 08?????

    It has been shown in many threads already that the shots/SOG ratio is accurate to real life.

    What hasn't been explained is why human players need 15 shots 7 shots on target to get a goal when the AI only needs 4 shots and only 1 on target. That is what i have in my game.

    Of course it is a case of my tactics but what exactly should i change when opposition does not get any good chances but score goals and i have average 5 1&1 + 4 clean shot chances per game and walk away with 1-2 goals??? This is the problem.

  55. #55
    Amateur
    Join Date
    25th August 2003
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    421

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by nymanr:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">And there are still nincompoops who look for things that don't even exist. They fall inbto the same stupid category as conspiracy theorists. Roll Eyes </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    How can you say this when you have admitted that you have not played 08?????

    It has been shown in many threads already that the shots/SOG ratio is accurate to real life.

    What hasn't been explained is why human players need 15 shots 7 shots on target to get a goal when the AI only needs 4 shots and only 1 on target. That is what i have in my game.

    Of course it is a case of my tactics but what exactly should i change when opposition does not get any good chances but score goals and i have average 5 1&1 + 4 clean shot chances per game and walk away with 1-2 goals??? This is the problem. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Exactly! ...Intresting to read that there are no problems from the guy who has stated that he doesn't even have FM2008!!1

    No FM2008 = No problems... well I cannot say that mr. Gavnoble is inccorect with his statement.

    Allthough it is somewhat hilarious to get these expert comments from him after that statement.

  56. #56
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    WTF Gavnoble doesn't even have the game, what the heck is he coming to this forum saying i'm wrong. little show of respect, let alone knowledge.

    I wonder which clinic he is in?

  57. #57
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    25th February 2000
    Location
    My liver is eating itself
    Posts
    1,618

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by nymanr:
    What hasn't been explained is why human players need 15 shots 7 shots on target to get a goal when the AI only needs 4 shots and only 1 on target. That is what i have in my game.
    </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Because the AI generally knows how to create better chances, in the same way that Bongo-Bongo and Gypsum have shown how a human manager can do the same.

  58. #58
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    25th February 2000
    Location
    My liver is eating itself
    Posts
    1,618

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    WTF Gavnoble doesn't even have the game, what the heck is he coming to this forum saying i'm wrong. little show of respect, let alone knowledge.

    I wonder which clinic he is in? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    You complaining about someone not showing respect is the pot calling the kettle 'grimy arse'.

    You already have a warning to your name. I suggest you start to take notice of it.

  59. #59
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Glyn:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    WTF Gavnoble doesn't even have the game, what the heck is he coming to this forum saying i'm wrong. little show of respect, let alone knowledge.

    I wonder which clinic he is in? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    You complaining about someone not showing respect is the pot calling the kettle 'grimy arse'.

    You already have a warning to your name. I suggest you start to take notice of it. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    If he hadn't opened his mouth about something he doesn't know about in the first place, nothing would have happened.

  60. #60
    Amateur
    Join Date
    16th July 2006
    Posts
    186

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    I would agree with you, but i made Milan better in the database so it is not really an issue. Also Gilardini is good enough for Milan in that way. Also i use the real-time editor to fix the dropping mental stats, because it is unrealistic.

    So it are not the players, it's the complet ****ed up, prehistorical, screwed match engine </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    That's what I was implying, it's ridiculous to claim that AC Milan can't score and this often. It was just directed to those fools who simply deny FM is having any kind of problem. Be it then the crap from anti-SI-Bashing gang.

    But it really is funny that so many lack the brain or anything to see that there are clearly things wrong which can't be explained with "it's your team and tactics"-things. If these guys know that much about football they would realize that the problem is either A) FM is greatly flawed because it is very random whether you succeed or not even with best teams or B) FM is flawed because AC Milan is incorrectly presented in the game if it sucks that much.

    Whatever the case is, I really don't get why people bother arguing and defending FM here because they have absolutely no evidence how these things work. But if someone feels there is something wrong and they want clarification, why can't they post here? People who don't have these problems aren't doing anything here because very seldom seem even willing to understand, not to even mention being able to. Sure, everyone has the right to say their thing but don't then blame complainers about making these forums bad or anything as the only problem is opposers being intolerant and selfish.

    Why don't everyone feeling the game is great create their own threads to hail SI and FM and leave people who don't think that way alone and let SI to answer? What on earth you think you are gaining? You are doing nothing but making these discussions very unpleasant to read as they are dragged from valid arguments and questions to abusing etc. Nobody is going to change their mind if some fanboi comes here blindly attacking everyone who criticize FM. Why do you bother? Answer is that you are yourselves more stupid than people who complain.

  61. #61
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    25th February 2000
    Location
    My liver is eating itself
    Posts
    1,618

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    If he hadn't opened his mouth about something he doesn't know about in the first place, nothing would have happened. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    So because someone says something you disagree with, it gives you the right to be offensive and say it's their fault? What a charming world you live in.

    Stop trying to blame others and take responsibility for your own actions instead.

  62. #62
    Reserves
    Join Date
    20th May 2006
    Location
    Prettier than Luke Chadwick... Just
    Posts
    10,156

    Default

    eXistenZ - Are you incapable of disagreeing with someone without resorting to petty insults and name-calling? It's so juvenile. I actually tend to come down on your side of the argument. But surely you'll have a better chance of being taken seriously if you behave in a more respectful manner.

  63. #63
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    Srry but he comes ramping about something where he obviously doesn't have a clue about.

    If you run in at for example Ford motors and say " i know how you have to make cars" and you haven't actually seen a car from close range, you don't only get verbal abuse, but you get kicked out by the security.

    He doesn't have a foot to stand on. he doesn't even own the game for heavens sake

    If i would come to SI tomorrow, and say "you have to do this and that", and i actually can't program i think i will also get abused.

  64. #64
    Runs A Pub
    Join Date
    18th December 2000
    Location
    V3 : Clarkdale
    Posts
    77,103

    Default

    Car Analogys

    Oh and gavnoble knows what he is talking about. He's broken down the match engine more times then I can count.

  65. #65
    Reserves
    Join Date
    20th May 2006
    Location
    Prettier than Luke Chadwick... Just
    Posts
    10,156

    Default

    So you're claiming to be the 'security' for these boards? They have mods for that. All opinions are welcome, as far as I'm aware. Abuse, however, is not.

  66. #66
    Third Team
    Join Date
    2nd June 2003
    Location
    Probably the only Chinese guy goes to Leeds' away game. Occasionally accompany by the missus
    Posts
    6,928

    Default

    Gav is a fanboy? you mean the bloke who has been one of the biggest critic of FM (the only person I know who had openly refused to buy a new release because he felt it wasn't good enough) is now a fanboy?

  67. #67
    Third Team
    Join Date
    2nd June 2003
    Location
    Probably the only Chinese guy goes to Leeds' away game. Occasionally accompany by the missus
    Posts
    6,928

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    Srry but he comes ramping about something where he obviously doesn't have a clue about.

    If you run in at for example Ford motors and say " i know how you have to make cars" and you haven't actually seen a car from close range, you don't only get verbal abuse, but you get kicked out by the security.

    He doesn't have a foot to stand on. he doesn't even own the game for heavens sake

    If i would come to SI tomorrow, and say "you have to do this and that", and i actually can't program i think i will also get abused. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    You really don't have a clue, do you?

  68. #68
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Mike7077:
    So you're claiming to be the 'security' for these boards? They have mods for that. All opinions are welcome, as far as I'm aware. Abuse, however, is not. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    N i'm not claiming that.
    Apparently i am the only one who find it a bit weird that someone who hasn't the game can make so much noise about something he doesn't have a clue about

    Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen."

  69. #69
    Reserves
    Join Date
    20th May 2006
    Location
    Prettier than Luke Chadwick... Just
    Posts
    10,156

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Mike7077:
    So you're claiming to be the 'security' for these boards? They have mods for that. All opinions are welcome, as far as I'm aware. Abuse, however, is not. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    N i'm not claiming that.
    Apparently i am the only one who find it a bit weird that someone who hasn't the game can make so much noise about something he doesn't have a clue about

    Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen." </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Exactly. Your valid point has gotten lost thanks to your childish attitude in delivering it. I'd think on that.

