Closed Thread
Results 1 to 90 of 90

Thread: Match Engine Is A Complete Joke

  1. #1
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    The match engine is a complete joke..even after the deployment of the patch..I have 4 strikers all with composure and finishing all 17 and higher, its what I always search for with a striker, I even have Bojan from Barcelona..my coaches rating for shooting is even the top rating..I get 20+ chances a game and sometimes don't even score..some games I even have 30+ chances, its ridiculous and beyond comprehension..no other version has been like this I am so disappointed.

  2. #2
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    The match engine is a complete joke..even after the deployment of the patch..I have 4 strikers all with composure and finishing all 17 and higher, its what I always search for with a striker, I even have Bojan from Barcelona..my coaches rating for shooting is even the top rating..I get 20+ chances a game and sometimes don't even score..some games I even have 30+ chances, its ridiculous and beyond comprehension..no other version has been like this I am so disappointed.

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Join Date
    28th June 2004
    Location
    Guess you only get one chance in life to play a song that goes like this.
    Posts
    31,633

    Default

    Please try searching before starting threads like this, the match engine has been discussed many, many times, and there's a 13-pgae thread a little further down the foirst page.

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    Basically, what Ackter said. Also, consider posting more constructive criticisms in future.

  5. #5

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by GillsMan:
    Also, consider posting more constructive criticisms in future. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Is it not clear what he's saying?

    He would prefer the game if top-class strikers weren't constantly missing easy chances.

  6. #6
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    I could have been a lot more cutting with my "criticism" as a matter of fact, explain to me how more constructive I could have been ? create a new match engine ??

  7. #7
    Amateur
    Join Date
    10th January 2008
    Posts
    84

    Default



    to be honest i think its disgraceful how something which is basically the whole point of the game can be so utterly unrealistic and for me just destroys the whole game, its cringeworthy watching your team dominate everyweek and hardly ever score, especially when that **** should have won easily crap pops up every single game, its almost as if some clown at sigames does it on purpose

  8. #8
    Amateur
    Join Date
    13th October 2007
    Location
    The internet :(
    Posts
    313

    Default

    Bojan scored 62 goals for me in about 40 matches in my previous season, and I doubt my Bojan is very different to yours, so clearly there is something else you could be doing because its is possible to score goals in matches

  9. #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by something less annoying:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by GillsMan:
    Also, consider posting more constructive criticisms in future. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Is it not clear what he's saying?

    He would prefer the game if top-class strikers weren't constantly missing easy chances. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Perhaps you don't understand English? The OP was very clear in his post, but tbh, the quality of this forum is declining rapidly with the likes of the OP et al simply ranting without saying anything CONSTRUCTIVE. To have a look at a detailed critique of the ME, check any of the threads with more than 1 page - there's some excellent debate (pro and against) the ME in there.

    Much more constructive than this tripe tbh.

  10. #10
    Third Team
    Join Date
    7th August 2007
    Posts
    8,473

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by something less annoying:
    Is it not clear what he's saying?

    He would prefer the game if top-class strikers weren't constantly missing easy chances. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Is the OP posting anything we havn't heard before?

    SI have kindly provided a search function & as has been said a large match engine thread already exists on the first page. Also I do believe SI have admitted their mistake on the shots issue & will be fixing it, so can people not just wait until 8.02 is released on this one?

  11. #11
    Amateur
    Join Date
    2nd April 2003
    Location
    Swindon
    Posts
    273

    Default

    For once i have to agree, after many years of playing CM/FM the actual engine really is a joke. It appears to concoct goals, for example why would a goal keeper go left about 10 feet and tip a ball wide from a free kick on the half way line, the ball never went near the 6yard box was going in a straigh trajectory all the way from the half way line and would have been about 10 feet even not more wide, from the corner a penalty and a goal. This is one example of strange things that this engine appears to concoct. I could go on, but I for one don't want to rant too much...

  12. #12
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    I am not sure that any man with "Yippee" in his little forum signature can regard anyone else's posts as Tribe, thanks though, I'll get myself a "quirky" little line that no-one cares about on my signature and head on over to geeksville and spend hours there reading, I have a job and life thanks, my rant was posted because I wanted to display my complete disatisfaction at the product, seems I am not the only one..

  13. #13
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Barside:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by something less annoying:
    Is it not clear what he's saying?

    He would prefer the game if top-class strikers weren't constantly missing easy chances. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Is the OP posting anything we havn't heard before?

    SI have kindly provided a search function & as has been said a large match engine thread already exists on the first page. Also I do believe SI have admitted their mistake on the shots issue & will be fixing it, so can people not just wait until 8.02 is released on this one? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Ohh thats fine then now you have cleared that up, I have had nearly every version of this game since I was a kid, there I was expecting to pay £25 for a complete product and satisfactory match engine as before..its ok I'll wait the months for the patch...****

  14. #14
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:
    **** </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    First of all, abuse is not tolerated on the forums. And secondly, snide comments about the fact that I wrote "yippee" in my location simply show you up for the child you apparently are.

    Here are some posts that contain constructive criticisms. Something you appear not to have mastered yet, my little man.
    Sorry but I needed to get this off my chest...
    Critique of FM08 transfer mechanism - will it ever change?
    Detailed experiment of youth development - Troubling results
    FIFA Manager 08 vs FM
    bugs that make this game unplayable
    Si making a blatant attempt to deceive us?
    OFFICIAL: Match Engine Wishlist
    Patch 8.0.1. Shots to Goal Ratio not fixed - SHOCKING!! SI Please answer - believe to be related to Closing down and Long shots bug (16 pages long!!!)
    (disproved on page 2) Finaly proved it, the game engine is bogus
    FM match engine = BLATANTLY pre-determined

  15. #15
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:
    I have a job and life thanks </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    OMGZ!!! Well, I clearly don't. Just because I'm posting on a forum (the same as you btw), I clearly can't have a job or a life. Thank you so much for saving me from myself. Seriously. I'm now going to trot off and live a fulfilling life. Thank you.

  16. #16
    Amateur
    Join Date
    10th January 2008
    Posts
    84

    Default

    what a cheeky **** you are gills , just slagging people off, when your the one who is actually childish and giving out cheap shots, you actually appear to live on this board, so i guess that makes you the little man eh living on a computer games board

  17. #17
    Amateur
    Join Date
    28th October 2004
    Location
    Two birds in the bush are worth far more than one in the hand.
    Posts
    229

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:
    Ohh thats fine then now you have cleared that up, I have had nearly every version of this game since I was a kid, there I was expecting to pay £25 for a complete product and satisfactory match engine as before..its ok I'll wait the months for the patch...**** </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    And it's that attitude that causes the negative reaction towards you. Others have started threads regarding the same problem and there have been pleasant debates. It's not the issue you brought up that people have a problem with per se, it is more the way in which you chose to deliver it.

