Jump to content
Sports Interactive Community

Who in your FM game are poorer than should be (Prem only)?

skingegg

Who in your FM game (prem only, sorry) are poorer in form than real life form?  

25 members have voted

  1. 1. Who in your FM game (prem only, sorry) are poorer in form than real life form?

    • Manchester United
      8
    • Chelsea
      1
    • Arsenal
      1
    • Liverpool
      1
    • Aston villa
      5
    • Everton
      2
    • Hull
      6
    • Tottenham
      1
    • Portsmouth
      0
    • other
      0

Recommended Posts

skingegg

skingegg

Posted
Posted

Who should be a LOT better in your FM09 game?

As i read in some posts/ that teams are MOSTLY doing poorer than thier REAL life counter parts have been doing CONSISTANTLY in the prem.

In my game Chelsea are on thier 6th manager in 4 seasons, i kid YOU NOT!! They have NOT finished in the top 5 since i started i started 6 seasons back!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
VonBlade

VonBlade

Posted
Posted

Hull, because the game is all about reputation and the researchers for the big clubs always overvalue their talent. The moment a player moves to a "big club" they turn into the second coming of Jairzinho. Whereas normal teams are realistic about their players good and bad points.

So more realistic data + the inability to purchase better players = poor results.

Link to post
Share on other sites
VonBlade

VonBlade

Posted
Posted
Man Utd. In terms of league position, they don't seem to do too badly, but they finish are fairly large number of points away from the top, and they are ridicolously easy to beat. Chelsea could be better as well.

Yeah because winning the league 4 times in 8 seasons by an average of 6 points is just Lyon levels of domination.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...