Criticized for changing tactics?

I've just had a news item, saying some pundits were openly questioning my decision to switch from my usual 4-4-2 to a previously untested 3-2-5 formation, following a 2-0 defeat at home to a team we should have beaten easily.

I'm a bit confused as to why they'd be so critical, considering I played with my usual 4-4-2 for 75 minutes, before switching to a 4-2-4 and then to the 3-2-5 around the 87 minute mark in a desperate attempt to get something from the game. Surely its not too much to ask for the game to recognize the formation played throughout most of the match, and to understand why a manager would switch to a far more attacking formation when they're losing with 15 minutes to go? After all, the AI does it often enough.

the press always try to make news of nothing. Ignore it else do a Joe Kinnear