Jump to content

the bad thing about having alot of under-21 players


Recommended Posts

games dont get called off if there is U-21 fixtures coinciding with league fixtures.

<a href="http://s179.photobucket.com/albums/w318/snooch99/?action=view&current=arsenalinj.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w318/snooch99/arsenalinj.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

aswel as a few big injuries(adebayor,vela,toure) i had not many subs to choose from!

my starting 11 was strong, with just balotelli in for walcott and denilson in for camacho, who are both capable starters, but i only had 5 subs to choose from, 2 of which hadn't made any apearance before and probably never will make another.

luckily it was against west brom and i had no injuries during the game.

worrying though!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing that always bugs me is that you get young players (16, 17, 18), obviously not yet fit to first team football. The idea is to have them progress and become good players, right?

Why are these then taken into account when judging if you perform well in the transfer market? Surely the game should understand that if we get young guys they will, normally, not play on the first team?

SI, please have a look at this: don't include young players on the transfer market performance ratio. I like to buy youngsters and develop them, therefore it's always impossible for me to get a good performance on the transfer market. Even if I get the youngsters for peanuts and the "real" transfers do perform well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...