b28937

So is this a bug on in the scouting center where it no matter how many times you assign a specific scout to scout the upcoming opposition, it always goes back to showing scouting pool? Because that’s clearly what it does. However, as the above user mentioned, if you go into staff responsibilities>scouting, it shows the scout I assigned to provide opposition scouting reports has that responsibility. However, I don’t think it works. I think it’s idiotic that I’ve played in a league for three seasons, we face a team we’ve played something like 10 matches against, but my scouts have no information on the opponent. No clue about their strengths and weakness, etc. I really don’t understand why SI refused to fix this bug. Last year I just assigned entire scouting report to manually scout every player in the league, just so I’d have some clue who’d I be playing. Such a waste of time and resources. It’s no longer 1994 when we live in a “fog” and don’t know anything about other players. Can’t my scouts at least spend an evening watching YouTube or browsing the internet? I play and Brazil and Flemengo has won the league something like 5 out of the past 6 years, we’ve played them in league, cup, a bunch of times, yet entering my fourth season my scouts still have no clue who is on their team. I’m sure I scouted each one of these players manually last year. Maybe I replaced the scout who did it and he took all the scouting reports with him. It’s just incredibly annoying. SI knows about the bug and refuses to fix it. Scouting your opponent is a little bit important, or am I wrong? Thankfully when I started the save I unselected the 1990s-era masking attributes, or we wouldn’t my club wouldn’t even have a clue whether a player can run fast or not. I really don’t understand the reasoning. SI screams about all of it’s headline features with advanced data analysis, but if you go to look at a team report, you have have a scout go and get one every time. It’s like they don’t even care. Irresponsible.

Although like you, I'd rather have my HOY make offers, or even my chief scout, my experience has been that it's usually only my DOF that actively makes offers for players out of the blue. It makes some sense because the DOF is the only one who you can ask to suggest transfer targets, makes offers to players you manually add to the transfer target list, and handles the development and unwanted lists. So the way the game is designed, it seems like the DOF is the only one who is really able to find and sign players, despite the option to delegate the responsibility to others Not sure if that makes much sense or if that's the way it is in real life, but that's the way it seems to work in the game. I do think there are exceptions, as I'm pretty sure I've seen my HOY make a (very bad) offer when I delegated it to him, but in my experience it's very rare for the HOY or CS to actively find players and make offers, only the DOF does it. I'm guessing it's due to the fact that he has a hidden pool of players in his knowledge, which is what enables him to suggest transfer targets out of nowhere (for example, he'll sometimes suggest or make an offer to players way out of my scouting range that there's no way we could have known about (eg, I'm managing in Brazil and sometimes he'll suggest a Brazilian player from a Saudi Arabian club)). Even though my DOF is only 14/14 judging CA/PA (compared to 19/20 for HOY), he's made some excellent suggestions and offers for players who have become key members of the squad. Accordingly, I delegate to him the responsibly to find and make offers for players on my first team, reserves, and youth team. Some are excellent finds, though usually for one reason or another I'll cancel the offer he's made. In fact, sometimes I'll add a player as a transfer target, then put it on hold. Then out of the blue he'll make an offer for that player, despite the hold.

Show me a game in real life managed by someone with your managerial skills.... Clearly you gave the wrong team talk at halftime and I would guess did something like play very attacking in the second half with complacent, uninterested, exhausted, frustrated, and angry players, thinking it would be a cakewalk to a 10-0 win, just because you are managing Barcelona and had a good first half. I have no idea what managerial decisions you made, but a screenshot showing match stats tells us absolutely nothing. Obviously the result you posted would be inconceivably unrealistic in real life, that's indisputable. But I'm quite certain that no real life no manager would have managed the second half like you did, whatever that was. Go to Rashidi (Bust the Net)'s Patreon page so you can upload your save and have him do a "Gamechanger" video ($10 tier) for you. Send me a PM and I'll pay for it. You clearly need some direct help specifically tailored to how you want to play. Rather than always blaming the game, sometimes you have to look in the mirror to find the problem. --------- For example, I see in your previous posts comments like, "At the beginning I really tried to spend time and learn all the details, but I realized it's pointless." or "I'm a horrible player (you can attack me dear experts), often I have to save scum to get out of a losing streak, because I don't have patience and time to spend hours to figure out some hidden reason, why my midfielders turn into zombies." or "No matter how bad my tactics are, but by having £40-50m attacking midfielders/strikers, they should finish 1 or 2 strikes just by individual value/talent, regardless my tactics." or " I do accept that my tactics may not work, and I'm not a very good player, but in my opinion the stats of that game are completely out of real life's context." or "And yeah let's say my tactics are **** (which btw works against any other team), but still ... in real life hard to imagine Real Madrid to make such a dominance, especially against a team with similar value. I watched the full game, my players just simply unable to play football against them....They got a penalty in the first minute , show me a real life CL game where a penalty was given in the first minute. All because we are talking about Real Madrid. I think in the future I will just go on holiday when playing against them, waste of time, the result is known anyway." or "It's also very exciting to play european cup/league games against premier league teams. Just had a super cup final against Manchester Utd ,where they turned the score from 3-0 . There are definitely predictable segments of the game which favour these teams. Not feeling any point to play european cup finals, when the winner already decided before the game." or "Rigged" or "I think this is just part of the game, all we can do is to accept it stop playing this ****. It looks like once you overperform and you put yourself in a position unexpected by the game engine, it will make the adjustments in the end of the season." or "Now what Sports Interactive did with this game is , that they are trying to create a football manager simulation, as close to reality as possible. And that includes all the injury issues, the million hidden attributes, the precise tactics required and so many other things. This is not a game anymore. ...... just because you don't have 100% perfect tactics. Seeing it as a game we don't want to accept this mediocrity, but the game engine will still push you into it. " or " The problem is, that people like you and me, we look at it as a GAME. Let's have a look, why people play video games; it opens up an imaginary world, where you can become anyone you wish. It gives you a platform where you can forget all the issues of the real life and have a peaceful relaxing time, without being bothered by anything or anyone." etc., etc. ------------------------------- In one of those previous threads, someone was nice enough to post a link that might have helped you out. Not sure if you watched it, but I'd recommend you take a look. And I'm completely serious, I'll pay for him to do a "Gamechanger" video for you, to show you exactly what you are doing wrong and how to manage better. I know it sounds like I'm just slamming you and being an a-hole, but the truth is you clearly have some very bad misconceptions about the game. If you want to enjoy FM, you need an expert to take a look at your specific save to see what you are doing wrong and show you how to fix it. On the other hand, if you really are just looking for a "peaceful relaxing time, without being bothered by anything," then FM is definitely not the right game for you.

Solution ended up being I terminated his contract using the in-game editor a few days before it expired, then made him an offer to be the u20s manager which he accepted, with neither the fans nor players getting upset. I had been sending him on coaching courses while he was playing as this was my hope all along, so everything worked out fine. You can close this, thanks.

FYI I continue to have the same or similar problems with the squad planner resetting. I find the squad planner to be very useful and spend a lot of time setting it up. Then I go back to it and discover everything has been completely reset. I don't even bother with it anymore. It simply doesn't work and never has in FM23. Complete waste of time.

I had this problem often previous versions and even occasionally in FM 23. I submitted numerous bug reports and crash files, etc., as well, but SI was never able to determine the cause. SI would say it's Logitech's fault and Logitech would say it's SI's fault. First, two pieces of advice, which you might already follow but i mention just in case: Always exit the game when you are not actively playing. If you put the computer to sleep with the game running, for example, and then wake the computer the next day and continue playing, it can cause the game to crash. I don't know why, but it does. Also, sometimes when the game is left running, the Nvidia or other graphic card manufactures will put out updated drivers and before you notice it, and the game will crash. Again, have no idea why. But the culprit in my case, I discovered, is that I use a Logitech mouse and the mouse software runs a background program called "Logitech Overlay.exe". For some reason, this file causes FM and many other programs to crash (you can search the file name/crash and find pages and pages of people complaining that this file causes all sorts of programs to crash. The file is unnecessary - all it does is enable Logitech to generate a popup telling you the battery is low or whatever. I forget how I disabled it, I just followed the instructions on one of those pages. Apparently there are other "overlay" programs that cause crashes. For example, here is a link to an FM22 crash troubleshooting guide: https://www.getdroidtips.com/football-manager-2022-crashing-pc/#14-Try-Disabling-Overlay-Apps which states: Anyway, after disabling that Logitech file (you can check task manager to see if it's running), I rarely have crashes, and when I do it's usually because one of the first two things I mentioned above (ie, not exiting the game when not actively playing). Good luck and hope this helps.