    That aside, if you have been playing every version since you were a kid, you should already know the way the SI release/patch cycle works.

    I can't remember a release where there wasn't a final patch in February. This isn't the first time and it won't be the last.

  18. #18
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    GC - no need for that was there? I have regular access to the Internet, hence why I'm on this board a bit...not that I need to explain myself in all honesty. All I'm asking for is that if people want to criticise the game, they do so intelligently. I enjoy FM, but not blindly. I can see its faults, and there have been interesting debates. If only you could contribute in such a way.

  19. #19
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    Thanks Poindexter..like I said I haven't got the time to read among forums, I merely wanted to display my disatisfaction at the product, theres no more to say, I won't be buying future products and won't be playing the game again so thats it, seems theres an awful lot of people actually complaining about the match engine though, surprised you got time for all this?, ain't you got comic books to read or maybe a C++ code book ?

  20. #20
    Moderator
    Join Date
    19th December 2000
    Location
    Some people think I'm Bonkers, I just think I'm free!!!! :D
    Posts
    3,958

    Default

    tostao10 & Genuine_quality - Lose the attitude and cut out the abuse, it will not be tolerated in any form on these forums. From what I have read you two seem the only agressors in this thread. If you have nothing constructive to say then i suggest you simply just do not post.

  21. #21
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:
    Thanks Poindexter..like I said I haven't got the time to read among forums, I merely wanted to display my disatisfaction at the product, theres no more to say, I won't be buying future products and won't be playing the game again so thats it, seems theres an awful lot of people actually complaining about the match engine though, surprised you got time for all this?, ain't you got comic books to read or maybe a C++ code book ? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    No, I "aint" (sic).

  22. #22
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by DJdeMarco:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:
    Ohh thats fine then now you have cleared that up, I have had nearly every version of this game since I was a kid, there I was expecting to pay £25 for a complete product and satisfactory match engine as before..its ok I'll wait the months for the patch...**** </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    And it's that attitude that causes the negative reaction towards you. Others have started threads regarding the same problem and there have been pleasant debates. It's not the issue you brought up that people have a problem with per se, it is more the way in which you chose to deliver it.

    That aside, if you have been playing every version since you were a kid, you should already know the way the SI release/patch cycle works.

    I can't remember a release where there wasn't a final patch in February. This isn't the first time and it won't be the last. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    thats my point..maybe one day, we'll get a complete game without the need for patches, and how can the match engine be so different from previous versions ?

  23. #23
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:
    thats my point..maybe one day, we'll get a complete game without the need for patches, and how can the match engine be so different from previous versions ? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    It's possible that we'll get a game without patches, but SI's mantra, I believe, is "evolution not revolution", so I think they'll be concentrating on gradual changes, so I think we'll always have patches. I like a new patch, as it often adds a new dimension to a game, but I can certainly see why others don't like them.

  24. #24
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by GillsMan:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:
    Thanks Poindexter..like I said I haven't got the time to read among forums, I merely wanted to display my disatisfaction at the product, theres no more to say, I won't be buying future products and won't be playing the game again so thats it, seems theres an awful lot of people actually complaining about the match engine though, surprised you got time for all this?, ain't you got comic books to read or maybe a C++ code book ? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    No, I "aint" (sic). </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Brilliant how I placed the Grammar in there as I knew you would be the kind of guy to post on it..cheers you have confirmed my thoughts on you.. :-)

  25. #25
    Amateur
    Join Date
    18th May 2007
    Location
    London, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    544

    Default

    The people who complain about this makes me wonder if they've actually watched a Football match in real life.

    People constantly whining they're not winning 15-0 every match.

    It's quite balanced. The ammount of 1 on 1 chances you get is balanced by the lack of the chances put away.

    Plus if you actually watched a real game, you would notice that it's quite realistic.

  26. #26
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:
    Brilliant how I placed the Grammar in there as I knew you would be the kind of guy to post on it..cheers you have confirmed my thoughts on you.. :-) </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Mate, it was a tongue-in-cheek response. Think about me what you like, I couldn't really care less, but lose the chip on your shoulder, please.

    Let's cut the b*tching (from both of us) and get back to talking about Football Manager, yeah?

  27. #27
    Amateur
    Join Date
    10th January 2008
    Posts
    84

    Default

    ok, ill ask a reasonable question

    1.can you honestly say to me, that watching your team miss 10 one on ones in every other game is both down to bad tactics, and /or is realistic?

    2.why do you think tactics have such a large part to play in games when hsitorically teams that win leagues and cups do it because they have better players?, tactics can seperate teams that are close in natural ability, but thats all

  28. #28
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    I am a season ticket holder at Arsenal and have been for 12 years, so believe me I am used to 650 chances being missed.. :-) anyway who is the local Ontario team these days ? do they score lots of goals and make lots of great plays ?, who is on their roster this year ?..

  29. #29
    Amateur
    Join Date
    18th May 2007
    Location
    London, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    544

    Default

    Like Canadian soccer is even worth paying attention to.

  30. #30
    Third Team
    Join Date
    7th August 2007
    Posts
    8,473

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:

    Ohh thats fine then now you have cleared that up, I have had nearly every version of this game since I was a kid, there I was expecting to pay £25 for a complete product and satisfactory match engine as before..its ok I'll wait the months for the patch...t*** </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    If that's your attitude then do you really expect a good response from people.

    I offered a reply & because you didn't like the answer all you can do is offer abuse that was not in anyway encouraged by my post.

    I have also been an FM player sine the orignal version on the Amiga & whereas I don't think this game is the finished article I accept taht like all other PC games it will need a patch or two before it plays as the develpoers intended.

    Now will you kindly take your rotten attitude elsewhere.

  31. #31
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by GillsMan:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:
    Brilliant how I placed the Grammar in there as I knew you would be the kind of guy to post on it..cheers you have confirmed my thoughts on you.. :-) </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Mate, it was a tongue-in-cheek response. Think about me what you like, I couldn't really care less, but lose the chip on your shoulder, please.

    Let's cut the b*tching (from both of us) and get back to talking about Football Manager, yeah? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    The "tribe" comment was not necessary, I have been a player and lover of this game for years, I have never used this forum and did not expect the **** I encountered for highlighting a problem that many people appear to be having, I have never felt it necessary to post before as I have always been satisfied with the game and even patches, you do't still buy it after all these years if you don't like the game, my point is I know how to play the game and use tactics, its got to be quite serious when someone like me is actually posting..

  32. #32
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Skunner:
    Like Canadian soccer is even worth paying attention to. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    do teams not win 15-0 and score every chance then ?

  33. #33
    Amateur
    Join Date
    10th January 2008
    Posts
    84

    Default

    a good example in a recent game 3-0 up at half time and coasting, so i say dont get complacent, im only playing the bottom team, and i lose 4-3, now you can babbel on all you want about some random example of this happening in 1956, but totally season , that just defy mathematical probabilites happen all of the time, how a tactic that is so good in the first half, can be so, so , so bad in the second just about sums it all up

  34. #34
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Genuine_quality:
    ok, ill ask a reasonable question

    1.can you honestly say to me, that watching your team miss 10 one on ones in every other game is both down to bad tactics, and /or is realistic?

    2.why do you think tactics have such a large part to play in games when hsitorically teams that win leagues and cups do it because they have better players?, tactics can seperate teams that are close in natural ability, but thats all </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    1) No, I can't. But I've yet to experience that. To be fair, I think I concentrated too much on simply the goals/shots ratio and didn't take into account the quality of chances. A lot of people are saying that the number of quality chances being missed is too much, so maybe there's something in that, I don't know I haven't seen it myself.

    2) Ah, you've unwittingly encroached on one of the oldest debates in football. What makes a winning side: good tactics or good tactics? You seem convinced that it's only to do with better players, but if that's the case then Holland would have won a World Cup (1974 anyone?) and England would have beaten Croatia, etc. The answer is probably it's a little bit of both. But don't be fooled into thinking that football is purely about picking the best 11 players. After all, Steve McClaren picked more or less the same players we'd all have probably picked throughout the campaign, and we all know how well he did.

  35. #35
    Amateur
    Join Date
    10th January 2008
    Posts
    84

    Default

    jesus christ what a terrible forum, you can't even edit your own posts when you make an error

  36. #36
    Moderator
    Join Date
    19th December 2000
    Location
    Some people think I'm Bonkers, I just think I'm free!!!! :D
    Posts
    3,958

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Genuine_quality:
    ok, ill ask a reasonable question

    1.can you honestly say to me, that watching your team miss 10 one on ones in every other game is both down to bad tactics, and /or is realistic?

    2.why do you think tactics have such a large part to play in games when hsitorically teams that win leagues and cups do it because they have better players?, tactics can seperate teams that are close in natural ability, but thats all </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    1. I have never experienced this on FM08 as yet so cannot comment on this. I have a lot of chances, I score a few, miss a few but that is football.

    2. So you are saying that Scotland and France are close in natural ability even though us Scots are really pretty poor in comparison to France technically. We managed to beat them twice due to tactics from Smith and McLeish and ok with a lot of luck thrown in for good measure. What about Greece winning the Euros not so long ago, they did not have the best technically gifted players, they had tactics, organisation and were just too good tactically.

  37. #37
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:
    The "tribe" comment was not necessary. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    You've said that twice now. I actually said "tripe". And you weren't called a "****" and a "****" like I was, so shall we just let it go now? The debate about FM is in danger of turning sensible.

  38. #38
    Third Team
    Join Date
    7th August 2007
    Posts
    8,473

    Default

    Quick apology to the mods, I didn't see Andy H's comment before I hit the RP button.

    That being said the two posters in question are really not what this site needs.

  39. #39
    Amateur
    Join Date
    10th January 2008
    Posts
    84

    Default

    holland didnt win the world cup because they had rubbish defenders, croatia probably have better players technically than england or at least some of them are, you are just using the english bias toward our own teams ability like any other nation
    i think a better example would be in league format, the teams with the best players always win, and no matter how many permutations you had with slider bars for derby county they would still go down because there players are rubbish

  40. #40
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Andy H:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Genuine_quality:
    ok, ill ask a reasonable question

    1.can you honestly say to me, that watching your team miss 10 one on ones in every other game is both down to bad tactics, and /or is realistic?

    2.why do you think tactics have such a large part to play in games when hsitorically teams that win leagues and cups do it because they have better players?, tactics can seperate teams that are close in natural ability, but thats all </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    1. I have never experienced this on FM08 as yet so cannot comment on this. I have a lot of chances, I score a few, miss a few but that is football.

    2. So you are saying that Scotland and France are close in natural ability even though us Scots are really pretty poor in comparison to France technically. We managed to beat them twice due to tactics from Smith and McLeish and ok with a lot of luck thrown in for good measure. What about Greece winning the Euros not so long ago, they did not have the best technically gifted players, they had tactics, organisation and were just too good tactically. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    thats a fair point but they were exceptionally organised and tactically spot on, plus a very large point was that these teams had also built up a momentum, results on football manager can be random from teams that are bottom with poor players and poor setup, I can accept being tactically outclassed but it just seems so random than from before.

  41. #41
    Amateur
    Join Date
    18th May 2007
    Location
    London, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    544

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Skunner:
    Like Canadian soccer is even worth paying attention to. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    do teams not win 15-0 and score every chance then ? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Not really. Usually 1-0 wins from what I recall. They're like the equivilant to the Blue Square in England.

  42. #42
    Amateur
    Join Date
    10th January 2008
    Posts
    84

    Default

    france actually qualified, not scotland, so even though what your saying scotland had better universal tactics, they still lost in the end to the better teams

    stop making france out to be a world super power, they were crap in the qualifiers just like us

  43. #43
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Skunner:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Skunner:
    Like Canadian soccer is even worth paying attention to. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    do teams not win 15-0 and score every chance then ? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Not really. Usually 1-0 wins from what I recall. They're like the equivilant to the Blue Square in England. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I better start watching more games down in the blue square then if thats what we are judging by, thanks for your help..

  44. #44
    Amateur
    Join Date
    10th January 2008
    Posts
    84

    Default

    yeh, nobody is saying one off occurances can't happen, were detracting from the point, a good tactic isnt one thats lets the opposition miss countless one on ones and then have one shot and always score

    but on champ man it is

  45. #45
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Genuine_quality:
    holland didnt win the world cup because they had rubbish defenders, croatia probably have better players technically than england or at least some of them are, you are just using the english bias toward our own teams ability like any other nation
    i think a better example would be in league format, the teams with the best players always win, and no matter how many permutations you had with slider bars for derby county they would still go down because there players are rubbish </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    No, a better example would be the ones Andy used, such as Greece winning Euro 04, or Scotland beating France, twice.

    And I don't agree that Holland had rubbish defenders - their defence was on a par with the rest of the World Cup, and they only conceded one goal iirc before they got to the final. Not too shabby, eh?

  46. #46
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Genuine_quality:
    france actually qualified, not scotland, so even though what your saying scotland had better universal tactics, they still lost in the end to the better teams

    stop making france out to be a world super power, they were crap in the qualifiers just like us </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Thats true, Domenech is an awful coach and their only current world class player is Ribery, Henry is breaking down,Thuram is old,Vieira is broken down, Diarra though I rate him at Arsenal is first choice for France and can't even make our first team.

  47. #47
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Genuine_quality:
    but on champ man it is </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    I was going to point out that we're playing Football Manager, but thought the better of it in the end.

