Wayne\'o Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 After getting relegated from the prem i desided to have a look at all the top teams reports to see how many stars they had.. I was shocked to see most of the top 6 teams didnt have hardly any players over 4 stars. I was expecting these top teams to be flurishing in the 5,6 and 7 star rating's.. So my question is how important are stars and what do they really represent? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahmufcwafc Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 They just reflect how your one of your coaches rates certain players - they differ from coach to coach, depending on how good they are at judging player ability & potential. I don't pay an attention to them, as in most cases they aren't very accurate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neji Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 I don't use them much. I find that the attributes are much more important than their current ability. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skingegg Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Carrick for Man Utd is rated as a 3 star player (by ALL my coaching staff) and was only a decent squad member????! Ok, at the end of my first season he went to 4 stars. At the end of my second season he was still at 4 stars. At the end of my third season i got him to 5 stars but only for a few weeks. Sold him for Milan for £32.5m. Im baffled also........... :confused: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.