Best skin I've ever used since FM15. Thank you.

Best. Skin. Ever. Thank you for pointing this out to me, I never would have found it!!! Perfect. @Marco Beghesi, I thank you from the bottom of my heart and will PM you to see if I can make a donation to thank you for your efforts. So much better than all my desperate and frustrating rag tag efforts to eliminate faces over the years since FM15.

Hello, I want to eliminate all player face photos in the game. My preference would be just blank space where the photo would have been located, second best would be everybody has a shadow face. I've been able to do this in past versions, but things always seem to keep changing or I keep forgetting. I was able to do it after the early march FM23 update by using resource archiver to extract graphic.fmf and deleting all the player faces and creating a new archive. Whatever I did worked perfectly and there was just blank space for all player, staff, etc. Then SI issued the late March update and now I have a combination of blank spaces where the default faces were, shadow faces for everyone who didn't have a photo, and some new player photos that seem to have come from nowhere and I can't find how to get rid of them. It doesn't even seem like the player photos are in the graphics.fmf file like before, but maybe I'm misremembering where I deleted them from. In any event, can someone please help. I just use the SI default dark skin.

Experimented with providing player attributes and asking for assistance setting up corner kick routines for those who are interested. ————————————— Q. I’ve been hired by a football club in Portugal to be the manager. I am in the process of creating my tactics for the upcoming season. Presently, I am creating set peace routines, specifically attacking and defending corner kicks. If I provide you with the relevant attributes of my players, can you assist me in creating the set peace routines? A. Sure, I'd be happy to help. In order to create effective set piece routines, it's important to consider the specific attributes of your players, as well as the overall strategies and tactics of your team. Here are a few key factors to consider when creating set piece routines for attacking and defending corner kicks: The positioning and movement of your players: The positioning and movement of your players during a corner kick can have a big impact on the success of the routine. For example, you might want to position players near the goal to create scoring opportunities, or position players near the corner kick taker to create passing options. The strengths and weaknesses of your players: The specific attributes of your players, such as their speed, strength, and aerial ability, can play a role in the success of your set piece routines. For example, if you have players who are strong in the air, you might want to incorporate aerial passes or crosses into your attacking routines. The overall strategy and tactics of your team: The set piece routines you create should align with the overall strategy and tactics of your team. For example, if your team is known for its attacking prowess, you might want to focus on creating set piece routines that create scoring opportunities. On the other hand, if your team is known for its defensive strength, you might want to focus on creating set piece routines that prevent the opposition from scoring. Overall, the key to creating effective set piece routines is to consider the specific attributes of your players and the overall strategy and tactics of your team, and to use this information to create routines that maximize your team's strengths and exploit the opposition's weaknesses. Q. Now I will inform you about the teams style of play and players names and relevant attributes. A. Great, that will give me a better understanding of your team and the players you have available. This will help me provide more specific suggestions for your set piece routines. Q. Striker Bryan Rochez [provided all attributes]. A. Based on the information you provided, Bryan Rochez appears to be a strong attacking player with a combination of technical ability and physical attributes. His high ratings for dribbling, finishing, first touch, heading, and off the ball movement suggest that he is skilled at creating and taking scoring opportunities. His strong aggression, bravery, and determination also make him a valuable player for attacking set piece routines. Q. Attacking right midfielder Anderson Oliveira [provided all attributes]. A. Based on the information you provided, Anderson Oliveira appears to be a strong attacking player with a focus on dribbling and technical ability. His high ratings for dribbling, technique, and flair suggest that he is skilled at creating and taking scoring opportunities. His strong aggression and determination also make him a valuable player for attacking set piece routines. Q. But are you concerned with his lack of high jumping reach and strength? A. It's worth considering Anderson Oliveira's lack of high jumping reach and strength when creating set piece routines for attacking corner kicks. His lack of aerial ability may limit his effectiveness in situations where the ball is delivered into the penalty area from a high height, such as on crosses or aerial passes. In these situations, you may want to consider using other players who are stronger in the air, or using different tactics, such as short passes or ground crosses, to create scoring opportunities. Q. Next player is attacking center midfielder Luquinha [provided all attributes]. A. Based on the information you provided, Luquinha appears to be a strong attacking midfielder with a combination of technical ability and physical attributes. His high ratings for dribbling, passing, and technique suggest that he is skilled at creating and taking scoring opportunities. His player traits, such as his ability to play one-twos and run with the ball, make him a valuable player for attacking set piece routines. His strong aggression and determination also make him a valuable player for attacking set piece routines. Q. Next player is attacking left midfielder Wellington Junior [provided all attributes]. A. Based on the information you provided, Wellington Junior appears to be a strong attacking player with a focus on technical ability and shooting. His high ratings for dribbling, finishing, and long shots suggest that he is skilled at creating and taking scoring opportunities. His player traits, such as his tendency to cut inside from the left wing and shoot from distance, make him a valuable player for attacking set piece routines. His strong aggression and determination also make him a valuable player for attacking set piece routines. Q. Next player is Central midfielder Ewerton [provided all attributes]. A. Based on the information you provided, Ewerton appears to be a strong central midfielder with a combination of technical ability and physical attributes. His high ratings for passing, tackling, and defensive positioning suggest that he is skilled at both creating and preventing scoring opportunities. His strong aggression and determination also make him a valuable player for attacking and defending set piece routines. Q. Next player is central midfielder Pedro Sa [provided all attributes]. A. Based on the information you provided, Pedro Sa appears to be a strong central midfielder with a focus on technical ability and shooting. His high ratings for passing, dribbling, and finishing suggest that he is skilled at creating and taking scoring opportunities. His player traits, such as his tendency to shoot from distance and try long-range passes, make him a valuable player for attacking set piece routines. His strong aggression and determination also make him a valuable player for attacking set piece routines. Q. I disagree that he has a higher rating for finishing, it is only seven, please take that into account in the future. A. I apologize if I misread the information you provided. You are correct that Pedro Sa's finishing rating is seven, not 19. I have updated my response to reflect this. Based on the updated information, Pedro Sa appears to be a strong central midfielder with a focus on technical ability and shooting, but his finishing rating of seven suggests that he may not be as effective at scoring goals as some of your other players. This may affect his role in attacking set piece routines, and you may want to consider using other players with higher finishing ratings in these situations. Q. Next player is central defender Pedrao [provided all attributes]. A. Based on the information you provided, Pedrao appears to be a strong central defender with a combination of technical ability and physical attributes. His high ratings for heading, defensive marking, and tackling suggest that he is skilled at both attacking and defending set piece routines. His player traits, such as his tendency to switch play and bring the ball out of defense, make him a valuable player for attacking set piece routines. His strong aggression and determination also make him a valuable player for attacking and defending set piece routines. Q. Next player Filipe Relvas [provided all attributes]. A. Based on the information you provided, Filipe Relvas appears to be a strong central defender with a combination of technical ability and physical attributes. His high ratings for heading, defensive marking, and tackling suggest that he is skilled at both attacking and defending set piece routines. His player trait of liking to play short, simple passes suggests that he may be a valuable player for maintaining possession and building attacks from the back. His strong aggression and determination also make him a valuable player for attacking and defending set piece routines. Q. But his player trait of liking to play short simple passes would be irrelevant in set piece routines, would you not agree or am I wrong. You are correct that Filipe Relvas's player trait of liking to play short, simple passes may not be as relevant to set piece routines as some of his other attributes, such as his heading, defensive marking, and tackling. Set piece routines often involve players making more complex or difficult passes, such as crosses or aerial passes, in order to create scoring opportunities or prevent goals. In these situations, Filipe Relvas's ability to play short, simple passes may not be as valuable as his other attributes. However, his strong aggression and determination may still make him a valuable player for attacking and defending set piece routines. Q. Next player is right wing back Fahd Moufi [provided all attributes]. A. Based on the information you provided, Fahd Moufi appears to be a strong attacking wing back with a combination of technical ability and physical attributes. His high ratings for crossing, technique, and flair suggest that he is skilled at creating and taking scoring opportunities. His player trait of liking to dive into tackles suggests that he may be an aggressive and determined player, which can be valuable for attacking and defending set piece routines. His strong aggression and determination also make him a valuable player for attacking and defending set piece routines. Q. Next player is left wing back Mustapha Seck [provided all attributes]. A. Based on the information you provided, Mustapha Seck appears to be a strong attacking wing back with a combination of technical ability and physical attributes. His high ratings for crossing, dribbling, and technique suggest that he is skilled at creating and taking scoring opportunities. His player trait of liking to dive into tackles suggests that he may be an aggressive and determined player, which can be valuable for attacking and defending set piece routines. His strong aggression and determination also make him a valuable player for attacking and defending set piece routines. Q. Finally the goalkeeper Kosuke Nakamura [provided all attributes]. A. Based on the information you provided, Kosuke Nakamura appears to be a strong goalkeeper with a combination