Norwich in the Prem
Glad Utd and Pool are going down though!
Norwich in the Prem
Glad Utd and Pool are going down though!
On my game, they are inseparable.
As in: Manchester United 12th in the Championship, and Liverpool 13th.
Epic fail by De Graafschap:
i know next to nothing about the dutch league so I assume that TOP OSS are pretty poor in comparison to De Graffschap
I think he means that De Graddschap managed to thow away a 4-1 lead in the 2nd half and lost 6-4
Ah ok my eyes aint what they used to be - did not spot that.
Epic fail by me
Got another for you English lovers though then:
Charlton Athletic in the future...??
Nah, Charlton will never be that good, it is impossible
Did they lose the final by any chance?
Also what skin is that?
The skin is Klassa, look in the Skinning Hideout for download link
Charlton just aren't meant to win the cup are they?
What a comeback from Schalke
Just take the bloody hint, Sheffield. You're not getting my staff.
I don't think he is too pleased at Arsene's decision
He has obviously nicknamed the coaches and staff so he knows which one is which
Saw that in dafuges challenge Gypsum, it was incredibly funny
The Championship never looked so....good?
Evidently there is something more satisfying than getting one over your rivals.
Don't get my goalie angry
This was an FA cup 2nd qualifying round match
Last edited by Thomasmc135; 24-05-2009 at 12:42.
Think that pretty much explains it.
How do you swap positions with yourself?
David Silva i put in from the start but he was the only professional player that was part of my team. I can honestly say that i have not cheated to sign any players i.e haven't put in another manager to get players.
It's part of an experiment to see whether they will stay with a club that has a high rep but low standing or whether they will leave as soon as offers come in.
Last edited by Thomasmc135; 24-05-2009 at 13:40.
Last week I started an experiment to see what would happen if I started a save as a female manager, to see if it would make any difference. I couldn't think of a name, so thank God for MTV! (you'll see what I mean).
Anyway that's beside the point. Have a close look at the options at the bottom and you will see the result of starting as a female manager:
Someone is obviously a closet AFC Hornchurch fan
Cmon Ref are you kidding me 9 mins of injury time!!!!!!! Q.P.R have bribed you havn't they
By the way I still won the match
Had a lot of injuries in the game?
not that I can remenber no more than 1 though
Bit hot for the beginning of January and it's BREEZY
You could have been a lot more perceptive than that .
a) Your team don't have a name
b) Why didn't you get loads of penalties considering the referee is a Friend?
c) What's your club's youth sytem like, because looking at the breadcrumbs on the bottom, your team is called Paedo XI
Is it just me or should i be £8m down so far this month as opposed to £800k as expenditure usually relates to a cost rather than income?
Im man city.
And i just played Blackburn.
Net transfer spend is negative - ie. Overall you have less money from transfers than you have had before, therefore, you have spent more than you have received.
I see many issues with that screenie;
The Profit/loss figure is derived from expenditure minus net transfer spend in this screenie. Clearly incorrect, since net transfer spend is a relative figure which has parts in turnover and expenditure (ie. buys and sells)
The figure should be simply calculated by turnover (money in) minus expenditure (money out).
Net transfer spend is just a guide to what you have been doing on the market. The other issue with is that it hasn't updated for the new month. Its the same as the previous month which seems highly unlikely.
Basically - its all just a mess. Hope to be proven wrong and have a laugh - otherwise
Income was £0
Expenditure was £4,714,446
Net Transfer Spend was (£3,887, 763)
Profit was (£826,683)
Profit = Income - (Expenditure + Net Transfer Spend)
Income was £0, or £3,887, 763 if you include transfers.
£3,887,763 subtract £4,714,446 equals -£826,683 (work it out on a calculator if you think I'm wrong).
This obviously isn't the case. £4,714,446 minus -£3,887,763 is £8,602,209 which isn't the value given.The Profit/loss figure is derived from expenditure minus net transfer spend in this screenie. Clearly incorrect, since net transfer spend is a relative figure which has parts in turnover and expenditure (ie. buys and sells)
I won the Conference South with ease 42 wins from 42 only conceding 1 and scoring 337. I won the Conference League Cup, FA Trophy and FA cup.
The board are hard to please with 54% job security. The big teams are coming in for my players and because some didn't play much they want to leave and so i have sold 3 players for £50 million. Robbie Blake rejected Rangers.
I have agreed to sell a defender to Man Utd for £7 million but i made it so that the transfer will go through in a years time. I signed Vieri on a free after Atlanta didn't renew his contract and Davide Santon for £8 million after he requested a transfer and another Italian veteran, Panucci.
I'm going to play in the Blue square premier and Euro cup and after this season i doubt i will have many original players left as the interest in them is immense.
Thats is the most ridiculous fixture list i have ever seen. good luck with that
Any ideas on why the net transfer spend hasn't updated for the new month?
Why is it so convoluted when it can be simple. Income is said to be 0 when as you say, it should be 3,887,763. It says 'Income', it doesn't say 'Income less transfers profit'.
I find it amusing you get so defensive over Toni when you still put the best midfielder in the game in your side!
pretty obvious hes talking about silva (who isnt) because Aquino is pants! (so fair play)
In all honesty i did an experiment like yours a few years ago, it is great fun to trounce the lower divisions and see how you do in cups against real competition
Don't know if it's funny but it sure is tight
made me chuckle
Suprising coaching role for Dwight Yorke
Last edited by jrDon; 28-05-2009 at 23:31.
Obviously has some confidence in his ability.
I have a slightly hot headed midfield regen called Johnny Daley.
Mr Daley sees strange zebra like object trying to escape
Mr Daley takes evasive action
Mr Daley seems pleased with his work
Mr Daley shows dominance with staring out policy
after i struggled to beat Belgium in the qualifying play offs...
beat Brazil in the second round 3-1, Colombia 2-2 (won on penalties) in the quarter final then beat Germany 1-1 (won on penalties) after Germany missed a penalty in the 120th minute
Oh, England, only you could do this:
England had already qualified, though - although it is the sort of result which would result in Wembley being burnt down and Capello charged with murder.
Okay so picture this. I'm 3-0 up and it's the 90th minute with three minutes of extra time to play, we get a corner and my goalkeeper decides to go up for the corner? I mean what? I'm winning 3-0 why does he need to do this;
Not impressed. 0_o
Not sure how to post pictures on this board so here's the link to a screenshot of when I attempted to sign Hatem Ben Arfa for my Man City squad...looking at the drop in wages if he moved clubs, who says players only want big wages?
I thought this was funny: An error by Nemanja Vidic allowed striker Samuel Eto'o to score a powerful effort. It came up when i was playing a couple of days after the champions league final irl.
I don't know whats worse. Cech being the oldest player to play for chelsea despite him not even being the oldest player in my first team, or the previous record holder being only 14.
I've seen that bug before, but only ever with Chelsea :confused:.
Probably been posted a few times before, but still funny And even more funny considering the fact that "Holyday Manager" after 11 years unemployed got his first job in the "FM-world" 8 days before this rumour came out, shurley he must be waaaaay more experienced than those 'Football Manager' applications
Last edited by GEIRunar; 01-06-2009 at 17:30.
Talk about a two horse race.
100 points and still not good enough for title