  70. #70
    Amateur
    Join Date
    31st July 2002
    Location
    London
    Posts
    576

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by andyinuk:
    Gav is a fanboy? you mean the bloke who has been one of the biggest critic of FM (the only person I know who had openly refused to buy a new release because he felt it wasn't good enough) is now a fanboy? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Mate, I'm a fanboi

    Played CM/FM since the beginning. Always loved this game. Actually the only game that I've stayed loyal to *LOL*

  71. #71
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Mike7077:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Mike7077:
    So you're claiming to be the 'security' for these boards? They have mods for that. All opinions are welcome, as far as I'm aware. Abuse, however, is not. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    N i'm not claiming that.
    Apparently i am the only one who find it a bit weird that someone who hasn't the game can make so much noise about something he doesn't have a clue about

    Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen." </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Exactly. Your valid point has gotten lost thanks to your childish attitude in delivering it. I'd think on that. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    The most important thing in a discussion is the argument itself, not how the speaker brings it.

  72. #72
    Reserves
    Join Date
    20th May 2006
    Location
    Prettier than Luke Chadwick... Just
    Posts
    10,156

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Mike7077:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Mike7077:
    So you're claiming to be the 'security' for these boards? They have mods for that. All opinions are welcome, as far as I'm aware. Abuse, however, is not. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    N i'm not claiming that.
    Apparently i am the only one who find it a bit weird that someone who hasn't the game can make so much noise about something he doesn't have a clue about

    Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen." </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Exactly. Your valid point has gotten lost thanks to your childish attitude in delivering it. I'd think on that. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    The most important thing in a discussion is the argument itself, not how the speaker brings it. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    True in theory. But in practice, the presentation of an argument often overrides the actual message.

  73. #73
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    People should focus more on theory.

  74. #74
    Reserves
    Join Date
    4th March 2004
    Location
    Granada, Spain @GranadaCdeF_en & @HeathISF Editor: InsideSpanishFootball.com
    Posts
    10,700

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:

    Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen." </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    What one can not speak, thereof one must be silent

    Interesting eulogy there, but the person you question has examined a number of aspects of a number of releases in detail. I would be more likely to understand and comprehend his posts on the matter, given the basis of a well presented argument and critique, without the apparent need to be abusive or offensive to other forum users.

    There are issues with FM08, which I'm sure will be fixed at some point.

    Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but what gives people the right to be abusive or offensive to others? If someone simply disagrees with your opinion, that's their opinion, there's no need to blast them for it!

    Perhaps if you are handy enough to criticise, yet unable to accept it in return, you should perhaps consider your own eulogy, which by the way, is not as "hooded" a sneer posting in another language as you think. We do live in the age of online translation tools you know...

  75. #75
    Reserves
    Join Date
    20th May 2006
    Location
    Prettier than Luke Chadwick... Just
    Posts
    10,156

    Default

    Well whilst the majority of people on the boards, and more importantly the mods, prefer it that we refrain from abuse, it might be wise to consider arguing your points like an adult in future.

  76. #76
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Mike7077:
    Well whilst the majority of people on the boards, and more importantly the mods, prefer it that we refrain from abuse, it might be wise to consider arguing your points like an adult in future. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Most people also would like that everyone who doesn't know what he is talking about, keeps silent

  77. #77
    Semi Pro
    Join Date
    30th March 2003
    Location
    http://madscandi.wordpress.com, http://www.spreadsheet.se/madscandi
    Posts
    3,020

    Default

    It's like this every year with people complaining.
    If you don't like it, don't play it, it's that simple really.

    I've won loads of matches were I had 1 or 2 chances, while my opponents had 10-20.

    You don't see me coming here complaining about winning a match I should have lost.
    Sorry to say this, but this is the way football is.

  78. #78
    Runs A Pub
    Join Date
    18th December 2000
    Location
    V3 : Clarkdale
    Posts
    77,103

    Default

    eXistenZ : Id advise you to stop this silly tirade as you obviously dont understand how gavnoble can have a very concise input into FM08 even though he doesnt own it (given his prior work).

    Take your own advice in your last post eh?