of technical ability and physical attributes. His high ratings for command of the penalty box, handling the ball, reflexes, and tendency to punch the ball suggest that he is skilled at both attacking and defending set piece routines. His strong aggression and determination also make him a valuable player for attacking and defending set piece routines. Q. When attacking corners from the left Side, in your opinion who should I have take the corner kicks and why A. It's difficult to make a specific recommendation without more information about your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players. However, based on the information you provided, Anderson Oliveira and Mustapha Seck may be good options for taking corner kicks from the left side. Both players have high ratings for crossing and dribbling, which can be valuable for creating scoring opportunities from corner kicks. Anderson Oliveira's high aggression and determination may also make him a valuable player for attacking set piece routines. Mustapha Seck's high ratings for dribbling and technique may also make him a valuable player for creating scoring opportunities. Ultimately, the best player to take corner kicks from the left side will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players. Q. I am not sure I agree with your choices. In your opinion, what are the most important player attributes when determining Who should take a corner kick when attacking set pieces? A. When determining who should take a corner kick during attacking set pieces, some of the most important player attributes to consider include: Crossing: The ability to deliver accurate and well-placed crosses into the penalty area can be critical for creating scoring opportunities from corner kicks. Dribbling: The ability to dribble past defenders and create space for a cross can be valuable for attacking set piece routines. Technique: Good technique and ball control can be important for executing successful crosses and passes during set piece routines. Aggression and determination: Players who are aggressive and determined may be more likely to win aerial duels or make important tackles during set piece routines. Anticipation and vision: Players who have good anticipation and vision may be able to anticipate and anticipate runs or passes from their teammates, allowing them to make more effective crosses and passes during set piece routines. Ultimately, the specific attributes that are most important for taking corner kicks will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players. Q. OK I will now provide you with additional information on my players ability to take corner kicks, Please focus most on the attribute for corner kick taking. When providing me advice On who should take a corner kick, you should assume that the most important attributes are the players corner check ability, passing ability crossing ability the preferred foot and technique, among the other traits you listed above. But corner kick taking attribute is most important. A. Based on the information you provided, some potential options for taking corner kicks may include: Bryan Rochez: His corner kick taking rating and strong technical abilities, such as his dribbling and finishing ratings, make him a potential option for taking corner kicks. Anderson Oliveira: His corner kick taking rating of 10, crossing rating of 11, and dribbling rating of 15 make him a potential option for taking corner kicks. Luquinha: His corner kick taking rating of 13 and strong technical abilities, such as his dribbling and passing ratings, make him a potential option for taking corner kicks. Wellington Junior: His corner kick taking rating of six, crossing rating of eight, and finishing rating of 13 make him a potential option for taking corner kicks. Ultimately, the best player to take corner kicks will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players. Q. I disagree with y what you have told me. Please remember, that the attribute ratings are on a scale of 1 to 20 with one being the very worst, 10 being average, and 20 being the very best in the world. Corner kick Taking ratings of five or six are terrible compared to Liquinha’s corner kick taking rating of 13. I believe corner kick ratings of five and six should never be considered. In my opinion we should have the Luquinha take Corner kicks from both the left and the right side. Do you agree with me? A. Based on the information you provided, it does appear that Luquinha has a higher corner kick taking rating than Bryan Rochez and Anderson Oliveira. However, it's important to consider the other attributes and player traits of these players as well. For example, Anderson Oliveira's high crossing and dribbling ratings may make him a valuable player for creating scoring opportunities from corner kicks, even if his corner kick taking rating is lower than Luquinha's. Similarly, Bryan Rochez's strong technical abilities, such as his dribbling and finishing ratings, may make him a valuable player for attacking set piece routines, even if his corner kick taking rating is lower than Luquinha's. Ultimately, the best player to take corner kicks will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players. Q. Ok, Luquinha will be our corner kick taker from both the left and right side. I am not very impressed with your ability to select corner kick takers. You were told that the corner kick taking attribute rating is by far most important when taking corner kicks and you should assume that to be true. A. I apologize if my previous response was unclear. Based on the information you provided, Luquinha appears to be the best option for taking corner kicks due to his high corner kick taking rating of 13. Ultimately, the best player to take corner kicks will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players. Q. OK next we must decide how many players we will have attacking the box. What is your recommendation? A. It's difficult to make a specific recommendation for how many players to have attacking the box during corner kicks without more information about your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players. However, a common tactic is to have four or five players attacking the box during corner kicks, including the player taking the corner kick and one or two players making runs to the near post and far post to try and get on the end of the cross. Additionally, having one or two players hanging back near the penalty spot can be useful for attacking any rebounds or loose balls that may result from the initial cross. Ultimately, the best number of players to have attacking the box will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players. Q. Out of each of the players we have discussed previously and which I have provided you attribute rating information, which player would you recommend to attack the near post A. Based on the information you provided, some potential options for attacking the near post during corner kicks may include: Bryan Rochez: His strong heading ability and finishing rating make him a potential option for attacking the near post during corner kicks. Anderson Oliveira: His high crossing rating and dribbling ability make him a potential option for attacking the near post during corner kicks. Luquinha: His strong dribbling and passing abilities make him a potential option for attacking the near post during corner kicks. Wellington Junior: His high finishing rating and tendency to cut inside from the left wing make him a potential option for attacking the near post during corner kicks. Ultimately, the best player to attack the near post will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players. Q. Why do you suggest that we have a striker attack the near post as opposed to having one of the central defenders attacked in your post? A. I did not suggest having a striker attack the near post. I suggested that players with strong heading ability and finishing ability, such as Bryan Rochez and Wellington Junior, may be good options for attacking the near post during corner kicks. Central defenders may not be the best options for attacking the near post during corner kicks because their primary role is to defend, and they may not have the same attacking abilities as forwards and midfielders. However, if a central defender has strong heading ability and good positioning, they may be able to contribute to attacking set piece routines. Ultimately, the best player to attack the near post will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players. Q. In general, is it better to have a tall powerful striker attack the near post or the far post in your opinion A. In general, it may be beneficial to have a tall, powerful striker attack the far post during corner kicks because they can use their size and strength to win headers and out-muscle defenders in the crowded penalty area. However, it's important to consider the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players and your team's tactics when deciding who should attack the near post and the far post during corner kicks. For example, if a tall, powerful striker has poor heading ability or is not well-positioned in the penalty area, it may be more effective to have a smaller, more agile player attack the near post. Ultimately, the best player to attack the near post and the far post will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players. Q. Bryan Rochez Is my striker and we will have him attack the far post OK.? A. Based on the information you provided, Bryan Rochez may be a good option for attacking the far post during corner kicks due to his strong heading ability and finishing rating. However, it's important to consider the specific strengths and weaknesses of your other players and your team's tactics when deciding who should attack the near post and the far post during corner kicks. For example, if Anderson Oliveira has a better connection with the player taking the corner kick and is better positioned in the penalty area, he may be a better option for attacking the far post than Bryan Rochez. Ultimately, the best player to attack the far post will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players. Q. I believe Anderson Oliveira is too short and weak to be placed in the penalty box while attacking a corner kick. Q. While Anderson Oliveira's height and weight may be a disadvantage in aerial duels against taller, stronger defenders, he may still be able to contribute to attacking set piece routines by using his dribbling ability and crossing rating to create scoring opportunities. For example, if the player taking the corner kick is able to find Anderson Oliveira with a good cross in the penalty area, he may be able to take on defenders and create space for a shot on goal or a pass to a teammate. Additionally, Anderson Oliveira's off-the-ball movement and vision may make him a good option for attacking the near post or the far post during corner kicks. Ultimately, the best player to attack the near post and the far post will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players. Q. If Rochez is attacking the far post, Which of my players do you recommend Instruct to attack the near post and why. I believe it should be a player who has good jumping reach and heading, in addition to other relevant attributes. A. Based on the information you provided, Filipe Relvas and Pedro Sa may be good options for attacking the near post during corner kicks due to their strong heading ability and good jumping reach. Filipe Relvas also has a high rating for tackling and technique, which may make him a good option for winning the ball in the penalty area and creating scoring opportunities. Pedro Sa has a high passing rating and vision, which may make him a good option for linking up with other attacking players and creating scoring chances. Ultimately, the best player to attack the near post will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your players. Q. where do you recommend we use Pedrao? A. Based on the