The only thing i don't like is...........

how the player ratings are set now. 6.7...what is that about? the simple 6,7,8,9 ratings were fine.

just alot better to look at more than ought

i know people have been angry so if you disagree, please take it easy!

I think it is just something you need to get used to. I didn't like them at first but after playing FM today, I think it's fine. It's also much better to judge how well you're playersare doing.

ok il give it time

I'm comfortable with it. I just think that the ratings tend to be a bit harsh.

I didn't like them at first but know I really like them.

I didn't like them at first but know I really like them.

Same with me.

I couldn't rate my players personally after a few matches because of it, but I am picking it up now.

In the past 6 could have meant 5.5 or 6.4, and that's a massive discrepency that I'm glad no longer exists.

tbh, I love it. It's something I always wanted in the game (other thing is stats going from 1-100 instead of 1-20)

i think the 6.1 and 6.7 etc is ace cus you can tell if a player is performing closer to a 7 or a very low six

IMO, in previous games too many players had the same rating, i think its good to have .something... it lets you no (even more) whos playin well, even when your winning by a large margin (or playin badly when ur losing)

Personally I'd rather have the more wider-covering one digit ratings, as in the end I think I can decide how much better or worse one player has been playing compared to another. I might think someone with 6.3 has been playing better than the 6.8, but if they were both 6 I'd know they were both doing average (although really that should be 5 >_>) and still be able to compare.

Personally I'd rather have the more wider-covering one digit ratings, as in the end I think I can decide how much better or worse one player has been playing compared to another. I might think someone with 6.3 has been playing better than the 6.8, but if they were both 6 I'd know they were both doing average (although really that should be 5 >_>) and still be able to compare.

Why would you think someone with a 6.3 rating would be playing better than someone with 6.8? I'm confuzzled.

Why would you think someone with a 6.3 rating would be playing better than someone with 6.8? I'm confuzzled.

HaHa and me

I think it is much better as I can tell the difference between average and poor and it helps me decide where to make changes, both tactical and player wise

Because it can be down to opinion. Computers don't have perception and opinions, certaintly not to our extent.

precision is a great thing

Because it can be down to opinion. Computers don't have perception and opinions, certaintly not to our extent.

I can see your point. I often disagree with the ratings.