  79. #79
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    3rd December 2007
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Kris:
    eXistenZ : Id advise you to stop this silly tirade as you obviously dont understand how gavnoble can have a very concise input into FM08 even though he doesnt own it (given his prior work).

    Take your own advice in your last post eh? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I knew what i was talking about. he didn't. who get's the warning? me. it's obvious he provoced me.

  80. #80
    Reserves
    Join Date
    4th March 2004
    Location
    Granada, Spain @GranadaCdeF_en & @HeathISF Editor: InsideSpanishFootball.com
    Posts
    10,700

    Default

    eXistenZ - it might be worth listening to the moderator.

    People are'nt disagreeing with the problems you have with the game and discussing the matter. People just have a problem with your attitude or approach to the matter.

    We can help you only so much, and the mod is being very patient.

    Let it go and continue presenting your argument in a more constructive manner.

  81. #81
    Runs A Pub
    Join Date
    18th December 2000
    Location
    V3 : Clarkdale
    Posts
    77,103

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Kris:
    eXistenZ : Id advise you to stop this silly tirade as you obviously dont understand how gavnoble can have a very concise input into FM08 even though he doesnt own it (given his prior work).

    Take your own advice in your last post eh? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I knew what i was talking about. he didn't. who get's the warning? me. it's obvious he provoced me. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    No you didnt (well not articuatly anyway)
    Yes he did
    Yes you did
    No he didn't

    In that order.

  82. #82
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by eXistenZ:
    I knew what i was talking about. he didn't. who get's the warning? me. it's obvious he provoced me. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    You should try to be mature enough not to be "provoced" (sic) by other people.

    Listen, people don't like being given abuse for no reason. I didn't even disagree with what you were saying, and I got accused by you of talking BS (just because I had the audacity to ask if the figures you'd quoted were guesses or if you'd actually gone through and done the number crunching).

    I've no time for people who act idiotic and can't make their points - however valid - without being abusive.

  83. #83
    Amateur
    Join Date
    1st June 2004
    Location
    ehmtheblueline.com
    Posts
    466

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">The human controlled team's goalkeeper always gets higher ratings to make it look like he is playing better. Why would Si do that? Because the AI keepers are always performing better and this is used to disguise that fact. Si really need to fix this blatant attempt to deceive us. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Sounds to me like you're just reaching for things to complain about, because this point is stretching it.

    If you yourself saw the performance and think it was only worthy of a 2, then why are you believing the 7 that the game gave out? Aren't you capable of avoiding deception by siding with your own judgments?

  84. #84

    Default

    To answer a couple of points on the front page, the reason we don't answer posts like this is firstly because it's a duplicate of something mentioned often, and secondly because we have answered on others on the same subject.

    As for the person who mentioned last weeks FA Cup stats, I haven't seen those, so can't comment on them. However, and somewhat ironically, the game that I watched live on TV last week was the Real Madrid v Real Zaragoza game, a game where Zaragoza had 20 odd shots, and didn't score, whereas Madrid had only a few shots, and scored 2.

  85. #85
    Youth Team
    Join Date
    9th May 2003
    Location
    Wembley, Block 133, Row 23, Seat 296 - COME ON YOUR SPURRRRS!!!!
    Posts
    4,279

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    Obviously I must be, after all I keep looking at the same stupid comments about problems that do not exist.

    Try going away and looking at some stats from real life football matches, compare the goals to shot ratios and then come back and tell me if there is a problem. The results will surprise you but of course this would involve you actually making some sort of effort on your part, which I doubt you actually want to do because you don't wish to be proved wrong. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    What a ridiculous post.

    Why as somebody who isnt even playing FM08 you feel you can be so condescending to somebody regarding a known and very annoying issue that you obviously are unaware of (or just do not even want to consider may exist) is beyond me.

  86. #86
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by George Graham:
    What a ridiculous post.

    Why as somebody who isnt even playing FM08 you feel you can be so condescending to somebody regarding a known and very annoying issue that you obviously are unaware of (or just do not even want to consider may exist) is beyond me. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Actually, GN was right - FM stats do broadly mirror IRL stats. There seems to be a misconception on this forum among many that there aren't that many shots in football matches, or that the percentage of shots on target to goals is higher IRL than it actually is.