  48. #48
    Moderator
    Join Date
    19th December 2000
    Location
    Some people think I'm Bonkers, I just think I'm free!!!! :D
    Posts
    3,958

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Genuine_quality:
    france actually qualified, not scotland, so even though what your saying scotland had better universal tactics, they still lost in the end to the better teams

    stop making france out to be a world super power, they were crap in the qualifiers just like us </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I never said once France were a world super power, I said they were technically superior to Scotland as you said tactics only really separate teams who are close on natural ability when Scotland are no where near as good as France but managed to beat them twice and was pointing out that tactics in those particular matches were the major factor.

  49. #49
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:
    Thats true, Domenech is an awful coach and their only current world class player is Ribery, Henry is breaking down,Thuram is old,Vieira is broken down, Diarra though I rate him at Arsenal is first choice for France and can't even make our first team. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Benzema looks quality as well tbf.

  50. #50
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by GillsMan:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Genuine_quality:
    holland didnt win the world cup because they had rubbish defenders, croatia probably have better players technically than england or at least some of them are, you are just using the english bias toward our own teams ability like any other nation
    i think a better example would be in league format, the teams with the best players always win, and no matter how many permutations you had with slider bars for derby county they would still go down because there players are rubbish </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    No, a better example would be the ones Andy used, such as Greece winning Euro 04, or Scotland beating France, twice.

    And I don't agree that Holland had rubbish defenders - their defence was on a par with the rest of the World Cup, and they only conceded one goal iirc before they got to the final. Not too shabby, eh? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Suurbier,Krol and Haan aint too shabby !!

  51. #51
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by GillsMan:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by tostao10:
    Thats true, Domenech is an awful coach and their only current world class player is Ribery, Henry is breaking down,Thuram is old,Vieira is broken down, Diarra though I rate him at Arsenal is first choice for France and can't even make our first team. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Benzema looks quality as well tbf. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    he does but its still potential at the moment and untested.

  52. #52
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    So basically, and what these IRL things show, is that it's not just enough to pick the best players. You need to have a bit of tactical nouse about you as well IRL.

    The same goes for FM, I think you need to be able to alter your tactics slightly in order to stay on top. I think the ME can be improved and I hope it is improved over the coming years, but I don't think it's bugged at the moment. But it does need refining, but then SI never denied that as far as I'm aware.

  53. #53
    Amateur
    Join Date
    10th January 2008
    Posts
    84

    Default

    everytime there is a tactical discussion all the clique jump out with random occurances of a succesfull underdog, but blatantly leaving out the statistical probability of it happening

    yeh for every upset there are a infinately more results with teams with better players prevailing, champ man is totally tactical based, therefore unrealistic, you could accept the odd one of tactic beating you, but there is an unnerving randomness in the game which is just impossible to predict wether your playing the top or bottom teams, and even if your playing your best 11, if every slider bar isnt perfect youll get beat of a pub team cos there tactics are better

  54. #54
    Amateur
    Join Date
    10th January 2008
    Posts
    84

    Default

    explain to me how when playing the deepest i can, the most defensive i can, and everybody off forward runs, i can still get caught on the counter attack(not from a corner or free kick either), thats a good example of ambiguity in the game play

  55. #55
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Genuine_quality:
    everytime there is a tactical discussion all the clique jump out with random occurances of a succesfull underdog, but blatantly leaving out the statistical probability of it happening

    yeh for every upset there are a infinately more results with teams with better players prevailing, champ man is totally tactical based, therefore unrealistic, you could accept the odd one of tactic beating you, but there is an unnerving randomness in the game which is just impossible to predict wether your playing the top or bottom teams, and even if your playing your best 11, if every slider bar isnt perfect youll get beat of a pub team cos there tactics are better </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    I don't know, that's certainly not what I've found in my experience. What I have found is this: by looking at the match engine, I've been able to see what was going wrong. For example, my first few games in my Gillingham career, I was getting humped all the time. By paying attention to the match engine, I could see that the opposition's wingers were getting in behind my full backs all the time, and laying on chance after chance for the opposition. To remedy this, I simply ensured my full backs were much more defensive (to make up for their lack of pace) and if the winger they were facing was pacy, I'd ensure that the fullback was NOT marking them tightly (so they'd always be a yard or two off them).

    To make up for the lack of attacking threat from the fullbacks, I put the farrows on my wide midfielders all the way to the top, allowing THEM to get in behind the opposition's fullbacks.

    I'm no tactical genius, but it's little things like this that have helped me. Admittedly, I've had to spend time, but not that much. I certainly don't fiddle about with most of the sliders in all fairness.

    Just to reiterate, I don't think the ME of the game is perfect, but I don't agree it's bugged. But that's just my experience.

  56. #56
    Amateur
    Join Date
    10th January 2008
    Posts
    84

    Default

    anyway, i think your france -scotland tactical analysis is incorrect

    i think there were other variables to take into account like determination and work rate and sheer will, if there not all the same thing, to just say scotland won because of there tactics say 4-5-1 is wrong because what your saying is if every team just played against france with scotlands tactic they would win, dont you think that there could be other reasons for scotland win other thank passing style, etc

  57. #57
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Genuine_quality:
    explain to me how when playing the deepest i can, the most defensive i can, and everybody off forward runs, i can still get caught on the counter attack(not from a corner or free kick either), thats a good example of ambiguity in the game play </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Slow defenders? If not, then I can't. And there again, maybe unwittingly, you might have stumbled on a good point. So, perhaps if you could detail your precise tactics, the players in your defence, and how you were caught on the counter attack, we can analyse it. More importantly, it might flag up to SI a potential flaw in the game - and this can only help them, surely?

  58. #58
    Moderator
    Join Date
    19th December 2000
    Location
    Some people think I'm Bonkers, I just think I'm free!!!! :D
    Posts
    3,958

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Genuine_quality:
    anyway, i think your france -scotland tactical analysis is incorrect

    i think there were other variables to take into account like determination and work rate and sheer will, if there not all the same thing, to just say scotland won because of there tactics say 4-5-1 is wrong because what your saying is if every team just played against france with scotlands tactic they would win, dont you think that there could be other reasons for scotland win other thank passing style, etc </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Of course there were other variables that contributed to Scotland's wins but part of that was the tactics.

  59. #59
    Amateur
    Join Date
    10th January 2008
    Posts
    84

    Default

    well of course a part of it was tactics, like if scotland had played 9 up front they would have lost heavily etc, but on champ man its 75% tactics and 25% player ability

  60. #60
    Youth Team
    Join Date
    9th May 2003
    Location
    Wembley, Block 133, Row 23, Seat 296 - COME ON YOUR SPURRRRS!!!!
    Posts
    4,279

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Skunner:
    The people who complain about this makes me wonder if they've actually watched a Football match in real life.

    People constantly whining they're not winning 15-0 every match.

    It's quite balanced. The ammount of 1 on 1 chances you get is balanced by the lack of the chances put away.

    Plus if you actually watched a real game, you would notice that it's quite realistic. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Oh the irony.

    So its fine if unrealistic amounts of chances are created, as long as the score isnt unrealistically high?