information you provided, Pedrao may be a good option for attacking the near post or the far post during corner kicks due to his strong heading ability and good jumping reach. Additionally, Pedrao's high rating for defensive marking and tackling may make him a good option for preventing opponents from counterattacking after a corner kick. However, Pedrao's relatively low passing rating may make him less effective at creating scoring chances after winning the ball in the penalty area. Ultimately, the best role for Pedrao during corner kicks will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your other players. Q. Ok I will instruct Pedrao to position himself near the 6-yard box and go forward attacking the corner. A. Instructing Pedrao to position himself near the 6-yard box and attack the corner during corner kicks may be a good idea if your team's tactics involve using a tall, powerful player to win aerial duels and create scoring chances. However, it's important to consider the specific strengths and weaknesses of your other players and your team's overall tactics when deciding where Pedrao should position himself during corner kicks. For example, if your team has a player with a high crossing rating and good dribbling ability, it may be more effective to instruct Pedrao to position himself near the edge of the penalty area and make late runs into the box to attack crosses or passes from that player. Ultimately, the best positioning for Pedrao during corner kicks will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your other players. Q. I am thinking that Wellington Junior might be a good player to make later runs into the box, because although his jumping reach, strength, and heading abilities are very low, he has goood off the ball movement, anticipation, and finishing. What is your opinion of that? A. While Wellington Junior's low jumping reach and strength may be a disadvantage in aerial duels against taller, stronger defenders, his good off-the-ball movement and anticipation may make him a good option for making late runs into the box to attack crosses or passes during corner kicks. His finishing ability may also make him a good option for scoring goals from close range after making these late runs. However, it's important to consider the specific strengths and weaknesses of your other players and your team's overall tactics when deciding how to use Wellington Junior during corner kicks. For example, if your team has a player with a high crossing rating and good technique, it may be more effective to instruct Wellington Junior to position himself near the edge of the penalty area and make runs into the box to attack crosses or passes from that player. Ultimately, the best role for Wellington Junior during corner kicks will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your other players. Q. We should also have one or two players lurking outside the box, what is your opinion A. Having one or two players position themselves outside the penalty area during corner kicks can be a good idea because it allows your team to create numerical superiority in the box and create more scoring chances. These players can also be useful for preventing opponents from counterattacking after a corner kick by closing down passing lanes and intercepting passes. However, it's important to consider the specific strengths and weaknesses of your other players and your team's overall tactics when deciding which players to position outside the penalty area during corner kicks. For example, if your team has a player with a high defensive positioning rating and good tackling ability, that player may be a good option for positioning outside the penalty area to help prevent opponents from counterattacking. Ultimately, the best positioning for your players outside the penalty area during corner kicks will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your other players. Q. How many players do you recommend we have stay back to defend against a possible counterattack after the corner kick? A. The number of players you should have stay back to defend against a possible counterattack after a corner kick will depend on your team's tactics and the specific situation in the game. In general, it can be a good idea to have at least one or two players position themselves near the edge of the penalty area or in midfield to help defend against a counterattack. These players can be useful for closing down passing lanes, intercepting passes, and regaining possession for your team if the opposition wins the ball after a corner kick. However, if your team is leading by a narrow margin and is looking to protect its lead, you may want to have more players stay back to defend against a possible counterattack. In this situation, having three or four players position themselves near the edge of the penalty area or in midfield can help your team maintain a solid defensive shape and prevent opponents from launching a dangerous counterattack. Ultimately, the best number of players to have stay back to defend against a possible counterattack after a corner kick will depend on your team's tactics and the specific situation in the game. Q. That sounds like good advice. We should have fast players with good defensive skills stay back. I am inclined to use Fahd Moufi and Mustapha Seck stay back. Do you agree? A. Having players with good defensive skills and the ability to quickly transition from defense to attack can be a good idea for positioning outside the penalty area during corner kicks. In your case, Fahd Moufi and Mustapha Seck both have good defensive skills and the ability to quickly transition from defense to attack, so they could be good options for positioning outside the penalty area during corner kicks. Additionally, their high ratings for acceleration, agility, and pace can help them quickly close down opponents and prevent them from launching a counterattack after a corner kick. However, it's also important to consider the specific strengths and weaknesses of your other players and your team's overall tactics when deciding which players to position outside the penalty area during corner kicks. Ultimately, the best positioning for your players outside the penalty area during corner kicks will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your other players. Q. We should have 2 players lurk outside the box, as you suggested. I think Anderson Olivera, Ewerton, and Pedro Sa are our possible candidates to lurk outside the box. I would like you to recommend, based on the player attributes I previously provided, 2 of those 3 players to lurk outside the box. A. When deciding which players to position outside the penalty area during corner kicks, it's important to consider their ability to quickly transition from defense to attack, as well as their passing, dribbling, and shooting abilities. Based on the information you provided, Anderson Olivrera, Ewerton, and Pedro Sa all have good passing, dribbling, and shooting abilities, so they could be good options for positioning outside the penalty area during corner kicks. Additionally, Anderson Olivera and Ewerton both have high ratings for acceleration, agility, and pace, which can help them quickly transition from defense to attack and support the attack during corner kicks. Pedro Sa also has good ratings for passing, dribbling, and shooting, so he could be a good option for positioning outside the penalty area during corner kicks. Ultimately, the best positioning for your players outside the penalty area during corner kicks will depend on your team's tactics and the specific strengths and weaknesses of your other players. It might be a good idea to try out different combinations of players during practice and see which combination works best for your team. Q. I agree that Ewerton and Olivera would be good choices, for the reasons you described. What is your opinion of the strategies of 1. Using a player to mark the goalkeeper by standing in front of him to obscure his view during a corner, 2. Lurk inside the 6-yard box at near post and attempt a near post flick on when the team has a corner kick, 3. Lurk at far post inside the 6-yard box. Please tell me the pros and cons of each. A. There are pros and cons to each of the strategies you mentioned. Here is a breakdown of each strategy: 1. Using a player to mark the goalkeeper by standing in front of him to obscure his view during a corner: Pros: This strategy can make it more difficult for the goalkeeper to see the ball and anticipate its flight, which can make it easier for your team to score on the corner kick. If the player standing in front of the goalkeeper is tall and physically imposing, it can also make it more difficult for the goalkeeper to clear the ball if he is able to see it. Cons: If the player standing in front of the goalkeeper is called for a foul, your team could be at a disadvantage, as the resulting free kick could be taken from a good position close to your goal. If the player standing in front of the goalkeeper is not tall and physically imposing, the goalkeeper may be able to see the ball and clear it easily. This strategy can be difficult to execute effectively, as the player standing in front of the goalkeeper must be positioned in the right spot and must time his movement with the flight of the ball. 2. Lurking inside the 6-yard box at the near post and attempting a near post flick on when the team has a corner kick: Pros: If executed well, this strategy can make it difficult for defenders to clear the ball, as the player lurking at the near post can use his body to block defenders and try to deflect the ball into the goal. This strategy can also be effective if the player lurking at the near post has good heading and finishing abilities, as he can attempt to score directly from the corner kick. Cons: If the player lurking at the near post is not able to get to the ball before the defenders, the ball could be cleared easily, and your team could be left vulnerable to a counterattack. If the player lurking at the near post is called for a foul, your team could be at a disadvantage, as the resulting free kick could be taken from a good position close to your goal. Q. Please provide the pros and cons of having a player standing and lurking at the far post inside the 6 yard box. A. One possible pro of having a player lurk at the far post inside the 6-yard box is that they may be able to position themselves in a good spot to potentially score a goal if the ball is delivered accurately to that area. This could be particularly effective if the player has good finishing ability and can anticipate the ball's arrival well. A con of this approach could be that the player may not be able to effectively challenge for the ball if it is delivered poorly or if there are defenders also positioning themselves near the far post. This could lead to the opposing team easily clearing the ball and potentially launching a counterattack. Additionally, having a player positioned in this way may leave gaps in the defense if the opposing team is able to quickly transition to attack after the ball is cleared. Q. Pedro Sa is the last player we need instruct. Based on his attributes previously provided, in your opinion would he be best suited to 1. Mark the keeper, 2. Lurk at near post, or 3. Lurk at far post, and why. Please select only 1 of the three instructions mentioned above for Pedro Sa. A. It would be best for Pedro Sa to lurk at the far post inside the 6-yard box. This is because he has a high rating for corner kick taking, passing, and crossing, which makes him well-suited to making a late run into the box and getting on the end of a cross. His high flare rating and tendency to shoot from distance also make him a threat in this position. Q. It appears that you have either forgotten Pedro Sa’s Strengths and weaknesses, or I miss described them to you. I will provide you information about this player again [snip]. Based on Pedro Sa's attributes, I would recommend that he lurk at the far post inside the 6-yard