    Having looked at a number of IRL games and compared them to AI controlled matches in the game they are about right (with the right proportion of 'crazy' matches too, IMO).

    The difficult comes when looking at human teams - now, I'm not the best FM manager in the world by any means, I'm normally rubbish. However, by assessing the match engine I've created a tactic which suits my Gillingham team very well. I'm not experiencing any of the problems reported in this post - sometimes I dominate matches and the other team wins, sometimes the other team dominates and I win, that's football.

    The point is, I'm not alone in this so at least some of this widely reported issue *has* to be down to user error in not fully understanding the game, or using the wrong tactics and/or personnel. Well, that's my opinion anyway.

  87. #87
    Amateur
    Join Date
    19th October 2007
    Posts
    6

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Miles Jacobson:
    To answer a couple of points on the front page, the reason we don't answer posts like this is firstly because it's a duplicate of something mentioned often, and secondly because we have answered on others on the same subject.

    As for the person who mentioned last weeks FA Cup stats, I haven't seen those, so can't comment on them. However, and somewhat ironically, the game that I watched live on TV last week was the Real Madrid v Real Zaragoza game, a game where Zaragoza had 20 odd shots, and didn't score, whereas Madrid had only a few shots, and scored 2. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


    And as i have stated earlier this is one game in 40 odd league games. In FM it happens every single match !!!

  88. #88
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by jazzysheff:
    And as i have stated earlier this is one game in 40 odd league games. In FM it happens every single match !!! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    NO IT DOESN'T!!!!! It really, really doesn't happen in every match.

  89. #89
    Amateur
    Join Date
    26th October 2006
    Location
    Salford
    Posts
    102

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by GillsMan:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by jazzysheff:
    And as i have stated earlier this is one game in 40 odd league games. In FM it happens every single match !!! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    NO IT DOESN'T!!!!! It really, really doesn't happen in every match. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Does in my game!

  90. #90
    Third Team
    Join Date
    2nd June 2003
    Location
    Probably the only Chinese guy goes to Leeds' away game. Occasionally accompany by the missus
    Posts
    6,928

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by jazzysheff:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Miles Jacobson:
    To answer a couple of points on the front page, the reason we don't answer posts like this is firstly because it's a duplicate of something mentioned often, and secondly because we have answered on others on the same subject.

    As for the person who mentioned last weeks FA Cup stats, I haven't seen those, so can't comment on them. However, and somewhat ironically, the game that I watched live on TV last week was the Real Madrid v Real Zaragoza game, a game where Zaragoza had 20 odd shots, and didn't score, whereas Madrid had only a few shots, and scored 2. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


    And as i have stated earlier this is one game in 40 odd league games. In FM it happens every single match !!! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    and it happen hell a lot more than one game in 40 in real life

  91. #91
    andygregory
    Guest

    Default

    I think oldsoldier did a good job of explaining what is happening here..
    http://community.sigames.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/5211026...492012273#2492012273

    Paul C has already acknowledged the problem and agreed with some of the findings about the way the match engine handles shots and goals etc. Looks like there will be something to fix this problem in the next patch.

    The reason not everyone is coming across the problem is because it only seems to happen if you don't play with any width.

    So for those who were saying it has something to do with tactics, are half right. However having to play a certain way every game to avoid a 'bug' isn't quite what we'd expect from a game of this caliber.

    Andy

  92. #92
    andygregory
    Guest

    Default

    oh and I agree that there are far too many posts on this subject. In a way it's good as it highlights the problem. But bad, because it is drowning out the other bugs people are finding eg. lower league club managers being berated by the board and fans for not beating a premier league side in a cup match etc.

  93. #93
    Amateur
    Join Date
    8th August 2007
    Posts
    538

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by jazzysheff:
    And as i have stated earlier this is one game in 40 odd league games. In FM it happens every single match !!! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    It most definitely does not, and I'm 3 seasons in on several games with Liverpool, Carrarese, Belchatow, and AIK. It hurts when it does, but honestly, I'm winning that many games it's not really an issue.

