+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: AI imaginative formations

  1. #1
    Reserves
    Join Date
    22nd January 2012
    Posts
    12,807

    Default AI imaginative formations

    Whats the most imaginative formation an AI has played against you? I dont usually pay that much attention but I just saw basingstoke has lined up with this



    An odd formation which I would call a 1-2-2-3-2.

  2. #2
    Youth Team
    Join Date
    19th March 2011
    Posts
    4,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ri916 View Post
    Whats the most imaginative formation an AI has played against you? I dont usually pay that much attention but I just saw basingstoke has lined up with this



    An odd formation which I would call a 1-2-2-3-2.
    I saw one like it, but they had the central midfielder pulled back in a DMC position and no sweeper. It was a good tactic, as they had five men in defense, five men in the midfield and seven men in attack. They were a bit vulnerable on the flanks, though, so I crushed them anyways

  3. #3
    Third Team
    Join Date
    27th November 2011
    Posts
    7,543

    Default

    i have seen some strange ones.
    Liverpool played a 4-2-1-2-1 against me (back 4 and 3 midfielders 2 wingers and a striker), i used the same fomration against them the next season and beat em 6-1
    Fulham played an odd one as well
    4-1-2-2-1

  4. #4
    Amateur
    Join Date
    7th October 2011
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    261

    Default

    i'm using a 4-4-2 fairly well at the moment and teams like to switch to a 3(central defenders) -3(wing backs & defensive midfielder) -2(two central midfielders) -1(attacking midfielder) -1(striker)

  5. #5

    Default

    I have noticed teams going to 5 at the back against my side, when we are running wild with 3 strikers and a winger. Then the rest of the team lines up down the center of the field, giving them a 5-1-2-1-1! Sure, it protects the center of the pitch, but the fullbacks can run wild, and 3 men in midfield completely nullifies it.

    I have also seen a team line up with 4-1-3-1-1 recently, same idea, try to dominate the center of the park, I guess? I think the opposition manager was just trying to keep me guessing as they always play 4-4-2 and I mentioned as much in the press conference, so he was trying to one-up me, I suppose? It was a case of 'who blinks first' and since my team was having the better of it they had to end up changing tactics midway to... 4-4-2! Come on, the formation I lined up ready to face? Seriously?

  6. #6
    First Team
    Join Date
    5th June 2007
    Location
    Wishing Brendan Rodgers had been this good in 2010
    Posts
    22,222

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ri916 View Post

    An odd formation which I would call a 1-2-2-3-2.
    Most people would call it 5-3-2 or 3-5-2. A fairly common formation in the 90s.

  7. #7
    Third Team
    Join Date
    6th August 2007
    Posts
    8,480

    Default

    The 5-3-2 variant is similar to what I played in during the early 90's in Germany, FB's were a little deeper until 92/93 when we starting playing more like WB's & the sweeper was replaced with an advanced CB, not quite a DM/Anchor man though.
    Last edited by Barside; 09-05-2012 at 19:39.

  8. #8
    Semi Pro
    Join Date
    21st May 2009
    Location
    \o/ Super Frankie Lampard! \o/
    Posts
    3,508

    Default

    Not an unusual formation per se, but in my FM08 game championship-side Watford played a hyper-attacking 4-2-4. They had the likes of Stephen Fletcher, Ebanks Blake, Damien Duff and Felipe Caicedo. They got third with an insane goal for tally, but unsurprisingly leaked goals like a sieve. Typical scorelines were 3-2's and 4-3's. Beat me in the playoff finals, the b*st*rds

  9. #9
    Amateur
    Join Date
    22nd November 2004
    Location
    Leicestershire
    Posts
    663

    Default

    On my save game in Russia Amkar Perm played a formation with a midfield 5 of 1 DM, 3 CM and 1 AM. It also had 4 defenders and 1 up front.

    It's been quite successful as they kept staying up year after year despite having a poor squad. I tended to do quite well against it though and dished out some thrashings. The manager who played it has retired now though, so I can see them tumbling into the 1st Division in my next season.

  10. #10

    Default

    The old 4-1-3-1-1. Its just too narrow, and some of the players are just too close to each other (the central mids and AMc and DMc), for my liking.

    I can see how against teams without any decent flank players you could ruin their game plan, entirely, though.


    Quote Originally Posted by Sir_Liam View Post
    On my save game in Russia Amkar Perm played a formation with a midfield 5 of 1 DM, 3 CM and 1 AM. It also had 4 defenders and 1 up front.

    It's been quite successful as they kept staying up year after year despite having a poor squad. I tended to do quite well against it though and dished out some thrashings. The manager who played it has retired now though, so I can see them tumbling into the 1st Division in my next season.

  11. #11
    Amateur
    Join Date
    29th November 2010
    Posts
    326

    Default

    I never seen a team with an odd starting tactic but they do at times change to some unusual tactic when they're chasing goal(s) or protecting a lead. The coolest one I've seen is... I don't know what it's called but it looks like a pine tree

    ST
    ACML ACMR
    ML MC MR
    DM
    DCL DC DCR

    Something like that IIRC

    (The spacing between ML-MC-MR not shown correctly... I don't know how to fix this O.o)
    Last edited by PPPPPPPPPPPP10; 10-05-2012 at 20:25.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts