Jump to content

Comparing CA/PA numbers to real life.


Recommended Posts

I searched but couldn't find anything so hence the new thread.

I'm currently editing the standard database in readiment for a new summer career and was wondering how people viewed CA/PA values in relation to the real world of football?

I see it as 180-190 as "world class" - e.g. the top few players in their position during that generation/five year peak.

190+, would be players who could be considered legends of the game in any era.

165-180... these would be top players in their domestic leagues, with 140+ being good, solid top division players or leading stars in second division leagues.

Is it accurate to view CA/PA like this, as analogous to real world football?

What are your thoughts on the numbers and what they represent in terms of performance levels?

Link to post
Share on other sites

But it mostly depends on the attribute spread.

Of course. I'm just trying to keep any changes I make to the database fairly objective (I want to adjust levels based on the season just gone).

160+ is top Premiership quality.

180+ is ridiculously talented

190+ is best ever territory

It'd be interesting to hear what sort of ranges are relevant to lower divisions and less reputable leagues?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're hidden since it would kind of ruin things to have they them visible at all times - who would need to scout when you could just search for the highest PA kids from the off?

You can see them all in the editor though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you cannot even see them on players in your squad ?

No, but your coach reports can give you an idea using the star ratings.

It really would ruin the game if you could see the CA/PA and hidden stats of your players.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...