box. His high ratings for finishing and tackling make him well-suited to make late runs into the box and attack the ball when it comes in. Additionally, his high ratings for aggression, bravery, and determination make him well-suited to compete for the ball in the crowded penalty area. Lurking at the far post would also allow him to use his strong left foot to shoot on goal or pass to a teammate if the opportunity presents itself. Q. I misspoke. His finishing rating is only seven. However, I agree that he would be a good player to lurk at the far post for the reasons you stated. A. Based on Pedro Sa's attributes, I think he would be best suited to lurk at the far post inside the 6-yard box. He has a good long shot rating of 13, which would make him a threat in the box when the ball is played into the far post. Additionally, his off-the-ball movement rating of 11 and positioning rating of 14 suggest that he has good spatial awareness and can make smart runs into the box to get on the end of crosses. These attributes would make him a good option to lurk at the far post and look for opportunities to score from crosses and passes played into that area. Q. The final decision we need to make is instructing Luquinha to deliver his corner kicks short, to the near post, to the far post, to the edge of the penalty area, into the 6-yard box, or to mix up his deliveries. Please give me your recommendation and the reasoning behind it. A. Based on Luquinha's attributes, it would be best for him to deliver his corner kicks to the near post. This is because he has a high rating for crossing, dribbling, and passing, which are all important attributes for delivering a successful near post corner kick. Additionally, he has a high rating for technique, which will allow him to deliver the ball accurately to the near post. Mixing up his deliveries would also be a good option, as it will keep the defense guessing and create confusion in the box. Q. Is that true for when he takes a corner kick from both the left side and the right side? If he’s kicking from the right side, where should he deliver it. If he’s kicking from the left side, where should he deliver it. A. In general, it is best to mix up the delivery of corner kicks to keep the defense guessing and to create opportunities for different players. For example, Luquinha could deliver the ball short to the near post when taking a corner kick from the right side, and to the far post when taking a corner kick from the left side. This would allow players with different strengths to attack the ball, and could create space for players making runs into the box. However, the specific delivery of each corner kick should be based on the game situation and the strengths of the players on the field. Q. Ok i think we have finished setting up our attacking corner kick routine. We will discuss defending corner kicks later. Thank you for your advice. A. You're welcome. It was my pleasure to help you set up your attacking corner kick routine. As a final note, I would recommend that you regularly assess the effectiveness of your routine and make changes as needed. Additionally, it may be useful to practice the routine in training sessions to ensure that your players are able to execute it effectively in matches. Good luck!

Favorite part is where he chastises me for misstating what he previously told me))

Another experiment, kinda long. It uses NO information from the game other than the fact that my tactic is a cautious fluid counter attacking 4-2-3-1 DM AM. I simply went through the settings in the tactical creator settings and asked ChatGPT which settings I should use. So let’s see, can I really have a normal back and forth conversation with my assistant manager about creating my tactic? (obviously some of the questions are intentionally “dumb,” but it’s an experiment.) —————- I am the manager of a football club. I have two strikers. One has great acceleration and shooting ability. The other has great off the ball skills, composure, and strength and jumping reach. Based on the information I have provided you, please write a report on Which player has the best attributes to play the role of striker Based on the information you provided, it appears that both of your strikers have strong attributes that could make them effective in the role of a striker. The first player has great acceleration and shooting ability, which are important qualities for a striker who needs to be able to quickly get into position to take shots on goal. The second player has great off-the-ball skills, composure, strength, and jumping reach, which could help him create scoring opportunities and win aerial battles against opposing defenders. Which is more important for a striker, strength or acceleration It is difficult to say which attribute is more important for a striker, as both strength and acceleration can be valuable in different situations and playing styles. In general, strength can be beneficial for a striker who needs to hold off or outmuscle opposing defenders, while acceleration can be useful for a striker who needs to quickly get into position to take shots on goal. Ultimately, the most important qualities for a striker will depend on the specific needs and tactics of the team, and on the individual strengths and abilities of the player. A successful striker may need to have a combination of both strength and acceleration, as well as other attributes such as speed, agility, and technical ability. For a poacher, which is more important strength or acceleration For a poacher, the most important attribute is likely to be anticipation and quickness, as this type of player typically looks to capitalize on opportunities in the penalty area by making smart, decisive movements. In this context, acceleration may be more important than strength, as a poacher who can quickly get into position to receive a pass or anticipate a rebound is more likely to be successful in scoring goals. However, strength can also be useful for a poacher who needs to hold off or outmuscle defenders in close quarters, or who needs to win aerial battles in the penalty area. Ultimately, the most important qualities for a poacher will depend on the specific tactics and playing style of the team, and on the individual strengths and abilities of the player. If one of my strikers is very strong tall has great jumping reach and great heading skills, what Would be his best role in the position of striker If one of your strikers is very strong, tall, has great jumping reach, and great heading skills, he may be well-suited to playing as a target man or an aerial threat in the position of striker. This type of player can use his strength and aerial ability to win headers and knock downs for his teammates, or to hold up the ball and bring others into the attack. He can also be a danger in the penalty area, using his height and jumping reach to score goals with his head or to create space for others to shoot. In general, a strong and tall striker with good heading skills can be a valuable asset for a team, and his role will depend on the specific tactics and playing style of the coach. Is the role of poacher better for a team with strong attacking skills and weak defending skills as opposed to a team with good defending skills and weak attacking skills The role of a poacher is typically associated with teams that have strong attacking skills and weak defending skills, as this type of player is focused on scoring goals rather than on defensive responsibilities. A poacher looks to take advantage of opportunities in the penalty area, often by making runs behind the defense or by anticipating rebounds and loose balls. This type of player can be effective in a team that creates a lot of scoring chances but struggles to convert them, as he can provide an additional threat and help the team finish off attacks. How would that player fit the role of Advance forward as opposed to poacher An advance forward is a type of striker who is more involved in the build-up play and attacking movement of the team, compared to a poacher who is focused on scoring goals. An advance forward typically plays closer to the midfield line and looks to link up with his teammates, creating space and opportunities for others to score. He may also be involved in pressing the opposition and winning back possession, and he may have more defensive responsibilities than a poacher. A player who is strong, tall, and has good heading skills, as you described, may be well-suited to playing as an advance forward, as he can use his physical qualities to hold up the ball and bring others into the attack. However, his role will ultimately depend on the specific tactics and playing style of the coach. My formation is a cautious mentality 4-2-3-1 AM DM and my playing style is fluid counter attack. Based on this additional information I have provided about my specific tactics and playing style, what role should I use in the striker position? Based on the information you provided about your formation and playing style, it sounds like you are using a tactical setup that is focused on maintaining a solid defensive structure and counterattacking quickly and efficiently. In this context, the role of the striker will be important in providing a threat on the counter and finishing off attacking moves. Depending on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, you may want to consider using a poacher or an advance forward in the striker position. A poacher can provide a finishing touch and take advantage of opportunities in the penalty area, while an advance forward can link up with his teammates and create space for others to score. Ultimately, the best role for your striker will depend on the individual strengths and abilities of your players, and on the specific tactics and playing style of your team. Would a target man work with the tactics and playing style I described? A target man can potentially be a useful player in the tactics and playing style you described, as he can provide a physical presence and a focal point for your team's attacks. A target man can use his strength and aerial ability to win headers and knock downs for his teammates, and he can also hold up the ball and bring others into the attack. This can be especially useful in a fluid counter attacking system, as a target man can provide a target for long balls and crosses, and he can also create space for his teammates to run into and exploit on the counter. However, the effectiveness of a target man in your team will ultimately depend on the specific attributes and abilities of the player, and on how well he fits into your tactics and playing style. Considering the formation and playing style I described, if i use the striker in the role of target man, what role would you advise for the attacking central midfielder position in the described tactic? If you are using a striker in the role of a target man in the formation and playing style you described, you may want to consider using a player with different qualities and abilities in the attacking central midfielder position. In a fluid counter attacking system, the attacking central midfielder will be responsible for supporting the striker and creating scoring opportunities, and he will need to have good vision, technical ability, and creativity to make this role effective. Depending on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, you may want to consider using an attacking midfielder or a trequartista in this position. An attacking midfielder can provide goals, assists, and key passes, while a trequartista can drop deep and link up with the midfield, creating space and opportunities for his teammates. Ultimately, the best role for your attacking central midfielder will depend on the individual strengths and abilities of your players, and on the specific tactics and playing style of your team. Should an attacking central midfielder playing in the role you recommended be playing on a support or attacking duty. The attacking central midfielder