Time_Consumer

Interesting take. Any individual instructions that matter? I like the use of two wingers, i think that's the way to go. It kind of screams CF(s) as the striker, I wounder how this would work.

Solid approach I think. What's your thought process behind giving White the stay wider instruction? I had a go for a couple of matches with your tactic, pretty good so far. Some defensive shenanigans that look more like an ME flaw rather than the tactic's fault. I dropped stay wider for White, it looked pretty good in terms of triangles with Saka and Ödegaard. I added stay wider for Martinelli, because I feel the formation and roles lack a bit of width on the left side. To be honest, I don't see a huge difference here. Thinking about dropping Martinellis duty to support - in theory, he should still be a goal threat but a bit more involved? I find the in game descriptions a bit misleading, also the standard PIs that give the attack duty "take more risks", although this is supposed to be a passing instruction. IF(s) has "vison" as a favoured attribute, IF(a) hasn't, so in my book it should be the other way around. That's a pet peeve I had for many FM iterations now.... How's the IWB(s) doing for you? I feel this role is just another body in midfield and doesn't do a lot. I also don't like the roam from position PI very much. I might tinke with FB(s) sit narrower, cut inside, take more risks or something similar. Also, PF(s) feels super weird as a role for Jesus, but it looks good for now. Heavily involved in the pressing, dropping deep, going to the wings through the added roaming instruction, still scores okay. Thanks anyway for posting your approach here, as said, very good base to tinker on.