Lambie\'s Lovechild

In that scenario, would your AMC be more effective as a Shadow Striker?

Could do with some assistance on this one. I've been playing variations on the 4-2-3-1 for a while now. Invariably I end up with the striker as an Advanced or Pressing Forward, wingers both on Attack, or Inside Forward, to effectively create a 3 pronged attack with Wing Back's supporting, and the centre 2 either being a BBM/BWM combination in the CM role, or a DLP / Volante combination in the DM role. But there's just one problem. And its at AM C When using these formations, its the one position on the park where, no matter the quality of players I put in there, ratings are poor, goalscoring is poor, assists are poor. I've tried as a flat AMC (Support) , a Shadow Striker, an Advanced Playmaker on Support or Attack, and consistently , regardless of talent, its a lowest rated attacking position. (I've yet to try Enganche or Trequarista, only because when looking over the players, those seem to be the positions that have the lowest star rating in most AM C's) Even a tried a narrow 4-3-3 with him playing as a Shadow Strikers behind 2 Advanced Forwards with a pair of BBM behind him doing all his running, but no luck. Running out of ideas here. How do you get an AM C to run the show in a match, the way a De Bruyne, Fernandes or Bellingham does in real life?

Sadly not. I heard a suggestion that keepers with a low vision score have a tendency to ignore distribution instructions more than others. Can anyone confirm?

What is the reason that keepers, when they have the distribution instruction to play short to defenders or wide to fullbacks, insist on kicking the ball 50 yards right up the middle? Especially prevalent from Goal Kicks

@knap , have you got a variation of this that plays super ultra defensive (5 or 6 across the back) , plays to never concede and win by getting set pieces? #Dychitaka as its better known.