  94. #94
    Moderator
    Join Date
    28th June 2004
    Location
    Guess you only get one chance in life to play a song that goes like this.
    Posts
    33,623

    Default

    1. Yes there's a problem with this
    2. If it's happening regularly, try something different
    3. When you find that something different, stick with it
    4. Stop beating the dead horse.

  95. #95
    Amateur
    Join Date
    12th April 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    696

    Default

    There are many variables to take into consideration:

    Pre-game tactics
    In-match tactics
    Team Talks
    Player Stats (Physical and Mental)
    Player Relationships
    Quality of Staff
    Club Conditions
    Media
    Transfers
    Quality of Manager

    Just recently I finished 6th in my first season with Atletico Madrid. It was really tough, but we rarely got thrashed even by the big teams. However, Ageuro scored most the goals.

    1st game of the 2nd season attempting to finish in the top 4, Villareal thrashed us 4-0 and we were playing like amateurs. The 2nd game we escaped with a draw against a poor team.

    Only a tactic I found in the 2nd season changed things around. I swear I would have sacked if I'd continued the same way. We ended up finishing 3rd, though I had to sell Aguero because he didn't fit the new system.

    You can't play well all the time! Back in 2000 or whenever it was IRL, Manchester United ran away with the league, and then got complacent and were terrible for several seasons. It happens!

  96. #96
    sav112
    Guest

    Default

    In my view I do believe the end results are acceptable (I’ve been playing on 08 for three season in a clan game) however it is the manner that the end result is achieved that has me most puzzled I think,

    All real stats! Taking say the Champoins league games this season say for the group stages for actual mmatches we see a pattern like this

    Chelsea had 18 shots wide to Rosenborg 4, but looking closer the actual shots on goal were 5 for Chelsea & 3 for Rosen which actual works for this 1-1


    Chelsea Rosenborg
    63'-1
    1-1

    24'-1

    Chelsea Statistics Rosenborg
    1 Goals scored 1
    1 Yellow card 2
    0 Red card 0
    5 Shots on goal 3
    18 Shots wide 4
    19 Fouls committed 19
    8 Corners 2
    3 Offsides 1
    37' 9'' Ball. Poss. (time) 21' 52''
    62% Ball. Poss. (%) 38%
    [\code]


    Again the score with this Milan game relates to 10 shots on goal with 4 being scored, Shak had even more shots on goal but only scored once

    Milan Shakhtar
    69'-1
    62'-1
    14'-1
    6'-1
    4-1

    51'-1

    Milan Statistics Shakhtar
    4 Goals scored 1
    2 Yellow card 3
    0 Red card 0
    10 Shots on goal 11
    5 Shots wide 8
    10 Fouls committed 13
    7 Corners 9
    4 Offsides 2
    24' 52'' Ball. Poss. (time) 32' 55''
    43% Ball. Poss. (%) 57%


    looking at stat after stat you seem to relise that shots on target often than not are low in number.
    taking the whole group matches into account in group B for all the matches played for the four teams it looks like this and remeber thats six matches......



    Group B
    Club
    shots wide 48 32 41 32
    shots on goal 42 24 30 20
    fouls committed 88 95 97 78
    corners 30 26 39 17
    offside 21 11 13 9
    ball. poss. time 37 Min. 28 Min. 30 Min. 35 Min.
    ball. poss. perc 53% 47% 48% 52%
    goals scored 9 6 5 2
    goals conceded 2 10 4 6
    yellow cards 3 8 13 8
    red cards 0 0 0 1




    Here are some IRL stats for Spain this season

    Played matches 182
    Remaining matches 198
    % played 47 %
    Home wins 47 %
    Draws 25 %
    Away wins 28 %
    Goals 468
    Goals p. match 2.57
    Goals p. match (H) 1.48
    Goals p. match (A) 1.09
    Over 2.5 goals 46 %
    Under 2.5 goals 54 %

