They do calculate some data different, like xG.
Possession is split of number of passes, ball share is like a chess clock for who has the ball. Pitch tilt is % of passes complete in the opposition final third.
No, which can be an issue they promise some unrealistic stuff.
I think the contracts have got better as long as you put a limit on them via the Transfer target page.
Hard to control a wage structure because whilst you might limit to 50k a week the DOF loves a 30% pay rise after just 20 games played.
I would love (and have requested to the team) more personality between DOFs so you’d have ones who are stricter with finances and more shrewd negotiators and then ones who are happy to throw money around. When running tests I’ve not seen massive differences between the negotiation attributes. There are some but long term I’d like it to evolve more.
On the transfer targets page you can set limitations.
Can also set up who you want to control, so DOF agrees fee, you do contract. I think Bens been doing this but has given full contract to DOF here.
Thats probably a fairer example. And even then Leeds were still a big draw.
This is what would sway me the most, It would also be interesting to see their finances because aren’t they in serious debt at game start? Has that got worst?