  61. #61
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th March 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by George Graham:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Skunner:
    The people who complain about this makes me wonder if they've actually watched a Football match in real life.

    People constantly whining they're not winning 15-0 every match.

    It's quite balanced. The ammount of 1 on 1 chances you get is balanced by the lack of the chances put away.

    Plus if you actually watched a real game, you would notice that it's quite realistic. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Oh the irony.

    So its fine if unrealistic amounts of chances are created, as long as the score isnt unrealistically high? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    yeah its been quite fun with him .. :-)

  62. #62
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    22nd May 2002
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,069

    Default

    Bottom line here is simple.

    If we all accept there was a flaw in the match engine covering shots to goals ratio, and it seems that most people including SI do acknowledge this, then it should have been SI’s objective to release an interim patch to fix this.

    They haven’t, and that has led to a lot of pointless topics and posts.

    As much as I hate to say it, it seems to me that since SI were bought out, the service level has dropped. In the past, we could have expected a patch for this very quickly.

    As someone pointed out early in this thread, this is almost the key component of the whole game.

  63. #63
    Moderator
    Join Date
    28th June 2004
    Location
    Guess you only get one chance in life to play a song that goes like this.
    Posts
    31,633

    Default

    Yes, lets get SI to rush out a patch to fix one issue.

  64. #64
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    22nd May 2002
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,069

    Default

    Knee jerk responses such as yours serve no purpose other than to irritate the poster, in this case me.

    If you had bothered to read the whole post and think before you wrote, you would have appreciated a little more depth in your response would have been called for.

    If you see the need to post frivolous rubbish just to boost your karma rating, so be it, I would appreciate it if you didn't do so at my expense thank you.

  65. #65
    Moderator
    Join Date
    28th April 2005
    Location
    Mankind is the only creature smart enough to know its own history, and dumb enough to ignore it.
    Posts
    27,108

    Default

    Because of it's complexity SI will take all the time they can get to get it right.
    As a patch is due after the transfer window it makes complete sense to keep working on and testing the ME till then rather than repeating the quick patch solution which failed in the first place.

    Your rehash of the theory that the Sega connection is somehow damaging is speculative balderdash and based on no factual knowledge at all. In fact it's a huge step in ensuring the future of FM.

  66. #66
    Reserves
    Join Date
    21st June 2005
    Location
    At work mostly.
    Posts
    11,163

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Genuine_quality:
    well of course a part of it was tactics, like if scotland had played 9 up front they would have lost heavily etc, but on champ man its 75% tactics and 25% player ability </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I personally have to disagree with this statement.
    I agree that it is difficult to understand some of the tactical elements of this game, and I've been saying for a long time now that some kind of feedback system is badly needed to give certain people more of an idea of why their tactics aren't working.

    And yes there is a well known issue regarding the number of one-on-one chances created.

    But it's very possible to create a balanced tactic that relies on player ability. I've done it myself and if your interested the details of this can be found in this thread.

    As I said there is a known problem with the number of one-on-one chances shown by the match engine. Unfortunately (and understandably) this distorts peoples belief in their tactics. Understandably they see their team creating a lot of chances that are missed and think because they are creating these chances their tactics must be solid. But like it or not you need to think differently at the moment and look more at the final scores than the number of one-on-one chances created.

    So the point is that there's nothing wrong with the game once you stop looking at chances as the main indicator of a successful tactic and instead look at results. From there it's easy enough to create a successful tactic and enjoy the game immensly, as many of us are doing.

  67. #67
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Ranson52:
    Bottom line here is simple.

    If we all accept there was a flaw in the match engine covering shots to goals ratio, and it seems that most people including SI do acknowledge this, then it should have been SI’s objective to release an interim patch to fix this.

    They haven’t, and that has led to a lot of pointless topics and posts.

    As much as I hate to say it, it seems to me that since SI were bought out, the service level has dropped. In the past, we could have expected a patch for this very quickly.

    As someone pointed out early in this thread, this is almost the key component of the whole game. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Listening to SI's podcast - which is just one way that SI communicate with their fanbase - I heard a very sensible comment from Miles Jacobson. He did feel that people were making too much of an issue about the goals to shots ratio, but then he did concede that it happens a bit too much in Football Manager. He then said this would be fixed in the next patch released end of February.

    I honestly can't agree that this "issue" makes the game unplayable. I can see the logic in the argument that there are too many clear cut chances created in a game that are being in the ME, and this will be fixed.

  68. #68
    Amateur
    Join Date
    27th November 2007
    Posts
    0

    Default

    I hope that in fixing this bug, it doesnt make the problem with 'zombie' defenders even worse. Hopefully they will improve the realism of defending at the same time.

  69. #69
    Amateur
    Join Date
    15th October 2007
    Location
    Struggling in EPL with Merthyr Tydfil 8.0.2
    Posts
    536

    Default

    IMHO there are two problems in ME related and people complaint about one of them.
    It's clear that some tactics create tons of chances, more chances than any matches. Yes, big teams sometimes have 20 shots in a match, but that is not real average. In FM is easy to have lots of chances, and some that look easy in 2D. That is a problem.
    And then, those tactics make teams miss lots of chances. I have seen it by myself, it's nearly ridiculous to have 20 shots in goal and only 1 against and lose the game. Second problem.
    But there are other tactics that work in a comprehensive way, with fine goal rating and a reasonable number of chances. I have found a couple of tactics that match this and I'm having success despite having less chances than before.

    So, people who say FM is unplayable: choose a right tactic, and you will enjoy the game.

    And people who say that FM has no problem: explain me why can't I play with fast tempo and direct passing and expect normal behaviour from the ME.

  70. #70
    Moderator
    Join Date
    20th November 2004
    Location
    Crawley Town Researcher (don't judge)
    Posts
    10,148

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by xouman:
    IMHO there are two problems in ME related and people complaint about one of them.
    It's clear that some tactics create tons of chances, more chances than any matches. Yes, big teams sometimes have 20 shots in a match, but that is not real average. In FM is easy to have lots of chances, and some that look easy in 2D. That is a problem.
    And then, those tactics make teams miss lots of chances. I have seen it by myself, it's nearly ridiculous to have 20 shots in goal and only 1 against and lose the game. Second problem.
    But there are other tactics that work in a comprehensive way, with fine goal rating and a reasonable number of chances. I have found a couple of tactics that match this and I'm having success despite having less chances than before.

    So, people who say FM is unplayable: choose a right tactic, and you will enjoy the game.

    And people who say that FM has no problem: explain me why can't I play with fast tempo and direct passing and expect normal behaviour from the ME. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    A very sensible post. I quite agree to a degree. The ME isn't perfect, but neither is it unplayable.

