ScottPalaceWilsher Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 I am a boy but I decided to be a female manager to see what it was like. I noticed that even though you are female you are always reffered to as 'he'. That is male and it should be female 'she'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blanchflower1 Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 I am a boy but I decided to be a female manager to see what it was like. I noticed that even though you are female you are always reffered to as 'he'. That is male and it should be female 'she'. I think that this could be a bug. Have you reported this in the bugs forum? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWaRFeGa Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 Irregardless of the "bug", I don't think there is an awful lot to your experiment Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shottaz Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 Everytime I see 'irregardless' I die slightly on the inside... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kain Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 Everytime I see 'irregardless' I die slightly on the inside... I don't know why, its a perfectly cromulent word. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWaRFeGa Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 It's perfectly acceptable nowadays. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamiescfc2009 Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 maybe he wanted to be a tranny and he was wanting to keep the "he" as the F.A needed to keep them as male managers and not the first female manager in f.a history Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryan_sacfc Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 It's perfectly acceptable nowadays. It's what they call 'non-standard.' Double negative, like misunderestimate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wonky Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 It's perfectly acceptable nowadays. Heh heh, not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWaRFeGa Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 Heh heh, not. Heh heh. What do you know? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wonky Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 Heh heh. What do you know? I know all the knowledge I've amassed in my lifetime. That's an odd question to ask. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWaRFeGa Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 Yes I've read that entry earlier. And you've proved it's an accepted word. Thank you for your time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crouchaldinho Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 http://wsu.edu/~brians/errors/irregardless.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wonky Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 "It is generally listed in dictionaries as "incorrect" or "nonstandard"." - Wikipedia. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWaRFeGa Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 But it is generally listed, yes? Thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wonky Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 OK, George Bush. I guess I missunderestimated you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.