lurkingwithintent Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 I'd be interested to know this, and also the amount of people who use 2D. I prefer it, tactically it's much clearer and also is a little less needy when it comes to my laptop's resources. So I presume there are no future plans to drop 2D? At least, not in FM11? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jod123 Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 I wouldn't imagine so. I mean the commentary only mode from the pre-2d days is still there now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
keeper tom Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 I now use 3D because my latest laptop doesnt lag when using 3D but I've recently been playin FM 2008 and have been loving the 2D. Surely they have to keep this option for the future games because people with low spec computers or noteboks will be able to play it without it jumping all over the place Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
keeper tom Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 I wouldn't imagine so. I mean the commentary only mode from the pre-2d days is still there now. Yep that's true Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grade Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 I think that the 2D will be there for several editions to come, maybe never be dropped. We never know what lays in the future. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JGM Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 i shouldnt think it will be removed for a long time, a lot of people prefer it/have to use it and i cant imagine it takes up a significant ammount of coding time every year relative to the 3d engine, its pretty good as it is. The more ways to view the match the better Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
morti31 Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 I always use 2D even though my PC can run 3D well....just don't like 3D don't know why. Don't imagine it will ever be dropped, like somone said, the commentary only option's still there from aagggessss ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgar555 Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 They better not remove 2D. I can run 3D if I want but its still rubbish. 2D gives a much better overview of the tactical picture and 3D needs to improve massively before I'll consider it again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronaldo_rooney Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 Don't real managers use this "dot" technolgy when training the team about tactics and positional responsibilities!? Can't get rid of this and I doubt they ever will. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crouchaldinho Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 They better not remove 2D. I can run 3D if I want but its still rubbish. 2D gives a much better overview of the tactical picture and 3D needs to improve massively before I'll consider it again. :thup: CAMRAD ftw! \o/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crouchaldinho Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 P.S. They best not remove 2D Classic. Or else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
swisso Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 Always used 2D, can't get a feel for positions and tactics if i use 3D Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertcornell68 Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 I doubt it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 2D if for the purists! Better for the studing of tactics. Not that is works for me, but I try! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lurkingwithintent Posted June 25, 2010 Author Share Posted June 25, 2010 Aye, 2D Classic is the only mode that works well and I hope they keep it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neji Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 I highly doubt it, there are far too many people who still use it. Even if there wasn't, it would probably stay just like commentary only mode has stayed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lutontown1991 Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 If SI remove 2D match engine I doubt I will keep on playing FM. Sometimes more realism is NOT wanted. We love 2D!!!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgar555 Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 P.S. They best not remove 2D Classic. Or else. This Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Currie Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 keep the 2d !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lurkingwithintent Posted June 25, 2010 Author Share Posted June 25, 2010 P.S. They best not remove 2D Classic. Or else. Agreed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
x42bn6 Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 The game will die without 2D. Honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooCooKaJoo Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 My PC cant really handle 3d very well, and i just prefer 2d anyway. CAMRAD Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suzie MUFC Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 Every time I've tried 3D, I stop using it after a couple of matches and go right back to 2D. CAMRAD!!! \o/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blanchflower1 Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 2D is a necessary feature of Football Manager. I doubt SI will ever remove this...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crouchaldinho Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 My PC cant really handle 3d very well, and i just prefer 2d anyway.CAMRAD Every time I've tried 3D, I stop using it after a couple of matches and go right back to 2D.CAMRAD!!! \o/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luton Town Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 personally i dont use 2D so i wouldn't mind it being dropped Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikegoodman25 Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 Superstition hits me with 2D, I always seem to do better when using 2D. Cannot get into 3D at all unfortunately. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cliff7197 Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 Personally I don't use it but there's no reason it should ever be dropped. After all, you're just displaying existing 3D data in a 2D display, it's nothing difficult or resource-hungry code wise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andre17 Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 2D IS the best way to view a match Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgar555 Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 personally i dont use 2D so i wouldn't mind it being dropped Oh well thats alright then. Thats like saying I don't use the classic tactics, so they can be dropped. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
speople Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 Personally I prefer 3d, seems better somehow to see someone running around rather than a dot. But it should still be kept, mainly because laptops etc dont really have the power to run 3d very well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgar555 Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 Personally I prefer 3d, seems better somehow to see someone running around rather than a dot.But it should still be kept, mainly because laptops etc dont really have the power to run 3d very well. What nonsense. Many laptops these days can run 3D very well, I have one. As pointed out above though I just don't like 3D and 2D gives me a better tactical picture. And thats the reason it should be kept in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neji Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 What nonsense. Many laptops these days can run 3D very well, I have one. It's not really nonsense. Sure, a lot of laptops do have decent enough specs to run the 3D but your basic 'cheap' laptops that a lot of people go for don't have decent graphic capabilities. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
speople Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 What nonsense. Many laptops these days can run 3D very well, I have one. As pointed out above though I just don't like 3D and 2D gives me a better tactical picture. And thats the reason it should be kept in. My laptop runs it v slowly in 3d mode due to the lower ram and processing power. Generally speaking (or at least virtually all the ones I have seen) laptops have slower processors than their pc counterparts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgar555 Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 It's not really nonsense. Sure, a lot of laptops do have decent enough specs to run the 3D but your basic 'cheap' laptops that a lot of people go for don't have decent graphic capabilities. My laptop runs it v slowly in 3d mode due to the lower ram and processing power. Generally speaking (or at least virtually all the ones I have seen) laptops have slower processors than their pc counterparts. Both points taken, maybe I should have said it was a sweeping generalisation. Hows that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
speople Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 Both points taken, maybe I should have said it was a sweeping generalisation. Hows that? Fine by me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.