Jump to content

egesagin

Members+
  • Posts

    311
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

11 "You're a bum, Rock"

About Me

  • About Me
    Istanbul/Turkey

Favourite Team

  • Favourite Team
    Galatasaray

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi @Neil Brock, I've uploaded a file with a recent news item: Ege Sagin - Galatasaray - Loanees.fm I've played around 3 seasons after that, now my loan manager handles it and he keeps recalling players too. Only the top, top talent who can already play on UCL level can play the agreed amount. No young players for development get to play in lower leagues, despite their talent being on par or regardless of that, despite what the AI offers in the first place. I highly doubt this is normal :/
  2. Hi, Throughout the past 3 season in my career, I've loaned out lots of players and in many of these cases, the manager isn't playing them even though they signed the player as regular starter. It happens way too often and I really think there's something wrong here. I didn't force them to agree to a higher playing time either, I accepted offers with initially good playing times. They should either: a) Play the players more, at least only one step below agreed playing time, OR b) Not send such offers and be better judges of player ability. Never had that issue in previous years in such severe fashion. You can see attached that I've received two items in the same day. I've also received more items like that in the previous week. One other thing that bugs me is that even when a player hasn't made a single appearance, the manager will respond by saying "He's playing enough." I can understand that if they at least play a match but come on, if this is intentional, it is just there to troll us. Sorry if this is the wrong place by the way. Made sense since it is about loan transfers after all. Thanks!
  3. Oh I assumed they asked you to gather this data to keep it according to real life. That's a shame. As feedback, I think the game deciding on staff numbers according to a global standard depending on reputation is utter nonsense. Every year, Galatasaray has tons of scouts who aren't allowed etc. I wish they used irl data and club culture instead of generalizing like that. Anyway, if the SM numbers affect sponsorship values, this presents an unfair challenge on an already financially challenging league so pushing it towards more realistic levels would be awesome. Thanks a lot for the explanation!
  4. Thank you for the extra information @perpetuamuch appreciated, it's all clear now. Just for clarity, I didn't think PSG was witholding tax, I assumed that since all details on the KAP announcements are net earnings, PSG would be sending over the taxes as well as the net €6M for said player's earnings. Now it makes sense that the information is kind of extra for that reason, and a club source is great to set things strait. I wish you a nice day!
  5. Thank you for the explanation, so the way I understand it is this: - His annual salary is €6,75M net, and Galatasaray pays €750K net of that part. However, PSG only sends over €6M net. The rest of the gross is paid by Galatasaray. However, I'm not really sure the KAP announcement can be interpreted that way. If only net amounts are (or can be) mentioned in the announcement, how do we know that PSG isn't sending over the gross amount but due to the way KAP announcements are structured, only the net part of that is mentioned? I mean, if Galatasaray's contribution is shown as net but it gross in reality, logic dictates (at least in my opininon) that PSG's contribution should also be gross in reality. Nowhere in the announcement it is said that "PSG will send x amount to Galatasaray" it is stated that "PSG will pay €6M of this amount." That's why, it can easily be assumed that PSG is obliged to cover all costs for that net €6M part of the salary. Do you have any source on how the deal is structured apart from the KAP announcement? Because it definitely doesn't say that €6M will be sent over and the rest of the gross is to be paid by Galatasaray. It sounds more like an assumption, unless that is the way all loan deals are handled in Turkey. Which I guess should be somewhere in an official regulations document or something. Btw, I have no issues with Mertens apart from signing on fees being part of the salary (should be part of the transfer budget imho) but that's SI's decision anyway so all good, that was just to show the tax rate as per my confusion about €750K for Icardi. Also, thanks for your patience!
  6. A couple questions here please: 1) How is the tax calculated? If Icardi is earning €750K net, then if we compare that with Mertens' post tax situation (attached) Galatasaray shouldn't be paying nearly as much as that. Is Galatasaray paying the tax with the French rate instead? If so, what is your source? 2) Here you mention that we should take notice that all numbers mentioned on the KAP announcement are net earnings of the player, not the gross paid by the club. By that logic, PSG should be paying €6M of his net earnings, as that is the number mentioned on the announcement. Which means, PSG should be paying almost €10M gross. But in the game, PSG is paying around €6M gross. Are you saying that in the KAP announcement, within the same sentence, PSG's amount is shown as gross and Galatasaray's amount is shown as net? If yes, what is the source on that discrepancy? I trust the work you guys do, but such discrepancies seem weird and I would love to learn more about it if I am mistaken and there are sources confirming the high amount paid by Galatasaray in the game, really. Thanks a lot!
  7. Hi, I was wondering if the social media follower numbers are bugged, or it was a conscious decision to misrepresent them in game? The attached screenshot is right after the final day of the first season with 200k or so increase compared to the start of the season. Simply visiting any social media account of Galatasaray will show that the number is certainly wrong. If it is a conscious decision, I would love to learn the reasoning behind it. Thanks!
  8. Hello, Just to update, one of the players (Traore) was finally included in the focus recommendations 2 months after he was fully scouted, sent to inbox via regular scouting recommendations AND disappearing from "in progress" part of the focus (I think). I guess there might be a weird issue with timing and sorting of the reports. Thanks for taking a look!
  9. Hi, I'm playing as Galatasaray and 2 of my scouting focuses are having issues. One is searching for an Advanced Forward, and the other is for a mid CA Turkish national (any position). For both of these assignments, I get "in progress" under the inbox reports. When I check them out, it seems that they would fit. After a while, the next report comes and "in progress" is back to zero, with no near matches or recommendations. However, when I check out Scouted Players from the Scouting Hub, I see matches that were clearly scouted as part of these assignments (I haven't manually assigned anything else) and were also suggested in Scouting Update inbox messages. As these players fit the criteria and they were seemingly found as part of the assignment (I remember seeing them in the "in progress" list of players when I checked), I believe this to be a bug and they should be displayed as either recommendations or near matches. Attached are a few screenshots to show that the players match the criteria, as far as I can understand. I've attached uploaded a save file named "Ege Sagin - Galatasaray-Scouting Bug.fm" which is 4 days before my most recent inbox about a scouting focus, but the issue unfortunately started a while ago so it might not be very helpful. You'll notice that I've shortlisted Orkun Kökçü, and not discraded his regular Scouting Update recommendation. So that can't be a reason it's not shown in the recommended or near match part of the scouting focus. Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...