  71. #71
    Amateur
    Join Date
    21st November 2007
    Posts
    95

    Default

    I think that the difficulty is that 'shots on target' is the 'last' ratio before goals. What I mean is that - if you have good possession and passing, but poor territorial advantage - then you assume you are being too cautious and adjust your play. If you have lots of shots off target, you assume that your strikers are poor or that they aren't getting quality service.

    But if you are getting 10-15 shots on target, 'logic' (experience of watching football irl) tells you that you should (most of the time) beat the keeper with 2-3 of them; and furthermore, it's very hard to see what else you as the manager can do to increase the quality of the chances. I fully accept that there may be things that can be done but they are not obvious, and I think this has frustrated people.

    If SI believe that the match engine is 'right' then imho there need to be other managerial tools within the game (along the lines of an OPTA analysis) that help you understand why your shots aren't turning into goals.

  72. #72
    Moderator
    Join Date
    19th December 2000
    Location
    Some people think I'm Bonkers, I just think I'm free!!!! :D
    Posts
    3,958

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Genuine_quality:
    well of course a part of it was tactics, like if scotland had played 9 up front they would have lost heavily etc, but on champ man its 75% tactics and 25% player ability </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    So you have said,

    " Tactics can separate teams that are close in natural ability, but thats all".

    So I have put my point across that tactics have a lot more to do with teams winning and losing as Scotland are no where near France in terms of natural ability but yet managed to beat them twice and therefore kinda picking all sorts of holes in the statement you made.

    Of course its mostly about tactics as that is what football is mainly about, although you seem to be of the belief that you can simply put eleven players on a pitch who seem better on paper and ability and expect them to win every single game but thats is not how football works irl and in FM.

  73. #73
    Banned
    Join Date
    19th March 2007
    Location
    NYC US and A
    Posts
    299

    Default

    After Torres missed yet another sitter I looked at the match report. It wasn't a sitter it was a diving header, a much more difficult chance to convert. The 2D didn't represent this chance adequately; and I missed the commentary line 'cos it flashed past too quickly.

    The point is not every sitter is as sitter.

  74. #74
    First Team Squad Member
    Join Date
    12th August 2003
    Location
    Twitter: Barnzy_BCFC
    Posts
    15,497

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by GillsMan:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by xouman:
    IMHO there are two problems in ME related and people complaint about one of them.
    It's clear that some tactics create tons of chances, more chances than any matches. Yes, big teams sometimes have 20 shots in a match, but that is not real average. In FM is easy to have lots of chances, and some that look easy in 2D. That is a problem.
    And then, those tactics make teams miss lots of chances. I have seen it by myself, it's nearly ridiculous to have 20 shots in goal and only 1 against and lose the game. Second problem.
    But there are other tactics that work in a comprehensive way, with fine goal rating and a reasonable number of chances. I have found a couple of tactics that match this and I'm having success despite having less chances than before.

    So, people who say FM is unplayable: choose a right tactic, and you will enjoy the game.

    And people who say that FM has no problem: explain me why can't I play with fast tempo and direct passing and expect normal behaviour from the ME. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    A very sensible post. I quite agree to a degree. The ME isn't perfect, but neither is it unplayable. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Unplayable depends on your point of view, I myself find the game unplayable due to certain things within the match engine - you may not take any notice of these things and carry on regardless.

  75. #75
    Semi Pro
    Join Date
    21st October 2005
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    3,396

    Default

    I personally find the match engine on the patch unplayable. The chances created bug is dreadful and I have given up playing it. First I tried playing it on just text commentary which made things better but I wanted the 2D pitch so I just went back to the beta patch and by doing this the match engine is near perfect.

  76. #76
    Part-Timer
    Join Date
    22nd May 2002
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,069

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Kriss:
    Because of it's complexity SI will take all the time they can get to get it right.
    As a patch is due after the transfer window it makes complete sense to keep working on and testing the ME till then rather than repeating the quick patch solution which failed in the first place.

    Your rehash of the theory that the Sega connection is somehow damaging is speculative balderdash and based on no factual knowledge at all. In fact it's a huge step in ensuring the future of FM. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I am rehashing nothing at all, and while I respect your right to an opinion (just like I and everyone else) to refer to my comment as "speculative balderdash and based on no factual knowledge at all" is stupid at best and crass at worst.

    I am not indulging in any sort of speculation, simply making a comment based on my own observations since the first day the Collyer Bros released a football sim, which I have been playing ever since. I didn't base my comments on any factual knowledge as there is none, I simply made an observation.

    Your comment that it is a “huge step in ensuring the future of FM” is based on your own opinion, and only after the next 15 to 20 years of the games existence will you be able to claim any "factual knowledge".

    Grow up, if you can't respect another person's right to express an opinion, then I suggest you refrain from making derogatory comments.

  77. #77
    Amateur
    Join Date
    2nd October 2001
    Location
    South Euclid, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    292

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Barside:
    Is the OP posting anything we havn't heard before?

    SI have kindly provided a search function & as has been said a large match engine thread already exists on the first page. Also I do believe SI have admitted their mistake on the shots issue & will be fixing it, so can people not just wait until 8.02 is released on this one? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I should point out that while you don't like the fact that the OP created this thread, by responding to it you have simply bumped it to the top of the pile...

  78. #78
    Moderator
    Join Date
    28th April 2005
    Location
    Mankind is the only creature smart enough to know its own history, and dumb enough to ignore it.
    Posts
    27,108

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Ranson52:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Kriss:
    Because of it's complexity SI will take all the time they can get to get it right.
    As a patch is due after the transfer window it makes complete sense to keep working on and testing the ME till then rather than repeating the quick patch solution which failed in the first place.

    Your rehash of the theory that the Sega connection is somehow damaging is speculative balderdash and based on no factual knowledge at all. In fact it's a huge step in ensuring the future of FM. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I am rehashing nothing at all, and while I respect your right to an opinion (just like I and everyone else) to refer to my comment as "speculative balderdash and based on no factual knowledge at all" is stupid at best and crass at worst.

    I am not indulging in any sort of speculation, simply making a comment based on my own observations since the first day the Collyer Bros released a football sim, which I have been playing ever since. I didn't base my comments on any factual knowledge as there is none, I simply made an observation.

    Your comment that it is a “huge step in ensuring the future of FM” is based on your own opinion, and only after the next 15 to 20 years of the games existence will you be able to claim any "factual knowledge".

    Grow up, if you can't respect another person's right to express an opinion, then I suggest you refrain from making derogatory comments. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I don't see anything derogatory there, your opinion v my opinion.
    Get off your high horse.

    I'd just point out that mine is an informed opinion and yours is just speculation.

  79. #79
    Amateur
    Join Date
    8th December 2007
    Posts
    12

    Default

    It's unplayable as far as I'm concerned. Realism is everything. The average Premiership game has about 20-25 shots on goal, but in my FM08 games it is more like 40. But the ME makes you miss loads of easy chances to ensure the total goals aren't too high.