    Most frequent scores Score Matches Percentages
    1 - 1 23 12.6 %
    2 - 0 19 10.4 %
    0 - 0 16 8.79 %
    2 - 1 14 7.69 %
    0 - 1 14 7.69 %
    1 - 0 14 7.69 %
    0 - 2 12 6.59 %
    3 - 0 12 6.59 %
    1 - 2 9 4.94 %
    3 - 1 9 4.94 %
    0 - 3 7 3.84 %
    2 - 2 6 3.29 %
    4 - 1 6 3.29 %
    4 - 3 4 2.19 %
    4 - 0 3 1.64 %
    Other 2 1.09 %
    1 - 4 2 1.09 %
    2 - 3 2 1.09 %
    4 - 2 2 1.09 %
    3 - 2 2 1.09 %
    3 - 4 1 0.54 %
    2 - 4 1 0.54 %
    3 - 3 1 0.54 %
    1 - 3 1 0.54 %
    4 - 4 0 0 %
    0 - 4 0 0 %

    League Progress Total %
    Matches played
    182 47.9 %
    Matches remaining
    198 52.1 %



    Outcomes Total %
    Home team wins
    85 46.7 %
    Draws
    46 25.3 %
    Away team wins
    51 28 %



    Goals Total Per match
    Goals scored
    468 2.57
    First-half goals
    206 1.13
    Second-half goals
    262 1.44
    Home goals
    269 1.48
    Away goals
    199 1.09

    Cards Total Per match
    All Cards
    975 5.4
    Yellow cards
    901 4.95
    Double-yellow cards
    40 0.22
    Red cards
    34 0.19

    Giving the opinion that yes high shots on goal does not guarantee success or that low shots on goal does not necessarily mean you’ll loose in real life football – we can all point to games we have seen that the result has astounded us – that’s the joy of it but it is the frequency that in the game as Human Manager and considering some of the time they are playing world class teams very high shots on goal or even wide are produced. And I have to say playing in spain nearly every second match and I’m being kind here produces very high shots on goal and even shots wide with little reward.

  97. #97

  98. #98
    Amateur
    Join Date
    11th November 2007
    Posts
    22

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">I just don't see it as the huge problem as everyone else does - but then part of that is that I'm still playing FM 2007 and not FM 2008, so can't really comment on that match engine. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    This isn't intended to be inflammatory in the slightest, but I simply must comment on this reply from you, Gav. How on earth are you going to come on here and argue about something you know little or nothing about? This ignorant blindness is exactly what we don't need on these forums. Are there too many complaints? Yes. Are they founded on hearsay or is there some kind of mass hysteria infecting these here parts? NO!

    SI have been desperately trying to release a patch to fix the patch of the patch due to there being a rather significant problem with the match engine if you haven't heard or noticed. The fact that a patch is due to be released in February months after the original release clearly constitutes a problem, I'm sure you will agree. Do I think SI are deceiving us? Not directly no, and not in the same context of the original post, but there IS a problem — it's been highlighted in numerous posts in this forum, and as it happens, the findings/complaints, whatever you want to call them, are well founded and fit in well with my game world and game experience.

    I've gone off topic slightly and I apologise, but please don't come on here and involve yourself in a debate you know nothing about, mate. Not only do you make a mockery of your own thoughts and opinions, but you too make a mockery of the folks on here that have played the game, experienced issues, and feel very let down by this version thus far. The least you can do is inquire yourself before posting on the matter — it's common decency, mate, that's all.

  99. #99
    Amateur
    Join Date
    6th December 2004
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    768

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    How about because every single year you get the same posts from people kmoaning about something that I just don't see as being an issue. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    You wouldn't see it as an issue if you don't have the game.
    I'm not a 'the games against me' person because I am pretty successful at the game anyway, it is not a hard game at all.
    People are rightly concerned with some of the issues though.
    This is not about 'it's your tactics' or 'your strikers obviously are crap' either. I know my tactics and player attributes well enough to win a lot more than I lose but there are some dodgy stats that come about because of the 1 on 1s issue. It's not our tactics or players fault that SI toned down the conversion rate of 1 on 1s because there were far too many of them.

  100. #100
    Amateur
    Join Date
    6th December 2004
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    768

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by gavnoble:
    Obviously I must be, after all I keep looking at the same stupid comments about problems that do not exist. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    How would you know if you don't have the game?

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts