Jump to content

rmills2000

Members+
  • Posts

    67
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

9 "What we've got here is a failure to communicate"

About Me

  • About Me
    Dorset, UK

Interests

  • Interests
    FM, FM and, er, FM...

Favourite Team

  • Favourite Team
    Gillingham

Currently Managing

  • Currently Managing
    Gillingham

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi guys, I've seen a few posts related to the Tactics interface and requests for visibility of "Attacking" and "Defending" tactics. I have a suggestion for how I think this could be achieved via a GUI enhancement that (I believe) wouldn't require any changes to the ME; My understanding is (generalising) that the formation interface is closely representative of the 'defensive' formation, with role and individual instructions determining the 'attacking' formation. On this basis, my suggestion would be to; have two formation interfaces (either side by side or via a toggle) update the representative position of the 'attacking' role on the 'attacking' interface depending on the role / instructions defined on the 'defending / default' interface have a 'drag and drop' function on the 'attacking' interface reflective of, and limited to, the different roles available for that position ie, a player occupying the ML position in the 'default' interface could be dragged to AML in the 'attacking' interface with the choice of role reflective on that part of the pitch similar to the existing role selection drop-down option (Winger / Attack in this example) with the player instructions being set accordingly, or similarly dragged into the AMLC position for a choice of Inverted Forward / Inverted Winger for example. Hopefully that makes some sense - happy to clarify if needed
×
×
  • Create New...