    Once you get it in your head that it's not a realistic match engine, it takes away the fun for me. The whole point of FM is we want to think we are playing a real game of football with real tactics etc...not just using trial and error to find some tactic that will beat a phoney match engine.

    Let's hope the patch fixes this issue, but I'm very disappointed they released the game with such glaring problems in the first place.

  80. #80
    Moderator
    Join Date
    28th April 2005
    Location
    Mankind is the only creature smart enough to know its own history, and dumb enough to ignore it.
    Posts
    27,108

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">But the ME makes you miss loads of easy chances to ensure the total goals aren't too high. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


    I can see why people would think that but that isn't the way it works.

  81. #81
    Reserves
    Join Date
    21st June 2005
    Location
    At work mostly.
    Posts
    11,163

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Roger Hunt:
    I think that the difficulty is that 'shots on target' is the 'last' ratio before goals. What I mean is that - if you have good possession and passing, but poor territorial advantage - then you assume you are being too cautious and adjust your play. If you have lots of shots off target, you assume that your strikers are poor or that they aren't getting quality service.

    But if you are getting 10-15 shots on target, 'logic' (experience of watching football irl) tells you that you should (most of the time) beat the keeper with 2-3 of them; and furthermore, it's very hard to see what else you as the manager can do to increase the quality of the chances. I fully accept that there may be things that can be done but they are not obvious, and I think this has frustrated people.

    If SI believe that the match engine is 'right' then imho there need to be other managerial tools within the game (along the lines of an OPTA analysis) that help you understand why your shots aren't turning into goals. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I agree with this completely. Although I've managed to create a tactic that doesn't suffer from this problem, and have realised that results are more important than number of shots (meaning I'm now enjoying the game as much as ever), I can completely understand why it is so misleading to people. As has been said it's very difficult to know what to do to improve a tactic when all the signs point to it being a good one already. If you're creating vast numbers of chances that look good but still losing, then how will you have any idea what you're supposed to do to stop losing?

    So while the game is playable and enjoyable for many of us this issue makes the tactical side of the game very difficult and frustrating for many, which is why more tools are needed to help the user have the same level of understanding of the tactics that the AI managers seem to have.

  82. #82
    Youth Team
    Join Date
    9th May 2003
    Location
    Wembley, Block 133, Row 23, Seat 296 - COME ON YOUR SPURRRRS!!!!
    Posts
    4,279

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Kriss:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">But the ME makes you miss loads of easy chances to ensure the total goals aren't too high. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


    I can see why people would think that but that isn't the way it works. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Would you enlighten us as to where the problem lays then?

    It would be useful as it might help people play around the issue as we know it doesnt happen to everybody.

  83. #83
    Youth Team
    Join Date
    9th May 2003
    Location
    Wembley, Block 133, Row 23, Seat 296 - COME ON YOUR SPURRRRS!!!!
    Posts
    4,279

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by chopper99:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Roger Hunt:
    I think that the difficulty is that 'shots on target' is the 'last' ratio before goals. What I mean is that - if you have good possession and passing, but poor territorial advantage - then you assume you are being too cautious and adjust your play. If you have lots of shots off target, you assume that your strikers are poor or that they aren't getting quality service.

    But if you are getting 10-15 shots on target, 'logic' (experience of watching football irl) tells you that you should (most of the time) beat the keeper with 2-3 of them; and furthermore, it's very hard to see what else you as the manager can do to increase the quality of the chances. I fully accept that there may be things that can be done but they are not obvious, and I think this has frustrated people.

    If SI believe that the match engine is 'right' then imho there need to be other managerial tools within the game (along the lines of an OPTA analysis) that help you understand why your shots aren't turning into goals. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I agree with this completely. Although I've managed to create a tactic that doesn't suffer from this problem, and have realised that results are more important than number of shots (meaning I'm now enjoying the game as much as ever), I can completely understand why it is so misleading to people. As has been said it's very difficult to know what to do to improve a tactic when all the signs point to it being a good one already. If you're creating vast numbers of chances that look good but still losing, then how will you have any idea what you're supposed to do to stop losing?

    So while the game is playable and enjoyable for many of us this issue makes the tactical side of the game very difficult and frustrating for many, which is why more tools are needed to help the user have the same level of understanding of the tactics that the AI managers seem to have. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Spot on.

    BTW what do you find gets around this issue?

  84. #84
    Amateur
    Join Date
    30th June 2006
    Posts
    420

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by chopper99:
    I agree with this completely. Although I've managed to create a tactic that doesn't suffer from this problem, and have realised that results are more important than number of shots (meaning I'm now enjoying the game as much as ever), I can completely understand why it is so misleading to people. As has been said it's very difficult to know what to do to improve a tactic when all the signs point to it being a good one already. If you're creating vast numbers of chances that look good but still losing, then how will you have any idea what you're supposed to do to stop losing?

    So while the game is playable and enjoyable for many of us this issue makes the tactical side of the game very difficult and frustrating for many, which is why more tools are needed to help the user have the same level of understanding of the tactics that the AI managers seem to have. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I also agree with this and have been harping on this a lot lately. Tactics need a overhaul and need to be made more understandable instead of the cryptic way they currently react with the match engine.

    I don't have the time or patience to watch every game with full highlights in an effort to try and work out what is going wrong. Even if I do manage to isolate a problem, trying to translate a solution through the sliders can be frustrating in itself.

    Tactics and match analysis need to be made more accessable because the match engine is increasingly becoming more complex but the information and tools given to us are never improved. We are playing FM08 now, not CM4, it's no longer acceptable for this part of the game to be neglected.

  85. #85
    Reserves
    Join Date
    21st June 2005
    Location
    At work mostly.
    Posts
    11,163

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by George Graham:

    Spot on.

    BTW what do you find gets around this issue? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I'm currently using a very balanced 4-1-2-2-1 formation with high creative freedom and stuff on the 2 AMC's. The tactic's neither particularly attcking or particularly defensive and seems to do the trick.

    If I'm perfectly honest I can't really pinpoint the exact reason why my tactics don't result in a noticeable amount of missed one-on-one chances but if you'd like to take a look at it yourself more details can be found in this thread which includes a link to the tactic if wanted.

  86. #86
    Moderator
    Join Date
    28th April 2005
    Location
    Mankind is the only creature smart enough to know its own history, and dumb enough to ignore it.
    Posts
    27,108

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by George Graham:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Kriss:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">But the ME makes you miss loads of easy chances to ensure the total goals aren't too high. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


    I can see why people would think that but that isn't the way it works. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Would you enlighten us as to where the problem lays then?

    It would be useful as it might help people play around the issue as we know it doesnt happen to everybody. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Sorry George, I wasn't offering a solution, just pointing out that they don't tune up keepers so that they effectively ensure the correct goal ratios occur.

    Are you sitting comfortably?
    Please read this, it will help explain why we are where we are with the ME.

    In the beginning Fred Dev sat down with a whole list of changes and improvements he wanted to make for the FM08 version of the ME.

