davhislop Posted January 10, 2009 Share Posted January 10, 2009 I mean av found theres little evidence to support that managers manage there sides based on there stats??/ av found that too many managers have to many tactical changes in common which is unrelastic! joe bloggs at reading should not be making same changes tactically to his side as say fergie wud at utd also this thing that EVERY manager employs of 424 when there team is getting beat, its just to unreaslistic wha am saying as a whole is that i dont see enuff to think that managers are doin there job at the level of there stats but more like a pre programmed stat for everyone! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
davhislop Posted January 10, 2009 Author Share Posted January 10, 2009 anyone agree disagree Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.A.R.T.I.N Posted January 10, 2009 Share Posted January 10, 2009 tbh i agree. its a joke how everyone goes to 424 when there getting beat. needs a bit of a tweak imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted January 10, 2009 Share Posted January 10, 2009 To me, it often seems like how well AI teams do is pretty random. The quality of their manager seems almost irrelevant. It shouldn't be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted January 10, 2009 Share Posted January 10, 2009 tbh i agree. its a joke how everyone goes to 424 when there getting beat. needs a bit of a tweak imo. All that means is that they're pushing their wingers forward. It's pretty easy to counter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
davhislop Posted January 10, 2009 Author Share Posted January 10, 2009 thats wha am saying u know they have programmed it wrong when u hear ppl say stuff like a.i is too hard, it shouldnt be said like that, it shouldnt be programmed in the way of its the computer vs the human. a manager in the lower leagues with prob a tactical stat of 9 shouldnt be makin changes to the level and similarty of fergie with a tactical stat of prob 18+ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djwilko6 Posted January 10, 2009 Share Posted January 10, 2009 Please try and cut down the text speak, it is against forum rules. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
davhislop Posted January 10, 2009 Author Share Posted January 10, 2009 Well that was helpful to the original topic. Thinking about it , i cant believe you clicked into this topic read it i assume thats your output, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JD nawrat Posted January 10, 2009 Share Posted January 10, 2009 Well that was helpful to the original topic.Thinking about it , i cant believe you clicked into this topic read it i assume thats your output, He's got a point. Anyway, yes, I agree to an extent. It's not always down to the manager. Otherwise Joe Kinnear wouldn't be doing so well at Newcastle just now, would he? Just because he's an unknown, doesn't mean he's bad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
davhislop Posted January 10, 2009 Author Share Posted January 10, 2009 He's got a point.Anyway, yes, I agree to an extent. It's not always down to the manager. Otherwise Joe Kinnear wouldn't be doing so well at Newcastle just now, would he? Just because he's an unknown, doesn't mean he's bad. Was my pt at all about the managers rep?? no, maybe he might have decent stats?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.