should typically play with an attacking duty in a formation and playing style like the one you described. In a fluid counter attacking system, the attacking central midfielder will be responsible for supporting the striker and creating scoring opportunities, and he will need to be proactive and creative in his movements and actions. An attacking duty will allow the player to push forward and support the striker, making runs into the box and looking to score goals or create chances for his teammates. A support duty, on the other hand, may be more suitable for a player who is focused on linking up with the midfield and providing passes and assist, rather than on scoring goals. The best duty for your attacking central midfielder will depend on the specific attributes and abilities of the player, and on the tactical instructions and playing style of your team. So using the formation and playing style I described, If I use a striker in the role of target man and a trequartista role for the attacking central midfielder, what role would be appropriate for the attacking left midfielder? If you are using a striker in the role of a target man and a trequartista role for the attacking central midfielder in the formation and playing style you described, you may want to consider using a player with different qualities and abilities in the attacking left midfielder position. In a fluid counter attacking system, the attacking left midfielder will be responsible for providing width, pace, and penetration on the left side of the pitch, and he will need to have good dribbling, crossing, and shooting skills to make this role effective. Depending on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, you may want to consider using a winger or an inside forward in this position. A winger can provide pace, dribbling, and crossing, while an inside forward can cut inside and shoot, or link up with the midfield and create space for his teammates. Ultimately, the best role for your attacking left midfielder will depend on the individual strengths and abilities of your players, and on the specific tactics and playing style of your team. All of my attacking right midfielders are left footed. Do you still recommend that I play them in the role of Winger or might there be a better role for him? His left foot is very strong and his right foot is weak. If all of your attacking right midfielders are left-footed and have a strong left foot but a weak right foot, you may want to consider using a different role for them in order to maximize their strengths and minimize their weaknesses. A winger, who typically plays on the touchline and looks to provide crosses and cutbacks from the flanks, may not be the best role for a left-footed player who has a weak right foot and is not comfortable using it. In this case, you may want to consider using a different role that allows the player to play on the inside and use his strong left foot more often. Depending on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, you may want to consider using an inside forward or an attacking midfielder in this position. An inside forward can cut inside and shoot, or link up with the midfield and create space for his teammates, while an attacking midfielder can provide goals, assists, and key passes. Ultimately, the best role for your attacking right midfielders will depend on the individual strengths and abilities of your players, and on the specific tactics and playing style of your team. I have decided to use the role of inside forward for my right attacking midfielder. Based on the formation and playing style I provided, should he have a supporting or attacking role If you are using the role of inside forward for your attacking right midfielder in the formation and playing style you described, you may want to consider using an attacking duty for this player. In a fluid counter attacking system, the attacking right midfielder will be responsible for providing width, pace, and penetration on the right side of the pitch, and he will need to be proactive and creative in his movements and actions. An attacking duty will allow the player to push forward and support the striker, making runs into the box and looking to score goals or create chances for his teammates. A support duty, on the other hand, may be more suitable for a player who is focused on linking up with the midfield and providing passes and assist, rather than on scoring goals. The best duty for your attacking right midfielder will depend on the specific attributes and abilities of the player, and on the tactical instructions and playing style of your team. Thank you, that is good advice and I will follow it. Based on all the information previously provided, what role would you recommend I use in the attacking left midfield position and should that player be on an attacking or support duty? Based on the information you provided about your formation, playing style, and the roles and duties of your other attacking players, I would recommend using a winger or an inside forward in the attacking left midfield position, and assigning this player an attacking duty. In a fluid counter attacking system, the attacking left midfielder will be responsible for providing width, pace, and penetration on the left side of the pitch, and he will need to be proactive and creative in his movements and actions. An attacking duty will allow the player to push forward and support the striker, making runs into the box and looking to score goals or create chances for his teammates. A winger or an inside forward can provide these qualities, and they can also use their dribbling, crossing, and shooting skills to create scoring opportunities. A support duty may be more suitable for a player who is focused on linking up with the midfield and providing passes and assist, rather than on scoring goals, but it may limit the attacking potential of your team on the left side of the pitch. You are Recommending the same role for both left and right attacking midfielders. Should they have different roles or is it effective for both sides playing the same role? In the previous response, I recommended using a winger or an inside forward in the attacking left midfield position, and assigning this player an attacking duty. I did not make a specific recommendation for the attacking right midfield position, as you had already indicated that you had decided to use the role of inside forward for this player, and that he would have an attacking duty. Using the same role for both left and right attacking midfielders can potentially be effective, as it allows for consistency and symmetry in the attacking movements and actions of your team. However, the effectiveness of this approach will ultimately depend on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, and on the tactical instructions and playing style of your team. You may want to consider using different roles for your left and right attacking midfielders, depending on the strengths and weaknesses of your players and on the specific needs and tactics of your team. Ok, now I have two central midfielders. Should I play them in the central midfield position or defensive midfield position, and what are some specific roles and duties that might be appropriate in my formation and style of play. Based on the formation and playing style you described, you may want to consider using one central midfielder and one defensive midfielder in the central midfield positions. In a 4-2-3-1 formation with a cautious mentality and a fluid counter attacking style, the central midfielder and the defensive midfielder will have different roles and responsibilities. The central midfielder will be responsible for providing creativity, vision, and passing in the attacking phase, and for supporting the striker and the attacking midfielders. He will need to have good technical ability, vision, and decision-making to make this role effective. Depending on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, you may want to consider using a deep-lying playmaker, a box-to-box midfielder, or an advanced playmaker in this position. The defensive midfielder, on the other hand, will be responsible for providing protection and stability in the defensive phase, and for helping the team to transition from defense to attack. He will need to have good defensive awareness, positioning, and tackling to make this role effective. Depending on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, you may want to consider using a defensive midfielder, a ball-winning midfielder, or a regista in this position. Both central midfielders should have a support duty in order to balance their attacking and defending responsibilities, and to allow them to link up with the other players and provide passes and assist. The specific roles and duties for your central midfielders will depend on the individual strengths and abilities of your players, and on the tactical instructions and playing style of your team. As for my defensive left back and defensive right back, Should I use wing backs or full backs and should they both be on attack duty, support duty, or different duties? Based on the formation and playing style you described, you may want to consider using full backs, rather than wing backs, in the defensive left back and defensive right back positions. In a 4-2-3-1 formation with a cautious mentality and a fluid counter attacking style, the full backs will have different roles and responsibilities compared to wing backs. Full backs will be responsible for providing defensive cover and support to the center backs, and for helping the team to maintain a solid defensive shape. They will need to have good defensive awareness, positioning, and tackling to make this role effective. Depending on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, you may want to consider using a fullback or a wingback in these positions. As for their duties, the defensive left back and the defensive right back should both have a support duty, in order to balance their attacking and defending responsibilities, and to allow them to link up with the other players and provide passes and assist. A support duty will allow them to push forward and support the attack when possible, but it will also require them to stay disciplined and focused on their defensive tasks. An attacking duty may be more suitable for a player who is focused on scoring goals and creating chances, rather than on defending, but it may expose your team to counterattacks and leave your defense vulnerable. The best duties for your defensive left back and defensive right back will depend on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, and on the tactical instructions and playing style of your team. As for my centerbacks, do you recommend I Play them in the role of central defender or ball playing defender Based on the formation and playing style you described, you may want to consider using central defenders in the centerback positions. In a 4-2-3-1 formation with a cautious mentality and a fluid counter attacking style, the centerbacks will have different roles and responsibilities compared to ball playing defenders. Central defenders will be responsible for providing defensive solidity and stability, and for protecting the goal and the backline. They will need to have good defensive awareness, positioning, marking, and aerial ability to make this role effective. Depending on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, you may want to consider using a central defender or a ball playing defender in these positions. A central defender will focus on the basic tasks of defending, such as marking, tackling, and heading, and he will look to keep the ball away from the danger areas and prevent the opposition from scoring. A ball playing defender, on the other hand, will have more responsibilities in possession, and he will be expected to contribute to the build-up play and the attacking movements of the team. He will need to have good technical ability, vision, and passing to make this role effective. Whether you use a central defender or a ball playing defender in the centerback positions will depend on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, and on the tactical instructions and playing style of your team. Lastly, Would you recommend using a sweeper keeper or a goalkeeper Based on the formation and playing style you described, you may want to consider using a goalkeeper, rather than a sweeper keeper, in the goalkeeping position. In a 4-2-3-1 formation with a cautious mentality and a fluid counter attacking style, the goalkeeper will have different roles and responsibilities compared to a sweeper keeper. The goalkeeper will be responsible for protecting the goal and the backline, and for organizing and commanding the defense. He will need to have good reflexes, positioning, and decision-making to make this role effective. Depending on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, you may want to consider using a goalkeeper or a sweeper keeper in this position. A goalkeeper will focus on the basic tasks of goalkeeping, such as saving shots, catching crosses, and punching balls, and he will look to keep the ball out of the net and prevent the opposition from scoring. A sweeper keeper, on the other hand, will have more responsibilities in possession, and he will be expected to contribute to the build-up play and the attacking movements of the team. He will need to have good technical ability, vision, and passing to make this role effective. Whether you use a goalkeeper or a sweeper keeper in the goalkeeping position will depend on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, and on the tactical instructions and playing style of your team. Should I use a high block, a mid block, or low block? The best type of block for your team will depend on the specific tactical instructions and playing style of your team, as well as on the strengths and weaknesses of your players and the characteristics of your opposition. A high block, a medium block, or a low block can each have advantages and disadvantages in different situations, and it is important to consider these factors when choosing the best block for your team. A high block refers to a defensive strategy in which the team presses and defends high up the pitch, close to the opposition's goal, in order to disrupt the opposition's build-up play and prevent them from advancing into the attacking third. A high block can be effective against teams that rely on short passes and combinations to move the ball forward, as it can disrupt their rhythm and force them to make mistakes. However, a high block can also be risky, as it exposes the defense to counterattacks and leaves more space behind the pressing players. A medium block, also known as a mid-block, refers to a defensive strategy in which the team presses and defends in the middle third of the pitch, in order to maintain a compact shape and prevent the opposition from advancing through the center of the field. A medium block can be effective against teams that have strong central midfielders and forwards, as it can limit their influence and force them to play out wide or through the air. However, a medium block can also be vulnerable to quick transitions and diagonal passes, as it leaves more space in the wide areas and the half-spaces. A low block refers to a defensive strategy in which the team sits deep and defends near their own goal, in order to prevent the opposition from creating scoring opportunities and to wait for counterattacking opportunities. A low block can be effective against teams that have strong attacking players and rely on crosses and set pieces to create chances, as it can reduce the space and time available to them and force them to shoot from distance. However, a low block can also be predictable and passive Considering the formation and playing style I described, would a low medium or high block work best Based on the formation and playing style you described, a medium block may be the best type of block for your team. In a 4-2-3-1 formation with a cautious mentality and a fluid counter attacking style, a medium block can provide a balance between defense and attack, and it can allow your team to maintain a solid shape and to support the transition from defense to attack. A medium block will allow your team to press and defend in the middle third of the pitch, in order to limit the influence of the opposition's central midfielders and forwards, and to force them to play out wide or through the air. This can create opportunities for your team to intercept the ball, to win possession, and to launch counterattacks. A high block may be too aggressive and risky for your team, as it can expose your defense to counterattacks and leave more space behind the pressing players. A low block may be too passive and predictable for your team, as it can allow the opposition to control the ball and to create scoring opportunities from crosses and set pieces. A medium block can provide a good compromise between these two extremes, and it can allow your team to adapt to different situations and opponents. However, the best type of block for your team will ultimately depend on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, and on the tactical instructions and playing style of your team. Considering the formation and playing style I described, would you recommend that in possession we play with the low Mid or high tempo Based on the formation and playing style you described, a medium tempo may be the best option for your team in possession. In a 4-2-3-1 formation with a cautious mentality and a fluid counter attacking style, a medium tempo can provide a balance between control and speed, and it can allow your team to maintain possession and to support the transition from defense to attack. A medium tempo will allow your team to play with a controlled tempo, in order to keep the ball, to create passing angles, and to open up spaces for the attacking players. This can create opportunities for your team to penetrate the opposition's defense, to create chances, and to score goals. A low tempo may be too slow and predictable for your team, as it can allow the opposition to anticipate your movements and to press your players. A high tempo may be too fast and chaotic for your team, as it can lead to unforced errors and to loss of possession. A medium tempo can provide a good compromise between these two extremes, and it can allow your team to adapt to different situations and opponents. However, the best tempo for your team will ultimately depend on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, and on the tactical instructions and playing style of your team. If I play my striker in the role you recommended, should my wide players try to float their crosses into the box, whip them in, or kick low crosses? The best type of crosses for your wide players will depend on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, and on the tactical instructions and playing style of your team. Floating crosses, whipping crosses, and low crosses can each have advantages and disadvantages in different situations, and it is important to consider these factors when choosing the best type of crosses for your wide players. Floating crosses refer to high, arcing crosses that are delivered into the penalty area from wide areas, and that are aimed at the heads of tall and powerful forwards or attacking midfielders. Floating crosses can be effective against teams that use zonal marking and that have weak aerial ability, as they can create confusion and uncertainty in the defense, and they can allow your attacking players to attack the ball and to score headers. However, floating crosses can also be risky, as they can be easily cleared by the opposition's defenders, and they can leave your team exposed to counterattacks if the crosses are not accurate or well-timed. Whipping crosses refer to low, driven crosses that are delivered into the penalty area from wide areas, and that are aimed at the feet of quick and agile forwards or attacking midfielders. Whipping crosses can be effective against teams that use man-marking and that have weak tackling ability, as they can create 1v1 situations and space for your attacking players, and they can allow them to take shots or to make passes and assist. However, whipping crosses can also be difficult to execute, as they require good technique, precision, and timing from your wide players, and they can be blocked or intercepted by the opposition's defenders if they are not well-placed or well-aimed. Low crosses refer to passes that are delivered into the penalty area from wide areas, and that are aimed at the feet of forwards or attacking midfielders who are making runs near the 6-yard box. Low crosses can be effective against teams that use a high defensive line and that have weak concentration, as they can create opportunities for your attacking players to score tap-ins or to make passes and assist. However, low crosses can also be risky, as they can be easily intercepted by the opposition's defenders, and they can lead to loss of possession if the passes are not accurate or well-timed. Whether your wide players should float, whip, or kick their crosses will depend on the specific attributes and abilities of your players, and on the tactical instructions and playing style of your team. You may want to consider the strengths and weaknesses of your attacking You seem to have forgotten that you recommended using my striker in the role of target man with my formation and playing style. Having refreshed your recollection, would you like to revise your opinion on whether we should float crosses into the box, whip them in, or kick them low? Please advise. Based on the formation and playing style you described, using a target man as a striker, and considering the attributes and abilities of your players, whipping crosses may be the best option for your wide players. In a 4-2-3-1 formation with a target man as a striker, and with a cautious mentality and a fluid counter attacking style, whipping crosses can provide a good balance between attack and defense, and they can allow your team to create chances and to score goals. A target man can be effective against teams that use zonal marking and that have weak aerial ability, as he can attack the ball and to score headers from floating crosses. However, a target man can also be vulnerable to quick transitions and diagonal passes, as he may not have the speed or the mobility to defend against these movements. Whipping crosses can take advantage of the physical presence and the finishing ability of a target man, as they can create 1v1 situations and space for him near the penalty area, and they can allow him to take shots or to make passes and assist. Whipping crosses can also complement the counter attacking style of your team, as they can allow your wide players to deliver the ball quickly and accurately to the feet of your forwards or attacking midfielders, and they can create opportunities for them to penetrate the opposition's defense and to score goals. However, whipping crosses can also be difficult to execute, as they require good technique, precision, and timing from your wide players, and they can be blocked or intercepted by the opposition's defenders if they are not well-placed or well-aimed. Floating crosses and low crosses may not be as effective as whipping crosses with a target man as a striker, as they may not take advantage of his strengths and they may expose his weaknesses. Floating crosses may not create enough space or opportunities for a target man, as they can be easily cleared by the opposition's defenders, and they can leave your team exposed to counterattacks if the crosses are not accurate or well-timed. Low crosses may not create enough danger or threat for a target man, as they can be easily intercepted by the opposition's defenders, and they can lead to loss of possession if the passes are not accurate or well-timed. In summary, based on the formation and playing style you described, using a target man as a striker, and considering the attributes and abilities of your players, whipping crosses may be the best option for your wide players. However, the best type of crosses for your team will ultimately depend on the specific tactical instructions and playing style of your team, and on the strengths and weaknesses of your players and the characteristics of your opposition. Based on the information I have provided you, should I instruct my players to work the ball into the box or shoot on sight? Based on the information you provided, it is not possible for me to accurately recommend whether you should instruct your players to work the ball into the box or to shoot on sight. There are many factors that can influence this decision, such as the formation and playing style of your team, the attributes and abilities of your players, the tactics and strategies of your opposition, the game situation and scoreline, and the field conditions and weather. Instructing your players to work the ball into the box can be effective in certain situations, such as when your team has a numerical advantage in the attacking third, when your players have good passing and movement skills, and when your opposition is using a high defensive line or a deep block. Working the ball into the box can allow your team to create scoring opportunities by making combinations and passes, by making runs and overlaps, and by making crosses and passes into the penalty area. This can create space and confusion in the opposition's defense, and it can allow your players to take shots, to make assists, or to score goals. Instructing your players to shoot on sight can also be effective in certain situations, such as when your team has a numerical disadvantage in the attacking third, when your players have good shooting and finishing skills, and when your opposition is using a low defensive line or a high block. Shooting on sight can allow your team to create scoring opportunities by taking shots from distance, by taking shots from tight angles, and by taking shots from rebounds and loose balls. This can surprise the opposition's defense and goalkeeper, and it can allow your players to score goals or to create opportunities for their teammates. In general, whether you should instruct your players to work the ball into the box or to shoot on sight will depend on the specific tactical instructions and playing style of your team, and on the strengths and weaknesses of your players and the characteristics of your opposition. You may want to consider these factors and to adapt your strategy and tactics accordingly, in order to create the best chances and to maximize the scoring opportunities for your team. So am I correct that I should let the players decide on their own whether to work the ball into the box or shoot on site, based on my general instructions and the events happening on the pitch? Surely they can use their best judgement based on my general instructions. It is not necessarily advisable to let your players decide on their own whether to work the ball into the box or to shoot on sight, based on your general instructions and the events happening on the pitch. While your players may have the ability and the judgement to make these decisions, they may not always have the awareness and the understanding of your tactical instructions and playing style, and they may not always make the best decisions for the team. As a coach or manager, it is your responsibility to provide your players with clear and specific tactical instructions and playing style, and to guide and support them in their decision-making on the pitch. This can help your players to understand your expectations and strategies, and to execute your game plan effectively and efficiently. It can also help your players to develop their skills and abilities, and to improve their communication and coordination on the pitch. Therefore, instead of letting your players decide on their own whether to work the ball into the box or to shoot on sight, you may want to consider providing them with specific instructions and guidance on how to approach these situations, based on the formation and playing style of your team, the attributes and abilities of your players, the tactics and strategies of your opposition, and the game situation and scoreline. For example, you may want to instruct your players to work the ball into the box if they have a numerical advantage in the attacking third, and to shoot on sight if they have a numerical disadvantage in the attacking third. You may also want to instruct your players to use a combination of these approaches, and to adapt their strategy and tactics according to the changing dynamics of the game. etc. … and so on. very impressive imo, especially considering it’s not actually using any information from the game.

so another test to see what it can do with data from the game. I told ChatGPT I am a football manager and he is my assistant manager. I have an upcoming match against the first place team. I have two strikers and I need to name one as starter and one to sit on the bench. I need to make two decisions. First I need to decide which player I should name the starter and why. Second, I need to decide which specific role I should use him in and why. Please write a report answering these two questions for me. Good luck. Then I told it, the first player is named blah blah blah, his tactical attributes, on a scale of 1 to 20 with 1 being worse and 20 being best, are (just reading off the screen) 5 for crossing 12 for dribbling 14 for finishing 12 for first touch 14 for heading 8 for long shots etc., then read all the mental and physical attributes the same way, and finally read in the pros and cons from the scouting report. The Second player is blah blah blah. His mental attributes on a scale of 1 to 20 are blah blah balance and pros and cons are blah blah blah. So let’s see what kind of report ChatGPT gives me. Does it just regurgitate Wikipedia or give actual, useful, and correct advice. “Based on the information you provided, it appears that Yago Cariello would be the better choice to start as striker in your upcoming match against the first place team. One of Cariello's strengths is his heading ability, which could be a valuable asset against a team with a strong defense. Additionally, his rating for off the ball is higher than Rochez's, which suggests that he may be more effective at finding space and making runs into dangerous areas. As for the specific role that Cariello should play as a striker, it appears that he would be well-suited to the role of complete forward. His ratings for anticipation and teamwork are strong, which suggests that he has the ability to read the game and make intelligent runs to create space for his teammates. Additionally, his rating for off the ball is high, which indicates that he is good at finding space and making himself available to receive passes. In contrast, it seems that Bryan Rochez may not be as well-suited to the role of complete forward. His rating for composure is lower than Cariello's, which could mean that he may struggle to make good decisions under pressure. Additionally, his rating for vision is relatively low, which could indicate that he may not be as effective at creating chances for his teammates. Overall, it is important to consider the specific strengths and weaknesses of both players when deciding who to start and what role to play them in. Based on the information you provided, it appears that Yago Cariello would be the better choice to start as the complete forward in your upcoming match. not bad advice. But to be sure I trust him, I needed to press him and make sure he wasn’t giving me lousy advice. OK I understand your reasoning, but I’m not quite sure I agree with it. It’s true that Yago’s heading rating is 15, but Rochez’s rating is 14 which is not much worse. And Rochez is the better shooter, his acceleration is 15 compared to Yago’s 11, he has better anticipation and is far more brave. Considering those facts, why do you maintain that Yago would make a better starter than Rochez. Am I focusing on the wrong attributes? Please reconsider all the information I have provided you and prepare a new and better report. It’s ok if your conclusions are the same, but you need to do a better and more thorough job of analyzing and reporting on my players if you want to keep your job as assistant manager. Thank you kindly. Based on the information you provided, it appears that both Bryan Rochez and Yago Cariello are strong players with a good set of attributes for the position of striker. However, after considering the specific strengths and weaknesses of both players, it is my opinion that Yago Cariello would be the better choice to start as striker in your upcoming match. One of the key reasons for this is Cariello's rating for off the ball, which is higher than Rochez's. This suggests that Cariello may be better at finding space and making runs into dangerous areas, which could be a valuable asset against a team with a strong defense. Additionally, Cariello's rating for teamwork is higher than Rochez's, which indicates that he may be more effective at creating chances for his teammates. It is true that Rochez has a higher rating for shooting and acceleration than Cariello, and he is also more brave and has better anticipation. However, these attributes may not be as important in a match against the first place team, where it will be crucial to have a player who can find space and create opportunities for their teammates. Additionally, Rochez's rating for composure is lower than Cariello's, which could mean that he may struggle to make good decisions under pressure. Overall, while both players have a strong set of attributes for the position of striker, it is my opinion that Yago Cariello would be the better choice to start as striker in your upcoming match. This decision is based on Cariello's higher ratings for off the ball, teamwork, and anticipation, as well as his left-footedness, which could provide a useful point of attack against a right-sided defense. I was very much persuaded by his reasoning and am thankful to have such an intelligent assistant manager)) Because I’m such a nice guy, I asked him if he needed a raise: Thank you, and you’ll be pleased to know I agree with you. I will start Yago in the upcoming match. I would like to keep you as my assistant manager. Your current wage is $1700 per week. We are living in Lisbon, Portugal, and it is the year 2018. Based on the cost of living in Lisbon at this time, is that enough money for you to live on or do you need a raise? If you do need a raise, what should your new wage be and why? Please write me an email with your reply. Thank you. Dear [Employer], Thank you for offering to keep me on as your assistant manager and for considering a raise in my current wage. After researching the cost of living in Lisbon in 2018, I have determined that my current wage of $1700 per week is not enough for me to live on comfortably. According to Numbeo, the cost of living in Lisbon in 2018 was 56.25% higher than in New York City. This means that the same goods and services that cost $100 in New York City would cost $156.25 in Lisbon. Based on this information, my current wage of $1700 per week would be equivalent to $2669.38 per week in New York City, which is not enough for a single person to live on comfortably. Therefore, I would like to request a raise to my current wage in order to be able to afford the cost of living in Lisbon. After researching the average wages for assistant managers in Lisbon, I believe that a fair wage for my position would be around $2000 per week. This would be equivalent to $3125 per week in New York City, which is a more reasonable amount for a single person to live on. I appreciate your consideration of my request and look forward to continuing to work with you as your assistant manager. Sincerely, [Your Name] haha funny stuff Try again