    Fred doesn't just know the ME, he created it so he's not flying blind, however even he can't predict every consequence of every change he makes.

    So he makes the calculated adjustments to.
    Improve GK's closing down a striker.
    Get strikers to try rounding the GK more often.
    Get strikers trying more chips or lobs.
    Change the effect of the proximity of defenders on strikers muffing a chance.
    Reduce strikers taking long shots.

    And more and more and more, because these are all things people have suggested needed improving from 07.

    Now that is just one minute area of the ME touched in several different ways and the consequences in terms of match play can only at this stage be estimated.

    Fred actually makes hundreds and hundreds of changes right down to adding different goal celebrations.

    All of these changes have an effect on and are affected by the external factors such as match fitness, pre match morale, effect on morale of in match events, referee and assistant settings.
    Rep and current form of the two teams.

    The list is endless and the code changes run into thousands.

    After many a long hour Fred declares the ME ready for it's first test.
    This is a soak test and the ME is set to automatically play hundreds of matches so the end data can be analysed for accuracy.

    A key stat is the number of goals per match and of course Fred has the real life figures, so at the end of the test if all those matches produce a goal average within a decimal point of the real life ones Fred can declare the changes a sucess can't he?

    Well no he can't actually, because he has no idea how realistic the in match football which created those correct stats was played out.
    The only way to be sure that the stats were created by a beautiful rendition of the beautiful game is for real people to play hundreds of matches and that's where beta testing comes in.

    The problem with having real people judge the reality of Fred's efforts is that it takes a long time and as you see on this forum everyday peoples opinions tend to differ somewhat.

    Accept that after a while Fred and the testers agree that there is certainly a problem with defenders closing down.
    Fred makes a series of adjustments and a new copy of the ME goes to testers who start the testing process again.

    We now discover that improving closing down has caused a big increase in fouls, more adjustment, another ME version issued, etc, etc, ad infinitum.

    Several ME's later the testers are only moaning a little about the match play so we must be close.
    Time to run another soak test, this produces too many goals per game.
    Oh hell! here we go again.

    I hope this gives some people a clearer idea of how it works without appearing patronising.

    So to sum up, keepers aren't set to control the score line, their performances are just a result of the settings in place, which also produced the correct goal count at the end of the soak tests.

    I know that's very simplistic but I hope it helps clarify things.
    It is of course a very layman type explanation and Paul C will probably beat me with a big stick, but genius sometimes has difficulty explaining it's superior rationale

  87. #87
    Youth Team
    Join Date
    9th May 2003
    Location
    Wembley, Block 133, Row 23, Seat 296 - COME ON YOUR SPURRRRS!!!!
    Posts
    4,279

    Default

    Cheers Kriss and Chopper for the replies- I'll give the 41221 a go, as I too play this formation but have an AMR/AML instead of AMCs.

  88. #88
    Amateur
    Join Date
    15th October 2007
    Location
    Struggling in EPL with Merthyr Tydfil 8.0.2
    Posts
    536

    Default

    As software developer, I understand you perfetly kriss and love your explanation. With ME there are not program errors, just values for everything, there are lots and lots and they are interconnected. For example, how many probabilities has DMC that is playing as RB, with low form, 77% fitness, 12 marking, 14 tackle, 11 bravery, etc to take the ball from a LW who has good form, 81% fitness, 16 dribbling, 12 pace, 14 acceleration, 15 technique, 9 balance... who has been running for 20 meters and dribbled 1 CM, and has space ahead to dribble and a ST to pass the ball? You can make your maths and say 43%!!! And ohhh, ME gives now a 45%!!! so ME has to be tweaked. What can we do? downgrade importance of winger's dribbling? or just his pace? maybe the importance of the form? isn't better to tweak the marking influence? have you said tackling? Well, let's say a couple of these things. And now DMC playing as RB has a 43% of chances of taking the ball. Brilliant
    But what??? now a CD that tackles as ST has a 67% of taking the ball and with real life statistics it should have a 64%!!! Let's tweak the ME again.

    This is one of the problems of creating a great ME as Fm has: there are lots of things involving everything, more than can we imagine. So please, be nice with soft developers. We try to do our best, but things are sometimes just TOO much complicated.

  89. #89
    Youth Team
    Join Date
    9th May 2003
    Location
    Wembley, Block 133, Row 23, Seat 296 - COME ON YOUR SPURRRRS!!!!
    Posts
    4,279

    Default

    Well I tried your tactic and won my first game with it 7-1 at home to bottom placed MKDons- my striker scored 5 of them!

    After that it settled down to my usual drawing streaks but I put that down to me incorrectly praising my striker, and after I got a chance to criticise him I then beat the 4th placed team 4-1 away and drew unluckily to the top team 3-3.

    What did I think was different?

    Well imo my tactic created (imo) clearer chances than your one, but the 2 AMCs and the FC in your tactic would cut through defences like butter with their short passing- and I found it very pleasing to watch.

    I found a lot of the goals were where the striker was able to pull shots across the keeper- whereas many of my efforts were very square on goal.

    So although players in my tactic were unmarked the angle for shooting was less favourable than the ones created in your tactic.

    Im also amazed that the AI isnt able to take advantage of the massive hole in midfield- they seem too preoccupied in marking the AMCs rather than exploiting the gaping hole, although to be fair thats probably the best Ive seen a DMC play in FM08.

  90. #90
    Reserves
    Join Date
    21st June 2005
    Location
    At work mostly.
    Posts
    11,163

    Default

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by George Graham:
    Well I tried your tactic and won my first game with it 7-1 at home to bottom placed MKDons- my striker scored 5 of them!

    After that it settled down to my usual drawing streaks but I put that down to me incorrectly praising my striker, and after I got a chance to criticise him I then beat the 4th placed team 4-1 away and drew unluckily to the top team 3-3.

    What did I think was different?

    Well imo my tactic created (imo) clearer chances than your one, but the 2 AMCs and the FC in your tactic would cut through defences like butter with their short passing- and I found it very pleasing to watch.

    I found a lot of the goals were where the striker was able to pull shots across the keeper- whereas many of my efforts were very square on goal.

    So although players in my tactic were unmarked the angle for shooting was less favourable than the ones created in your tactic.

    Im also amazed that the AI isnt able to take advantage of the massive hole in midfield- they seem too preoccupied in marking the AMCs rather than exploiting the gaping hole, although to be fair thats probably the best Ive seen a DMC play in FM08. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I'm chuffed it's working for you. I agree that it's very difficult to understand why tactics are going wrong when you see good chances missed a lot. As you say, the chances in your tactic seem to be more clear cut than in mine and it's this that makes it difficult and frustrating for people as it's difficult to know what to change when things look like they're working. I'm just glad I've managed to create something that works.

    But as you say the 2 AMC's and Striker combo seems to overwhelm the defence and create chances that seem to be well converted.

Closed Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts