Bally Posted December 28, 2008 Share Posted December 28, 2008 I'm just wondering what people do in regards to signing players? When I'm filtering players out in a search, I put in the stats I feel are required for the position I'm looking to recruit in, and often players I look at and think look good, my scouts rate as only "decent" players or maybe even "last resort" when I'm looking at them thinking they look good. So what I'm saying is, do you rely heavily on your scouts opinion when signing players, or do you form you own opinion on the player? Cheers alot! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ftg87 Posted December 28, 2008 Share Posted December 28, 2008 It depends on the ability of your scouts to judge potential and ability, if these stats are low then they will not give you an accurate report on players, as a general rule, I go by player stats more than scout reports Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkim Posted December 28, 2008 Share Posted December 28, 2008 As mentioned, your scouts abilities to judge players is something that should be considered when making the final decision. In the end however, I am the manager, and I tend to go with what I think, rather then the scout. I look at the scouts as a method of assisting me in making the "right" choice. The final decision in my case, is made by the manager. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
greco Posted December 28, 2008 Share Posted December 28, 2008 perhaps someone can answer this question, is the scout report based upon the player skills or more on CA and PA..? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.